justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)

3. My truth twitter.com/JustUnderReal/…

@gdoughdoc2 @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @SecularSmurfAU @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair Not surprised. "different methods" is something I would expect to hear from an exploratory surgeon trying to remove a tumor on your spinal cord. Not something as - I would expect - trivial as a post. But yeah... they should have reimbursed you.

@JustUnderReal @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @SecularSmurfAU @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair Per me, not them. I told her she could go to another dentist. She hasn’t for two years.

Patrick's Thread 2.0 DON'T REPLY YET @OddBackgrowy @ChurchOAtheism @JustUnderReal @randomizer88996 @mirandaisrisen @StillDizzy2 @Emperor_Mollari @FiendInno @MichelleWth6 @MichaelSteidel @TW175663056 @NHoomans @dirk_fasshauer @MindfulDamage @BrianNazarenus @A_Damned_mk2

@gdoughdoc2 @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @SecularSmurfAU @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair That's very weird. Did they ever give a reason? I expect not, but that seems every ridiculous.

@JustUnderReal @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @SecularSmurfAU @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair She went to get a post taken out that was put in when they tried to do an implant, but found she shouldn’t have implants. I kept taking her for procedures. I asked her what it was like without the post. “They didn’t take out the post. Every time they end up just stopping.” Huh?

@SecularSmurfAU @gdoughdoc2 @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair something seems wrong here. I can't quite put my finger on it though.

@JustUnderReal @gdoughdoc2 @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair 👀

@gdoughdoc2 @mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @SecularSmurfAU @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair Hey! You unblocked me. Thanks! But yeah... the medical field (like so many other non-elastic markets) don't really care about justifying much. They just charge based on an algorithm regardless of how much it actually cost Supply cost can be infinite when the demand is infinite

@mirandaisrisen @MichelleWth6 @internatio50589 @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @StillDizzy2 @FredHikes @SecularSmurfAU @JustUnderReal @Simultanagnosia @HarveyWall15 @PatricktheB @Wolfpak561 @A_Damned_mk2 @TW175663056 @BabeTruth2 @JUReality @NHoomans @ChurchOAtheism @MucusMucous1 @harper_pau55997 @MindfulDamage @OpenlyReasoned @FiendInno @ahrehead @dirk_fasshauer @willsworldview @toxicmalestuff @Janetb172 @KenWali1 @Jasontwodollars @Akinyemisback @Raven4212 @PaulStetson13 @HatMcGlasses @JesusGibb @hardtohandle504 @Emperor_Mollari @MichaelSteidel @BrianNazarenus @IHateGod427 @OnkelOnkel666 @RossGilroy @TJMair I spent 75 grand in my wife’s teeth. I swear they didn’t do anything. They’re like used car salesmen. I went in and asked them what they did and really, they couldn’t justify anything. I just live with broken teeth in pain.

@mirandaisrisen @JamieBonkiewicz Hot take: we are all gay if the right person comes along 😉

@JamieBonkiewicz i tried sooo hard to be a lesbian after my last ex. if Paget Brewster was available, i think it might have worked.

I know sexuality isn’t a choice because I’m still attracted to men

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 Can you show any trustworthy 3rd party source that will say that? Like... will say word for word "scientific theorems are facts"? Everywhere I look either strays away from that language or gives a definitive "no, they are trustworthy claims based on evidence, but not fact"

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 There have been theorems where errors were found in the proofs but proven theorems are facts.

Atheism is illogical and doesn't make any rational sense.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 Would you like me to bring in some trusted 3rd party articles that agree with me?

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 More than trusted. Again, I think you need to study up more on them.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 You did, but - as I showed - they were only conditional certainties. I've heard all these views before, just an FYI.

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 But I gave you certainties like you asked for.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 theorems aren't facts though. theorems have been incorrect in the past, and they will be again. Sure they are trusted. And for good reason. But that's not what we are talking about.

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 No, not true specially with this one. Maybe for some edge cases but there is a reason the proofs get accepted and becomes theorems.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 Assuming the axioms is the correct application. But that's assuming again. There is always the possibility that the "correct" axioms haven't been identified yet. Safest assumption IMO is that they haven't... so we keep testing.

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 It works for the corrected applications. Again, we get into knowing the correct applications of usage but we know.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 It's repeatedly stood against being disproven. How do you prove a theory using deduction when you're only comparing it against other things?

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 Not an assumption with what we know. Repeatedly been proven.

@hammerjogger @godsfavoriteant @Truth_matters20 You think logic is optional too. Otherwise you wouldn't worship a zombie.

@JustUnderReal @godsfavoriteant @Truth_matters20 I made a metaphysical claim and even pointed out all your contradictions to which you have no answer other than further accepting them as brute facts as if that makes rational sense. You’re right. I cannot change your mind as you think logic is literally optional.

@hammerjogger @godsfavoriteant @Truth_matters20 I don't need answers. "I don't know" is a better answer than "my impossible God did it", and I have a better guess than "I don't know".

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 And I don't disagree with this. I think you might think I'm trying to discount science, but I don't think I'm doing that. It doesn't give us truth, but it is the best we have.

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 That’s why I also said scientific research generally just creates more questions because we want to know more.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 Right. And it can only show which hypothesis / counter-hypothesis is faulty. Not necessarily which one is correct. Right?

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 Yes, there can always be gaps in knowledge. That’s why scientific studies are pretty narrowly tailored to only answer a limited set of questions and are even then can still have limitations to the application of their answers.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 This only works if the 5th postulate (parallel lines) is correct. In non Euclidean spaces, this isn't true. On a small enough scale, things are "flat" so it works out practically, but even math makes assumption. 2/2

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 Well many of those are based on standing models (mostly the atomic model) which APPEARS to be true, and IF that's true than the rest are. But that's an assumption. As for the Pythagorean Theroem, this is a perfect example... 1/2

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 IMO there will always be gaps in the knowledge. And to me that means that the knowledge we have isn't true. Would you consider that semantics?

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 Well, not prove everything but a lot. It depends on the available science and ability to collect quantifiable data. Up until the late 1800s we thought the atom was the smallest indivisible unit of matter until we found a way with new science to view and prove subatomic particles.

@FedUpRetMarine @Truth_matters20 Yeah! This is my point! I love science because it shows how much we don't know! Just so your aware, I have justification for thinking what I do. We can go into that if you want just so you know I'm not trolling you.

@JustUnderReal @Truth_matters20 Oh we are. Generally any research actually causes even more questions. As we learn more and get exposed to more we ask even more questions.

@hammerjogger @godsfavoriteant @Truth_matters20 You made a faith based claim that is unconvincing. Do you think I'm trying to change your mind? I know I can't do that. You could change mine by making God make sense, but just as sure as you are that it's real, I'm sure that it's not.

@JustUnderReal @godsfavoriteant @Truth_matters20 I’ve already given you the explanation and you denied it without providing reason so I applied to an outside objective source and now you continue to deny. Hahahah.