John Burrows

@TXStrong11 @Rach4Patriarchy Thanks for your insight!!

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy The tone policing is too much with you ppl

Andrew told me as soon as he got done filming this that the low IQ retards who are stuck in the dialectical trap of thinking you have to pick either Israel or Iran, that you must support either Islam or Zionism, were going to lose their minds over this and get it wrong. Judging by the comments, he was right. But as usual, you’re gonna find out that Andrew knows what he’s talking about and you guys were having a knee-jerk reaction to what you thought he said and not what he actually means.

@mikethree @Rach4Patriarchy Thanks for your insights.

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy it’s not first actually, the substance of the argument is first you all want to address the tone first and foremost, because that concerns feelings not thoughts, as a distraction away from any point being made, you’re the one who needs to grow up, absolute childlike mentality

@RealBroNat @21WIRE So you’re a Jewish believer in Jesus!!

@21WIRE I am a FORMER jew and I believe in the DIVINITY of Jesus Christ!

Wow. The mask is coming off now: Shapiro: “The Goy must obey our Medieval Noahide Laws…” Sure thing Ben. Duly noted…

@PheebTastically @Rach4Patriarchy Mature adults know but know how to present themselves in the community in a respectful way!

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy Truth hurts sometimes. Adults know this.

@JoshuaTCharles I agree!!

Pharaoh hated Moses because he was apolitical. Ahab hated Elijah because he was apolitical. They killed the prophets because they were apolitical. Herod hated John the Baptist because he was apolitical. The Jewish and Roman leaders murdered Christ because He was apolitical. Nero executed St. Peter and St. Paul because they were apolitical. The pagan emperors martyred ancient Catholics because they were apolitical. If this all sounds ridiculous, that’s because it is. It exposes the apostate core of so many modern attempts to separate religion and politics, revealed truth and public life.

@ssj4Stridge Again, it’s not the same as calling someone retarded. Read what you’re sending and contemplate what’s being said.

@JohnKBurrows Did you not read this? The same is also taught through church history. It's okay to not know things, bro. Learn and move on. I didn't know either until I did.

@ssj4Stridge @Rach4Patriarchy I’m done with this. To call someone “retarded” is ignorance. Maybe the Wilson’s will pay attention to Troparia and the Kontakion of the day when attending liturgy. They could learn a thing or two about to interact as Christians to the outside world.

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy What in the chatGPT did you just reply? What essay are you even referencing?

So the mismatch is basically this: *The essay: shame as a cultural/legal/religious system regulating justice and behavior *The example: an interpersonal insult used in argument or conflict They both involve “shame” in a very broad sense, but they operate at completely different levels and serve different functions. To clarify: The essay is about social systems of honor and shame as moral and institutional mechanisms, especially in ancient or collectivist contexts where shame is tied to community standing, legal obligation, and even religious authority. It’s not really about casual insults or online arguments. A contemporary case like someone calling another person a “retard” for disagreeing doesn’t fit the essay’s framework for a few key reasons: First, the essay treats shame as a structured social force. In the biblical examples it discusses, shame is embedded in community norms, legal expectations, and shared moral standards (e.g., fair wages, protection of the poor, appeals to public justice or divine judgment). It’s about regulating behavior across a society in a way that ideally promotes fairness and order. By contrast, using a slur in an argument today is usually an individual act of insult, not a community-regulated mechanism. It doesn’t function as a shared system for maintaining justice or social obligation,it’s more about expressing anger, asserting dominance, or demeaning another person in a moment of conflict. Finally, the essay’s idea of shame is largely about moral accountability tied to behavior, especially exploitation of vulnerable people or violations of agreed norms (like withholding wages). Calling someone a slur for disagreeing isn’t connected to ethical obligations like fairness or harm prevention; it’s not evaluating conduct according to shared moral rules in a constructive way. Sorry, your point is weak!

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy I don't know dude, you could Google it. But here, I googled it for you. google.com/search?q=did+h…

@RealBroNat He is your brother!!

Rocor russin american chooch STUCK with stupid blipshit Nicholas who FEARS JEWS! NOT apostolic! * blipshit Nick, depressed Gabriel who got the shaft.

@ssj4Stridge @Rach4Patriarchy What’s your source to back up your statement?

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy Because people in the first century took honor and public shame way more seriously than we do now. An insult wasn’t just “mean words,” it was a public attack on your character. You're using presentism.

@OrthodoxTexan @Caelleigh1 @Rach4Patriarchy Do you use words like this when you sing the First Antiphon in the liturgy??

@JohnKBurrows @Caelleigh1 @Rach4Patriarchy This nіggеr said "ableist". Can you try not being a fаggоt for a lil bit.

@ssj4Stridge @Rach4Patriarchy And how did you come to this conclusion? You have some insight with name calling from the first century??

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy Calling someone a snake then was worse than calling someone retarded now.

@ssj4Stridge @Rach4Patriarchy Also, he called them snakes and not retarded!

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy Same way Jesus called the pharisees snakes 🤷‍♂️

@ssj4Stridge @Rach4Patriarchy Yes, religious people acting like this.

Pointing out that using an ableist slur to describe someone you disagree with isn’t about being overly offended. For many people who have family or friends with disabilities or mental health conditions that inhibit their physical capabilities, that kind of language comes across as disrespectful and unnecessary. I also don’t recall Jesus interacting with others in that way; when he had disagreements, it was often with religious leaders acting in similarly harsh ways. I’m fully for pushing back against progressive ideology, but I think it should be done in a more mature way.

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy You're the one offended by a word...

@whitepilory @Rach4Patriarchy Thanks! Appreciate it!

@JohnKBurrows @Rach4Patriarchy

@RealBroNat Wow! Another positive statement towards to the Jewish Messiah’s brethren!!

How to deal with jews * Ban from finance * Ban from media * Ban from civil office * Ban from education Emperor Justinian, Alexander II, Hitler DID it!

This is one way to misread the New Testament text. First, when the Tabernacle stood, access to God was mediated through the priesthood, and on the holiest day of the year, only the high priest could enter God’s presence. So to claim there is no mediation at all is inaccurate, since mediation is a central feature of the Torah. Second, the destruction of the Tabernacle and later the Temple is understood in the biblical narrative as a form of divine judgment. Even so, individuals still prayed directly to God in exile, as seen with Daniel in Babylon, though the nation as a whole was not considered in full covenantal standing. This is why the prophet Jeremiah speaks of a coming “new covenant” with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, and Isaiah likewise prophesies a renewed creation with new heavens and a new earth. The New Testament presents Jesus as fulfilling these promises, acting as humanity’s representative in the heavenly Tabernacle and inaugurating the new covenant, with the Holy Spirit indwelling believers in the present age. In this framework, Jesus’ sacrificial death provides forgiveness of sins and access to the Father, so that in the world to come believers will no longer need a veil but will see God directly. Therefore, don’t hesitate to walk through the door. It’s an eternal gift from God!

John 14:6 The Clearest Refutation of Christianity: ASK THE RABBI - Rabbi... youtu.be/wYmFqMIFg80?si… via @YouTube