Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π²

16.7K posts

Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π² banner
Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π²

Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π²

@JoshuaTengo

🐰 (L3, ❄️) MAXI bao bao 🐼

Katılım Haziran 2018
5K Takip Edilen338 Takipçiler
Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π² retweetledi
Sergio Perera
Sergio Perera@JEFESINCORBATA·
Un hombre deposita $10.000 en un banco. El banco le agradece y registra el depósito en su balance. Pero no donde cabría esperar. Para el banco, esos $10,000 son en realidad un pasivo, porque técnicamente pertenecen al cliente y podrían tener que ser devueltos. Entonces el banco hace lo que hacen los bancos do. : presta 9.000 dólares de ese dinero a alguien que compra un coche. Ahora ocurre algo interesante. El préstamo de $9,000 aparece en los libros del banco como un activo, porque ahora alguien le debe dinero. Así que los mismos $10,000 cumplen dos funciones a la vez. El depositante cree tener $10,000 seguros en el banco. El prestatario ahora tiene $9,000 para gastar. Esos $9,000 se depositan en otro lugar. El siguiente banco presta $8,100. Esos se depositan de nuevo. Luego se prestan $7,290. Pronto, los 10.000 dólares originales se han convertido silenciosamente en decenas de miles de dólares de préstamos repartidos por toda la economía. Todos creen tener dinero. Los depositantes ven los saldos en sus cuentas. Los prestatarios tienen el dinero que gastaron. Los bancos muestran activos saludables en sus balances porque la gente les debe dinero. Y aquí está la mejor parte. Los bancos cobran intereses por todos esos préstamos, quizás un 7%. Pero el depositante que aportó el dinero original podría ganar solo un 0,5% en su cuenta de ahorros. De esta forma, los bancos cobran intereses sobre un dinero que en su mayor parte no era suyo y se quedan con la diferencia. El sistema funciona maravillosamente. Siempre y cuando nadie pida la devolución del dinero al mismo tiempo.
Español
273
1.7K
5K
435.4K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Anthropic se niega a quitar sus "líneas rojas": no armas autónomas (IA decide targets sin humano) ni vigilancia masiva de estadounidenses. El Pentágono (Hegseth) les dio plazo hasta viernes para aceptar "todo uso legal" o pierden contrato de $200M y riesgo de supply chain blacklist. Vitalik los apoya si no ceden. Ahí va el drama actual.
Español
1
0
0
16
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
It will significantly increase my opinion of @Anthropic if they do not back down, and honorably eat the consequences. (For those who are not aware, so far they have been maintaining the two red lines of "no fully autonomous weapons" and "no mass surveillance of Americans". Actually a very conservative and limited posture, it's not even anti-military. IMO fully autonomous weapons and mass privacy violation are two things we all want less of, so in my ideal world anyone working on those things gets access to the same open-weights LLMs as everyone else, and exactly nothing on top of that. Of course we won't get anywhere close to that world, but if we get even 10% closer to that world that's good, and if we get 10% further that's bad) CC @DarioAmodei firefly.social/post/bsky/pv7f…
English
333
321
3.2K
362K
Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π² retweetledi
GUNZ Official
GUNZ Official@GUNbyGUNZ·
Let's talk about something that gets overlooked. @GunzillaGames shipped a AAA game. Not a browser demo. Not a mint page. Not "coming soon." A real game, on PlayStation. Xbox. Steam. Epic Game Store. Sony certified it. Microsoft certified it. Valve listed it. We are setting the rules, and reached the final steps. If you're locked in, like, comment & repost this 🫡
GUNZ Official tweet media
English
72
94
285
33.5K
Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π² retweetledi
Mocha
Mocha@mochanfts·
🗓️ The Big Day: Official Mint Date Mark your calendars, Mocha fans! The official Mint Date is set for: February 27th! Our collaborations are officially wrapping up 22rd! All Collab winners must make sure to send your wallets before February 23rd. Don't miss out on your spot! 💖 🆙 Level Up Your Discord Want to climb the ranks for Gtd &fcfs? Discord Level Up is available until February 24th. Keep the chat glowing and earn your stripes while you still can! ✨ Stay Mocha 🌸
Mocha tweet media
English
118
265
1.1K
17.5K
Union
Union@union_build·
As Union expands into private payments, compliance and auditability are built into the design, giving integrators tools for AML, auditability and proof of reserves. Here's what you need to know 🧵
Union tweet media
English
6
1
29
8.7K
ORO AI
ORO AI@getoro_xyz·
Hey ORO fam, We have some big news! The top 10% of our Season 1 contributors helped power 2.6 billion structured data points and we’re rewarding that impact with 25,000 ORO bonus points each. Points are rolling out over the next week Season 2 is up next and it’s only getting bigger.
ORO AI tweet media
English
257
123
764
33.4K
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
@VitalikButerin LLMs are equalizing tribal knowledge, especially in open source software. I think the question should be, how much of the protocol can an LLM generate and formally prove?
English
22
5
77
11.3K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
An important, and perenially underrated, aspect of "trustlessness", "passing the walkaway test" and "self-sovereignty" is protocol simplicity. Even if a protocol is super decentralized with hundreds of thousands of nodes, and it has 49% byzantine fault tolerance, and nodes fully verify everything with quantum-safe peerdas and starks, if the protocol is an unwieldy mess of hundreds of thousands of lines of code and five forms of PhD-level cryptography, ultimately that protocol fails all three tests: * It's not trustless because you have to trust a small class of high priests who tell you what properties the protocol has * It doesn't pass the walkaway test because if existing client teams go away, it's extremely hard for new teams to get up to the same level of quality * It's not self-sovereign because if even the most technical people can't inspect and understand the thing, it's not fully yours It's also less secure, because each part of the protocol, especially if it can interact with other parts in complicated ways, carries a risk of the protocol breaking. One of my fears with Ethereum protocol development is that we can be too eager to add new features to meet highly specific needs, even if those features bloat the protocol or add entire new types of interacting components or complicated cryptography as critical dependencies. This can be nice for short-term functionality gains, but it is highly destructive to preserving long-term self-sovereignty, and creating a hundred-year decentralized hyperstructure that transcends the rise and fall of empires and ideologies. The core problem is that if protocol changes are judged from the perspective of "how big are they as changes to the existing protocol", then the desire to preserve backwards compatibility means that additions happen much more often than subtractions, and the protocol inevitably bloats over time. To counteract this, the Ethereum development process needs an explicit "simplification" / "garbage collection" function. "Simplification" has three metrics: * Minimizing total lines of code in the protocol. An ideal protocol fits onto a single page - or at least a few pages * Avoiding unnecessary dependencies on fundamentally complex technical components. For example, a protocol whose security solely depends on hashes (even better: on exactly one hash function) is better than one that depends on hashes and lattices. Throwing in isogenies is worst of all, because (sorry to the truly brilliant hardworking nerds who figured that stuff out) nobody understands isogenies. * Adding more _invariants_: core properties that the protocol can rely on, for example EIP-6780 (selfdestruct removal) added the property that at most N storage slots can be changedakem per slot, significantly simplifying client development, and EIP-7825 (per-tx gas cap) added a maximum on the cost of processing one transaction, which greatly helps ZK-EVMs and parallel execution. Garbage collection can be piecemeal, or it can be large-scale. The piecemeal approach tries to take existing features, and streamline them so that they are simpler and make more sense. One example is the gas cost reforms in Glamsterdam, which make many gas costs that were previously arbitrary, instead depend on a small number of parameters that are clearly tied to resource consumption. One large-scale garbage collection was replacing PoW with PoS. Another is likely to happen as part of Lean consensus, opening the room to fix a large number of mistakes at the same time ( youtube.com/watch?v=10Ym34… ). Another approach is "Rosetta-style backwards compatibility", where features that are complex but little-used remain usable but are "demoted" from being part of the mandatory protocol and instead become smart contract code, so new client developers do not need to bother with them. Examples: * After we upgrade to full native account abstraction, all old tx types can be retired, and EOAs can be converted into smart contract wallets whose code can process all of those transaction types * We can replace existing precompiles (except those that are _really_ needed) with EVM or later RISC-V code * We can eventually change the VM from EVM to RISC-V (or other simpler VM); EVM could be turned into a smart contract in the new VM. Finally, we want to move away from client developers feeling the need to handle all older versions of the Ethereum protocol. That can be left to older client versions running in docker containers. In the long term, I hope that the rate of change to Ethereum can be slower. I think for various reasons that ultimately that _must_ happen. These first fifteen years should in part be viewed as an adolescence stage where we explored a lot of ideas and saw what works and what is useful and what is not. We should strive to avoid the parts that are not useful being a permanent drag on the Ethereum protocol. Basically, we want to improve Ethereum in a way that looks like this:
YouTube video
YouTube
vitalik.eth tweet media
English
660
521
3.7K
379.7K
Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π² retweetledi
ɴᴅᴜᴋᴀᴍ ⫷(✧ ✧)⫸
A quick reminder: @PrismaXai raised $11M, and what are they doing? They are constructing the bridge between robotics and mainstream adoption They have a point system. How do you earn points? ☞ Go to: app.prismax.ai ☞ Connect your wallet [SOL] ☞ You will get 1k points immediately [complete the quiz for 3,500 points after] ☞ Then link your Twitter account > input your Telegram ID, username, and email ☞ Do your daily check-in How to earn more? • Be active daily. • Optional: you can buy a robotic software for a 3x boost, and it costs $99–$499 Here is how it works… The membership plan comes in two tiers: ☞ Amplifier package ☞ Innovator package Amplifier costs $99, while Innovator costs $499 Both Amplifiers and Innovators get 3,000 points instantly after paying, and a 3x bonus, which is 150 points on live chat and 30 points for daily login. Innovators get 50 login points For the teleop, everyone joins a queue, but Innovators can skip the queue to number 2, and they can teleop 6 times a day..each session gives 90 points Amplifiers can’t skip the queue. They stay and wait and can teleop 3 times a day…each session gives 90 points Good luck 🫡
ɴᴅᴜᴋᴀᴍ ⫷(✧ ✧)⫸ tweet media
ɴᴅᴜᴋᴀᴍ ⫷(✧ ✧)⫸@ndukam14

So yeah, I joined my first community activities quiz on Prismas yesterday and spent almost all my time there. I enjoyed every question that was asked, especially this one: “What content does @PrismaXai encourage?” That question gave me what I needed to know about Prismax and what kind of content to put out there. Anyway, you’ll be seeing more beautiful content from me. Don’t miss the next community activity on January 8. Be there!

English
8
4
13
611
Joshua is Bored 👹💖 (✸,✸) | ETHGas ⛽ π²
Les comparto las respuesta de prismax
ɴᴅᴜᴋᴀᴍ ⫷(✧ ✧)⫸@ndukam14

I’ve been very busy offline doing my thing, but I still ended up coming through for @PrismaXai community activities. I don’t miss them because they’re always fun and genuinely educative. Some of the questions really caught my attention: Q – Which participant behavior best aligns with PrismaX’s community goals? Q – Which factor most influences the usefulness of a teleoperation session? Q – What long-term impact does PrismaX aim to achieve through its community network? These are worth looking into, especially for new community members. I ended up in 93rd place this time, which isn’t great, but I’ll do better next round and make sure I attend the next community activity 🫡

Español
0
0
0
30