Joshua Fortezza
2.8K posts

Joshua Fortezza
@JoshuaFortezza
To every man upon this earth death cometh soon or late, & how can man die better than facing fearful odds for the ashes of his fathers & the temples of his gods


Remember when Gavin Andresen described data spam like "the latest lady Gaga video" as "abuse from an evil mind"? Satoshi agreed, explained "that's why fees" & he added "There are other things we can do if necessary". BIP110. At your service. h/t image @ezCoinAccess

I don't want to black pill, but my conclusion is that state actors represent a far larger proportion of activity across our information space than most could believe possible. They have deep pockets and only pretend to run businesses, media or otherwise. They instead run at a loss for decades on end, because their purpose is influence and infowar.



Usury is a jewish system that was eventually accepted by weak kings and leaders due to manipulation, bribery and empty promises. It needs to be abolished.

[RG911Team] This fact alone proves 9/11 was a false flag. The Twin Towers were designed with the lightest, thinnest steel on the top floors, and each lower section used thicker, heavier and stronger steel than the one above it. This made a progressive collapse IMPOSSIBLE. The idea that a thin, light steel beam would collapse and then crush thick, strong steel below it… and that would in turn crush the even thicker and stronger steel below it… all through the path of GREATEST resistance… all in less than 12 seconds… violates the laws of physics. This is why FDNY sent hundreds of their best firefighters in those buildings. They knew the planes and fires could not completely collapse the towers because the extremely robust design would easily withstand it. 343 firefighters died on 9/11 because they were caught off guard by something no one expected - every single column being ripped apart and blown in every direction. And the only force that can do that requires explosives.


My life has become arguing with Cat/Racoon/Frog/Dinosaur, etc pictures on Twitter who ironically have a cult like mission in life to keep Cat/Racoon/Frog/Dinosaur pics out of the Bitcoin Mempool 🤪, the irony writes itself 🤯 you can't make this shit up!


This is a replay of the block size war once again — with all the CEOs and influencers wanting to make Bitcoin shitty, and all the Bitcoiners opposing them.

For the longest time I tried to stay neutral and unbiased on the Core v Knots debate, which ultimately turned into the #BIP110 debate. I genuinely tried to understand both sides. I listened to countless hours of podcasts and interviews from both camps, read the articles, asked questions here on X, and even used paid subs to Grok/Chat/Claude to work through the deeper technical questions. I spun up a Core node, then a Knots node, and built out a whole Bitcoin stack of services on a home-grown server so I could see it all for myself. I really, authentically, genuinely tried to give both sides a fair shake. But I simply could not get past the fact that ALL of the arguments made by the anti-110 side are easily countered by the pro-110 side. And honestly, I lost my patience with the pretentious elitism radiating from the anti-camp; the recycled logical fallacies, the cunning rhetorical devices, the arrogance and disdain for regular users of the network that you'd expect from progressive academia, not from Bitcoiners. Their blatantly obvious conflicts of interest, their connections to highly dubious individuals and organizations... it's just so obvious for anyone paying attention. Oh, and not to mention the overt concerted effort to thwart 110's momentum in recent days, reeking of desperation. The ONLY anti-110 argument I've heard that I agree with came from SuperTestnet, who pointed out that 110 doesn't have the same powerful economic and institutional support that 148 had (at least at the time of this post, 30 days out from mandatory signaling). Fair point. But 110 does have real support among a few miners, one or two pools, and everyday node runners, some of whom are more than willing to spend their own sats on rented hash to move it along. So all this to say: I DO NOT know with 100% certainty that BIP-110 will succeed. I have 100% hope that it does, but I can't predict the future (that siad, I do have a non-insignificant amount of sats wagering on the issue via Predyx). We have almost 30 days left, which feels like an eternity at this point, so anything could happen. Ultimately I have faith that #Bitcoin will survive, and that more and more people will come to their senses and use their connections, their networks, and their influence for the betterment of sound money. Money that doesn't carry the weight of shitcoining, shitscamming, shitstorage spammy garbage.


BIP-110 isn't about stopping spam. It's the network's immune response. Nodes saying no to non-monetary use of Bitcoin. And reminding everyone who actually decides what Bitcoin is.








