Judith Lair

@MamaLama43 Boo fing hoo! John was not hit by a car. KR is factually innocent. The general public loves her advocate, TB. $80,000+ proves it!

These statements — and many more like them — were directed at witnesses in the Karen Read trial in an attempt to intimidate and harass them. Kearney is charged with witness intimidation and harassment and is scheduled to stand trial this November. Karen Read’s own attorney, @BostonDefender publicly supports and participates in fundraising efforts for Kearney. He signs off on this behavior. 💥”I go down to your pizza shop and I stand out there for an hour, and I yell shit about your son. I just shit ALL OVER your child, Chris. Your middle child. I go down there and I shit all over him, and I accuse him of the most heinous things possible." ...I'm not afraid of your stupid son. Believe me, I could kick the shit out of your stupid son." ~Aidan Kearney, 9/5/23 💥I've got bad news for you, Chris. I've got really bad news for you. They're (Turtleboy's followers) literally everywhere. You can't like... You guys should stop going out in public. That'd be my recommendation. It's only going to get worse from here.' ~Aidan Kearney, 9/5/23. 💥”It makes me happy when I posted this (a picture of Jen McCabe’s minor daughters) because I'm just - it's just a reminder to her (Jen McCabe) that now you just can't leave. You know we're not going to allow you Jen to live a normal life. The worst thing you've ever done is go down to the courthouse and try to get an order on me. That's the dumbest thing you've ever done because now I know how much it's bothering you, and that's like a green light to accelerate.” ~Aidan Kearney, 6/20/23 This has to stop. Massachusetts cannot allow witnesses and victims’ families to endure this kind of abuse and intimidation. Defend the Truth. defendingthetruth.org

The Albert’s, McCabe’s and Higgins caused Ms. Read’s wrongful indictment, arrest, and prosecution 🗣️🗣️ 💯 💯 🎯 🎯 💥 💥 YUPPPPP.

@DoctorTurtleboy On Connor website he calls himself Chief Motor Vehicle Homicide Prosector so if they believe KR killed JOK with a car why wasn't Chief Connor elected to prosecute instead of wasting tax dollars.

@MamaLama43 @BoozeyBeauty Plus she was looking forward to a summer trip

Fact Check: Jen McCabe called Tom AND Erin Beatty because — unlike Karen, who was telling people John had been hit by a snowplow and was dead — Jen, who was helping look for John, believed he was still alive and possibly at a friend’s house. FACTS MATTER @BoozeyBeauty 💥Link to the witnesses legal fund so they can hold these lunatics accountable: defendingthetruth.org

@AlexisKat6 Wait till they try to spin this BS in front of a federal judge. Tick tock.

Jen McCabe admitted under oath that she deleted messages. So how does Jessica Hyde reach a conclusion that says the opposite?

This does raise serious concerns about Jessica Hyde’s conclusions.

You dumb-as-a-doorknob, cherry-picking, narrative-spinning troll. Let me walk you through this Drama Llama since you obviously lack basic reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. The purpose of the post was to show that Jen McCabe also called Erin Beatty during the early morning hours of 1/29/22, prior to John O’Keefe being found on her brother-in-law’s front lawn. We already knew from testimony that Jen called Erin’s father. We now know there were ✨7 calls✨ and that Jen also contacted Erin herself. That additional call was the point. Yet again, another call from that morning that was not part of the testimony you’re pretending everyone already knew about. You also conveniently skipped over the allegations that Erin herself was pressured and threatened after John’s death. Strange that you have no problem entertaining theories about Colin calling Erin at 12:33 AM for a “booty call,” 🤮 while brushing aside allegations that Erin was told to “put a dick in her mouth” and stop talking. You clearly read the full post because you seem to read every single one of them. So pretending I did not say something I did doesn’t make your argument stronger. You just make yourself look inept.. which obviously isn't that difficult. Perhaps lay off the chatGPT next time.

@Hellno319496 @DixieNormu95224 The FBI couldn’t sort through all the lies, destroyed evidence and blue line defenses.

@DixieNormu95224 Do you not think the FBI could have cracked the case if there was anyone else responsible except your girl KR?

The most important timeline in Canton history apparently rests on a screenshot with no metadata, changing stories and a family shuttle service between Fairview and Maple St. at 12:10 by Allie. Julie was contacted very early. Leaving Maple st to go to 34 Fairview. Returning to pick up Chris Albert, Then going back again. Staying only 30 minutes before heading back home. If multiple adults rapidly converged, transported people between homes, and communication suddenly became more controlled (“don’t text,” “talk tomorrow,” etc.), how do they not see that we naturally interpret that as heightened concern or damage control. Given the compressed timeline, rapid family movements, and later concern about texting sensitive details, people reasonably question whether conversations occurred off-phone before formal statements were solidified Later we see “don’t text about it” “tell them he never went in the house” And then the next time the public sees Colin Albert…people notice a bruise around his eye that many thought looked consistent with a fight. Maybe all innocent. Maybe all coincidence. But you cannot blame the public for asking whether the real panic that night was about getting ahead of the story BEFORE people started asking questions.

@bishalot @DixieNormu95224 He’s an adult today. A college dropout.

@DixieNormu95224 Ew why are you posting a photo of an underage boy?

@DixieNormu95224 You nailed it. “Damage control”.

Someone should ask Greg Connor how it feels that Michael Morrissey didn’t think he or any other NCDAO ADA was competent enough to prosecute Karen Read, so he had to go begging to the State Senate for funding to hire Hank Brennan? If Morrissey doesn’t think Connor is good enough then why should the voters?

@TheChauffeurX I knew Protor was a liar when he was asked interview if he would do anything different. Nope. If he was honest he would have said, take a picture of the taillight at Dighton.

The tow truck driver not taking a photo of Karen’s damaged taillight always struck me as odd, especially considering this was supposedly the “murder weapon” he was transporting back to Canton from Dighton. In this obviously edited and manipulated Sallyport clip, the driver appears to exit the Lexus and move toward the rear to take a picture. Proctor intercepts him, and he changes direction to photograph the front license plate instead. What’s fascinating are the glitches: the driver freezes, appears to morph into two people, and there seems to be a visible time cut. Equally interesting is how the white light Coleen Crawford edited onto the unbroken driver-side taillight in the inverted video appears to morph onto the driver’s jacket. Proctor never sought Ring footage from any surrounding homes. Ring footage from Karen’s return to John’s was deleted in his custody. No third-party video evidence exists except for footage from Mr. Read’s home, which was noted as one of the reasons Karen was acquitted.

@DixieNormu95224 Hope someone is filming the guests arrival (back and front doors) to get a head count of supporters.

Looking through the “Defend the Truth” donations and one thing stands out immediately: For a group claiming overwhelming public support in a tight-knit town, and they believed the house defendants to be innocent, why are SO many donations anonymous? And why are immediate family members publicly donating to each other through a campaign page instead of simply helping directly behind the scenes? Not accusing anyone of anything. Just observing A true grassroots movement usually doesn’t need this much anonymity while simultaneously screaming “silent majority.”

@Dimo84365952 @DixieNormu95224 “It didn’t hit him so it doesn’t matter.” Dr. Lapasota

@DixieNormu95224 They were both drunk, driving, and had a fight. He got out, she didn't want to go in with him, so she backed up and took off. Never knew she'd backed into him. Heard the same story before.

One of the biggest problems with this case has always been that the public gets shown pieces separately. A text here. A phone call there. A police movement somewhere else. But once you start COMBINING…the day starts looking very different. Here’s what the communication timeline actually starts looking like when layered together chronologically. 2:22:35 AM Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins For 1 second 2:22:52 AM Brian Higgins immediately calls Brian Albert backfor 22 seconds Meanwhile Jen McCabe’s phone records show repeated calls to John O’Keefe deleted calls, unanswered calls, outgoing attempts, internet activity, Including the now heavily scrutinized: 2:27:40 AM “how long to die in cold” 6:03 AM Jen arrives at 34 Fairview Then a rapid sequence begins 6:03–6:24 AM Calls to Nicole Albert Calls involving Brian Albert, Police arrival activity, Additional internet searches involving “die in cold” 7:20:18 AM Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins 1 minute 56 seconds 7:22:24 AM Brian Higgins calls Chief Ken Berkowitz 3 minutes 30 seconds 7:30:31 AM Brian Higgins calls Brian Albert 5 minutes 47 seconds 7:57:42 AM Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins 12 minutes 33 seconds That is now multiple calls, extended duration between witness/homeowner, federal agent, and police chief all within a short morning window This is BEFORE the public narrative stabilizes, formal reports are finalized, extensive witness statements are completed 11:30 AM Proctor and Yuri interview McCabe's and Brian Albert Then immediately at 11:30:22 AM Brian Albert calls Jen For 1 minute 31 seconds The communication continues DURING the investigative phase. 12:20 PM Jen calls Brian who was just at her house 2:00 PM Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert for 8 min 3:10 Brian Higgins calls Kevin Albert for 12 min 3:24 PM Brian Albert calls Higgins for 6 min 6:12 PM Brian albert calls Higgins for 1 minute 6:16 PM Berky calls Higgins for 5 min 6:35 PM Brian Albert calls Higgins for 10 min 6:45 PM Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert for 16 min 6:48 PM Berky calls Higgins for 4 min 7:54 PM Jen to Nicole Albert “Kerry talked to the cops. and kept it simple” 7:56 PM Nicole Albert responds “okay try and get some sleep talk tomorrow” 7:57 PM Jen “any update” 7:57 PM Nicole Albert “we'll get more info tomorrow don't want to text about it” SUNDAY JANUARY 30, 2022 12:19 PM Kevin Albert to Brian Higgins (17:21) 12:52 PM Chief Ken Berkowitz to Brian Higgins (9:46) 1:06 PM Brian Albert to Chief Ken Berkowitz (16:46) Cell phone location data revealed that Jen McCabe spent roughly 45 minutes to an hour on January 30 at the private residence of Canton Police Lieutenant Michael Lank. Kerry Roberts and Lank’s wife were also allegedly present. TUESDAY FEBRUARY 1, 2022 In a family group chat involving Jen McCabe Matt McCabe Brian Albert Nicole Albert 12:51 PM Brian Albert “Julie said Channel 4 is in DE” 1:04 PM Matt McCabe “Ask Chris to ask some questions. Tell them the guy never went into the house.” 1:13 PM During Kerry Roberts’ formal interview with Proctor Jen McCabe texts “She is telling him EVERYTHING!!” 1:16 PM Matt McCabe “yep. If she pleads out, it will end. If she fights it, it will be an episode.” 1:34 p.m. Matt McCabe texts the group chat: "Troopers back out front, but in front of asian house. And looks like more has been dug up there or at least looks like it". 1:48 PM Berky calls Brian Albert for 8 min Viewed individually, any one text may be explained away. But when organized chronologically across multiple days alongside the known phone calls and investigative activity, people can better understand why these communications continue drawing scrutiny.

@DixieNormu95224 Hope you all get the right guy elected as DA.🙏

“The temperature overnight [Feb 4] had reached 45 degrees with heavy rains, which melted much of the snow.” - Lank Yet 30+ pieces took two more weeks to “reveal themselves” to Yuri and Proctor, while super cop/homeowner Brian Albert somehow missed them on his own front lawn.

@saniyafatma1278 Maybe you should buy the ring

@adamdeitch @GrantSmithEllis What about organized rides to the polls?

This campaign is powered by people across Norfolk County who want to restore faith and confidence in our District Attorney’s Office. Whether you want to knock on doors, make phone calls, host a meet and greet, put up a lawn sign, or stay updated with the campaign, we’d love to have you involved. Sign up here if you haven’t already! voteadamdeitch.com/getinvolved (link in bio)

@AlexisKat6 @DoctorTurtleboy … and JOK just stood there while watching and waiting for a 6000 lbs vehicle to clip his arm. Seriously?!?

@DoctorTurtleboy And something Yuri had already done (minus the cosplay and blue paint) almost 3 years prior.

ARCCA absolutely obliterated Jud Welcher, who billed the taxpayers $700 an hour to paint himself blue, and whose “findings” were not discussed by Hank Brennan in his closing. No rational person could entertain the fantasy that John Okeefes injuries came from a car collision, therefore Karen Read is not only not guilty, she is completely innocent. The ONLY other people who could’ve killed him were the people inside Brian Albert’s house. They deserve (past and present tense) to be questioned aggressively because John Okeefe deserves answers. Millions of people have called them murderers because ARCCA made it clear that they are the ONLY potential suspects.

@chikfromthebrix @benchslappedtv You wrong.

@benchslappedtv FEDs and independent Audit found no conspiracy, cover-up or corruption in the investigators or investigation besides, improper texts…PERIOD. Karen is the only one responsible for John’s death.

Nailed it! Karen Read’s opposition to Lt. Brian Tully’s motion to dismiss is essentially arguing that this was not merely a flawed investigation but a deliberately biased and constitutionally defective investigation that Tully either knowingly allowed to happen or recklessly failed to stop despite being the direct supervisory officer over Michael Proctor and Yuriy Bukhenik. The entire opposition is framed around the idea that Tully had an affirmative duty to ensure the investigation into John O’Keefe’s death was fair thorough and unbiased and instead allegedly permitted investigators to target Karen Read immediately while ignoring or suppressing evidence that may have pointed elsewhere. The filing repeatedly emphasizes the Rule 12(b)(6) standard which is important because at this stage the court is not deciding whether Karen Read can ultimately prove these allegations. The court is only deciding whether the allegations if accepted as true plausibly state a legal claim. The opposition leans heavily into that standard and argues that all reasonable inferences must be drawn in Read’s favor. The first major section addresses the Section 1983 malicious prosecution claim. Tully apparently argued that even if mistakes occurred the later actions of prosecutors magistrates and grand juries broke the chain of causation and insulated him from liability. Read’s opposition responds by relying heavily on Hernandez Cuevas v Taylor which makes clear that officers are not automatically shielded from constitutional liability simply because a grand jury indicted someone or a magistrate found probable cause. The First Circuit has recognized that officers may still be liable where they mislead prosecutors suppress exculpatory evidence or fabricate evidence leading to a prosecution. The opposition then lays out the factual allegations that supposedly support that theory. According to the complaint investigators immediately focused solely on Karen Read without seriously investigating anyone else connected to the Albert home. The filing alleges investigators intentionally failed to search the inside of the Albert residence failed to inspect the individuals inside for injuries consistent with a physical altercation failed to preserve phones and digital evidence and failed to secure the scene in a way that protected against contamination or destruction of evidence. The filing also alleges that investigators failed to properly investigate Brian Higgins despite the existence of communications between Higgins and Read and further alleges that surveillance footage involving Higgins at the Canton Police Department was suppressed. The opposition additionally advances the allegation that taillight evidence was planted after being obtained from Read’s impounded vehicle. The argument here is legally significant because Read’s team is attempting to fit the allegations squarely into established federal precedent involving fabricated evidence suppression of exculpatory evidence and unconstitutional pretrial seizure under the Fourth Amendment. They are not merely claiming incompetence. They are alleging intentional constitutional misconduct. The opposition next addresses Tully’s argument regarding so called group pleading. Tully apparently argued the complaint improperly lumps him together with Proctor and Bukhenik without specifying his own conduct. Read counters by arguing that where coordinated conduct among investigators and supervisors is plausible group allegations are permissible particularly where the individuals worked within the same chain of command. 🧵1/3