Tom Fitton

.@JudicialWatch asked a Georgia state court to reject Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ efforts to continue hiding records about her office’s communications with Jack Smith’s office and the January 6 Committee. Judicial Watch filed a March 2024 open records lawsuit after Willis falsely denied having any responsive records (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No. 24-CV-002805)). Judicial Watch argues that 212 pages of still-secret records must now be released, as the controversial criminal case against President Donald Trump and others has been dismissed and Willis’ claims of privilege are without merit. The Fulton County court ordered Willis to explain why the documents should not be released following the dismissal of her indictments. “Fani Willis lied to the courts and the people about her ‘get-Trump’ conspiracy with the Biden and Pelosi operations,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents can’t be released soon enough.” In December 2024, the court granted Judicial Watch’s motion for default judgment against Willis for failing to properly respond to the lawsuit. The judge ordered her to conduct a diligent search and produce any releasable records within five business days, while also awarding Judicial Watch attorneys’ fees. Willis refused to release non-public documents. Her office continued to claim that no records existed about Jack Smith, cited various legal exemptions (especially for January 6 Committee communications), and released only one already-public letter to Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson. In January 2025, the court awarded Judicial Watch $21,578 in attorneys’ fees and costs. A hearing was held before Judge Robert C.I. McBurney in February 2025 on Judicial Watch’s motion for in camera (private) inspection of records and appointment of a special master to oversee Willis’ search. In March 2025, Willis was ordered to turn over 212 pages of records to the judge for review. She was also required to explain how the records were located and why any were being withheld. These records were only found only after multiple searches, despite earlier blanket denials. In August 2025, the court ordered Willis to provide new information and potentially conduct a further search for Trump-related records. Her affidavit failed to address whether devices belonging to former Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade or Chief Investigator Michael L. Hill (both involved in the Trump election case and likely to have been in contact with the January 6 Committee) had been searched. Judicial Watch is assisted in the case by John Monroe of John Monroe Law in Georgia.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump Advisor Alleges FBI Was Trying To Trap Him During 2024 Interrogations Over His Emails They Had Already Secretly Obtained HERRIDGE: Do you believe the FBI was laying a trap for you? CAPUTO: I do. CAPUTO: I think every time the FBI has spoken to me, they've been trying to set me up because they're not after me, really. They're after Donald Trump. @thelatmg @latimesstudios_

“It is entirely appropriate for USAID to contribute a significant share to the funding of his security detail, particularly given the significant rise in threats due to his position at USAID. These threats are designed to intimidate President Trump’s officials and Supreme Court Justices, to force them to compromise on their beliefs, and to give in to the Left’s radical demands,” Paoletta concluded. “But Director Vought, just like our great President, will never cave to radical Left wing threats and the public figures who encourage them. He is a true patriot who stands by his beliefs, no matter the personal cost.” Yes. Thank you, @MarkPaoletta thefederalist.com/2026/03/17/exc…

End mass mail-in votes, require voter id, citizenship verification, and, generally, voting in person. And count the darn votes on Election Day! SAVE America Act++!

They don't want you to know the truth about illegal alien voting.

Judicial Watch Sues State Dept for Records on Grants to Left-Wing European NGOs - judicialwatch.org/grants-left-wi…

NEW: @JudicialWatch files Federal lawsuit for records on Soros-linked groups in Europe getting taxpayer cash.

BREAKING: Longtime Trump Advisor @MichaelRCaputo Shares Never-Before-Seen FBI Subpoena And Search Warrant Targeting Him During Biden Administration; Alleges Biden Era Weaponization Continued at DOJ During Trump’s Second Term This week on Straight to the Point I sat down with Michael Caputo, a longtime confidant and advisor to President Trump. In this exclusive interview, Caputo shares a never-before-seen FBI subpoena and sweeping federal search warrant that targeted him during the Biden Administration. Caputo details the horrifying fallout of the secret Biden-era investigation over his Ukraine reporting and anti-weaponization policy work that stayed active even inside the Trump administration and the devastating toll it took on his family. @thelatmg @latimesstudios_ Straight to the Point: FBI’s Secret Targeting of Team Trump 00:35 Michael Caputo: Biden Era FBI ‘Surveilled’ Dozens of Trump Associates 01:28 Caputo Says He Was Targeted Over His Investigation Into Bidens and Anti-Weaponization Initiative 02:12 How Did the Biden-Era Investigation Continue Under AG Bondi? 03:10 Google Alert: FBI Subpoenaed His Records 04:29 Caputo Says He Was Working In Same DOJ Building As DOJ Investigation Targeting Him 06:00 August 2024 Susie Wiles Calls With Shocking News 06:40 Before Presidential Election, FBI Laid A Trap? 07:58 Federal Warrant Wanted Information About Caputo’s State of Mind 09:30 FBI Should Be Shattered: ‘Russia, Russia, Russia All Over Again’ 10:42 FBI File: Caputo Called A Radical Traditionalist Catholic (RTC) 11:30 Caputo 'Had To Go To The Highest Authority’ To Get Case Closed 12:44 Russia Gate Cost Caputo’s Family Everything 13:55 Threats To Caputo And Family 16:10 Accountability For RussiaGate 18:00 If Democrats Win Mid-Terms: Weaponization Will Increase 10x 19:50 Caputo: Task Force For Americans Who Were Harmed By Weaponization 20:50 Response to Critics Who Say Caputo Sees Conspiracies 21:43 Independent Journalism

False This is a lie Read the bill—especially the text beginning at line 22 of page 12

Senate Democrats need to read the bill They refuse And instead make arguments against provisions of the SAVE America Act that do not exist This is one of them

Chuck Schumer and other Democrats have insisted that they actually support Voter ID—they just object to other parts of the SAVE America Act. Well, @SenJonHusted just asked unanimous consent to pass ONLY the Voter ID portion of the bill. Democrats blocked it.

Pray for our troops!

NEW: ICE & DHS are accusing one of Rep. Veronica Escobar's (D-TX) staffers of repeatedly falsely claiming to be a lawyer in order to enter an ICE detention facility, meet with detainees, and give them cell phones. ICE says logbooks show Benito Torres falsely claimed to be a lawyer 11 times and repeatedly signed federal G-28 forms falsely attesting that he was an attorney there to see his clients. ICE says during one visit, the facility administrator at Camp East Montana caught Torres giving a phone to multiple detainees and confronted him, and Torres admitted he wasn't a lawyer and was visiting as a private citizen. Torres is now banned from ICE facilities, and the ICE Director has sent a letter to Rep. Escobar, demanding to know if Torres made the "fraudulent visits" with authorization from her, and whether or not she will cooperate with a potential federal investigation into the incident. We have reached out to Rep. Escobar's office, which tells @FoxNews they are looking into it. Will update when we hear back. Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) fired a staffer last year who had falsely claimed to be an attorney to gain entry to an ICE facility.

Why does the Left oppose voter id, cleaning election rolls, citizenship verification for voting, mass mailing of ballots -- while supporting ballot harvesting? You know why.

.@ElonMusk, the @X January algorithm update is tanking organic reach. With 3.2M+ followers, my post views have dropped 50-80% from earlier levels—even high-engagement posts reach barely 0.5% of my followers. Is there a plan to fix this?

🚨 In FOUR days, Judicial Watch returns to the Supreme Court for the most important election integrity case in a generation. This case decides whether or not it is UNLAWFUL for states to count ballots received after Election Day. We’re asking the High Court to affirm our victory at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This ruling struck down Mississippi’s law that unconstitutionally allowed election officials to count mail-in ballots up to 5 days after Election Day.

These states have NO voter ID: California, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania (strict voter ID law struck down by state court), Vermont. (Washington, D.C. also has no voter id AND allows aliens to vote despite Republicans running Congress.) And voting by mail has no serious id requirement in most every state.

Interesting.

.@IlhanMN and @NYCMayor should also be subject to denaturalizaiton investigations.

Cleaning election rolls is necessary for clean elections. And so is counting ballots according to law. @JudicialWatch is fighting on both fronts...in Federal court.