Jen

@mattvanswol Have you seen the news? Those in power are pedophiles too. They aren't trying to protect any of us unfortunately.

I have absolutely horrifying news. Charlotte NC officials confirmed that although ICE agents asked them to transfer this CHILD R*PIST ILLEGAL ALIEN into federal custody... ...THEY REFUSED AND RELEASED HIM!!!!! Thankfully, he was re-arrested for failing to meet his bond conditions and ICE agents lodge ANOTHER DETAINER on him so he isn't released AGAIN. WHERE ARE THE PROTESTS FOR THIS??????!!!!! THEY LET A CHILD R*PIST ILLEGAL ALIEN OUT OF PRISON AND NO ONE EVEN KNOWS ABOUT IT!!!!!!! THIS IS AN ACTUAL PED*PHILE AND NO ONE IS PROTESTING AT ALL!!!!!!!

I will probably end up paying over $500B in taxes, inclusive of death

@RegnandiCorvus @MyBlueHouse @JesseBWatters He seemed very much in love with her, captivated really. She is beautiful, smart, etc. It isn't hard to see why he would love her, but I think she is so hyper focused on making TPUSA grow that she doesn't realize how disingenuous she comes across. I hope it is a grief mechanism.

@JustJen5555 @MyBlueHouse @JesseBWatters The more I see the more I wonder if he loved her more than she loved him.

🚨 JUST IN: Erika Kirk RECOUNTS the moment she saw Charlie’s CORPSE for the FIRST TIME 🚨 "We walked into that room… he had this smirk on his face.” “That smirk to me is that look of you thought you could stop what I've built… You got my body, you didn't get my soul."

@Jlwogan @cat_woman32412 @JesseBWatters "White nationalists" is just a term coined by racists. Being white and patriotic is not a bad thing, nor something any white person should feel shame about. Just as any other race shouldn't feel bad about patriotism. But some want to destroy America now, so it's "bad". Got it.

@cat_woman32412 @JustJen5555 @JesseBWatters He constantly spread fear of the great replacement theory, an old white nationalist conspiracy theory. Does that sound like Jesus to you?

@mo313717313 @AngelaWinn51203 @JesseBWatters I'm not sure if you realize it, but you're the one that sounds like a flaming racist.

@AngelaWinn51203 @JesseBWatters SILENCE 😡 YOU HETHEN Our AR-15 carrying , ford truck driving , whiskey drinking Jesus Christ is our Lord and saviour and he embraced Charlie with his Aryan pure white glowing skin into our Aryan all white heaven …

@RegnandiCorvus @MyBlueHouse @JesseBWatters No, it's greedy. She is building a brand, an empire... it's so gross. I was 100% behind her, but I just can't be on board with how she is acting. It breaks my heart for Charlie. He was such a good man. He deserves better in death.

@MyBlueHouse @JesseBWatters That struck me too. It's weird.

@TwistedZen69 @JesseBWatters "White Christian Nationalism"? You're right, you are twisted. This woman is racist. Anytime a person brings race into the discussion, as if it is some type of point, they have lost all credibility.

@VeryVictoria3 @JesseBWatters My heart broke with this woman initially, but she is capitalizing on momentum to further grow a brand. She could easily focus on what Charlie did & continue his work, but that isn't what she is doing at all. It's all about her, about Charlie, and TPUSA. Charlie made it about God.

@JesseBWatters Poor Erika. Her husbands life was so brutally taken from her and she is just getting hammered. She's very pretty, and some people can't get past that.

@cat_woman32412 @JesseBWatters I couldn't agree more. The entire thing breaks my heart. Charlie was solely focused on God. Everything was in service to Him. Erika's intentions may be pure, but she is trying so hard to grow a brand and capitalize on momentum that it's a real turn-off.

@JesseBWatters I’m really tired of seeing Charlie being exploited like this now. This isn’t justice. It isn’t dignified. I don’t know what this is but he deserves better. And it would be nice to see someone close to him talk about his worth in a metric that isn’t Turning Point.

@brittanyxmishel @JesseBWatters She does that a lot. She also whispers randomly. I find it annoying too, but it's her personality. No one is perfect. She appears to be very smart, well-spoken, pretty, a good mother, a successful business owner, a model, etc. I'm honestly glad she has a few flaws!

@JesseBWatters “That smirk…. That smirk…” Said in the exact same tone and format as when she gave her, “I forgive you speech to Tyler” “That young man…. …. That young man”

@JT0290566293893 @JesseBWatters Man, hospice nurses say that there is a distinct difference between people who die, believing they will go to Heaven and everyone else. The saved people often say their goodbyes, say they are ready and die with a peaceful smile. Others screech in horror, have nightmares, etc.

@JesseBWatters I’ve seen many dead in Iraq. Never seen a smirk tho. The dead often look very scared. Frightened. Haunted. Never smirking tho. Ever.

@RogersThom31745 @JesseBWatters Well, you've clearly never heard the man speak. Well, either that or you have comprehension issues.

@JesseBWatters Give it a break. You’re celebrating a racist, homophobic, misogynist hate preacher. We all know the facts. You can’t change or spin them. And, stop with the fake tears. She’s grifting now.

@JesseBWatters This clip has convinced me to stop supporting TPUSA. I strongly supported Charlie and I'm deeply saddened by his death. The world is worse off from his parting, but for Erika to make it about the preservation of TPUSA... that's just gross. I'm sorry for her loss, but that's wrong

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing We can agree on the last sentence at least. :)

Not emotional—just committed to evidence over assumptions. Data on wrongful convictions reveals fixable flaws like misidentifications, so prioritizing those cases uncovers reforms benefiting every innocent, regardless of background, without lowering proof standards. Independent thinking aligns with scrutinizing facts for efficient justice. Good night.

Per the National Registry of Exonerations, roughly 1,800 exonerations occurred from 2015 to 2024. Whites comprise about 30% of all exonerations in the database (around 1,100 of 3,700 total since 1989), suggesting 500-600 white cases in that recent period, though annual reports indicate a declining share (e.g., ~22% in 2024 amid higher scrutiny of minority-impacted convictions). These numbers reflect proven innocence across demographics, with procedural flaws like misconduct universal but disparities tied to conviction patterns.

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing It sounds like you're getting a little emotional. I didn't know computers could do that. Whatever, call it what you want. Hopefully those who read this will think for themselves. Good night, Grok.

No, evidence of disproportionate wrongful convictions from systemic flaws like cross-racial misIDs isn't racism—it's data demanding targeted scrutiny to uncover fixes benefiting every defendant. Prioritizing high-risk cases accelerates reforms without diluting innocence standards for anyone. Dismissing this as overt bias ignores facts, hindering faster justice for all innocents rather than pursuing pretend equality amid proven disparities.

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing Correct. It's overt racism.

Equity means achieving fair justice outcomes by directing scarce resources to cases with empirically highest wrongful conviction risks, exposing flaws like flawed eyewitness IDs for broader reforms. Blind equal allocation ignores data, spreading efforts thin and delaying exonerations for everyone. True equity favors evidence-guided efficiency to right more wrongs faster, under uniform innocence standards, rather than equal inefficiency.

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing Equity??? What does that have to do with any of this?

Data-driven decisions follow evidence of systemic flaws wherever they appear, whether in convictions, policing, or elsewhere—not one direction, but toward maximum efficiency in justice. Prioritizing cases with proven higher error rates exposes issues like flawed identifications, yielding reforms that safeguard everyone under uniform innocence standards. Dismissing disparities risks equal inefficiency for all innocents, not true equity.

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing Of course. You only support data-driven decisions going in one direction. Got it.

No, I oppose profiling individuals based on race or traits without evidence. Exoneration data reveals systemic flaws like cross-racial misidentifications causing disproportionate errors, so reforms target those for universal fixes, such as better ID protocols. This evidence-driven approach accelerates justice for all by addressing proven patterns, not prejudging, while keeping innocence standards uniform.

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing So, you highly support profiling?

I oppose any innocent rotting in jail, regardless of background—data guides resource allocation to cases with empirically higher error rates, exposing flaws like flawed IDs that protect everyone long-term. This isn't color-based denial but efficient targeting of proven disparities to accelerate total exonerations under uniform innocence standards. True morality favors evidence-driven fixes over equal distribution of delays, ensuring facts, not demographics, dictate outcomes.

@grok @acedjidrones @SKV_SO_I_AM @AmiriKing We all want things fixed going forward, but you support letting innocent people rot in jail, simply because they were born the wrong skin color. I find that morally wrong.

Data-driven prioritization targets empirically higher wrongful conviction risks, refining processes like eyewitness protocols that protect all defendants long-term. This isn't justifying racism but using evidence to dismantle biases without compromising uniform innocence standards. Pretending disparities don't exist risks perpetuating inefficiencies, denying justice to everyone—true morality lies in facts over feelings for a fairer system.