Josh Rubin

383 posts

Josh Rubin

Josh Rubin

@JoshASRubin

Katılım Temmuz 2026
82 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
movie tweets
movie tweets@lauren_w67·
The only thing I don’t understand is this. Isn’t there also a 66.7% chance it’s behind door 1?
English
86
248
7K
455.8K
HeXoRcisT #OGPULSICAN
HeXoRcisT #OGPULSICAN@HeXorcist_666·
@rbmichae80 @AffordAnything Your a terrible bot! People are literally stealing bottled water to just empty out the water and return the bottles for 5c refunds. When you have nothing, time is nothing stupid!
English
2
0
2
69
Paula Pant
Paula Pant@AffordAnything·
Honest question: What would stop anyone from just flipping these groceries? Buy up all the inventory at 30% less than retail, then sell it at 10% less than retail? Especially canned/packaged goods? Kinda seems like a taxpayer-funded arb opportunity ... Has this not occurred to any of them??
End Wokeness@EndWokeness

Mayor Mamdani just announced that he will be opening 5 city-run, tax-funded grocery stores: "Prices set at 30% below retail prices"

English
581
48
893
159.9K
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@captgouda24 Seems like there should just be a single entity that serves as both payer and regulator that can come up with ex ante rules about what is and isn’t necessary, rather than exposing individuals to arbitrary and stressful denials of coverage at their most vulnerable.
English
0
0
6
543
Nicholas Decker
Nicholas Decker@captgouda24·
It isn’t! In patient care after routine surgery is generally not medically necessary, and *any* medical system which does its job and looks out for everyone would deny it.
Ashley@93xashley

My insurance company denied coverage for my son’s overnight hospital stay after he had a tumor removed from his chest and a port placed. His surgeon had to file an appeal because apparently that wasn’t considered medically necessary. But ya insurance companies rock

English
37
4
343
56.9K
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@ch3rryxx13 Lower supply as in not increase supply, not literally destroying supply
English
0
0
0
19
gay hag (modern peasant)
gay hag (modern peasant)@ch3rryxx13·
"NIMBYs lower supply" huh, i've never seen someone that a yimbro accuses of being a "NIMBY" advocate for demolishing rent controlled buildings or housing. yet i see yimbys say that every day. who is limiting supply ....?
Jake Thrailkill@jlthrailkill_23

@TheStalwart @yFactr I can’t tell if you are being serious or not right now, it’s clearly both supply and demand, and NIMBYS lower supply, while AI raises demand in San Fran.

English
3
2
9
826
Black & Gold
Black & Gold@JAdam4s·
@GOFORTHE2 The Gambler! We should put an asterisk at Dodgers titles the last two seasons for playing with a guy that should have been suspended for illegal gambling.
English
4
0
1
55
Angels in the Diamond Club
This should be the biggest story in all of sports but of course no one is actually talking about it. Good on ESPN doing some actual journalism and showing the world the true colors of the gambler.
English
155
167
1.8K
908.4K
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@rydethesnow Do you… do you think that his account was betting on baseball like Rose? Are you actually that uninformed?
English
1
0
5
1K
Jason E.
Jason E.@rydethesnow·
I'd like to see those doing things that got Pete Rose banned for LIFE, also banned for life. Don't care if they are the current golden ticket for MLB. Sports gambling is not only illegal for players in pro sports, but also in the state of California. Ohtani is guilty!!
ESPN@espn

This is the actual recording of Ippei Mizuhara claiming to be Shohei Ohtani during a call to authorize a transfer of funds to Mathew Bowyer's account. Listen to the first two episodes of "The Betrayal of Shohei Ohtani" on July 28, wherever you get your podcasts 🎙️

English
41
21
246
35.2K
SportsBetExpert
SportsBetExpert@SBETeam·
Shohei Ohtani was the one gambling. That poor interpreter took the fall. He’s MLB’s golden boy so they made the random Asian take the fall.
English
4
1
20
4K
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@conor64 @emre_mayo Will be a nice natural experiment to test if the “we have really slim margins” complaint is legit
English
0
0
0
8
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@LonesomeWest Yep exactly lol
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin

@Authw8 I also think that people are somewhat overstating their ability to conduct a natural double-blind study. YOU are very different 2-3 years later in your life and parenting a first child is very different from parenting with a toddler at home too

English
0
0
1
18
Glen Runciter
Glen Runciter@LonesomeWest·
What's especially funny is seeing people you know in real life say this, when it's incredibly obvious that they're raising their new kid very differently in ways that have major impacts but for some reason they don't seem to realize it because they just assume Kids Are Different.
tom bombadil@Authw8

i've seen this perspective a lot and i worry people are overcorrecting. all this does is establish that two people in similar environments still have underlying personality differences. it doesn't establish anything about the relative importance of nature vs nurture, it just establishes that there is some amount of natural personality variation even when you hold nurture steady.

English
1
0
2
155
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@Authw8 I also think that people are somewhat overstating their ability to conduct a natural double-blind study. YOU are very different 2-3 years later in your life and parenting a first child is very different from parenting with a toddler at home too
English
0
0
2
88
tom bombadil
tom bombadil@Authw8·
i've seen this perspective a lot and i worry people are overcorrecting. all this does is establish that two people in similar environments still have underlying personality differences. it doesn't establish anything about the relative importance of nature vs nurture, it just establishes that there is some amount of natural personality variation even when you hold nurture steady.
tom bombadil tweet media
English
10
2
49
18.9K
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@Naxela2 @captgouda24 I think it’s cool reading a book that I know someone else physically held and enjoyed too. It may be sentimental but it creates a feeling of connectedness that you can’t get from reading a pdf imho
English
0
0
1
147
Naxelas
Naxelas@Naxela2·
@captgouda24 The worship of books as a physical medium rather than abstracting out the information resource always baffles me.
English
5
0
54
1.1K
Nicholas Decker
Nicholas Decker@captgouda24·
A lot of people seem to think the problem with the Nazi book-burnings was that they were destroying physical copies of books.
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗

English
16
3
375
21.5K
Josh Rubin
Josh Rubin@JoshASRubin·
@FWJXiong @alexeldah @JackDorsey0x Yep. And even if the bets were illegal and done through an illegal bookie it would just be a slap on the wrist fine, like Jarred Cosart
English
0
0
0
25
b3cknasty
b3cknasty@b3ck69247nasty·
@JackDorsey0x The trading card companie$ are going to have this reporter killed
English
1
0
0
164