justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)

205.6K posts

justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc) banner
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)

justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)

@JustUnderReal

Adaptistic. Narrativist. Azathothian. (any/all) We need Radical Civility Projects: #RadicalCivility, #QuiaSumCogito, #SocialMathematics #NormalizeMentalHealth

unashamed delusion Katılım Temmuz 2018
1.1K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Patrick B. Onkel
Patrick B. Onkel@PatricktheB·
Why do Americans call sun cream 'sun screen?' IT'S NOT A SCREEN! It sounds like you're rubbing your phone on your arms and neck when you go out in the sun.
English
1
0
1
44
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)@JustUnderReal·
@ItsAnthonyz_ @PatricktheB Personally I use sunscreen. I don't see a big issue since we also use terms like driveway for parking, parkway for driving, shipment for cars and cargo for ships. English is just a language of bullshit words. 🤷 But yeah, "screen" is a noun but it's also a way of filtering. 1/2
English
1
0
0
16
Yẹmí
Yẹmí@KR3Wmatic·
Honest question: What would a universe not created by a benevolent God look like?
English
192
2
19
9K
Ark Encounter
Ark Encounter@ArkEncounter·
The account of the ark and the catastrophic flood is a reliable part of the Bible’s historical record.
English
22
7
73
1.2K
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)@JustUnderReal·
Let's follow the logic. If males are inherently violent, then it would subdue them to be in a space that is protected by non violent females. By contrast if women are inherently peaceful, then it would be torture to throw them in a men's space. JK just wants people to suffer.
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Follow the logic. Women are deluded and naive for thinking predatory and violent men can be kept out of women-only spaces. ‘They can rape you anywhere.’ However, trans-identified men can only be safe in women-only spaces, because no abuser would ever follow them in there.

English
0
0
0
14
Sir Sic
Sir Sic@SirSicCrusader·
Aside from the fact that many atheist don't believe in objective morality (which is not the same as no morality dot be stupid...er) if morality is subject to your gods whims, guess what? It's not objective.
Giga Based Dad@GigaBasedDad

👇

English
102
64
1.4K
38.3K
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)@JustUnderReal·
@_S0mnambulist_ @SirSicCrusader The big bang generated all physics. Within that, it's objective that physics exists. It wouldn't make a lot of sense to say "well physics is subjective to the big bang", right? Similarly, within physics, objective morality is saying "it's morally good to respect gravity." 2/2
English
1
0
0
18
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)
justunderreality .com (anti-dogmatism arc)@JustUnderReal·
@_S0mnambulist_ @SirSicCrusader True. But if God was the creator (hypothetical if) then it's in a different category than humanity or aliens. It would be objective as gravity or the planets or light. Our human morality would be subjective to peer evaluation. God wouldn't have any peers.
English
2
0
0
14
Somnambulist
Somnambulist@_S0mnambulist_·
@JustUnderReal @SirSicCrusader i mean it would be objective in the sense that the position of gods morality would be objective. but that's true of my morality as well. "Objectively, person A holds position X" doesn't mean that "Position X is objective"
English
1
0
1
11

Keşfet

@PatricktheB @ItsAnthonyz_ @MentallyNathan @matsciguycanada @KR3Wmatic @ArkEncounter @Thedukeistheman @_S0mnambulist_