Jake

9.7K posts

Jake banner
Jake

Jake

@Jvke201

AI & DeFi (probably, maybe, hopefully)

Katılım Eylül 2022
1.2K Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jake
Jake@Jvke201·
My $ORGO Beliefs. The more I pay attention to the CUA space, the more convinced I am that ORGO is not just another AI token floating around on Solana. It feels like one of the only projects actually building something CUA’s will need if they are ever going to replace humans in real digital work. Not another wrapper around an LLM, not a flashy UI, but an actual virtual machine where CUA’s can look at a screen, understand what is happening, think through steps, take actions and complete tasks the same way a real worker would. People keep asking why I care so much about ORGO. The answer is simple. If CUA’s are going to take over human tasks, someone has to build the environment they work inside. Humans click buttons. We read screens. We follow processes. We remember context. We fix mistakes. So the real question is where do CUA’s do all of that. Where do they click. Where do they read the UI. Where do they plan out a 20, 30 or 50 step workflow. Where do they store long term memory. What space lets them execute actions reliably without glitching out halfway through. That missing piece is exactly what ORGO is building. Something that stands out to me is that the team could have done the typical early stage AI startup thing and raised privately with SAFE notes and closed allocations. Instead they launched on Solana. That basically gives normal people the kind of early access that usually only VCs get. People like comparing ORGO to e2b. I get why but once you look deeper the comparison falls apart. e2b gives CUA’s a temporary sandbox where they can run code or browse a page. ORGO is building the full operating system around that experience. Vision. Memory. Planning. Guard rails. Payment rails. Multi CUA workflows. e2b is like giving a CUA a desk to work at. ORGO is giving it the entire workspace and the tools it needs to function like a digital worker with actual responsibilities. The support behind ORGO is kinda insane. Spencer, the founder, is doxxed, part of zfellows and surrounded by people who have built and exited real billion dollar companies. There is visible backing from the a16z scout fund, Forum Ventures, Pasternak, Cory, Luke Whiting and others. These are not vague claims. These are real networks that normally surround early stage AI companies, not small cap crypto projects. What makes this even more convincing is that ORGO already has early traction. Paid plans went live on November 24 and developers have already landed six thousand dollar client gigs using ORGO’s VM. Spencer also shared that ORGO hit 66.3 percent on Claude Opus 4.5’s full computer use benchmark. That is impressive for how early this entire category is. It is real proof the technology works, not just a concept on a roadmap. The independence announcement on November 18 cleared out the Believe related confusion and made it clear ORGO is fully in control of its direction. Its been mentioned about active outreach to liquid token VCs and early enterprise pilots in insurance, healthcare and logistics. These are industries filled with repetitive digital labor where CUA’s have an obvious advantage. If CUA’s are going to replace humans in any sectors first, it will be these. Even one successful pilot could push ORGO toward real recurring revenue much faster than people expect. This naturally leads to the question: how big this can get? The AI sector in crypto is currently around a 20 billion dollar market cap and peaked around 70 billion during the hype cycle. If ORGO captures even a small role in the CUA operating system layer, would a 50 million or 100 million market cap be unrealistic. That is roughly 0.5 percent of the sector. It is almost nothing in the context of CUA’s replacing human labor at scale. If you zoom out on the timeframe, a 25x or 50x move does not feel extreme. It feels like a reasonable outcome if the CUA narrative develops the way everything is pointing. The timing also feels very aligned. ACI is building the payment rails for CUA’s. AI labs are shifting from simple chatbots toward autonomous digital workers. StreetFDN is coordinating long term capital around these exact types of narratives. None of this guarantees ORGO wins. Nothing ever does. But it does increase the odds for ORGO, you would want to be in if you believe CUA’s will eventually become mainstream digital labor. This also connects to why I am bullish on StreetFDN. I have always liked the tokenized ownership idea. The whole ICM movement that Ben Pasternak started. MetaDAO, Soar, Street. All of them came from the belief that communities should own part of what they help build. Even Paradigm aligned with that idea. Street feels like the next version of this. Not just tokenizing projects but coordinating entire narratives over long cycles instead of chasing hype. ORGO fits naturally into that worldview. It aligns with where digital labor is actually heading, not whatever random meta Twitter is obsessed with on any given day. I am not expecting ORGO to explode overnight. I am looking at it like the kind of early bet you make if you genuinely believe CUA’s will take over human digital tasks and you realize someone has to build the operating system they work inside. Go big $ORGO home.
English
16
18
58
12.7K
nick vasilescu
nick vasilescu@nickvasiles·
I connected my Meta RayBans to my OpenClaw so that I can manage my entire fleet of 20+ OpenClaw agents while out and about. It can see what I see, hear what I hear, and I can literally work an entire day while talking to my glasses out in the city in San Francisco. The future of work is here.
English
45
28
274
31.1K
Jake
Jake@Jvke201·
VCs keep holding MetaDAO and you think the whole eco going to die? Personally I like to pick the leading projects from their eco @omnipair The only project with a 100% gain since ICO. $meta $omfg
English
0
0
3
53
Omnipair
Omnipair@omnipair·
Fridays are for sneak peeks Permissionless, isolated leverage is coming
Omnipair tweet media
English
12
8
39
1.2K
AJC
AJC@AvgJoesCrypto·
Since 2025, if you bought every token sale on CoinList, Legion, MetaDAO, and BuidlPad, you would be down 46%. Of the 41 token sales in this period, only 6 are above the initial sale price. Perhaps most notable is that 4 out of these 6 launches were @MetaDAOProject launches: $OMFG, $AVICI, $UMBRA, $RNGR.
AJC tweet media
English
26
18
177
22.2K
Jake retweetledi
rakka
rakka@rakka_sol·
No it was not, I know it's a bit unbelievable but that's unfortunately the reality of it.. most of lending protocols just relies on humans to assess these metrics (like an asset liquidity, markets ..etc).., the program is blind to it.. (I'm pretty sure you didn't mean propping it up from $1 to $1.2).. Idk man, take a good look at this token, this is the one that was used to collateralize the $300M borrows. The system was not designed for this kind of "asset wrapper" to slip in.
rakka tweet media
English
1
1
1
61
Jake
Jake@Jvke201·
@rakka_sol It makes sense though, I liked the analogy
English
0
0
1
22
Jake
Jake@Jvke201·
DeFi but its permissionless and oracle free @omnipair $omfg
English
0
0
0
45
kdot | bulk
kdot | bulk@kdotcrypto·
Anyone grave dancing right now is sick in the head Real lives affected, not just the team… But users and folks who thought they were in safe yield on other protocols Sad day for Solana DeFi
English
54
46
446
23.7K
Sisyphus
Sisyphus@0xSisyphus·
Drift raised more than $50 million to build code that lost $220 million of other people's money. Hyperliquid #investing
English
59
73
1.3K
74.5K
Omnipair
Omnipair@omnipair·
Omnipair has integrated with @birdeye_so, Solana's leading on-chain analytics terminal. Unified spot and oracleless lending liquidity in GAMM pools gives every SPL token a full money market without permission. Now discoverable by every trader and LP worldwide.
Omnipair tweet media
English
8
16
51
3.9K
nick vasilescu
nick vasilescu@nickvasiles·
Always on Limitless AI Pendant (ears) AI Meta Ray-Ban Smart Glasses (eyes) Obsidian Vault (brain) Claude Code (hands) OpenClaw agents with their own computer on Orgo (more hands) The tools are all here. You just have to glue them together.
English
10
7
89
4.4K
PRODIGY
PRODIGY@kingprodi·
It’s time to give back.
English
9
2
50
2K
Lily Liu
Lily Liu@calilyliu·
being a founder is super tough and we are here to help if you are a founder on solana, I am happy to strategise with you on: - GTM plan - TVL - user acquisition - east vs west BD strategy feel free to dm me. i will try to reply to everyone
Seraphim@MacroMate8

being a founder is super tough and we are here to help if you are a founder on solana, I am happy to strategise with you on: - GTM plan - TVL - user acquisition - east vs west BD strategy feel free to dm me. i will try to reply to everyone

English
101
35
632
97.5K
Jake
Jake@Jvke201·
P2P folded under 0 pressure
English
0
0
0
27
Nicholas Wenzel
Nicholas Wenzel@Nic_Wenzel_1·
GIF
P2P.me (TGE arc)@P2Pdotme

A note on the Polymarket positions you've seen on-chain - the account named "P2P Team" is ours. We wanted to come out honestly. The capital came from our foundation account and all proceeds return to it. Here's the full picture. 10 days before our raise went live, we placed bets that we'd hit our $6M+ target. At that point we had one oral commitment from Multicoin ($3M) - no signed term sheets, no guaranteed allocations, nothing binding. We were betting on ourselves. We'd told the market we were raising over $6M. We believed we could. That bet was our way of backing our word with our own money at a moment when the outcome was genuinely uncertain. Over the following 10 days we made our case, secured commitments, and the raise closed at $5.2M - entirely from outside investors we don't control. We understand why this raises questions. Trading on an outcome you can influence erodes trust. We don't believe we were trading on a done deal, but we recognize reasonable people can see it differently. We named the account "P2P Team" deliberately - to give a marketing signal of our presence to the community and reflect our intent to be transparent. But intent isn't the same as action. Not disclosing at the time was a mistake we own. We took time to study the legal implications before speaking, which is why we stayed silent until now with a "No Comments" stance! - that too is a fair criticism. All proceeds go back into our futarchy-governed MetaDAO treasury. We will be liquidating all positions in the next few hours and are putting together a formal company policy on prediction market trading going forward. One thing we want to be unambiguous about: MetaDAO (@MetaDAOProject ) had zero knowledge of or involvement in these bets. We're genuinely excited to join this community and wanted to start on the right note - which means being straight with you about this.

ZXX
3
0
10
1.3K