Johnny

@TheHistoryGuy07 You have described what morals ACTUALLY do to describe what God would supposedly prevent. Morals DO change over time, DO vary by culture and are a subjective personal preference.

Good without God? No. Only God is the ultimate source, grounding & definition of all goodness. Without an absolute & unchanging Moral Law Giver, morality becomes subjective, changing over time & varying by culture. Morality/goodness becomes a matter of personal preference.

@RTSG_Main Because I'm not a psychopathic faggot

Zionists FEAR Communism. So why aren't you a Communist in 2026?

If evolutionary theory is true: Human rights don't exist - just survival of the fittest. Morality doesn't exist - just gene propagation. Free will doesn't exist - just chemical reactions. Purpose doesn't exist - just blind, pitiless indifference. Reason isn't trustworthy - just survival. Justice doesn't exist - just strength of will. But nobody lives that way. We all know these things exist. And they can't come from a naturalistic evolutionary view of Life's origins. These things come from God. If you believe things like human rights, morality, free will, purpose, reason and justice actually exist, but you don't believe they come from God - where do they come from?

@darwintojesus 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

The only reason atheists think science and atheism go together is because they understand neither.

@LostMyHats 🤣 what a crash out. Who cares, they're all Muslims anyway by your logic.

Just a reminder that using the term "Hebrew Scriptures" is often a deliberate attempt to manipulate you. Don't fall for it. It's called the "Old Testament." That's what Christians have called it universally since Melito of Sardis, about 170AD, titled it "The Books of the Old Testament." The word "testament" = "covenant," and the name indicates the Christian understanding that the Old Covenant has expired and the New has come. It remained "Old Testament" through the Middle Ages and up through the Reformation, whether Catholic, Orthodox, Lutheran, Reformed, Anglican, or Baptist, or whatever - Christians overwhelmingly referred to it as the "Old Testament." The theology behind it is important, and serves as a guidestone to what we believe about it. Yes, it was first inspired in Hebrew. Neat story. But we don't call the New Testament the "Greek Scriptures," do we? We do not. Because that's dumb. If Huff used the term ONLY to denote the language in which it was inspired, why did he not say, "The Hebrew Scriptures and the Greek Scriptures?" It's because the nation of Greece isn't spending just shy of 1 billion per year convincing American evangelicals it's our Christian obligation to fund their military. And by the time of Jesus, it wasn't Hebrew anymore. Jesus used the Greek Septuagint. When he taught in the Synagogue, it wasn't the Hebrew Scriptures. It was the Greek. Almost every reference you see in the New Testament in which Jesus or the Apostles cited the Law and Prophets was the Septuagint. If it wasn't the "Hebrew Scriptures" to even Jesus Himself, that's a weird phrase, regardless of what language God originally inspired it. The term "Hebrew Scriptures" didn't become regularly used until the mid to late 1800s - and then, only inside Academia - when used in historical-critical scholarship to refer to the Jewish Canon independently of the New Testament. In other words, if you're talking about the Bible with the New Testament included, you say "Old Testament." If you don't believe in the New Testament, or it's irrelevant to you, you say "Hebrew Scriptures." It was the attempt of Academians to divorce Jewish Scriptures from Christian theological language. It's something pagans and secular academics did, not Christians. It' like saying BCE instead of BC, to avoid the overtly Christian context. "Hebrew Scriptures" didn't become common parlance outside the academy until the 1960s and 1970s, thanks to the advance of Scofield and Darbyism, and is a product of Dispensational theology creep. It is one of those really, really weird things Christians do when they divorce themselves from church history and adopt doctrinal novelties. And before you know it, evangelicals are using a term for the Old Testament that was designed by non-Christians in a subtle insult to the New Testament's inscripturation. Who the #%@#% says "Hebrew Scriptures and New Testament" in the same sentence? What bizarre black magic is this? It's freaking weird. Normal Christians don't do that. That's someone trying to emphasize the "Jewishness" of our faith to the exclusion of the Jesus in our faith. It's not Judeo-Christian, it's Judeo > Christian phrasing. It emphasizes the very exact problem that Huff says is exagerrated/fabricated by criticizing the term. This is an example of the problem. The Old Testament is not "Jewish." The Talmud is Jewish. The Old Testament is CHRISTIAN. I'm aware Jews disagree. And they are as wrong. CHRISTIANS do not cede ownership of the Holy Scriptures. The Bible is the property of God Almighty, with its care and stewardship entrusted to God's chosen people, who, incidentally, are those who've chosen Christ. It belongs to the care of God's Royal Priesthood, which is the Church (1 Peter 2). Jesus said that Jews who deny Him don't believe the Scriptures (John 5:46-47), that they reject Him because they reject Moses. Why on Earth would we genuflect to Jews and cede ownership of the Scriptures to people who don't believe them? Pay attention, and you'll see that when they use the term "Hebrew Scriptures," they either have a Judeo-Christian spin to their message, or they were catechized by someone who did.

@DefiyantlyFree 🖕 God

It truly baffles me now many people have no fear of God.

@seanmdav Christians stole a religious text, added Jesus and said "Look, the text was about Jesus the whole time!" 🤡

The Bible is not a story where Christ just shows up halfway through to create a fun little plot twist. Christ was present at creation. Christ was present in the burning bush. Christ was at Sinai when the law was given. Christ was at Jericho. In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. The law belongs to the Triune God, not to a people. It is His law, not ours. The consequences of breaking the law belonged to all people, Jew and Gentile—until the incarnate Christ Himself bore the penalty of sin and paid the ultimate price on behalf of all who believe in Him. Christ fulfilled the law perfectly, yet died, and rose again that we might live with Him for eternity in spite of our sin. The entire Bible, from the beginning to end, is the story of adoption, apostasy, atonement, and redemption. It is the story of our sin and the Triune God’s mercy and grace. There is no Bible without Christ, because there is no God apart from the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And there is no redemption without Christ, either. That is the point of the Bible. That is why the Triune God gave us the word and the Word. And anyone who tries to obscure that essential fact—the most essential Truth in all of history from now until the end of time—deserves to be strongly rebuked.

@sola_chad Or........he could mind his own business

Protect this man at all costs

@Cernovich Christians know he's right, that's why they keep whining like faggots

He is not a Christian though. Does he call out Jews for not being Jewish enough? Does he call people fake Jews? What would be the reaction if he did so? Would it be positive? I doubt it. He shouldn’t be claiming authority on Christianity when he has none.

@KarolineGosling Fixed it for you.

You cannot be a Christian woman and think you are the boss of your husband.

@Cernovich Oh, are Christians getting into an argument about lecturing? Unbelievable.

Christians don’t want to be lectured about Christianity by people who aren’t Christian.

@TradAdvocate You do, just not at the cost that makes you happy apparently. You are free to live with all the white people you want. You don't get to use the government to discriminate for you.

@JohnnyGentle78 Maybe we should have freedom of association in the US.

Legalizing racial discrimination could improve housing affordability for white families in a massive way. Right now, if a developer built a brand-new subdivision with affordable $200K homes it will most likely become very racially diverse. Once a neighborhood becomes around 50% black, the homicide rate jumps to ~15 per 100,000. If instead the developers were legally allowed to keep the same subdivision 100% White, the homicide rate would stay around 3–4 per 100,000. That's roughly 5 TIMES less murder. Today, the only way a young White family can get into a neighborhood with murder rates that low is to buy a home in the 450K–$600K range. The anti-discrimination laws essentially force White families to pay an extra $250K–$400K just to live in a safe area, because they can’t legally create or buy into an affordable all-White one. This is totally unjust and unsustainable at a time when the white population is shrinking worldwide and young families are struggling to afford homes. We must repeal the Civil Rights Act and allow true freedom of association.

@JackPosobiec Only according to John, the latest gospel.

Christ existed before time itself

@Templarpilled God and human rights both issue from the same source, the human mind.

"God isn't real because I can't see Him." Well do you see human rights?

@JoelWebbon Man, and I thought Muslims were delusional.

With regard to the heresy of "Judeo-Christianity”: The 10 Commandments are eternal, immutable, and undeniably Christian. The Jews had already perverted every single one of them by the time of Christ, and exponentially more so today. The great stories of the Old Testament are summarized in the Christian New Testament, “The Hall of Faith” (Hebrews 11). All these great men and women were Christians. God developed the idea of subsidiarity as the alternative to tyranny and slavery. It’s greatest and purest expression was found in the last 1,500 years of Christendom. Jews developed usury, propaganda, and pornography. Christians were the ones who actually taught the whole world to read and write, and developed written languages for peoples who previously had none. The mere existence of Israel is only because of the West, and yet, many remain ungrateful. This leading cause of the rising tide of “anti-semitism” continues to be Jewish behavior, and it sickens many. Those of you, such as Jordan Peterstein, engaging in gaslighting for your oh-so-moral reasons must repent, or you will be judged severely by God. And remember, you proud "Judeo-Christians" objecting in all your purity: Christ Himself was ethically a Jew, but he chose to identify with all of humanity by referring to himself as “The Son of Man”, and he destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple in AD 70 because of their rebellion and unbelief.

@JackPosobiec No, that's the central core of John. M, M and L don't say anything of the sort.

Christ always existed and is God Himself. He was not suddenly created at the beginning of the New Testament. Christ existed before Abraham. This is the central core of Christianity

@DrFrankTurek Religion makes people say dumb things.

Are there mistakes in the Bible?

@JackPosobiec Yeah, but you're Polish.

White peope have a right to exist

@darwintojesus TAG is the worst apologetics has to offer.

The greatest miracle of science isn’t what it discovers… it’s that discovery is possible in the first place.