JusticeIsComing 🦋

First ever post on #twitter, my original suspended account. @edwinbarnesc @alpha5tate @GenFlynn @Patri0tContr0l @pulte @ryancohen I was silent watching from the shadows until Q came on the scene & lit a fire under us. Learned, trained my emotions, adapted to NO time-tables

@DSquadRadio x.com/theoryng/statu…

D-Squad Radio x.com/i/spaces/1Dxle…

Everyone needs to see this. #GME has more DRS / registered holders than all magnificent 7 stocks combined. Shout out to @lawsondt for consolidating the data. (1/2)

Proposal to acquire eBay. investor.gamestop.com/ebay

@PhantomBlack699 @ThePPseedsShow

@ThePPseedsShow Source or ban

LATEST 🚨 WE ARE GETTING REPORTS A MASSIVE HEDGEFUND HAS BEEN LIQUIDATED ON GAMESTOP AND BBBY. STAY TUNED FOR FURTHER DETAILS

Comey was charged under 18 USC Section 871 — threats against the president — AND 18 USC Section 875C which covers threats sent via text, email, and electronic communications INCLUDING those involving FOREIGN governments. This goes way beyond a social media post. They have something much bigger.

Old-school DD from 2021–2022 on tokenized stocks/securities (STOs) and what it could do for the ENTIRE industry. These read like prophecies now with Computershare’s ISTs + SEC green lights. Pulled the juiciest bits: 1. r/defi (May 2022) “Why does no one seem to care about tokenized stocks on public blockchains?”
reddit.com/r/defi/comment… Key quotes: “Tokenized stocks… significantly more transparent on exactly who owns what… The concept that a company could short Gamestop for literally more stock than exists shows the current system is extremely flawed.” “Create entirely independent markets on these assets… Price discovery happens on chain… solves the inefficiency and operation problems.” 2. r/Superstonk (2021) Overstock’s digital dividend via tZERO (the real precedent)
reddit.com/r/Superstonk/c… Patrick Byrne: “Parallel universe: legal, blockchain-based capital market resistant to legacy NMS trading and settlement issues.” “If the dividend isn’t cash, then I can’t pay it and I have to close my short.” Prevents rehypothecation/synthetics → immutable ownership. 3. r/CryptoCurrency (Jan 2022) Non-technical guide to Security Tokens
reddit.com/r/CryptoCurren… “Programmability (automated dividends, voting). 24/7 trading. Cost reductions via middleman removal. Fractionalization + global access. Immutable transparency. Reduction of corruption/fraud… Actual ownership (not IOUs).” This is exactly what’s unfolding now: T+0, transparency hammer on synthetics, issuer-controlled on-chain shares, parallel markets. The old apes were cooking. What do you think — is this the “exit ramp” or the great reset for capital markets? 👀 $GME $OSTK

Tokenization is happening.. SEC issued a statement about it on 1/28 this year. sec.gov/newsroom/speec… GameStop had a $700m “subsequent event” after 1/31 Issuing tokenized shares or a new class from an M&A deal, might be something capital markets have never seen before 😈

The original X post/Grok screenshot referenced a general 2-year resale restriction after a §363 sale to preserve NOLs (anti-abuse/continuity rules). In BBBY’s case: •There were earlier §363 sales (Overstock for brand/IP in June 2023; BuyBuy Baby in July 2023), but the overall estate wound down via the liquidation plan, not a single full-estate credit bid to Sixth Street. •Sixth Street (FILO/DIP lender) had consent rights and credit-bid capability, but public dockets/plan show no documented full transfer of the NOL shell to them followed by a hold-and-flip.51 •The Plan Administrator (still active) continues claims reconciliation and litigation; the shell exists for wind-down, not active operations. The theory is an inference combining Sixth Street’s lender status, the preserved shell, NOL value, and §382 mechanics. No public docket, SEC filing, or court order confirms a hidden Sixth Street credit-bid acquisition of the NOL entity followed by transfer to Teddy Holdings LLC. If such a transfer occurred privately after the 2-year window, it would not appear in the public restructuring site unless a new motion/filing was required. Bottom line: Official records fix the clock at September 29, 2023 (Effective Date). The 2-year §382(l)(5) and COBE restrictions (if they applied) expired September 29, 2025.

The accurate dates for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.’s (now 20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc.) Chapter 11 are September 14, 2023 (confirmation) and September 29, 2023 (Effective Date). The community reference to “September 29, 2025” appears to be a common shorthand or typo that conflates the shell company’s naming convention (20230930 = September 30, 2023) with the actual timeline; official records uniformly confirm 2023.10 Official Court and SEC Documents Confirming the Dates •Kroll Restructuring Administration (official claims/docket site): “On September 14, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement on final basis and confirming the Plan. On September 29, 2023, the effective date of the Plan occurred and the Plan was consummated.” A Notice of Effective Date was filed the same day.51 •SEC Form 8-K (filed September 29, 2023) by 20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. (f/k/a Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.): “The Confirmed Plan became effective (the “Effective Date”) on Friday, September 29, 2023. On September 29, 2023, the Company Parties filed a Notice of … Occurrence of Effective Date.” All equity interests were canceled on the Effective Date.52 •Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan (filed pre-confirmation): Defines “Effective Date” as the first Business Day when conditions are satisfied; liquidation transactions, cancellations, and Plan Administrator authority vest on or as soon as practicable after the Effective Date.15 These are the dates the Bankruptcy Court, debtors, and SEC used. The shell company name (20230930-DK-Butterfly-1) simply encoded the anticipated/actual effective date. Recent 2025–2026 post-confirmation quarterly reports and dockets continue referencing the September 29, 2023 Effective Date with no subsequent “reset” or new confirmation.20 IRC §382(l)(5) and the Two-Year Rule — Exact Legal Text and Timing The two-year clock (no second ownership change, or NOL limitation drops to zero; plus continuity-of-business-enterprise/COBE rules) is tied to the ownership change date (“change date”), not plan confirmation. Direct quotes from 26 U.S. Code § 382 (current law): •§382(l)(5)(D) — Second ownership change within 2 years: “If, during the 2-year period immediately following an ownership change to which this paragraph applies, an ownership change of the new loss corporation occurs, this paragraph shall not apply and the section 382 limitation with respect to the 2nd ownership change … shall be zero.”50 •§382(c) — Continuity of business enterprise: “If the new loss corporation does not continue the business enterprise of the old loss corporation at all times during the 2-year period beginning on the change date, the section 382 limitation … shall be zero.”50 •§382(i)(2) — Testing period for second change: “If there has been an ownership change under this section, the testing period for determining whether a 2nd ownership change has occurred shall not begin before the 1st day following the change date for such earlier ownership change.”50 •§382(j) — Change date definition: The date on which the owner shift or equity structure shift occurs (in a confirmed Chapter 11 plan, this is the Effective Date when the transactions close, equity is canceled, new ownership vests, etc.). Tax regulations and case law treat the Effective Date/consummation as the change date for plan-based restructurings (Treas. Reg. §1.382-9, examples in bankruptcy contexts). Confirmation is merely court approval; the actual ownership shift happens on or after the Effective Date when the plan is implemented.25 Application here: If a qualifying §382(l)(5) ownership change occurred via the Plan (e.g., creditors becoming owners or a structured transfer of the loss corporation/shell), the 2-year period started September 29, 2023 and ended September 29, 2025. As of April 2026, that window has closed by over six months. Context for the Community Theory (Sixth Street → Teddy Holdings)

Sixth Street 🔜 Teddy Holdings LLC

HOLY CRAP… a long awaited fuse has just been lit and a political BOMB is set to go off💥 🚨 Senator Chuck Grassley RESURRECTS old FBI Investigation into Clinton Foundation Donations and the Russian URANIUM 1 Deal Q was right, and it’s absolutely mind-blowing… but first, context: 🔻 Uranium One was a Canadian mining company that, through acquisitions (including UrAsia Energy, co-founded by major Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra), controlled significant U.S. uranium assets—roughly 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity at the time (mines in Wyoming, Utah, etc.). Between 2009–2013, Russia’s state-owned nuclear giant Rosatom (via its subsidiary ARMZ) gradually acquired majority then full control of Uranium One in stages. Because this involved U.S. critical minerals, it required unanimous approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—an interagency panel of 9+ cabinet-level departments, including State (then led by Hillary Clinton), Treasury, Defense, etc. CFIUS approved it in 2010; President Obama SIGNED OFF; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission followed. Frank Giustra: Canadian mining magnate and Clinton Foundation donor. In 2005, he and Bill Clinton traveled to Kazakhstan (a uranium-rich nation). Shortly after, Giustra’s UrAsia secured major Kazakh uranium concessions. Giustra later merged UrAsia into Uranium One (retaining stakes) and donated TENS OF MILLIONS to the Clinton Foundation (and pledged $100M+). Ian Telfer: Uranium One chairman (post-merger). His family foundation donated ~$2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation (often routed through a Canadian entity). Bill Clinton also received big money from various foreign entities… but we won’t go there. Q repeatedly emphasized U1/Uranium as a cornerstone example of Clinton corruption and Pay-to-play treason for personal gain: “U1 [sale of US uranium to Russia] Sold out US and Risked US National Security for personal financial gain? This was framed as a bigger plot to KILL the UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN, selling secrets, SAPs, AID, etc. — but it was “More than selling of URANIUM… >Crimes against Humanity” Dems’ attacks on Trump/Ukraine were projection for their own Russia/U1 deals; closed financial systems (China/Russia/Iran) as common denominator. Q drops treat U1 as proof the “deep state” protected the Clintons while weaponizing agencies elsewhere. Grassley’s document directly VALIDATES the existence of the 2016 FBI EC and unfinished investigative threads that Q claimed were buried, but will rock the political landscape once revealed. Think dirty bombs. Think The Sum of All Fears. Think WW3. Think 16 year plan to destroy America. Uranium 1 is back in the News… A massive Boomerang is coming.. Sauce grassley.senate.gov/download/grass…

The SSP APA for SpaceBaby is all in Doc 2656. And the NDA with Sussman and SSP at the end, are the reason nobody can talk about it.

$BBBYQ According to the schedule granted by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald there is a deadline set for tomorrow for Ryan Cohen's team to disclose their expert witnesses & reports with 20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. v. Cohen et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-05874-NRB): x.com/i/status/20290…

Playing the what if with Grok. Hypothetical: If Cohen Had Sold to HBC as a True “Placeholder” (Retaining Beneficial Ownership) This is not what happened, but here’s how securities law would treat it under Section 16(b) and related rules: • Beneficial ownership is determined by economic reality, not paperwork. Under SEC Rule 16a-1(a)(1) and Rule 13d-3, you’re a >10% “beneficial owner” (triggering insider status) if you have direct or indirect voting power, investment/dispositive power, or a pecuniary (economic) interest in the shares. This includes nominees, controlled entities, trusts, derivatives, swaps, or any arrangement where you still bear the risk/reward. A sham “sale” to a placeholder/nominee (even if documented as arm’s-length) gets disregarded—courts look through form to substance. • Impact on the “sale” itself: If the August 2022 transfer to HBC wasn’t a bona fide disposition (i.e., Cohen kept the economic upside/downside or control), it wouldn’t count as a closing “sale” for short-swing matching purposes. Section 16(b) claws back profits by pairing the lowest purchase price within the prior 6 months with the highest sale price (strict liability math, no intent required). A fake sale could mean: • Cohen was still treated as >10% owner longer than reported. • The matching transactions shift, potentially increasing (or changing) the ~$47M profit figure the plaintiff is already seeking. • His 13D amendments stating “sold entire position to 0%” could be viewed as inaccurate, though this suit is narrow (only 16(b) profit recovery, not fraud claims). • How it would play out in this lawsuit: It would almost certainly hurt Cohen’s defense and strengthen the plaintiff’s position. The liquidating trust is already arguing Cohen was >10% in spring/summer 2022 due to BBBY’s public buyback program (simple math on his purchases pushed him over). Evidence of a placeholder arrangement would reinforce that he never truly exited insider status during the relevant window. Discovery (which is ongoing into mid-2026) could subpoena trading records, agreements, communications, or bank flows between Cohen/RC Ventures and HBC. If such evidence existed, the plaintiff could seek to amend the complaint or use it at summary judgment/trial. • Real-world bar for proving this: Extremely high. Courts require concrete evidence (contracts, side letters, control agreements, payment flows, etc.), not speculation. Sham-transaction claims are fact-intensive and rare without smoking-gun documents. Nothing in the current docket suggests the plaintiff is pursuing this angle. Bottom line: The case remains a straightforward, narrow 16(b) clawback based on Cohen’s disclosed 2022 open-market buys and sales while (allegedly) >10%. The March 2026 discovery extension is purely procedural—no bombshells or hidden ownership theories on the record. If new facts emerged in discovery showing retained beneficial ownership via any party (placeholder or otherwise), it would likely expand the recoverable profits, but that’s pure “what if” at this point. The public filings and docket show a clean exit in 2022 followed by unrelated HBC activity in 2023.

@HungCao_VA @SuZuQ17 Iykyk

This weekend, 23 years ago, I salvaged the plane wreckage of JFK Jr., his wife, and her sister off the coast of Martha's Vineyard. As a Navy Diver, it was an honor to assist an iconic American family during such a difficult time of grief and tragedy. (1/2)

JUST IN: SAMSON MOW JUST SAID ADAM BACK'S $BSTR IS ABOUT TO BUY $1,500,000,000 #BITCOIN AND SET OFF A "SUPPLY SHOCK" MORE COMPANIES WILL FOLLOW SAYLOR EXCHANGES WILL RUN OUT OF BTC "IT IS INEVITABLE" 🚀

Why do you think Donald Trump hasn't appointed an IRS commissioner? The lack of one means the IRS currently has no enforcement authority - so says me. I appear to be the first person in the country challenging the IRS's ability to take your stuff without a legally mandated Commissioner of Internal Revenue. I filed a motion to vacate a tax court judgment as there is no Commissioner to rule in favor of. Trump intentionally has not appointed one. Senate Democrats on March 12 said this is outrageous and will lead to chaos and confusion and put the IRS's ability to function in legal jeopardy. Yet other than their press release on March 12, they appear to have taken no action. Will be discussing updates and answer questions. Here is the link on youtube for tomorrow at 9 am EDT but I will also be streaming live on X. If you want to be a guest - go to IRSMedicMembers.com and grab the link to join as a guest. youtube.com/live/6xNVXEC-s…

KABOOM 💥 Reporter: You said arrests are coming regarding the 2020 election. Can you elaborate? Kash Patel: We have many ongoing investigations into LARGE SCALE conspiracies, like today, we’ll announce those arrests when the Grand Jury returns those indictments Key words… LARGE SCALE conspiracies. A very large HAMMER is about to be dropped and it’s going to ROCK the political landscape! rumble.com/v78trkc-kash-p…

@HodlMagoo They did!

Stablecoins recycle existing dollars into Treasury demand. Bitcoin generates net new assets the system can expand credit against. They aren't in conflict. They're complementary engines of the same machine. The sovereign bet doesn't end. It just found a new way to grow the asset side of a ledger that was running out of room. Bitcoin is the escape valve. And nobody planned it that way (or did they)

Bitcoin Isn’t Just a Hedge Against the System. It’s How the System Survives Itself. The US government's quiet stablecoin strategy is genius. Stablecoins buy Treasuries. Treasuries fund deficits. Deficits keep the machine running. But there's a hole in the theory. To create stablecoins, you need dollars or Treasuries that already exist. You're not creating new money. You're recycling it. So how do you actually expand the asset side of the ledger? Enter Bitcoin. 🧵