Jon Smetzer

1.7K posts

Jon Smetzer

Jon Smetzer

@JonSmetzer

Retired Teamster car hauler. Conservative since 1993 when I started listening to Rush Limbaugh and realized what a fool I was by voting for deceitful democrats.

Castalia, OH Katılım Kasım 2022
111 Takip Edilen3.2K Takipçiler
@·
Be honest! If Elon Musk is to send you $1M dollars now and ask for nothing in return will you accept it? Yes or No?
 tweet media
English
1.6K
136
805
46.8K
@·
Just Brain test!! 0.0001 get right this!! What's your answer???
 tweet media
English
27
1
7
469
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
James Woods
James Woods@RealJamesWoods·
Of course.
James Woods tweet media
English
9.3K
17.7K
133K
897.1K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 REP. WESLEY HUNT (R-TX) just gave the PERFECT response: Q: There won't be any black Republicans left in the House? HUNT: "It's not relevant." "I'm not here because I'm black." "I am here because I am a qualified representative for Congressional District 38." "The American people choose who they want to choose." "I don't want to get into this game of RACE BAIT all day, every day." "If there's 4? If there's 10? If there's NONE." "I represent a white majority district that President Trump would have won by over 20 points, and I won by over 25 points." "I'm being judged not by the color of my skin, but the content of my character." 🇺🇸🇺🇸 📽️ @PabloReports @WesleyHuntTX
English
2.8K
28.7K
151.1K
2M
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
Fucking finally. Brian Harpole just dropped the hammer...a federal defamation and civil conspiracy suit against Candace Owens, her LLCs, GeorgeTom Inc., and that Fort Huachuca fabulist Mitchell Snow...and it is long, viciously overdue. The man who spent years putting his body between Charlie Kirk and every credible threat now gets to drag Owens into open court for what she is; a predatory opportunist who weaponized a national tragedy to manufacture a conspiracy so grotesque it makes her Macron birth-certificate fever-dream look like amateur hour. Let’s speak with cold legal precision, because this isn’t “free speech.” This is defamation per se with actual malice screaming from every pixel. Under Tennessee and federal standards, Harpole doesn’t even have to prove special damages...the false accusation that he orchestrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination is libelous on its face. Owens took a witness of convenience (Snow), fed him a narrative, amplified it across her podcast, X feed, and every grift-adjacent platform, then doubled down while Kirk’s blood was still warm on the pavement at Utah Valley University. That isn’t journalism. That is reckless fabrication calculated to destroy a man’s reputation, livelihood, and safety. Psychologically, this is textbook narcissistic supply run amok. Owens has built an entire late-career brand on betrayal theater...former allies, former employers, former truths...all sacrificed at the altar of relevance. Kirk’s assassination gave her the ultimate macabre stage: turn the security chief into the villain, paint Erika Kirk as co-conspirator, sprinkle in “military brass at Fort Huachuca,” and watch the donations and clicks pour in. It’s not incompetence. It’s malevolent pattern recognition. She doesn’t chase truth; she chases the dopamine hit of being the only one “brave enough” to say the quiet part loud, even when the quiet part is pure, weaponized fiction. The psychology of the grifter is always the same: when your relevance depends on perpetual outrage, every corpse becomes content. And now the walls close in. Discovery is going to be a bloodbath. Depositions. Emails. DMs. Phone records. Every single iteration of that “eyewitness” story gets shredded under oath. Snow will either fold or perjure himself. Owens’s “research” will be exposed as the lazy, self-serving echo chamber it always was. She can hide behind “I’m just asking questions” all she wants...courts don’t give a fuck about your podcast persona when the plaintiff is a man whose entire professional life was torched by your lies. This isn’t just one lawsuit. It’s the first domino in what should be a goddamn avalanche. Harpole isn’t the only one whose life Owens tried to detonate for sport. More are coming. And when the judgments start stacking, when the liens hit those LLCs and that smug little empire of conspiracy cash, maybe...just maybe...the rest of these performative truth-tellers will remember that free speech still has a price tag when you decide to assassinate someone’s character for sport. Candace, you built your brand on “saying the quiet part out loud.” Enjoy the discovery, bitch. The quiet part just got subpoenaed.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 💀⚖️🗡️
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby

BREAKING: Brian Harpole, former head of Charlie Kirk’s security, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens and Mitchell Snow. More are certainly on the way.

English
297
920
3.9K
88.4K
Jon Smetzer
Jon Smetzer@JonSmetzer·
@grey4626 Sad but true. Too many RINO Republicans are controlled by big corporate interests that want to keep the illegals for cheap labor. So fucking disgusting!
English
0
0
2
56
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
This is going to fucking piss you off. This myth that keeps circulating like a virus: “You only need five senators to remove Thune.” That claim is not analysis...it’s procedural illiteracy wrapped in performative rage, a comforting fairytale for people who want blood but refuse to understand why the beast is so damn hard to slay. In the House, a handful of pissed-off members can torch a Speaker with the motion to vacate and watch the circus burn. That’s the lower chamber’s congenital disease...raw majoritarianism engineered for short-term savagery, as we saw with McCarthy’s ritual execution in 2023. The Senate GOP Conference? A colder, more ancient machine deliberately designed by the Framers to smother exactly that kind of populist fire. There is no rule. No precedent. No conference provision that even contemplates mid-term regicide. Any five senators can call a meeting...technically true. But the Senate is not a numbers game. It is a temple of hierarchy, reciprocity, institutional memory, and the raw psychology of power. Senators are wired for continuity, not crusade. They breathe long-term relationships, cloakroom deals, and mutual back-scratching. A meeting only happens when a solid majority actually hungers for the chaos...because most of these creatures fear disruption more than irrelevance. Even if the meeting materializes? Good luck. You’d have to improvise and ratify an entirely new mid-term removal procedure on the spot, demanding explicit majority buy-in from men and women whose entire careers reward loyalty to the club over loyalty to principle. And that’s the part that truly pisses me off. John Thune...this smooth, establishment hack with his polished scripts and corporate-friendly instincts...sits there armored by exactly this system. Not because he’s some beloved titan of conservatism, but because the Senate rewards the safe, the connected, the incrementalist who never rocks the boat too hard. He’s the embodiment of the sclerotic GOP machine: competent enough to survive, spineless enough to disappoint when real courage is required. The psychology is brutal...loyalty to the institution becomes loyalty to mediocrity, and the unwritten rules protect the very insiders who’ve hollowed out the party for decades. The odds of a successful coup against him aren’t low. They’re zero in five hundred thousand. And that’s the real indictment: not that five senators can’t do it, but that the entire architecture makes it nearly impossible to purge establishment fossils like Thune when they prioritize DC club rules over the base that sent them there. This myth isn’t harmless. It’s a philosophical surrender...pretending the Senate is a neutral tool when it’s actually a fortress built to preserve the status quo against reformers who threaten it. The Framers wanted deliberation. What we got is entrenchment. Enough. Understand the machine before you rage at it. Then rage harder...because the real problem isn’t that five senators can’t remove Thune. It’s that the system is engineered to keep hacks like him firmly in place.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 💀⚖️🗡️
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
220
744
1.8K
23.6K
Jon Smetzer
Jon Smetzer@JonSmetzer·
@grey4626 Don't forget EO 13224 and it's reissue upgrade EO 13886 which gives superpower to the Treasury to freeze the assets of anyone worldwide deemed a threat to our nation! No trial, no warning, no congressional approval. All the President has to do is declare a national emergency!
English
0
0
1
90
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
Let's discuss the Insurrection Act. The Insurrection Act isn’t some dusty relic for polite debate… it’s a goddamn constitutional scalpel forged in 1807, honed through blood and rebellion, and it sits in President Trump’s hands right now like a live grenade with the pin already halfway out. Section 252 of Title 10, United States Code, is crystal fucking clear: whenever “unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States” make it “impracticable to enforce the laws” by ordinary means, the President can call forth the military and militia to suppress it. Washington used it against the Whiskey Rebellion. Lincoln invoked it to crush secessionist treason. Eisenhower deployed it to ram integration down the throats of Southern governors who thought they could nullify the Constitution. Every single time, the message was the same: when the republic’s survival demands it, the Executive Branch doesn’t ask permission from the very vermin blocking the law. And right now? Congress is the insurrection. These corrupt idiots…both sides of the uniparty sewer…have turned the People’s House into a racketeering enterprise. Insider trading on a scale that would send any street hood to federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison for life. They exempted themselves from insider-trading laws while trading on classified briefings, then passed 6,000-page omnibus slush funds at 3 a.m. while the country burned. They weaponized the DOJ, FBI, and intelligence apparatus against political opponents in open violation of the Bill of Rights. They flooded the borders with military-age males from adversary nations, funded endless foreign wars while veterans slept in tents, and printed trillions in fiat funny money that gutted the middle class. That isn’t governance. That is organized rebellion against the sovereign will of the American people. Psychologically, they’re terrified because they know what they are: hollow men, midwits in $5,000 suits whose only real skill is narrative control and graft. They project their own treason onto Trump because the alternative…admitting the system they’ve rigged for decades is collapsing under the weight of their greed…would force them to confront the abyss they created. So they scream “democracy dies in darkness” while they’re the ones blacking out the windows and locking the doors. Trump doesn’t need their permission. He doesn’t need 60 Senate votes. He doesn’t need another toothless “investigation.” One invocation of the Insurrection Act, backed by the plain text of the Constitution (Article II, Section 3: “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”), and the military…loyal, apolitical, oath-bound to the Constitution, not to Chuck Schumer’s slush-fund machine…can restore order with lethal precision. Corrupt members obstructing lawful federal functions? Removed. Facilities used to coordinate lawfare? Secured. The administrative state’s chokehold on the Republic? Snapped like a chicken’s neck. This isn’t fantasy. This is the law. The same law the regime cheered when it was used against parents at school boards or border agents doing their jobs. Turnabout is not just fair play…it’s constitutional justice. The country doesn’t need more hearings, more “norms,” more slow-walked theater while Rome burns. It needs a lion in the Oval Office to roar once, enforce the law without mercy, and let the chips fall where they may. The corrupt will cry “coup.” The people will call it deliverance. President Trump: the Act is yours. Use it. Clean house with fire and finality. The time for half-measures died in 2024. This is the hour of the axe. 💀⚖️🗡️
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
244
1.5K
3.5K
45.9K
@·
Can i follow you? Yes or no❤️
 tweet media
English
553
50
1.7K
17.3K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
John John Jr
John John Jr@_Johnkennedyjr·
WE ARE Q WE GOT THEM ALL! PREPARE FOR THE STORM! THIS WILL BE THE BIGGEST EXPOSURE IN THE HISTORY! JOIN AND REMEMBER WHY WE FIGHT
John John Jr tweet media
English
39
79
205
2.2K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
DC_Draino
DC_Draino@DC_Draino·
We didn’t just save the midterms today. We potentially saved the next 3+ decades of American prosperity. If Republicans control DC during the 2030 Census, at least 10-15 seats will be reallocated from blue states to red states. Add in mass deportations over the next 4 years and that number may climb to over 20. The Democrat Party as it currently stands all but ceases to exist as a national party. Now throw in Voter ID and election fraud prosecutions and we have a truly 60-40 GOP country for many years.
AF Post@AFpost

The Supreme Court has ruled that racial gerrymandering is unconstitutional, paving the way for Republicans to redistrict the South and save the House. With the 2030 Census, this will be a dramatic shift in power balance. Follow: @AFpost

English
1.3K
4.8K
21.6K
451.3K
retweetledi
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
Absolutely fucking sensational. The thin-as-hell Comey indictment just dropped...deliberately spare on its face, yet engineered with lethal precision as a holding charge. Classic prosecutorial leverage: cuff the target in the system, apply the pressure points, force the flip, and pry open the larger conspiracy. And the timing is surgical poetry...it lands exactly as John Brennan’s investigation in the Southern District of Florida barrels into its final, unforgiving chapter. So what does the cerebral architect of the Russia collusion hoax do? The same Brennan who, with Comey and Obama’s blessing, weaponized the full apparatus of the state against a sitting President runs straight to MSNBC to whine about… government weaponization. “Part of this is to harass, to try to hurt individuals reputationally, professionally and financially.” “We have people in government who seem to be so mean spirited that they try to hurt individuals, people, family and others.” The projection is so pure, so clinical, it’s almost beautiful in its pathology. This is the same cabal that manufactured the Steele dossier fairy tale, green-lit Crossfire Hurricane, abused the FISA courts, leaked like sieves, and spent years methodically shredding Donald Trump’s reputation, finances, family, and political future...all to nullify the will of 74 million Americans. They didn’t just target one man. They declared psychological and institutional war on the republic itself, convinced their “ends” sanctified any means. Psychology 101, deep-state edition: when the predators become prey, the howls of victimhood are immediate, righteous, and utterly lacking in self-awareness. Entitled authoritarians who believed themselves the permanent ruling class now discover...to their theatrical horror...that the machine they built has no loyalty and a very long memory. Watch the holding charge. It is not the kill shot. It is the opening wedge. The real indictments are loading. The leverage is tightening. The reckoning isn’t coming.... It is already here, motherfuckers...precise, ferocious, and long overdue.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 💀⚖️🗡️
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
403
1.8K
6.7K
78.7K
retweetledi
Israel & USA forever
Israel & USA forever@israelUSAforeve·
Stefan Miller is a butcher of lying journalists! Just rejoice!
English
452
3K
24.4K
204.4K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
Conservative Brief
Conservative Brief@ConservBrief·
Fetterman to Dems - LET'S GO! Democrat Sen. John Fetterman just CHALLENGED his party to purge more moderate liberals like him - if they dare: “And now, as the only single Democrat that’s flipped seats and now I’ve also made it mathematically impossible to even to reclaim the majority in the United States Senate.” “So if they want the Democratic Party to turn it into, witch burning and to go after the one Democrat that’s done the thing that these people haven’t been able to do, so they’re entitled to do it.” “But I’m proud to represent Pennsylvania.” “And I don’t just represent just Democrats in Pennsylvania. I represent ALL 13 million Pennsylvanians.” “And I’m going to play it straight. I’m going to never lie or pretend something’s wrong.”
English
6
52
342
6.3K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
Tom Fitton
Tom Fitton@TomFitton·
HUGE: Orgegon SETTLES federal election lawsuit with @JudicialWatch. Agrees to remove up to 800,000 dirty names from voter rolls. Judicial Watch heavy lifting has now cleaned 6 MILLION names from voting rolls across the land!
Tom Fitton@TomFitton

.@JudicialWatch just cleaned FIVE MILLION dirty names from voting rolls but Oregon is still a mess. Our legal team has fed court hearing there this week (we have some support from @RealDonaldTrump DOJ). The heavy lifting never stops..

English
2.2K
13.4K
41.6K
443.7K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
John John Jr
John John Jr@_Johnkennedyjr·
I AM ALIVE AND I’M HEALTHY AND STRONG
John John Jr tweet media
English
177
288
1.3K
8.6K
Jon Smetzer
Jon Smetzer@JonSmetzer·
@grey4626 You have a brilliant mind which I greatly admire. Your masterful use of the English language to put thought into words is impressive beyond bounds! I am grateful that you express on the side of what's right and just.
English
0
0
0
11
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
The robed activists on the Supreme Court’s liberal wing have spent decades turning the Voting Rights Act into a sacred relic of racial grievance rather than the statute it actually is. Their dissents in today’s Louisiana v. Callais decision…Kagan’s alarmist eulogy joined by Sotomayor and Jackson…do not merely disagree with constitutional text, history, and structure. They reject the enterprise entirely. These justices do not apply law. They emote it. And that emotional solipsism is precisely why they have no legitimate claim to sit on the highest tribunal of a republic founded on written limits, not feelings. Consider the constitutional architecture they treat as optional. Article III vests “the judicial Power” in one Supreme Court…not a super legislature, not a remedial equity court, not a panel of sociologists in robes. Federalist 78 is explicit: judges exercise judgment, not will. The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments forbid racial classifications and intentional denial of the vote on account of race. Section 2 of the VRA, properly read, enforces that by targeting practices that deny minority voters an equal opportunity to elect their preferred candidates…not a perpetual entitlement to proportional racial outcomes or majority Black districts drawn predominantly on race. Congress made it so. The majority in Callais, led by Justice Alito, correctly held that Louisiana’s SB8 map…drawn with race predominating to create a second majority Black district…was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander because Section 2 did not actually require it under a text and history faithful reading. No compelling interest justified the state’s use of race. Yet in dissent, Kagan and company confess their method. They lament the decision as rendering Section 2 “all but a dead letter,” with “far reaching and grave” consequences. Kagan read her dissent from the bench, framing the majority as betraying Congress’s “great statute” and setting back “racial equality in electoral opportunity.” Translation: any map that fails to deliver the racial outcomes they deem just must be suspect. Never mind the updated Gingles framework the majority applied…demanding illustrative maps that respect traditional districting criteria without race predominating, proof of racial bloc voting disentangled from partisanship, and evidence of present day intentional discrimination rather than historical grievance or societal effects. Never mind that the Constitution triggers strict scrutiny for race based districting and permits it only for narrowly tailored compelling interests…not indefinite racial balancing. Kagan’s jurisprudence is results oriented racialism dressed in the language of “protecting the right to vote.” It is the living constitution virus metastasized: the VRA means whatever the liberal conscience requires it to mean to achieve proportional representation by any means. This is not judging. This is psychological projection masquerading as jurisprudence. Decades of critical race adjacent scholarship have taught these justices that neutral rules are never neutral, that color blindness is itself suspect, and that the only legitimate outcome is proportional racial outcomes in every electoral map. Their dissents reveal the tell: when the majority insists on text, history, precedent, and the Fourteenth Amendment’s command against racial classifications, they cry betrayal and tragedy. The subtext is always the same…democracy dies unless we, the enlightened, impose equity by judicial fiat. It is the soft totalitarianism of the empath: my moral intuition about systemic racism and historical guilt trumps your oath to the written law. Scalia warned us: “The Court is not a legislature.” These justices treat it as the only legislature that matters…and a remedial one at that, forever remedying “effects of societal discrimination” without end. A Supreme Court justice who substitutes sentiment for constitutional command, who treats statutes as moral clay to be reshaped by “totality of circumstances” filtered through personal racial narrative, who views federalism, equal protection, and strict scrutiny as obstacles rather than safeguards, has forfeited the moral and intellectual authority the robe demands. They are not enforcing the law. They are waging lawfare against it…demanding race predominate in map drawing to chase proportional representation that the VRA’s text, the Fifteenth Amendment’s focus on intentional discrimination, and the Constitution’s color blind ideal never required. The republic deserves judges who read the Constitution as a charter of negative liberties and enumerated powers…not as a suicide pact with their own ideological priors or a blank check for racial gerrymandering in the name of “opportunity.” The liberal wing’s dissents in Louisiana v. Callais are not errors of analysis. They are confessions of usurpation. And until the American people demand justices who honor the document they swear to support, rather than the grievances they carry into chambers, the rot will continue. The Constitution is not a feelings based covenant. It is law. Enforce it, or get the fuck off the bench.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ ⚖️💀
LHGrey™️ tweet media
English
43
288
860
17.1K
Jon Smetzer retweetledi
il Donaldo Trumpo
il Donaldo Trumpo@PapiTrumpo·
YUUUUUUUGE WIN FROM THE SUPREME COURT!!!😎🇺🇸🥳🥳🥳 —NO MORE RACE-BASED CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS!!!
English
943
10.9K
60K
2.1M