Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🚨This is how evidence of harm to children is neutralised — by design
People believe that if children are harmed and evidence exists, accountability will eventually follow.
📢That belief is false.
Here is how the system actually works.
1️⃣ The process is never about what happened
When you challenge a government department, the legal process is not designed to find the truth.
It is designed to ask narrow, defensive questions like:
👉Does the agency still “hold” the documents?
👉Were records destroyed?
👉Did the agency say it conducted “reasonable searches”?
⚠️Whether children were harmed is deliberately excluded.
Once the issue is framed this way, truth no longer matters.
2️⃣ Evidence doesn’t just “expire” — it is destroyed
This is the critical point people need to understand.
Evidence does not simply fade away.
⚠️It is destroyed — sometimes while accountability is still active — and later justified by pointing to retention policies.
The system does not ask:
👉why the records mattered,
👉whether they related to misconduct,
👉whether destruction prevented investigation,
👉or whether destruction itself concealed wrongdoing.
Once evidence is destroyed, the law treats that destruction as neutral.
📢Destruction becomes the shield.
3️⃣ “No records held” ends everything — even when everyone agrees they once existed
Tribunals routinely accept this position:
The documents likely existed, but they no longer exist now.
That single sentence shuts the door.
It doesn’t matter:
👉who made the decisions,
👉what process was followed,
👉whether procedural fairness was denied,
👉or whether children were harmed.
📢If the records are gone, accountability dies with them.
4️⃣ I wasn’t just labelled “vexatious” — I was blacklisted
This is not semantics.
There was no formal decision.
👉No criteria.
👉No notice.
👉No right of reply.
Instead, my name was placed on an internal blacklist — a “do not respond” list — which still triggers today if my name is entered.
👉No investigation.
👉No findings.
👉No accountability.
🔗x.com/Jolanda04/stat…
The system admits this happened — and then refuses to examine or rectify it.
5️⃣ Public interest is deliberately excluded
Even when allegations involve harm to children, tribunals can say:
⚠️It is unnecessary to consider public interest.
Why?
➡️Because the question is restricted to whether records are held — not whether wrongdoing occurred.
📢This is how child harm is administratively neutralised.
6️⃣ Narratives are created to replace facts
When evidence can’t be confronted, a narrative is substituted.
Complainants are reframed as:
👉difficult,
👉vexatious
👉obsessive,
👉unreasonable,
👉or “historic”.
Agencies are framed as:
👉having “looked into it”,
👉having “closed the matter”,
👉or having acted “appropriately”.
These narratives harden over time — even when they are false — and are used to justify silence, inaction, and erasure.
7️⃣ This is not a failure of the system — it is how the system works
People assume corruption survives because evidence is weak.
In reality, evidence is often strong — but procedural walls are built around it.
By the time a matter reaches review:
👉evidence has been destroyed,
👉narratives are entrenched,
👉responsibility is diffused,
👉and the law insists it’s “too late” to look back.
⚠️This is how those in power are protected.
8️⃣ Silence is not innocence — it is containment
The most dangerous myth is:
➡️“If this were real, something would have been done.”
Something was done.
📢It was buried.
If this can happen to one family, it can happen to any child.
And it continues — because the system was built to make sure it does.
🔴Today one of my NCAT decisions was handed down.
This decision does not say:
👉no harm occurred,
👉no wrongdoing took place,
👉or that the conduct was lawful.
It says the system has found a way to never have to answer.
👉when evidence can be destroyed,
👉when narratives replace facts,
👉when public interest is ruled irrelevant,
👉and when children disappear behind procedure —
that is not justice.
📢That is protection.
And it is being used right now to shield those who harm children.
Jolanda C@Jolanda04
English
