Invictus

2.2K posts

Invictus

Invictus

@JonathanKisyul1

Law, Refugees and GGMU

Anywhere Katılım Temmuz 2022
1.8K Takip Edilen392 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Invictus
Invictus@JonathanKisyul1·
Never again
English
0
0
1
94
Invictus retweetledi
Mwendefrey
Mwendefrey@mwendefrey·
I want to clarify that siko Kwa hio group ya Akamba 5.
Filipino
32
65
434
9.5K
Invictus
Invictus@JonathanKisyul1·
Camavinga ffs?😭😭
Português
0
0
0
112
Invictus retweetledi
munir
munir@bigpochu·
No hate but why doesn’t Gloria orwoba use lipstick that will go well with her face.
English
84
151
1.9K
72K
Invictus
Invictus@JonathanKisyul1·
Tangu accountant @cosmicmanu126 ajoin Kenol twitter hayuko my tl. Rada buda?
Indonesia
0
0
1
26
Invictus retweetledi
LaBan
LaBan@laban_ach·
Tangu nitoke ile side ya law twitter dealing with idiots like Miracle and those jobless girls we were classmates with, maisha imekua sawa sana. watu kama akina Tekin I nolonger see on my TL. I used to pray for times like this. Mafala huwa wamewatawala huku mbaya sana
Filipino
2
7
58
3.2K
SNILLOH
SNILLOH@DoaneIsCrazy·
Wueh🤣🤣🤣
SNILLOH tweet media
Indonesia
29
96
556
15.3K
Leone Wandera
Leone Wandera@Leone_wanderaa·
ATP Tweeps mnarusha maswali ya project work huku. Tunawaona. Wapi ya krimino?
Indonesia
3
4
85
3.3K
Invictus retweetledi
Spry Voice
Spry Voice@SpryVoice·
VAR implementation was the final blow to Barcelona cheat code.
English
0
2
1
136
Invictus retweetledi
garageLawKe
garageLawKe@wanjikukihika·
I hope the Supreme Court will one day review its ruling in Dina and the related cases. The Torrens system should have been ring-fenced. The records of the root of title rests with the registrar. If we cannot trust the registrar, how can we rely on their records?
steve Biko osur@wuodosur

The one question all these judgments and judges evade is the liability of the registry and its officials in the churning out of dubious titles. Are they entirely innocent? Why are they being let off the hook when the locus of crime is the lands registry?

English
0
4
5
322
Invictus retweetledi
steve Biko osur
steve Biko osur@wuodosur·
The one question all these judgments and judges evade is the liability of the registry and its officials in the churning out of dubious titles. Are they entirely innocent? Why are they being let off the hook when the locus of crime is the lands registry?
ROBA & ASSOCIATES LLP@AssociatesRoba

🔴🔴 COURT OF APPEAL WARNS LAND BUYERS AGAIN: EVEN A CLEAN TITLE CAN FALL; YEARS AFTER PURCHASE For some time now, courts have repeated one uncomfortable truth: a title deed is not always the final word. From the landmark decision in Dina Management Limited v County Government of Mombasa & Others, the message has been clear: when the root of title is questioned, a registered owner must go beyond waving a certificate and demonstrate how ownership was lawfully acquired. That principle is not new. But in Patricia Mary Clark v Godfrey Ngatia Njoroge & Others, the Court of Appeal of Kenya has now delivered a sobering reminder; and pushed the conversation further into uncomfortable territory for innocent buyers. In this case, the buyer conducted an official search, confirmed ownership at the Lands Registry, paid KSh 11 million through advocates, and obtained a certificate of lease. On paper, everything was perfect. Years later, however, the original owner emerged and denied ever selling the property. When the registry records were scrutinized, a glaring gap appeared: there was no transfer instrument showing how the seller acquired the land in the first place. The register showed movement, yes, but the paper trail, the legal spine of ownership, was missing. And that missing link changed everything. In reaffirming that the title could not stand, the Court did more than restate existing law. It reinforced a growing judicial posture: due diligence is no longer just procedural, it is substantive. The decision signals that where circumstances raise suspicion, courts may expect purchasers to interrogate the history of ownership more deeply. This is not a departure from the law established in Dina Management, but it sharpens the warning. The comfort buyers once found in searches, titles, and registry entries is steadily narrowing. The takeaway is quiet but powerful: land ownership in Kenya is no longer just about what the register says; it is increasingly about how the register came to say it. And for buyers, that means that the deeper you dig before purchase, the safer you stand years later. Kindly repost widely🙏🙏. For more info, check our profile.

English
12
253
375
23.6K
Ndong@Conslaw
Ndong@Conslaw@Ndonglaw043·
@Yousuf_0010 I am saying statute (LSA) already grants the power to challenge a will, a party cannot oust that in a will. ✅️✅️
English
4
3
23
3.9K
Ndong@Conslaw
Ndong@Conslaw@Ndonglaw043·
Our Jurisprudence says the dead cannot command the living from the grave, the WILL is limited to providing for the dependants & beneficiaries. It cannot BAR anyone from challenging it in court. That power is granted expressly in statute. ✅️✅️
English
1
17
64
2.8K
Invictus
Invictus@JonathanKisyul1·
All over sudden academic pressure on a Friday tena juu hiyo PE paper wamefanya ningeuma nje. CLE!!?
English
1
0
6
84
Invictus
Invictus@JonathanKisyul1·
@ShaniaWagema Weka picha tukuambie congratulations Shania
Indonesia
0
0
4
1.4K
Invictus
Invictus@JonathanKisyul1·
10:12 PM niko firm meeting on a UCL night! When will this end?
English
1
0
0
44