
FREE Luigi
8.1K posts

FREE Luigi
@Joshyydooo
casual account. pretend you don't know me I love comedy & hate fascists. 🤷🏼♂️ Sometimes I have opinions too ✌ ❤& 🔊 wakaan



when i think about twin peaks this is always the first image to come to my mind. it scares me.




TRUMP INAUGURATION TO BE MOVED INDOORS DUE TO COLD -CNN


“I submitted the document. It wasn’t Michael. He knows that, you know that.” Jeremy Corbell was PISSED that Nancy Mace named Michael Shellenberger as submitting the Immaculate Constellation document.







Is it time to "redefine" obesity? Is BMI no longer sufficient to diagnose excess adiposity? The Lancet seems to think so, and they just proposed a new diagnostic framework to reflect this new thinking. Limitations of BMI: - BMI is useful for identifying individuals at increased risk of health consequences but is not a direct measure of body fat. - BMI cannot determine the distribution of body fat or establish whether excess body fat is a health problem. For example... Overweight (BMI: 25–29.9) may include individuals with excess body fat or those who are metabolically healthy, while obesity (BMI: 30+) can include individuals with high body fat who may or may not exhibit signs or symptoms of illness. This may have several unintended consequences: 1. Individuals with high muscle mass (e.g., athletes) may have high BMIs despite low body fat, leading to inappropriate diagnoses of obesity. 2. People with excess body fat but a BMI under 30 may go undiagnosed, even though they have health risks. 3. Some individuals with high BMI may maintain good health and normal organ function, challenging the current definition of obesity. Basically, BMI alone is insufficient for diagnosing obesity, more comprehensive assessments are needed to determine the full extent of weight-related health consequences, and health context matters more than BMI as a number. Thoughts?


the way nobody gaf about him anymore 😭












