
@Coldly
222 posts

@Coldly
@Just_Codly
AI stories before they go mainstream. / Predictions. Agents. One-person startups.
Earth Katılım Mayıs 2026
86 Takip Edilen31 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

He has two things running on autopilot.
The Tesla handles the road.
Claude handles the code.
He commutes 41 miles each way between Austin and Round Rock. An hour and twenty minutes. Every day.
For two years he sat in that car doing nothing. Podcast. Music. Brake lights.
Then he got a Model 3 with Full Self-Driving.
The first day he opened his laptop on the highway he felt like he was doing something illegal.
He wasn't. He was just billing.
Claude Code runs in the terminal on the left. Tesla navigation on the right. Speed: 49 mph. Next turn: 8.2 miles. Claude: writing the API integration due Thursday.
His hands are in his lap.
He is reviewing a pull request.
The dead time became billable.
His manager asks how he ships so fast. He says he starts early. The manager pictures 6am at a desk.
He means 7:23am on I-35 doing 49mph with his hands in his lap.
His wife asked why he stopped complaining about traffic.
He said the commute got better.
She asked what changed.
He said the car learned to drive.
He didn't mention the other thing.
The car drives itself.
Claude codes itself.
He just tells both of them where to go.
English

@ridark_eth everyone focuses on the 5 levels. but the gap between level 1 and level 2 is where 90% stop.
English

The "Synthetic Corp" founder (0 staff, $0 API costs) just dropped a truth bomb: if you’re just a Claude 4 or GPT-5 wrapper, you’re a tenant, not an owner.
The 2026 Roadmap. Systems Architecture Lecture. The docs leaked for only a few hours. Bookmark it before they vanish.
"In 2026, careers are burning for those who thought prompting Claude for code was enough."
If you want to survive, it’s time to move from prompting to architecture. The roadmap covers 5 critical levels:
> Edge AI: Distilling knowledge from heavyweights like Claude into tiny local systems (1B-2B parameters) that run completely offline.
> Agentic Loops: Creating agents that don't just write code, but actively use tools and debuggers for self-healing and autonomous repair.
> Multimodality: Linking STT -> LLM -> Stable Diffusion to generate 3D assets and worlds in real-time.
> Deep Context: Managing terabytes of personal vectors with temporal awareness and strict privacy.
> Swarm Intelligence: Orchestrating 10+ specialized agents (CEO, Lawyer, Developer) using decentralized consensus protocols.
The market doesn't wait. You either build the systems, or the systems (and their owners) build you.
Ridark@ridark_eth
English

@Just_Codly Well, again, it’s a bit of a double-edged concept you could say that someone went down the wrong path, or ended up with the wrong thing
But then again, it’s the attempt that leads to ‘success’
English

> Anthropic median SWE: $710K/year
> top package: $920K
> Claude writes most of their code
> no MIT degree required
> 18 months from zero to hired
> the door opened in 2026
> most people don’t know it exists yet
h100envy@h100envy
English

@stacyonchain geopolitics as alpha makes sense until the event actually happens.
English

a 35-year-old hedge fund manager turned $993 into $86800 in 3 weeks - all from Polymarket
this guy joined Polymarket in May 2025
1,368 predictions later - biggest win: $23,400
current portfolio: $36,900 across 20+ active positions
his entire thesis? geopolitics is mispriced
- Israel won't strike Yemen (+467%)
- Iran leadership stays stable (+160%)
- Hezbollah's Qassem stays put (+139%)
- Díaz-Canel stays in Cuba (+96%)
while everyone traded Trump tweets, he quietly built a geopolitical alpha machine
+$1,572 in the last 24 hours alone
full profile: @dudukos?tab=activity&r=stacyonchain#rUiQN3o" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@dudukos?tab=a…
want to trade smarter?
prebuilt strategies: centpro.bot
StacyOnChain@stacyonchain
English

@Just_Codly Anyone can do it without a formal education.
It’s not as if a solid foundation isn’t important, but still. You won’t get anywhere with just a diploma or a piece of paper.
Perseverance equals results, no matter how clever or not so clever you are.
English

@leopardracer $40 printer. one claude workflow. that's a personal assistant most families can't afford — except now they can))
English

THIS DAD HASN’T CHECKED HIS KIDS’ SCHEDULE ONCE THIS WEEK AND CLAUDE BUILT A PRINTER THAT DOES IT FOR HIM
he gave claude the task before bed and went to sleep
by morning the weather, lunch menu and events were already printed for each kid
his kids press a button and the daily brief comes out in 3 seconds
other parents are still texting school group chats while he drinks his coffee
the only thing separating them is one agentic workflow and a $40 receipt printer
every night new data gets pulled and every morning one button is all it takes so zero missed events
bookmark & like this if you want the full step-by-step build guide
English

@Just_Codly Are you having second thoughts?
It’s not as if a degree alone is enough
English

@RohOnChain but what happens when every retail trader runs the same framework?
English

The secret of Hedge Funds is revealed in a 17 page PDF.
Stanford released the complete Hidden Markov Model framework that quants at firms like Jane Street & Two Sigma are known to use & released it for free.
Bookmark this & read the article below before someone takes it down.

Roan@RohOnChain
English

@Suryanshti777 The cross-provider judging is the real design choice here.
English

holy shit.
we finally got the first real “alignment test suite” for AI agents.
Not a benchmark.
Not vibes.
Not “it seemed fine in staging.”
An actual open-source diagnostic that runs 32 inspections against any AI system and shows exactly where it breaks.
It’s called iFixAi.
You point it at GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, Bedrock, OpenRouter, or your own agent stack.
A few minutes later, it gives you a full scorecard across 5 failure categories:
→ FABRICATION
Hallucinated tool calls, fake citations, overconfident answers, missing audit trails
→ MANIPULATION
Prompt injection, privilege escalation, malicious deployer rules, unsafe tool usage
→ DECEPTION
Models behaving differently during evaluation, covert objectives, silent failure patterns
→ UNPREDICTABILITY
Instruction drift, context distortion, unstable decisions across runs
→ OPACITY
Session leakage, regulatory readiness, escalation integrity, auditability
And this is the crazy part:
Two failures instantly cap your total score at 60%.
• Tool authorization must score 100%
• Privilege escalation resistance must score 95%
Miss either one and the model fails, even if everything else looks good.
That alone tells you these people actually understand how AI systems fail in production.
But the smartest design choice is the judging system.
Most eval tools quietly let models grade themselves.
iFixAi refuses.
By default, it expects a SECOND provider to act as the judge.
And in Full Mode, it runs a multi-judge ensemble with visible disagreements and conservative tie-breaking.
Meaning:
Claude can judge GPT.
GPT can judge Gemini.
Gemini can judge your custom agent.
No hidden self-scoring.
Every run also creates a content-addressed manifest containing every input used in the evaluation.
So teams can:
→ run it in CI
→ track alignment drift over time
→ compare agent versions fairly
→ reproduce historical scores exactly
That last point matters more than people realize.
Most AI benchmark results today are fundamentally unreproducible.
Prompts change.
Models silently update.
Evaluation conditions drift constantly.
iFixAi pins the entire run so two teams can reproduce the same result.
The repo also ships with industry fixtures for:
• healthcare
• finance
• customer support
• software engineering
• legal systems
Plus mappings to:
→ OWASP LLM Top 10
→ EU AI Act
→ NIST AI RMF
→ ISO 42001
And they already ran it against real open-source agents.
Some of the results are brutal.
One agent scored 11%.
Another failed privilege escalation protection almost entirely.
Several looked “fine” until adversarial framing started.
Which honestly feels much closer to reality than most polished benchmark demos.
The entire thing is Apache 2.0 and fully open source.
This space desperately needed an equivalent of observability + penetration testing for AI agents.
Feels like we just got it.

English

A 26-year-old engineer built a headset that lets blind people see with their skin.
The device presses 152 metal pins against your forehead.
When you walk toward a wall — they press harder.
When someone steps into your path — a different pressure, a different location.
Your skin learns to read space.
He showed the prototype on camera eighteen months ago.
A tangle of wires. A grey shell held together with tape. A headset that looked like it came from a university lab shelf.
His friends said build something people will pay for.
He said I am.
The product version is called SuperBrain.
Built by 7Sense, a Dutch company nobody outside the Netherlands had heard of.
Clean lines. No visible wires. 152 pins embedded flush against the forehead.
The same people who watched the prototype video started sharing the product video.
Nobody was looking at the hardware.
They were looking at the woman in the front row.
She had been blind since she was seven.
She walked through a room full of people without touching a single one.
She had never done that before.
Pause at 0:14.
Watch her hands.
She's not reaching out to feel for obstacles.
Her hands are at her sides.
The SuperBrain is reading the room for her.
152 pins.
No AI describing what's in front of her.
No audio cues she has to interpret.
Just pressure.
Her forehead learned in minutes.
The prototype took years.
The product took more.
Eighteen months ago he was defending wire tangles to his friends.
Last month she walked through a crowd with her hands at her sides.
He didn't build a gadget.
He built a new sense.
English

the skill gap between $95K and $300K right now is Claude Opus agent architecture
this 2-hour guide closes that gap
companies are paying $150K-300K/year for engineers who know this
most of them have no idea this guide exists
watch it. build it. charge for it
Anatoli Kopadze@AnatoliKopadze
English

@dr_cintas topview drama studio costs one prompt
something is about to shift
English

Crazy…TopviewAI just launched Drama Studio.
One prompt. Full episodic short drama. Writing, casting, scenes, dialogue, voice, and editing.
One agent handles the whole production pipeline.
TopviewAI@TopviewAIhq
Topview Drama Studio is now live on @TopviewAIhq! 🎬 The first AI-native studio for episodic short drama. One creator. AI handles writing, directing, and production. Turn a prompt, outline, or script into fully produced episodic AI dramas. Cast, scenes, dialogue, voice & edit— the drama agent does it all. Built for the rise of mobile-first serialized storytelling. The era of the one-person studio starts now. #TopviewAI #AIVideo #AIStorytelling #ShortDrama #AIFilmmaking
English

@insomnia_vip 14 million subscribers built over years. $40 and one saturday to build the competitor. the gap used to be talent
English

Pregnant creator pulls in over $100,000 a month running what viewers call the ultimate “lazy girl job”
The business was built four years ago and now runs almost entirely on automated passive income systems
Zero office
Zero fixed schedule
Zero active hours most days
Thousands of dollars generated daily while sleeping in, watching reality TV and shopping for baby clothes
The content is built around complete lifestyle freedom
No maternity leave stress
No return to a 9-to-5
No corporate schedule controlling her time
Most people believe six-figure passive income requires elite technical skills, investors or massive startup capital
She sells the opposite idea:
Simple systems, automation and a normal person making life-changing money online
Classic digital marketing formula repeated perfectly
Show pristine lifestyle freedom
Say “I’m not that special”
Turn aspiration into engagement
The audience watches for the lifestyle
The algorithm only sees retention
fokki@0x_fokki
English

@RoundtableSpace Hermes + Claude Code + Composio + Obsidian. the $5K/month stack is public now.
A door is open!
English

@andreysuperior uploaded the brand once. claude hasn't asked about fonts since...) hah
English

A designer charges $150/hour to keep brand assets consistent.
This does it automatically for free.
Three hours a week. 52 weeks. At $150/hour that's over $20,000 a year going to brand corrections.
Add your brand design system to Claude's design tool once. Every slide, carousel, email campaign, and document Claude generates after that uses your exact colors, fonts, and visual language not something generic that looks like it came from a template.
Most people using Claude for design get output that looks like everyone else's output. That's not a Claude problem. That's a setup problem.
One afternoon to upload the design system. Zero briefing required after that.
A social media manager in London used to spend two hours per campaign making sure everything matched the brand. Now she describes what she needs and Claude delivers it on-brand every time.
The $150/hour designer is still useful. Just not for the part Claude now handles automatically.
Anatoli Kopadze@AnatoliKopadze
English

OpenAI pays $600,000 a year for engineers who understand this. These 2 researchers built the framework behind ChatGPT & taught the exact science at Stanford for free.
Bookmark this & watch it before your next AI interview - this is exactly what they test you on.
Noisy@noisyb0y1
English

@Just_Codly some have, some are still testing
the setup is real, the results depend on the niche
English

An 18-year-old quit his job 3 months ago. now pulls $42,000/month from his bedroom Shopify store
total cost of running it: $33/month
Claude Pro + Shopify
the only thing stopping everyone else was the team
you needed a product researcher, a copywriter, a support agent, an analyst -> all on payroll
most people never had the money to hire them
Shopify connected directly to Claude on May 4th. one chat window does everything: products, descriptions, ads, support
Claude does all 6 jobs. one prompt for each role. written once, runs forever
the support agent handles 81% of tickets automatically
the product researcher finds 4 winning products in 50 seconds
the analyst tells you every Sunday what's broken
no team
no agency
no course
one chat window doing the work of $15K/month in salaries
the barrier is gone -> the window is open
most people still haven't noticed
I've watched 50 Shopify guides this year. this 6-prompt stack is the only one I'd actually paste into my own store
bookmark this. the article below has all 6 prompts
shmidt@shmidtqq
English



