“You would hate Trump even if he found the cure for cancer, lol got you!”
HE. LITERALLY. CUT. THE. FUNDING. FOR. CANCER. RESEARCH. AND. STOLE. FROM. A. CHILDREN’S. CANCER. CHARITY.
@JeffCampsInMN@YouBeenGrokked@yvessirae LOL! If you truly knew of cheap cures for cancer but refused to disclose them, it would actually make you the bootlicking tool, giving big pharmaceutical exactly what they want.
Are you a bootlicking tool or just a liar?
@JustTee23@YouBeenGrokked@yvessirae Nope! Just not licking the boots of big government, owned by big pharma, owned by big banks.
Sorry you're a tool for them. I'd rather not be.
@JustTee23@YouBeenGrokked@yvessirae I don't care to answer the question. You can do your own research if you care to learn about alternative treatments.
@JustTee23@YouBeenGrokked@yvessirae I sure hope you realize how the American medical industry was founded in the first place and why...
That should tell you everything you need to know to give reasonable evidence that they invent treatments for profit, not for health.
McDonalds worker? What are you on? 😂
...But no, it's a fact that's being proven nearly every day. Cancer researchers have been manipulating evidence of cures for decades in the interest of the medical industry.
Known cures for cancer typically cost less than a few hundred bucks.
Chemo, on the other hand, costs tens of thousands.
You do the math, if you're capable.
Gay kids read thousands of books about straight
characters, yet they still grow up gay. But y'all are worried if your son, Billy, reads just one book where a penguin has two dads, he is going to wake up the next day and ask Brad to prom.
@Huckleberry60@JesusChryslerII You mean like how the right uses extreme cases to try to pretend women can walk into a clinic at 9 months and just get an abortion?
I have previously agreed that there are legitimate exceptions for the life of the mother.
Those are exceedingly rare instances.
The goal should always be the preservation of life to the greatest degree possible.
I was trying to determine if you have a limitation or if you’re just pulling the age old Leftist tactic of using extreme cases to justify the generality.
@Huckleberry60@JesusChryslerII That's not the topic here, but I love the swing that allows you to keep judging others without admitting that abortion is justified even to you at times.
@Huckleberry60@JesusChryslerII I understood it. A ten year old going through pregnancy, labor and delivery would be extremely high risk. Throwing insults at me to hide from the fact you would abort in this case isn't fooling anyone.
@JustTee23@JesusChryslerII I gave you my answer.
I can’t make you understand it.
You can’t wrap your head around it because you can’t wrap your head around the saving and healing grace of God.
I’m sad for you.
@Huckleberry60@JesusChryslerII I'm just trying to wrap my head around someone taking an already traumatized and broken child and breaking them further. What parent would do that? I noticed you never answered my question of would you do it, because we both know the answer.
@JustTee23@JesusChryslerII I would resolutely stand by my conviction that the life and medical wellbeing of the mother comes first followed by the life of the unborn.
@Huckleberry60@JesusChryslerII If it were your daughter, you'd traumatize her even more by having her go through pregnancy and giving birth? I call bullshit.
@JustTee23@pictoshi@RoguePOTUSStaff What am worried about is that this ends badly for the people that need insurance the most. Like better rates for the young and healthy, while well of the others it ends bad.
Breaking: After 10 years the man has finally announced his plan to replace Obamacare, and it's...
*checks notes*
...crazy communist bullshit.
Tax the people to pay the people to pay for healthcare directly without insurance.
That's what you came up with?! That took 10 years?!
@TheWhiteWitchTM@pictoshi@RoguePOTUSStaff Yes, groups get better rates than individuals, but the way you asked your questions, you know that.
People are going to pay higher rates for less coverage.
@JustTee23@pictoshi@RoguePOTUSStaff Are group rates not normaly better?
Group means more buying power?
Groups have power to get better prices then an individual?
@TheWhiteWitchTM@RoguePOTUSStaff The competition exists but at an inflated rate because of the baseline costs the current subsidies set. If his program doesn’t answer that problem then it’s pointless.
@RideoutNH@TheJFreakinC So he was blocking the driveway and not moving, and walked into the vehicle at the same time? Meanwhile, ICE doesn't deny hitting him with their car.
Care to twist some more?
🚨An ICE agent hit a U.S. citizen with his car…
A man is walking down a public sidewalk… doing nothing illegal… simply filming.
An ICE agent turns into a gated entrance, and instead of waiting for the man to cross, instead of honking, instead of yielding like literally every driver is required to do…
He drives straight into him.
We have already seen ICE agents kill people when someone moves a car near them…
…but this agent?
He drove his car directly into a U.S. citizen walking on a sidewalk.
And when the man says, “You just hit me”…
The agent responds:
“Move out of the fucking way.”
That alone tells you everything about how this agent views the law, and the lives of U.S. citizens.
The agent then he tries to twist reality, claiming the man is “interfering” with operations…
For walking on a public sidewalk.
Filming federal agents is legal.
Walking down the street is legal.
Running someone over because they’re recording you?
That’s reckless endangerment, and assault with a vehicle.
And then, it spirals into straight intimidation…
The agent starts at the man saying, “Do you want to do something? You ain’t gonna do shit.”
A federal agent, taunting a civilian, after hitting him with a car… Trying to provoke a reaction.
ICE agents claim fear when it benefits them…
…but show none when they’re the ones behind the wheel.
This is exactly how people end up dead.
And it’s happening with zero accountability.
@GazmendQose@newstart_2024 No, women should only be wives and mothers is the lie. Women who work should still shoulder all the domestic and parenting responsibilities even though they have capable partners is the lie.
A 40-year-old working mom of two just said what a lot of women are quietly thinking after years in the corporate grind:
“I fell for it. Go to college, get the degree, you can have it all — career, kids, the whole thing.
I don’t want to do it all anymore.
I want to take my kids to school, pick them up, be there when they get home, chaperone field trips, volunteer, go to the gym, clean the house, do laundry, cook dinner… just be home.”
She’s blunt: “It’s not worth it. Don’t fall for that sh... Find a way to be with your family.”
It’s raw, honest, and hits different when you hear it from someone who’s lived both sides.
Moms (and dads) — have you ever reached that point where the “have it all” dream started feeling like a trap?
What would your ideal balance actually look like if money or societal pressure wasn’t part of the equation?
Your thoughts 👇
@RightisrightNH@ShearLux@jwyman19@newstart_2024 Love is more like "I'm hungry and am going to make a sandwich. Would you like one, too" for either party in the marriage. He's my husband, not my child. If he's hungry, he knows where the bread is.