SojournorBitcoin ₿

@redphone There is only one reason to be here. To give “Glory to God” Everything else is vanity/pride.(self) Humble yourself before the Lord, and He will raise you up. Pride is of the world. Humility is from God.

@knutsvanholm Truth is true freedom.

Whenever someone tells me I should "worry about my reputation," I giggle a little, because it's quite revealing. Whether they are genuinely concerned or just trying to threaten me doesn't matter. What they don't understand is that people who are honest to themselves as well as to others don't ever have to, or even can, think about their reputation. You gain a good reputation by being a good person and standing up for what you believe in. Not by gamifying your words to gain a good reputation.

Corporate bitcoin? or Pleb bitcoin?

@knutsvanholm @ToneVays Is Tone Deaf always this effeminate.😂🤣 Geese

@ToneVays He is not threatening them, he's warning them. YUGE difference!

Hollow shit! Kratter is losing his mind 🤯 - He is threatening mining pools - He is threatening a crash of Bitcoin price - He is threatening a chain split This video is a perfect example why Bip110 will fail & NO ONE is going to pay attention to him or Luke or Mechanic in 30 Days

@OSUFanBigTime @kit_sats By design it is deflationary. Its output is halved every 4 years. Plus it is capped at 21 million coins ₿. So the dollar is debased, while ₿ hardens.

@DefaultBitcoin @kit_sats How is bitcoin immune to inflation

Inflation doesn’t just steal money. It steals time.

@gatewaypundit Like until Aug 7th

CNN’s Scott Jennings: McConnell “Still Has A Few Weeks to Go” Link in the comment section.

@infraa_ @SatoshiSound Nailed it!👊🫡🧡

I haven’t engaged in the BIP-110 war, mainly because it reminds me of the block size wars (a massive driver in me selling my XX BTC then) and evokes a bit of a trauma response Justin nails it (as usual). It’s a significant reason I’ve been so much more bearish/cautious and sold 50% of my BTC at 80k (obviously my macro outlook informed a significant portion too) I legitimately cannot understand the counter argument When I first heard of BTC (sometime circa 2011), it was via an obscure anarchist blogspot that was championing this new decentralized, permission-less *money* A money that the government could not control. They couldn’t print more, they couldn’t decide who owns it and they couldn’t decide who gets to transact with it What the fuck are we even doing these days? Seriously guys… People I thought were hardcore Bitcoin maxis have turned into Saylor maxis Now all we talk about is perpetual preferreds. Multiple to NAV. USD reserves. How to sell BTC to support dollar-denominated liabilities. We have some ugly bastardization of Bitcoin now. Some version where the primary conversation *isnt even NGU*, but some financial engineering of some spook’s dying software business- not actual Bitcoin: The fuck you, fuck your printing, fuck your centralized control— MONEY I want that back. Give me that back and I’ll get a lot more bullish

@infraa_ @SatoshiSound 🎯🎯🎯 Maxi in Reverse.🤦‍♂️

@JonathanDe7657 @DerrickEvans4WV 🤝❤️ That’s called “Investing “ None better!

@DefaultBitcoin @DerrickEvans4WV Spending it on the wife and kid 🥴

So dang true 🤣

@PAMsLOvE It’s ok I tend to think to deep. Ask my wife😂🤝

@DefaultBitcoin 😅🤣

@catturd2 For awhile

Mitch McConnell is dead isn’t he?

@LukeDashjr @ConsumingCrypto

Removing rules is a hardfork. That includes scheduled rules like subsidy halvings, and yes, even BIP110. Rejecting BIP110 is a contentious hardfork attempt. And unlike softforks, hardforks need consensus to succeed. There is no consensus on rejecting BIP110.

@JonathanDe7657 @DerrickEvans4WV Nope But you get to take home all that $$ from being your own boss😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤦‍♂️

@DefaultBitcoin @DerrickEvans4WV Brought my laptop to the beach so I could work this week. There is no real time off.

@cguida6 @Singekino_Miner 🤝 None taken 😂

@DefaultBitcoin @Singekino_Miner Haha no hard feelings 🧡

Love that the bcashers are coming out against bip110 It's bitcoiners against shitcoiners As always

@PAMsLOvE Never mind I was being sarcastic,,with an AI response. Joke

@DefaultBitcoin Explain how Ai centers will help humanity?

𝙽𝚘 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚎 🤨

@cguida6 @Singekino_Miner Deleted it after your kind suggestion Prick 😶

@DefaultBitcoin @Singekino_Miner Saylor thinks bitcoin isn't money, so this meme sucks :p

@NewsBlast17 @MPDunaway And no mention of Lindsey

The newspaper he is holding in the photo is today's cover of the Washington Post's sports section. Why would they need to include the paper, and it raises more questions as if it could be photoshopped. This looks like manufactured 'proof of life'.

@adam3us @BTCBeliever21 @JasonGnarlee Are you ever going to address the Blockstream cloud mining ponzi allegations? Seems like they should be easy to refute. Or are you going to be cowardly and non-transparent like you were with your little alleged side visit to a a certain island?

@lukej_sgf @ChrisMc_L I know 🤦‍♂️ That’s the look you get when you say ₿ is money. Fixed it

@DefaultBitcoin @ChrisMc_L Saylor said bitcoin isn't money

I've been quiet on the ongoing debate of Core vs Knots. I want Bitcoin to be a monetary network only. It's not possible to eliminate spam, but limiting non-monetary transactions is positive in my book. I have a problem with what Core did. They didn't change Bitcoin, because they can't. Nodes control Bitcoin, not development teams. But they did nudge the network's behavior through inertia. Changing policy defaults without consensus is soft power. It's influence. That's dangerous. On BIP 110, my issue isn't the goal. It's the 55% signalling threshold. Consensus changes should need overwhelming agreement, not a simple majority. The thing I love that came out of this: client diversity is good for Bitcoin. Knots is a positive reaction by the community. We can't have one group having influence without pushback. It's a good thing for node runners to have options. That's where I stand. Money first, sovereignty at the node level, and a high bar for changing the rules.