AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸

21.1K posts

AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸 banner
AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸

AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸

@JustAmyMcC

Homesteader. My 3 nonnegotiables: any abuse/neglect toward children, elderly, and animals. 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸#VaxInjured #VaxDisabledRN #ChristIsKing

Oregon, USA Katılım Nisan 2022
6.8K Takip Edilen6.9K Takipçiler
CDC
CDC@CDCgov·
A CDC study found 2 in 3 adults aged 45-49 had never been screened for colorectal cancer. If you're 45 or older, don’t wait—talk to your doctor about your colorectal cancer screening options today. bit.ly/3UP5Aah
CDC tweet media
English
4
11
32
13.3K
AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸
@Wrygryn I don’t say those words lightly and do double check that’s why I can say that. I’ve seen your work and know you don’t put out BS.
English
0
0
0
8
Steven Jerry Chapin
@JustAmyMcC Nope. Dont trust even me. Double check and if im wrong on anything, please tell me. I will own it, explain it, and appologize for it.
English
1
0
1
11
Steven Jerry Chapin
UNDERSTANDING “HEALTHIER OREGON” AND STATE FUNDED HEALTH CARE IN OREGON SUBJECT: This article will mostly be covering Medicaid (OHP) and Ed Diehls involvement to date. HB 3352 is a house bill passed by Democrats in 2021 that renamed “Health Care for All Oregon Children” to “Cover All People,” and extended low income free medical coverage (Medicaid/OHP) to all non-citizens including illegal immigrants. “Cover all People” later became “Healthier Oregon” and is sometimes referred to as “Healthier Oregon Program” or HOP. Oregon is one of only 6 states that have done this, and these “Medicaid-like” programs claim to only use state generated tax dollars to fund the healthcare for illegal immigrants. The term “illegal immigrants” is used specifically because while federal funding does have a few carve outs where it can be used, (IE—Refugees, emergency room visits made by illegal immigrants, etc) it mostly can’t be used to provide free healthcare to illegal immigrants. HB 3352 changed that and allowed illegal immigrants to receive free health care which is paid for by Oregon citizen tax dollars so long as they meet the requirements. Ed Diehl was not in politics in 2021 when bill HB 3352 passed, so he did not vote for it. (Ed wasn’t a state Rep until November 2022). Any claims saying Ed voted for this bill, are therefore incorrect. In January 2023, Ed Diehl and 5 other Republicans voted YES on HB 2010, which generates billions in federal matching funds for Oregon’s Medicaid program (OHP) and extends taxes that were due to sunset to pay for it. These taxes/assessments that Ed voted for help fund HB 3352 significantly. The way this is done is a bit of a shell game though, and it’s why Oregon and the 6 other states that have these programs are currently under investigation by the federal government. First, the fees are charged to the hospitals. That money is then used in a matching program where the federal government doesn’t just match the dollars, but often returns 3 times the cost of the fees. OHP takes roughly 65% of the revenue that is generated by the hospital fess in HB 2010, are keeps it. The remaining 35% or less is given back to hospitals. These fees are important to hospitals because they allow them to get paid whenever people are treated at the hospital but are unable to pay the hospital for its services. This is most notably seen when illegal immigrants use hospitals and then do not pay. Without these fees the hospitals would not get paid at all in these situations, and they would still be required, by law, to provide service to anyone who seeks emergency aid. The portion of the fees that hospitals pay is considered “State generated funds” and OHP keeps as much of this as they legally can—preferring to use the federal dollars to pay back the hospitals who paid the fees. These “state generated funds” and the remaining federal matching funds, can then be used by OHP to provide any of its qualifying services. Under HB 3352, the “state funds” can be used to pay for “Healthier Oregon” which provides free health care to illegal immigrants that qualify. In the recent gubernatorial debate David Medina asked Ed Diehl to explain his vote on HB 2010 and claimed that HB 2010 helped fund insurance for illegal immigrants and pay for transgender surgeries. Ed Diehl claimed this was a lie and went on to say: “…Medicaid cannot be used for illegal immigrants it’s against federal law…that bill has nothing to do with that, absolutely nothing. What that bill does is…it is a fee that hospitals pay…they give it to the state, the state uses that to draw down Medicaid dollars and all that money goes back to the hospitals, all that money goes back.” This is completely incorrect, and is the exact opposite of what is going on. As previously stated, over 65% of the money generated by these fees is kept by OHP and used for other things—hospitals only get 35% of the money back. Furthermore, the fees that Ed Diehl is describing above are one of the primary ways that OHP is funded in Oregon. Remember that hospitals are required to help anyone who shows up. This fact is used and abused by the illegal immigrant population to get free healthcare even if they are not registered to OHP’s Healthier Oregon Program. To keep them from going bankrupt, hospitals are reimbursed for the illegal immigrants and anyone else who uses their emergency services, and doesn’t pay. This further casts incredulity on Ed’s claim that the money doesn’t have anything to do with free health care for illegal immigrants, because they are the largest group that uses emergency care and doesn’t pay, and thus the largest group supported by these fees generated by HB 2010. Ed Diehl went on to say that: “You guys have a hospital here right, bay area hospital? Without that funding that hospital would not exist, it’s as simple as that.” This statement is disturbingly similar to what Governor Tina Kotek said when she forced HB 3991 (the gas tax) into law. Tina Kotek said: "if we don't pass the gas tax bill people would be fired and roads wouldn't get fixed." Ironically, when Tina Kotek tried that tactic, Ed responded by saying: "Governor Kotek is giving Oregonians a false choice: either hike the gas tax or cut road maintenance and lay off crews." Republican’s should not resort to Democrat scare tactics and false choices. Claiming hospitals would be closed if Ed didn’t sign HB 2010 is a false choice, and a scare tactic. As David Medina later pointed out in rebuttal, Ed could have pushed for changes to legislation to remove illegal immigrants from what OHP provides services to, instead of siding with Democrats to extend taxes and fund it. 15 Republican’s voted NO on HB 2010, while Ed Diehl and 5 other Republican’s supported this bill and sided with Democrats. Interestingly, Cyrus Javadi was one of the 5 who voted YES with Ed Diehl on this bill (Javadi is the infamous Republican traitor who not too long ago switched from Republican to Democrat). Democrats voted unanimously in favor of HB 2010. Voting no on HB 2010 would not have “shuttered all rural hospitals in Oregon” as some have claimed, it would have just forced Democrats to make cuts, offer compromises to Republicans, or maybe force Democrats to cut some of their DEI and social welfare programs (healthcare for illegal immigrants would have been a great choice to cut). Cutting illegal immigrants out of OHP would have saved Oregonians roughly 300-350 million dollars in annual expenses. HB 2010 will continue to help fund HB 3352 until the year 2032, and continues to attract illegal immigrants who want free health care—which exacerbates the problems of illegal immigrants showing up to hospitals, receiving service, and then not paying. Do you see how this cycle feeds itself? The more illegal immigrants that use hospitals and don’t pay, the more the Fed needs to reimburse hospitals, and the more money OHP generates and keeps. How does this all tie in with the recent Medicaid fraud claims from Dr. Oz and others? In November of 2025, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) publically came out and announced they were auditing the 6 states that have been giving out free healthcare to illegal immigrants. CMS asserted that states have been illegally using federal Medicaid dollars to pay for the state programs that provide benefits to illegal aliens (I.E. “Healthier Oregon Program (HOP)”). Since Federal Medicaid dollars can normally only be used to pay for US citizens or people legally here in the US, this would be illegal, and the Fed could demand those dollars be paid back. Oregon denies any wrong doing, but refuses to turn over records that could prove the federal government wrong in its accusations. CMS is currently suing them to get access to the records so they can determine for themselves whether or not federal funds were used correctly. Here is the tricky part though, many numbers get thrown around and people misquote them all the time. The problem is, CMS has not made any claims yet as to how much Oregon has or has not misused federal funds, and likely won’t for a while because the court case is ongoing. You may have heard the “1.25 to 1.35 billion” number being thrown around? That number specifically is referring to the projected biennium budget (2025-2027) for HOP (which is a subset of OHP). This is the two year budget that pays for non-citizens “free” health care, and works out to be 600-750 million dollars per year. Very little of what goes to pay this should be paid with Federal tax dollars, but there are some exceptions. Two examples of exceptions are: a person with “official refugee status” and “a non-citizen being admitted to a hospital for emergency care”. Until CMS concludes its investigation, we won’t know how much of these federal dollars were spent on legit things, and how much was spent illegally. You may have heard the “5.4 million dollar” number mentioned somewhere. The 5.4 million number isn’t Medicaid money being “clawed back”, it’s a negative grant award (fancy phrase for reduction in federal payments) tied to a federal notice in Sep. 2024 that is unrelated to this. The notice stems from a claim that Oregon misused some federal COVID dollars that were provided to Oregon during COVID. The “300 million” number floating around X is tricky because it could refer to several different things. The CMS Administrator (AKA—Dr. Oz) said he had already “clawed back 300 million” but he was referring to money that he got back from California specifically—this was not in reference to Oregon as he has not gotten any money back from Oregon yet. There’s also a “300 million” number that refers to the federal funded part of HOP’s budget. CMS claims that states are blending the two together to help pay for rising health care costs due to trying to support programs like HOP, but nothing concrete has been released yet. The final “300 million” number is actually “300-350 million” which is an estimate on what the State of Oregon spends every year on just illegal immigrants through “Healthier Oregon”. According to OHP’s web dashboard, 99,723 total non-citizens receive free health care from HOP (current as of 3/18/2026), but the breakdown that shows how many are legal and illegal isn’t available to the public. GROK estimates that roughly 80-90% of people using HOP are likely illegal immigrants, and the “300 million spent on illegal immigrants” lines up perfectly with that number—so likely it’s where it stems from. NOTE: the “300 million” number in the last example only matches up if you use the low end of GROK’s estimate which was 80%--the numbers come out significantly higher if you instead assume the top of the range, 90%. Did Ed Diehl vote for HB 2010 on purpose, or on accident? Ed is a strong proponent of only deporting illegal immigrants that are “violent criminals,” so it’s not unreasonable to wonder if Ed was trying to provide healthcare intentionally to illegal immigrants who are non-violent as he has no intention of deporting them—that is certainly what Democrats have been using it for. It’s more believable than the alternative—that he ignorantly voted in lock-step with Democrats and Cyrus Javadi (one of the 5 other “republicans” that voted YES on HB 2010), which is concerning since Ed is running for Governor. After all, Ed put his foot down with NOTAXOR, so why didn’t he do the same thing for HB 2010? The answer to this is simple; Ed doesn’t want to get rid of illegal aliens, just illegal aliens that are also violent criminals. Every single time he talks about or supports deportation it’s always only “violent criminals”. Ed appears to be just fine with non-violent illegal aliens staying here, and he voted to extend taxes that help pay for free healthcare for them. A simple search using AI or on X will verify these statements as fact, not opinion. HB 2010 was a Democrat bill designed to help them pay for HB 3352 which provided free healthcare to the illegal immigrants in Oregon that Democrats want to make into new voters. Ed Diehl has supported this endeavor by voting YES on HB 2010, just like traitor Javadi did. Ed either doesn’t know where the money goes or lied about it, but either way, it is funding healthcare for illegal immigrants, trans surgeries, and every other server OHP provides. Choose wisely Oregon, let legislator votes dictate how you view candidates, and who you pick to be your next Governor for Oregon.
English
5
5
13
319
Steven Jerry Chapin
@JustAmyMcC Lotta hours went into that. Lol. So hard to check and double check every fact. Super glad you liked it. It's people like you that clearly care, that I wrote it for.
English
1
0
1
14
Lindsay Maher
Lindsay Maher@MaherLinds87412·
What the heck @realDonaldTrump @SecKennedy @SusieWiles??? Why on earth are you not fighting this horrendous and easily winnable injunction???
Independent Medical Alliance@Honest_Medicine

🚨 Breaking News: Chairman Milhoan Confirms that ACIP Disbanded in Response to Federal Court Ruling; Sources Indicate Administration Opts to Reconstitute ACIP Rather Than Appeal IMA: “Big Pharma-Backed Medical Groups Use the Courts to Protect Industry Profits at the Expense of American Families” FULL STATEMENT: WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a national coalition representing more than 12,000 independent physicians and clinicians, today released the following statement after Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Chairman Milhoan (@KMilhoanMDPhD) confirmed to IMA that the panel has been disbanded. Sources also indicate that the Administration plans to reconstitute a new committee, rather than pursue a lengthy appeal of U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy's March 16 ruling that stayed the appointments of 13 ACIP members and nullified all committee votes taken since June 2025. “This is what happens when Big Pharma's business model is threatened. They lawyer up. A coalition of industry-funded organizations went judge-shopping and found a willing partner to shut down the first ACIP in decades that dared to ask hard questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, and the conflicts of interest that have plagued this process for years. As a physician and pathologist, I have spent my career following the evidence wherever it leads. The American people deserve a vaccine advisory committee that does the same, one free from industry capture, committed to rigorous science, and accountable to patients, not pharmaceutical balance sheets. The Administration's decision to reconstitute ACIP is the right move. We look forward to the appointment of a new committee that restores scientific integrity and puts the health of American families first.” – Dr. Ryan Cole (@DoctorCole), Head of Medical & Scientific Affairs, Independent Medical Alliance The judicial decision effectively canceled a critical ACIP meeting scheduled for March 18-19 that was to have included, for the first time in the committee's 62-year history, a formal discussion of vaccine injury, a subject the previous committee never meaningfully addressed. IMA Senior Fellow and ACIP Chairman Dr. Kirk Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist and one of the stayed ACIP members, was singled out by name in Judge Murphy's opinion, despite his direct clinical experience treating children with cardiac complications, including those following vaccination. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (@AmerAcadPeds) and six other medical organizations, groups with deep financial ties to vaccine manufacturers, that challenged Secretary Kennedy's (@SecKennedy) efforts to bring transparency, accountability, and genuine scientific independence to a committee long captured by pharmaceutical industry interests. Judge Murphy's 45-page opinion blocked the January 2026 revisions to the childhood immunization schedule, which had reduced routine recommendations from 17 diseases to 11 in alignment with European standards. The ruling also voided ACIP votes to remove the hepatitis B birth dose for low-risk infants, to transition COVID-19 vaccination to shared clinical decision-making, and to eliminate thimerosal from children's flu vaccines, all measures IMA physicians supported as evidence-based reforms. Who is Judge Murphy? • Overturned for "Rogue" Activism: In 2025, Judge Murphy attempted to block the Trump administration’s third-country deportation policy even after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay against his initial injunction. Even Justice Elena Kagan criticized Judge Murphy for his continued defiance of the Supreme Court stay, and the Solicitor General was forced to seek a rare clarification from the high court to stop his interference in executive branch authority. • Political Backing from "Pharma-Funded" Senators: Murphy was recommended for his position by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey. These senators have collectively received significant contributions from the "Pharmaceuticals/Health Products" industry, including nearly a quarter of a million dollars of campaign cash over the past several years. Critics argue this creates a "circular defense" where pharma-backed politicians appoint judges who then protect pharma-backed panels like the old ACIP. • A Career in "Pro-Crime" and Far-Left Advocacy: Before his appointment by Joe Biden in late 2024, Murphy spent his career as a public defender and criminal defense attorney, earning a reputation among members of Congress as a "far-left activist" with more sympathy for those who break the law than for the public interest. • Obstruction of the MAHA Mandate: Beyond vaccine policy, Murphy has issued a string of rulings designed to thwart the President’s agenda, including halting immigration enforcement and blocking the removal of funding from failing federal research programs. Who is the AAP and what motivated them to bring this lawsuit? • Big Pharma President’s Circle: The AAP lists among its largest donors the big pharma staples Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, and Sanofi, among others. Is it any surprise they’re pushing for more vaccines and more prescription drug use? • Defending the excessive vaccine schedule: While HHS sought to create a streamlined, evidence-based schedule of 11 essential vaccines, the AAP fought to preserve a bloated 18-disease shot regimen, including ongoing mandates for COVID-19 and Hepatitis B for newborns, ignoring cumulative safety data demanded by parents and independent scientists. • Promoting Transgender Irreversible Medical Interventions for Minors: The AAP remains a staunch advocate for what they deem "gender-affirming care," including the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for children. This stance ignores the growing international medical consensus and the concerns of traditional families regarding the long-term biological impact on minors. • Opposition to Choice and Religious Freedom: The AAP has doubled down on its demand to eliminate all non-medical vaccine exemptions for school attendance, effectively seeking to strip parents of their fundamental right to make healthcare decisions for their children based on their conscience or faith. • Fighting Transparency Initiatives: Rather than welcoming a "Data Pause" to verify safety signals and health outcomes, the AAP has used its massive lobbying apparatus to sue the federal government, attempting to block the very transparency that 80% of Americans now demand from health agencies. @RWMaloneMD @DrJBhattacharya

English
1
3
10
475
Seeds of hope 💖
Seeds of hope 💖@CChristensen125·
I finally got part of my garden bed chicken proofed and planted out, I'm so excited!!! 🥰 Honey pod peas, purple sprouting broccoli, garlic and a few silverbeet and lettuce. Just needs a sprinkle of chaos carrots 🥕💖
Seeds of hope 💖 tweet media
English
3
0
17
59
AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸
Oregonians don’t want ANY DIEHLS’s.
Steven Jerry Chapin@Wrygryn

UNDERSTANDING “HEALTHIER OREGON” AND STATE FUNDED HEALTH CARE IN OREGON SUBJECT: This article will mostly be covering Medicaid (OHP) and Ed Diehls involvement to date. HB 3352 is a house bill passed by Democrats in 2021 that renamed “Health Care for All Oregon Children” to “Cover All People,” and extended low income free medical coverage (Medicaid/OHP) to all non-citizens including illegal immigrants. “Cover all People” later became “Healthier Oregon” and is sometimes referred to as “Healthier Oregon Program” or HOP. Oregon is one of only 6 states that have done this, and these “Medicaid-like” programs claim to only use state generated tax dollars to fund the healthcare for illegal immigrants. The term “illegal immigrants” is used specifically because while federal funding does have a few carve outs where it can be used, (IE—Refugees, emergency room visits made by illegal immigrants, etc) it mostly can’t be used to provide free healthcare to illegal immigrants. HB 3352 changed that and allowed illegal immigrants to receive free health care which is paid for by Oregon citizen tax dollars so long as they meet the requirements. Ed Diehl was not in politics in 2021 when bill HB 3352 passed, so he did not vote for it. (Ed wasn’t a state Rep until November 2022). Any claims saying Ed voted for this bill, are therefore incorrect. In January 2023, Ed Diehl and 5 other Republicans voted YES on HB 2010, which generates billions in federal matching funds for Oregon’s Medicaid program (OHP) and extends taxes that were due to sunset to pay for it. These taxes/assessments that Ed voted for help fund HB 3352 significantly. The way this is done is a bit of a shell game though, and it’s why Oregon and the 6 other states that have these programs are currently under investigation by the federal government. First, the fees are charged to the hospitals. That money is then used in a matching program where the federal government doesn’t just match the dollars, but often returns 3 times the cost of the fees. OHP takes roughly 65% of the revenue that is generated by the hospital fess in HB 2010, are keeps it. The remaining 35% or less is given back to hospitals. These fees are important to hospitals because they allow them to get paid whenever people are treated at the hospital but are unable to pay the hospital for its services. This is most notably seen when illegal immigrants use hospitals and then do not pay. Without these fees the hospitals would not get paid at all in these situations, and they would still be required, by law, to provide service to anyone who seeks emergency aid. The portion of the fees that hospitals pay is considered “State generated funds” and OHP keeps as much of this as they legally can—preferring to use the federal dollars to pay back the hospitals who paid the fees. These “state generated funds” and the remaining federal matching funds, can then be used by OHP to provide any of its qualifying services. Under HB 3352, the “state funds” can be used to pay for “Healthier Oregon” which provides free health care to illegal immigrants that qualify. In the recent gubernatorial debate David Medina asked Ed Diehl to explain his vote on HB 2010 and claimed that HB 2010 helped fund insurance for illegal immigrants and pay for transgender surgeries. Ed Diehl claimed this was a lie and went on to say: “…Medicaid cannot be used for illegal immigrants it’s against federal law…that bill has nothing to do with that, absolutely nothing. What that bill does is…it is a fee that hospitals pay…they give it to the state, the state uses that to draw down Medicaid dollars and all that money goes back to the hospitals, all that money goes back.” This is completely incorrect, and is the exact opposite of what is going on. As previously stated, over 65% of the money generated by these fees is kept by OHP and used for other things—hospitals only get 35% of the money back. Furthermore, the fees that Ed Diehl is describing above are one of the primary ways that OHP is funded in Oregon. Remember that hospitals are required to help anyone who shows up. This fact is used and abused by the illegal immigrant population to get free healthcare even if they are not registered to OHP’s Healthier Oregon Program. To keep them from going bankrupt, hospitals are reimbursed for the illegal immigrants and anyone else who uses their emergency services, and doesn’t pay. This further casts incredulity on Ed’s claim that the money doesn’t have anything to do with free health care for illegal immigrants, because they are the largest group that uses emergency care and doesn’t pay, and thus the largest group supported by these fees generated by HB 2010. Ed Diehl went on to say that: “You guys have a hospital here right, bay area hospital? Without that funding that hospital would not exist, it’s as simple as that.” This statement is disturbingly similar to what Governor Tina Kotek said when she forced HB 3991 (the gas tax) into law. Tina Kotek said: "if we don't pass the gas tax bill people would be fired and roads wouldn't get fixed." Ironically, when Tina Kotek tried that tactic, Ed responded by saying: "Governor Kotek is giving Oregonians a false choice: either hike the gas tax or cut road maintenance and lay off crews." Republican’s should not resort to Democrat scare tactics and false choices. Claiming hospitals would be closed if Ed didn’t sign HB 2010 is a false choice, and a scare tactic. As David Medina later pointed out in rebuttal, Ed could have pushed for changes to legislation to remove illegal immigrants from what OHP provides services to, instead of siding with Democrats to extend taxes and fund it. 15 Republican’s voted NO on HB 2010, while Ed Diehl and 5 other Republican’s supported this bill and sided with Democrats. Interestingly, Cyrus Javadi was one of the 5 who voted YES with Ed Diehl on this bill (Javadi is the infamous Republican traitor who not too long ago switched from Republican to Democrat). Democrats voted unanimously in favor of HB 2010. Voting no on HB 2010 would not have “shuttered all rural hospitals in Oregon” as some have claimed, it would have just forced Democrats to make cuts, offer compromises to Republicans, or maybe force Democrats to cut some of their DEI and social welfare programs (healthcare for illegal immigrants would have been a great choice to cut). Cutting illegal immigrants out of OHP would have saved Oregonians roughly 300-350 million dollars in annual expenses. HB 2010 will continue to help fund HB 3352 until the year 2032, and continues to attract illegal immigrants who want free health care—which exacerbates the problems of illegal immigrants showing up to hospitals, receiving service, and then not paying. Do you see how this cycle feeds itself? The more illegal immigrants that use hospitals and don’t pay, the more the Fed needs to reimburse hospitals, and the more money OHP generates and keeps. How does this all tie in with the recent Medicaid fraud claims from Dr. Oz and others? In November of 2025, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) publically came out and announced they were auditing the 6 states that have been giving out free healthcare to illegal immigrants. CMS asserted that states have been illegally using federal Medicaid dollars to pay for the state programs that provide benefits to illegal aliens (I.E. “Healthier Oregon Program (HOP)”). Since Federal Medicaid dollars can normally only be used to pay for US citizens or people legally here in the US, this would be illegal, and the Fed could demand those dollars be paid back. Oregon denies any wrong doing, but refuses to turn over records that could prove the federal government wrong in its accusations. CMS is currently suing them to get access to the records so they can determine for themselves whether or not federal funds were used correctly. Here is the tricky part though, many numbers get thrown around and people misquote them all the time. The problem is, CMS has not made any claims yet as to how much Oregon has or has not misused federal funds, and likely won’t for a while because the court case is ongoing. You may have heard the “1.25 to 1.35 billion” number being thrown around? That number specifically is referring to the projected biennium budget (2025-2027) for HOP (which is a subset of OHP). This is the two year budget that pays for non-citizens “free” health care, and works out to be 600-750 million dollars per year. Very little of what goes to pay this should be paid with Federal tax dollars, but there are some exceptions. Two examples of exceptions are: a person with “official refugee status” and “a non-citizen being admitted to a hospital for emergency care”. Until CMS concludes its investigation, we won’t know how much of these federal dollars were spent on legit things, and how much was spent illegally. You may have heard the “5.4 million dollar” number mentioned somewhere. The 5.4 million number isn’t Medicaid money being “clawed back”, it’s a negative grant award (fancy phrase for reduction in federal payments) tied to a federal notice in Sep. 2024 that is unrelated to this. The notice stems from a claim that Oregon misused some federal COVID dollars that were provided to Oregon during COVID. The “300 million” number floating around X is tricky because it could refer to several different things. The CMS Administrator (AKA—Dr. Oz) said he had already “clawed back 300 million” but he was referring to money that he got back from California specifically—this was not in reference to Oregon as he has not gotten any money back from Oregon yet. There’s also a “300 million” number that refers to the federal funded part of HOP’s budget. CMS claims that states are blending the two together to help pay for rising health care costs due to trying to support programs like HOP, but nothing concrete has been released yet. The final “300 million” number is actually “300-350 million” which is an estimate on what the State of Oregon spends every year on just illegal immigrants through “Healthier Oregon”. According to OHP’s web dashboard, 99,723 total non-citizens receive free health care from HOP (current as of 3/18/2026), but the breakdown that shows how many are legal and illegal isn’t available to the public. GROK estimates that roughly 80-90% of people using HOP are likely illegal immigrants, and the “300 million spent on illegal immigrants” lines up perfectly with that number—so likely it’s where it stems from. NOTE: the “300 million” number in the last example only matches up if you use the low end of GROK’s estimate which was 80%--the numbers come out significantly higher if you instead assume the top of the range, 90%. Did Ed Diehl vote for HB 2010 on purpose, or on accident? Ed is a strong proponent of only deporting illegal immigrants that are “violent criminals,” so it’s not unreasonable to wonder if Ed was trying to provide healthcare intentionally to illegal immigrants who are non-violent as he has no intention of deporting them—that is certainly what Democrats have been using it for. It’s more believable than the alternative—that he ignorantly voted in lock-step with Democrats and Cyrus Javadi (one of the 5 other “republicans” that voted YES on HB 2010), which is concerning since Ed is running for Governor. After all, Ed put his foot down with NOTAXOR, so why didn’t he do the same thing for HB 2010? The answer to this is simple; Ed doesn’t want to get rid of illegal aliens, just illegal aliens that are also violent criminals. Every single time he talks about or supports deportation it’s always only “violent criminals”. Ed appears to be just fine with non-violent illegal aliens staying here, and he voted to extend taxes that help pay for free healthcare for them. A simple search using AI or on X will verify these statements as fact, not opinion. HB 2010 was a Democrat bill designed to help them pay for HB 3352 which provided free healthcare to the illegal immigrants in Oregon that Democrats want to make into new voters. Ed Diehl has supported this endeavor by voting YES on HB 2010, just like traitor Javadi did. Ed either doesn’t know where the money goes or lied about it, but either way, it is funding healthcare for illegal immigrants, trans surgeries, and every other server OHP provides. Choose wisely Oregon, let legislator votes dictate how you view candidates, and who you pick to be your next Governor for Oregon.

English
0
1
4
84
A Line
A Line@ALine569919·
Federal Judge Brian Edward Murphy’s shut down ACIP for now as the aap.org is sponsored by these organizations. Can anyone figure this out, @SecKennedy?
A Line tweet media
English
2
5
10
1.7K
Corey
Corey@Corey0815850641·
@JustAmyMcC @Real_EdDiehl Yup! I want a tax break. I want Oregon to get a tax break. I want Oregon to be successful. I want to Make Oregon Great Again 😏
English
1
0
1
17
American Rogue
American Rogue@AmericanRogue_1·
Is he even in America Legally?
JoForOregon@JoforOregon

What the hell is @TinaKotek mouthing? This Somali cosplaying an American was part of the "special" committee who ramrodded Kotek's ODOT tax bill through to get it on the May ballot. It's abundantly clear she used him. And, it's abundantly clear she has her hand up his *ss as a puppeteer in this clip. Oregon's politicians are nothing but corrupt and abusers of us hardworking, LEGAL taxpayers. .@GovTinaKotek

English
1
0
1
5
AMY 🇺🇸🙏🏼🇺🇸
@PeggiBosquez I used to prefer chicken to beef UNTIL I found a local farm to get my beef. Now we rarely eat chicken and get our beef boxes. I even eat steak now which I never would before.
English
0
0
1
18
Peggi
Peggi@PeggiBosquez·
People love my ground beef. Just got a random call to buy some.. the trick for me is to not sell so much that we run out again. You never realize how much you love ground beef until you don't have it. Sigh..
English
7
4
78
709
Michaela Marie
Michaela Marie@Michaela_1776·
Omg... finally. She's an insufferable RINO. That's being nice. 😊❤️
David Medina For Governor 🌲🇺🇸@davidmedinapdx

@pederson_angela Angela, you have to be the most dishonest person in Oregon politics. You constantly spread lies about me because I’m a threat to your establishment republicans. I encourage people to go watch this. They’ll see how dishonest you are. Do better.

English
1
2
10
191