Jon Fleming

@BZsSaloon Bullshit. There was no settlement. He dropped the suit with prejudice. The Court was not involved. He just decreed the slush fund and immunity. The most partisan aspect of the slush fund is it can't be for Republican persecution, like Comey. facebook.com/680831408/post…

Let's examine what REALLY happened. When Donald Trump was a private citizen, a government contractor stole his private tax data and leaked it to the media. Because the government failed to protect his private records, Trump and his family sued the IRS for $10 billion. On May 18, 2026, the Justice Department settled the case. Trump agreed to walk away with zero dollars for himself. In exchange, the government put $1.776 billion into an "Anti-Weaponization Fund" to help ordinary citizens who say they were also unfairly targeted by federal agencies. The government also agreed to completely drop its ongoing tax audits against Trump's businesses. Trump declined $10 billion he was statutorily entitled to under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 and converted it into a compensation pool for other citizens, so calling this a corrupt enrichment scheme is factually backwards. If anyone else got that award they would have taken it and ran. Joe Biden and every other Democrat out there. The fund’s text explicitly says “there are no partisan requirements to file a claim,” meaning Democrats, independents, and Republicans are equally eligible. The audit waiver is bound to pre-May-18-2026 conduct, not “perpetuity immunity forever” as the ridiculous media and out of job former attorney Liz Oyer claims. Biden pardoned Hunter for crimes he was actually convicted of and Jim Biden while Jim was under two active federal investigations, with an 11-year window and zero public-facing remedy and the same commentators called that defensible. Literally. So the Biden family could issue pardon for crimes committed and active investigations but Trump, who was actually agreed and is statutory entitled to this money set up a fund to help Americans who were victims of political persecution, and the demented media is calling it some kind of corrupt act? Of course that same demented media wants judicial oversight. Would that be the judicial oversight that consistently rules incorrectly in any case involving Trump and gets overruled sometimes 9-0 at the Supreme Court? Not one prior U.S. president has faced this volume of criminal prosecution, civil litigation, and unauthorized disclosure of confidential financial records simultaneously, so pretending this is a normal political cycle is dishonest bs. The Obama administration used the exact same Judgment Fund mechanism in Keepseagle $760M, no congressional appropriation and the press called that justice. But it was actually much worse because in the Obama case this settlement was made against the advice of career DOJ officials who thought they could win at court. Trump personally receives zero dollars, zero damages, and zero direct financial benefit from the settlement the only thing he gets is the audit waiver as protect protection so he won’t be targeted by the same Weaponized government should they ever get power again. Congress will never legislatively compensate Jan 6 defendants, FACE Act defendants, or dismissed-case targets, so the choice was this fund or no remedy at all for documented victims of politically motivated federal action. The media is very dishonest in this country and there’s a lot of experts who are even more dishonest. I am not an expert at anything except research and common sense. It is just basic common sense that when you have a president issue blanket, pardons for crimes that nobody even knows about that may or may not have been committed on his way out, and the media doesn’t bat an eye, but then you have a president who is actually wronged and who uses his settlement money to help those who are also politically persecuted smeared as corrupt the problem is the media. -Insurrection Barbie

@Fur_Baby_Mama @mattjones2856 @RealHickory @gand5063 You did not provide any evidence you didn't fall for a lie.

@mattjones2856 @JonRFleming @RealHickory @gand5063 I didn’t fall for shit. You just feel stupid cuz you fell for all of it and I shined a light on your ignorance. Go back to your tv and wait for your instructions, retard.

@JonRFleming @RealHickory @gand5063 Aren’t you supposed to be sitting in front of your tv waiting for them to tell you how to think and feel? Have you ever had an original thought, you brainwashed cuck?

@Fur_Baby_Mama @RealHickory @gand5063 Ad hominem because you have no evidence or rational argument I'm wrong.

@Fur_Baby_Mama @RealHickory @gand5063 I notice you have no evidence of an inside job.

I believe you know that j6 was an inside job. You know the whole truth, but you push a false narrative because, to you, the J6 hoax is currency. As long as you can crucify MAGA, it makes all your bad life choices ok. It’s Trumps fault! Waaa. It’s MAGAs fault! Waaaa. This social currency also makes it ok for you people to behave however you want without consequence. It’s your free pass to bad behavior. Anytime anyone objects, you slap them with a cultivated video of the j6 scene. Currency. Your bad deeds are all paid for. That’s why you won’t let go of your lies. You know the truth, and so do we.

I shouldn't really be surprised to see how a lot people are just now realizing that the J6 Fedsurrection was an inside job, when many of us have been saying that from day one! That's how much control the media still has. Anyway, welcome to the "J6 was an inside job" society!

@Fur_Baby_Mama @RealHickory @gand5063 Ad hominem because you have no evidence I'm wrong.

@JonRFleming @RealHickory @gand5063 You must have to stay 500 feet away from schools and playgrounds with your “lost puppy” story and pocket full of warm candies.

@Fur_Baby_Mama @RealHickory @gand5063 MAGA did that.

I knew when I watched it LIVE on tv. I told my husband “That’s not MAGA!” and “MAGA doesn’t do that!” I knew all the way over in California! Then the media followed orders and showed only what they wanted people to see and I knew instantly what was happening. The liberals have been using this false narrative as and excuse for all their REAL bad behavior, and they aren’t ready to give up that social currency. That’s why it’s been so hard to convince them who was behind J6, because then they would lose that leverage over us.

@artnap @RealHickory They haven't. Especially January 6.

@RealHickory Why is it that every "crazy conspiracy theory" has come true?

@El__Chuco_ @Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty Which mentions in-person early voting but not dropboxes.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott Blaney, issued on or around April 16–17, 2026, in the case Heap v. Galvin et al. (Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap vs. the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors). Key holdings that match the statement: • The Board of Supervisors does not have “plenary” (unlimited/broad) authority over election administration. Their general supervisory powers do not allow them to override specific duties Arizona statutes assign to the elected County Recorder. • The Board’s seizure of the Recorder’s IT staff, systems, servers, databases, software, websites, and equipment was ruled an “unlawful usurpation” of the Recorder’s statutory authority. • The Recorder has primary statutory authority over key election functions, including voter registration, voter list maintenance, early ballot distribution, signature verification, and in-person early voting. • The Board must return control of those functions and resources (or fund equivalents) and cannot use funding leverage or agreements to take over Recorder-specific duties. This ruling came after Recorder Heap (with support from America First Legal) sued the Board over changes to a shared services agreement that shifted control away from his office. The Board has appealed and sought a stay, but as of recent reports (mid-May 2026), the core ruling stands and has been cited in ongoing disputes (e.g., over ballot drop boxes).

Arizona's Attorney General @AZAGMayes chimes in on the side of the @maricopacounty Board of Supervisors in the "Who is in charge of drop boxes?" fight.

@El__Chuco_ @Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty I notice no citation to that court.

@Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty Nobody asked that pendeja her useless opinion Court already ruled on this

@HenriettaGreat @Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty Read it.

@Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty Heap a lawyer himself knows better than Mayes.

@NecroSignatures @Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty She did in the second to last paragraph. If you can read, which seems unlikely.

@Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty The law is the law and if you notice in Mayes’ letter, she never mentions what the law states.

@APienstein @Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty You should read. Heap isn't.

@Garrett_Archer @AZAGMayes @maricopacounty Thanks for posting this; without reading much about it, I now know that Heap is correct.

@EViajero1111 @Garrett_Archer @TheSCIF @Real_RobN I've seen them many times. I'm familiar with their BS. I notice you have no evidence I'm wrong.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer @TheSCIF @Real_RobN I gave you two accounts who routinely have and you didn't even look them but if you want to remain willy blind and ignorant, go for it. No one is going to stop you.

Those who look at 2020 or 2022 and believe they were rigged or stolen will always be susceptible to manipulation. Going to one day in person voting would not matter. Grifters will find something in the process to sow doubt and their vibes based audience will dutifully amplify.

@EViajero1111 @Garrett_Archer @TheSCIF @Real_RobN You haven't produced any.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer @TheSCIF @Real_RobN More than likely you are incapable of seeing the truth or cannot comprehend the level of election fraud that truly exists. You are willfully ignorant and blind. Time to wake up and see what the rest of us sees.

@Tatorchop @Garrett_Archer Haven't seen it. Your references don't have any.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer Hard evidence is produced all over the place, along with common sense. Paid off courts shouldn’t be the ones to tell you when you have to take a piss!

@Tatorchop @Garrett_Archer When someone produces hard evidence.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer So when do you plan on GTFU and realizing this country owes DJT 4 years now, or when these Georgia and Arizona federal investigations are finished proving you wrong? ALL YOU HAVE IS FRAUD!

@EViajero1111 @Garrett_Archer @TheSCIF @Real_RobN No hard evidence. Just people who don't understand the process.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer @TheSCIF @Real_RobN Video evidence of people who witnessed election fraud is not bullshit. Your willfull ignorance doesn't change the truth or the facts.

@Tatorchop @Garrett_Archer SFW?

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer The next thing was the second week in Georgia timeline. Election was Tuesday 3rd, 2020: Monday 9th: HOR plus all state legislators called where Republicans picked up seats. Tuesday 10th: Senate called with the first ever dual senate runoff from same the same state to decide

@Tatorchop @Garrett_Archer So you don't have anything official.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer I don’t have our previous conversation, but I do have my end. First, here is all of the investigations compiled by Tru the Vote, Verify the Vote, along with other investigators and prosecutors. These compiled findings are the subject of DOJ’s investigation now.

@Tatorchop @Garrett_Archer The usual bullshit. The poll worker's signatures are required by rule 183-1-12 and don't affect the validity of the ballots. The recounts produced insignificantly different results.

@JonRFleming @Garrett_Archer cdn.nucleusfiles.com/e0/e04e630c-63…