Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Johnny Fiction
2.4K posts

Johnny Fiction
@JohnnyFic
Johnny Fiction | Jack of All Trades | Master of Hobbies | Content Creator | Songwriter | Multi-Instrumentalist | Synths | Unfiltered Creativity
North Carolina Katılım Mayıs 2009
486 Takip Edilen565 Takipçiler

@jkrhannan @hayke02 @glow_guru @ManaByte FYI, when talking about seeing mountains at 200 miles away, the curvature of earth is roughly 8 inches per mile. So your only talking about 133.33 feet of curvature over 200 miles.
English

@hayke02 @JohnnyFic @glow_guru @ManaByte Because it would be over the curve. But it's not because there's no curve. If water always seeks level and 70% of our earth is water, that's a lot of curving to do.
English

Earth isn’t flat, the Moon landing wasn’t faked, and space isn’t some CGI dome. These claims fall apart the moment you look at the technology we use every day. None of it works unless Earth is a sphere in a real cosmos.
Start with GPS. Your phone calculates your position by comparing timing signals from satellites orbiting Earth. Those satellites move at precise speeds and altitudes that only make sense in a real vacuum. If Earth were flat or if space were fake, GPS would fail instantly. No navigation, no rideshare apps, no airline routing, no global timing systems. The entire system depends on orbital mechanics that match what physics predicts for a spherical planet.
Satellite internet, satellite TV, and weather forecasting all rely on the same reality. We watch storms form from orbit. We track hurricanes across oceans using data from satellites operated by different countries and private companies. These systems agree with each other because they are observing the same real planet from space. If space were fake, every meteorologist, every aerospace engineer, every telecom company, every airline, and every military on Earth would have to coordinate a perfect lie for decades. That is not possible.
Now to the claim that NASA fakes photos of Earth. This is one of the easiest conspiracy theories to debunk because NASA is not the only source of Earth images. Not even close. Dozens of countries and private companies have their own satellites that photograph Earth constantly. Weather satellites from Europe, Japan, India, and South Korea all produce their own full‑disk images. Private companies like Maxar and Planet Labs take high resolution photos of Earth every day for commercial clients. Amateur radio operators receive live images directly from NOAA satellites using equipment you can buy online. None of these systems rely on NASA. None of them match a single centralized source. Yet they all show the same spherical Earth from different angles at different times.
If NASA were faking Earth photos, every other space agency and every private satellite operator would have to fake them too. They would also have to coordinate the lighting, cloud patterns, storm movements, and surface features in perfect sync. That is not happening. The simplest explanation is the correct one. Multiple independent systems are photographing the same real planet.
The Moon landing is even harder to deny once you look at the tech. We still interact with the equipment the astronauts left behind. Observatories fire lasers at the retroreflectors sitting on the lunar surface and receive the return signal at the exact predicted intervals. This is not a theory. It is a measurement that universities and independent facilities repeat all the time. You cannot fake a laser return from nearly 240,000 miles away.
Even the internet used to spread these conspiracies relies on space infrastructure. Undersea cables carry most traffic, but satellites handle the rest. The timing, routing, and handoff between systems only work because the satellites are actually in orbit. If space did not exist, the global communications network would collapse.
The irony is simple. The technology that flat Earth believers and Moon landing deniers use to post their claims is the same technology that proves them wrong. The evidence is not hidden. It is built into the functioning of the modern world. You can reject the conclusions, but you cannot reject the infrastructure that makes your phone, your internet, your weather alerts, your maps, your flights, and your entire digital life possible.
These conspiracies do not just fail scientifically. They fail technologically, mathematically, and logistically. They only survive when people stop paying attention to the systems they rely on every day.
English

@jkrhannan @hayke02 @glow_guru @ManaByte What's the flat earth word for "hemisphere"? Like: America is in the northern hemisphere, Australia in the southern hemisphere.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok While you're researching flat earth explanations for sunrise hitting tall buildings before seal level, find out the flat earth word for "hemisphere".
Just wondering what you guys call them, and explain how seasons are opposite between northern and southern hemispheres.
English

@ThomasKundera1 @JohnnyFic @Tazerface16 @grok Satan has been deceiving people for a long time. You have never seen the curve either.
English

@TEMPLERTV Can Flat Earthers explain time zones while accounting for summer solstice in the northern hemisphere being equal to winter solstice in the southern hemisphere?
Also, what's the Flat Earther word for "hemisphere"?
English

@jkrhannan @hayke02 @glow_guru @ManaByte Why does sunrise hit the tops of tall buildings before sea level?

English

@hayke02 @glow_guru @ManaByte That's cause it flat. Earth curve calculator at 200 miles puts it so far over the curve it would be too far below the curve to see even a tip.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok You're the one cherry picking. You brought a picture of Felix Baumgartner into this debate, but you're going to deny what he experienced.
Also, you're still avoiding explaining the sunrise hitting tall buildings before sea level.🥱

English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok I know the fish eye lense trick. I'm not falling for it.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok I've asked and shared this image repeatedly, but you avoid it. At sunrise, why does the sun shine on the tops of buildings before "sea level"?

English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok Sea level isn't a constant.
I've explained the 0.0126% diff at commercial flight altitude.
Curvature visibility from inside Felix Baumgartner's pod is obscured by field of view of the internal camera. Go watch the jump for yourself on YouTube. Plenty of curvature.

English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok Its not the same. Nobody has ever seen the curve. Including you. You are chosing to believe something not observable, perpetuated by an agency founded by nazis.

English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok You can change units but the ratios are the same:
400 miles x 5280 feet per mile = 2,112,000 feet
267 feet / 2,112,000 feet = 0.000126
That's still 0.0126%.
And still the same as being able to see a 1/83 of an inch difference over 8 feet.
English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok 267 feet of curvature should be observable Mr. Fiction. I'm not taking the Nazi's word for it.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok What I described is exactly how it works, and I used the figures you presented in debate.
English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok That's not how it works. Again, nobody has ever seen the curve. Even me at 40,000 feet. I'm not taking NASA's word for it. They were founded by a Nazi scientist named Werner von Braun.
Your name fits you well, Johnny Fiction.
Have a nice day.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok 1 mile = 5280 feet
1 foot = 12 inches
400 miles to inches:
400 x 5280 x 12 = 25,344,000 inches
3200 inches of curvature over 400 miles:
3200/25,344,000=0.000126
Normalized value = 0.0126%
Human visual perception can’t detect a 0.0126% relative difference.
English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok No. In 400 miles of horizon, there should be 3200 inches of curvature, if there's 8 inches of curvature every square mile. Its not there. So the curvature is imaginary. No body has ever seen the curvature. Only known Nazi scientist founded agencies.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok And I asked earlier but seems no flat earther can explain: why does sunrise light hit the tops of tall buildings before ground level?

English

@ThomasKundera1 @JohnnyFic @Tazerface16 @grok I've never seen the curve, even at 40,000 feet. So I'm not going to trust a Nazi scientist founded agency. Everything I've observed says the the Bible is true.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok Again, if you can spot the 3200” curvature at 40k feet, you’d also be able to spot 1/83” over 8ft, which is impossible.

English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok Again, ask around and find someone that can spot a 1/83”difference over a distance of 8ft. This is equivalent to the 3200 inches of curvature you referenced over 400 miles.

English

@ThomasKundera1 @JohnnyFic @Tazerface16 @grok That was the old Babylon. There is a current Babylon the Great see Revelation 18, and with violence shall the great city Babylon be thrown down.
Im done debating with you about the shape of the earth. I've said all I need to say about that.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok Over a distance of 400 miles (25,344,000 inches), a difference of 3200 inches is 0.0126%. That difference can’t be seen by the naked eye.
Scaled down, ask a construction worker if they can spot 1/83-inch over 8ft. FYI, their tools don’t even measure at that precision.
English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok At 40,000 feet you can observe at least 400 square miles with your own eyes. Nasa says there is 8 inches of curve every square mile. That 3,200 inches of missing curvature. Its as flat as a pancake. Yes, 40,000 feet is meaningful.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok And you think 40k feet is meaningful? An altitude of less than a 1000th the circumference of the Earth is meaningful to you?
English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok This is a picture I personally took at 40,000 feet. Absolutely zero curve.

English

@ManaByte Have you considered that the "satellites" aren't quite what you believe them to be?
Are they actually orbitting Earth or just held up by balloons?
English

@JohnnyFic @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok First of all, you are asking a demon. Grok is a demon. Secondly, by observation, the earth seems motionless and flat. I've even flown on an airplane at 40,000 feet and looked out of the window with my own eyes. By observation, I verified the earth is flat.
English

@TheMG3D He’s a Doctor of Chiropractics, guessing he’s confusing his study of spinal curvature with space.
English

@Lost_Sheep__ @ThomasKundera1 @Tazerface16 @grok if the above scripture is part of your proof for flat earth argument, isn’t that indoctrination?
Also, tell us some fun facts that disprove flat earth, and brighten up our spherical earth with some knowledge. Thanks, Grok! You’re the best! 💪 🌎
English

@ThomasKundera1 @JohnnyFic @Tazerface16 Psalm 104:3-5
He lays the beams of His upper chambers in the waters
Who makes the clouds His chariot,
Who walks on the wings of the wind,
Who makes His angels spirits,
His ministers a flame of fire.
You who laid the foundations of the earth,
So that it should not be moved forever
English





