TruthScreamer

@mikkelraskdk @plan271 @SpotFestRadio @caramel_craft @legolloydYT @iskall85 u can't date your workers you can't date your moderators you can't date your team members you can't date your fans your not really living anyone left he is gonna meet naturally

@plan271 @SpotFestRadio @caramel_craft @legolloydYT @iskall85 ".. it appears that Iskall engaged in inappropriate behavior toward members of his community, including moderators and fans, in a way that crossed ethical and moral boundaries."

Not watching Hermicraft anymore, this is so sad to see what happened to @iskall85 this shouldn’t ever happen to anyone. I stand with you iskall.

@1DungeonDaddy @WelsknightPlays Also he does deny it he says straight out it never happened and that she has done this to another youtube before

@WelsknightPlays “It’s my private life” “I always fight for the small man” “I’m the victim here” No denial, no apology, just asking for pity

That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it. -Dayna Craig, "The Narcissist's Prayer"

@WelsknightPlays what iskall said did happen it was that bad you did cause it you did mean to do harm and he didn't deserve it stress wouldn't of sided with him unless u guys were in the wrong.

@1DungeonDaddy @WelsknightPlays apologizing would be admitting guilt for something he never did

@WelsknightPlays stress wouldn't of sided with him unless you people are the toxic ones nice try to gaslight but stress knows way more than you do should of trusted the police to do their job and not decided to pretend u were actual knight.

@DyslecticAttack @chland sure live in a fantasy where no one ever does anything wrong Someone did something wrong here and maybe it was iskall but like live in reality

@JusticeIskall @chland Or you know, I'm trying to look at the situation from both sides, and see the gaps of neutral ground. Because unlike some, I acknowledge there might be some. But assuming nefarious reasons does seem to becoming a pattern for you, makes people easy to dismiss and all.

Ok cool. Mavs traded away a 25 year Luka Doncic who is imo THE most talented and clutch basketball player on the planet for a 32 year old glass canon that got injured in game one after the trade. How can you screw up so badly? Unreal.

@DyslecticAttack @chland ik what your doing , your trying to safe guard the hermits in the event iskall is proven innocent by pretending its messy and hard to know who is lying and blab blah either the women lied or she didn't end of story either iskall harassed her or he didn't

@JusticeIskall @chland Which tells me you haven't actually read the fucking allegations. Because if you had, you'd know several of those assumptions don't even line up that way with the actual allegations.

@DyslecticAttack @chland you sure act like it and using the world dolt doesn't really change my mind but sure.

@JusticeIskall @chland I'm not even American you dolt.

@DyslecticAttack @chland if that's the case it would still prove iskall innocent in my eyes cause it would prove that the situation is completely out of context and misunderstood by both people and that no wrong doing was intended or planned.

@JusticeIskall @chland Or, it depends heavily on personal context and interpretation what the messages of both sides encouraged or discouraged. Which then depends heavily on the information both sides had at the time, which is then even more complicated by language barriers. You know, the human aspect.

@DyslecticAttack @chland and sure it could be messier than she fully lied but if they were flirting with her permission then changed her mind or got her heart broken or heck any reason, she is still in the wrong for lying anyone who would twist truth to ruin someone else's life is in the wrong

@JusticeIskall @chland Do you see how utterly dumb that arguement is? Because your own example to support the "100% truth" you argued, is based on the conclusion of 1 sided abolute truth And not on, for example, my assumption that messy interpersonal relationships aren't black & white, but complex.

@DyslecticAttack @chland iskall doesn't live in America and every country has different laws you clearly are failing to look outside your American point of view cause defamation isn't treated the same where you live.

@JusticeIskall @chland No, we should listen to the finder of fact, and not the investigation of the executive branch of government, but the judicial branch. You know, the way western society is set up. On the trias politica system.

@DyslecticAttack @chland lol so funny when idiots use the strawman argument incorrectly it doesn't make you look smart if you don't know what your saying. your arguing the investigations job isn't to fact check BUT THAT IS LEGIT WHAT A DEFAMATION INVESTIGATIONS JOB IS

@JusticeIskall @chland Like, chill and actually read what I've said, and what it was in response to. Trying to make it into a strawman isn't going to change the facts. And it is important to be sceptical of info on both sides. Which includes acknowledging the limitations any kind of investigation has.

@DyslecticAttack @chland that is legit the one fucking thing that the point of the investigation to check if the claims these thing happened as victims said it did are true if the messages are real or out context would be what they check, heck if the investigation proves iskall is lying i will block him!

@JusticeIskall @chland And that's completely reliant on the presumtion that the report would show people fabricated messages. So yes, if we're going to just assume one side has straight up fabricated everything, and has 0 basis whatsoever. Then in that case the police investigation would show truth.

@DyslecticAttack @chland if the investigation for example shows those messages or screenshots the victim claimed never existed or have been taken greatly out of context would that not 100% show the truth.

@JusticeIskall @chland So pointing out that a police investigation has limitations, and that those limitations need to be taken into consideration, is wrong now? Never said it wouldn't raise worthwhile questions and info, just refuted your claim that those investigations would "100%" show the "truth".

@DyslecticAttack @chland Defamation is the act of spreading false lies the police investigation's goal then will be to determine if these claims are true or false they will then be a case yes but to claim their not the finder of facts that's legit the job their given right now to find the truth.

@JusticeIskall @chland And since when are police the finders of fact? Oh right, they aren't. They can investigate, and they can determine if they think it meets the standards they need to find it criminal and pursue a case. But the finder of fact, the determiner of "truth" is a judge, even in Sweden.

@DyslecticAttack @chland no it 100% is about the truth of them its only defamation if their lying

@JusticeIskall @chland Which would still mean it's not Iskall that'd be "innocent" or "guilty".... The outcome instead would be about the veracity of the allegations, not even the "truth" of them, just about the standard of validity Sweden has on it in regards of criminality, and whether it's met.

@DyslecticAttack @chland defamation is a crime where he lives so if the rumors about him as false it would be a crime for the "victims" to say he did things he never did tho i can't blame you for not knowing the laws of another country.

@JusticeIskall @chland Highly depends what and who the police are even investigating, because no crime was alledged to have been committed by Iskall. So if it is him they're investigating, then him being found innocent seems a forgone conclusion, since the possibility "guilty" wasn't even alledged.