
Jon Czin
358 posts

Jon Czin
@jonczin
Michael H. Armacost Chair @BrookingsChina. Usual caveats apply.






.@mazecraze8888: “This State Visit Could Have Been an Email…To be sure, the vibes were immaculate…But man cannot live on atmospherics alone…We’re having trouble pointing to…anything in the concrete outcomes department.” @triviumchina @andrewpolk81 sinicapodcast.com/p/trivium-week…




POMP AND CIRCUMSTANCE, SIGNIFYING NOTHING. That's my Trump-Xi take... Few deals. No breakthroughs. But thankfully no US concessions on Taiwan or tech. Hard to call this summit a success, since it didn't really address any US-China structural problems. Yet not a disaster either.


What is the economic and commercial undercurrent of the Trump-Xi summit? @CSIS_Trade’s Philip Luck joins Senior Fellow @Henrietta_Ivy for a conversation on tariffs, export controls, and what it means to win a summit. Listen to the new episode of Pekingology below, and tune in tomorrow for a special episode unpacking the outcomes from President Trump's visit to China with @BrookingsChina's @JonCzin. csis.org/podcasts/pekin…

Are China and the U.S. in an AI race? @kyleichan discusses AI innovation in both countries with @DouthatNYT on “Interesting Times.” Listen here: nytimes.com/2026/05/14/opi…

What is the “constructive strategic stability” framework Beijing is now promoting for US-China relations? Despite the new branding, it largely repackages familiar PRC formulations — from the “new type of great power relations” to “mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation.” Xi’s presentation makes clear that “constructive stability” is contingent on what Beijing sees as “concrete actions” by both sides. Notably, this is immediately paired with a warning that the United States must handle Taiwan with caution. The emphasis on “equal-footed consultation” is also significant, as Beijing will likely use that formulation to criticize what it views as future U.S. “unilateral actions.”

.@SecScottBessent on meeting with the Chinese Vice Premier: "We’re going to talk about forming a board of trade for the bilateral trade between the U.S. and China, and we’re going to talk about a board of investment that will be responsible for investment in nonsensitive areas."

4/ I have heard speculation Trump could ask Xi for help on Iran and in return Xi could request Trump to make concessions on Taiwan. I don't expect this to happen. Doing so would violate Beijing's longstanding principle that Taiwan is "non-negotiable." It isn't how Beijing rolls.
