Bryan Walker

24.2K posts

Bryan Walker banner
Bryan Walker

Bryan Walker

@kbryanw

#Bitcoin

Katılım Mayıs 2009
1.1K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
Bryan Walker
Bryan Walker@kbryanw·
@upholdreality You don't have to beg the Chinese for deals. They're ready to do business usually.
English
0
0
0
243
Jonathan Chavez ᯅ 🇵🇦
@TheStaad We'd break up into a series of Jane Jacobs-style city/hinterland-states with state lines serving as a loosely binding framework masking ever-changing alliances. Culturally, probably more aligned with Colin Woodard's American Nations map.
English
1
0
1
138
Joey
Joey@TheStaad·
I believe the United States will ultimately break up into smaller nation-states, and this will be a good thing The red flyover states will return to familial and communal living and traditional values, and the blue states will disintegrate into oblivion
English
1.4K
80
1.5K
825.9K
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
When did we normalize this? When did it become okay for a president to tell a female reporter she’s a ‘dumb person’ for asking a totally legitimate question about his contradictory answers? Was there a specific date and time it become okay? Normal? Normalized?
Aaron Rupar@atrupar

TRUMP: We have a ballroom that's under budget. It's going up right here. I've doubled the size of it because we obviously need that. REPORTER: The price doubled TRUMP: I doubled the size of it, you dumb person. You are not a smart person.

English
3.5K
7.1K
37.1K
1.9M
Luna 🇺🇸
Luna 🇺🇸@LunaForTruth·
IMAGINE IT'S MIDNIGHT & THIS DATA CENTER SOUNDS LIKE A JET TAKING OFF NEXT TO YOUR BEDROOM! YOU CAN'T SLEEP. YOUR KIDS ARE SICK. YOUR WATER IS GONE. YOUR ELECTRICITY IS GONE. YOUR TAXES RAISED. TECH GREED IS DESTROYING OUR LIVES. ENOUGH SILENCE.
English
324
3.1K
8.7K
1.1M
Jesus Wept
Jesus Wept@jesus_wept2686·
@kbryanw @bcdsignature No. They don’t. It took thousands of years to “Discover” ai. No one saw it in nature afore time and said: hey, how can i replicate it. That never happened.
English
1
0
0
30
Bolocan Cristian Daniel
Bolocan Cristian Daniel@bcdsignature·
Can you imagine when humans first controlled fire? Some said, “It makes food taste better.” Others said, “So you want to risk burning the world for better food? One million years later, we are having the same argument about AI.
English
22
35
223
527.8K
Bryan Walker
Bryan Walker@kbryanw·
@jmhorp They haven't figured out how to make it useful to themselves yet, so they don't care.
English
0
0
0
29
Jesus Wept
Jesus Wept@jesus_wept2686·
@bcdsignature Baloney. Faulty logic. Fire is natural in nature and is uncreated by man by lightening. Nothing in nature spontaneously creates ai.
English
1
0
0
100
Bryan Walker
Bryan Walker@kbryanw·
It's a little bit of a catch 22 because every expert had to have the terms explained to them in colloquial language the first time. Otherwise you wouldn't have non-experts become experts. Then you build on concepts, of course. Might take a while to explain things in colloquial language but it can be done.
English
0
0
0
7
Josh
Josh@WxPolitics15·
@kbryanw But the conservation of angular momentum explained in terms of a figure skater or a ballerina is actually over-simplifying the dynamics to such an extent that you may be misleading your audience as to what is really happening
English
1
1
2
117
Josh
Josh@WxPolitics15·
This is the anti-intellectualism I was talking about because it’s not true for virtually any of the physical sciences. Yes sometimes you have to learn complex concepts in order to understand complex phenomena and sometimes this isn’t expressible in colloquial language!
Coren ✒🎨@CorenLaVolpe

Truly intelligent people can describe complex ideas in a way that a layman can understand. Being verbose is intentional obfuscation to maintain their little "elite" circle.

English
28
145
1.3K
20.6K
People's Poster
People's Poster@peoplesposting·
@kbryanw @WxPolitics15 Can you explain the color charge of fundamental particles without using specialist language (such as "color charge", for example)?
English
1
0
0
11
bumbadum
bumbadum@bumbadum14·
So far this is the only reasonable argument I’ve heard against them.
Davisaar 🌲@Davisaar69

@bumbadum14 I’m anti-datacenter/AI because I’m gonna need a mortgage to build a new PC the way things are going

English
28
3
180
3.8K
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
But conversely, while there is nothing wrong with building a great business and becoming extraordinarily wealthy there *is* something wrong with hoarding that wealthy for personal consumption or to pass to your kids. slowboring.com/p/the-real-pro…
English
839
13
233
819.5K
Bryan Walker
Bryan Walker@kbryanw·
@tonyannett Nah. You can disagree, but libertarians believe that the most people will have the best life possible with liberty rather than control.
English
0
0
0
18
adam
adam@resurrecti0ns·
it straight up never occurs to some people that there are some ideas that you can't really understand as a layman because they're too complicated. and it would be a bad thing to pretend otherwise and only pass down warped, extremely simplified versions of those ideas!
Coren ✒🎨@CorenLaVolpe

Truly intelligent people can describe complex ideas in a way that a layman can understand. Being verbose is intentional obfuscation to maintain their little "elite" circle.

English
135
812
9.8K
278.9K
Roman Helmet Guy
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy·
This is her dumbest take. Monopolies form naturally. Monopolies are much more profitable than competitive industries. So if you find yourself in a competitive industry, it makes sense to buy out or collude with all your competitors, or to temporarily take a loss in order to drive them out of business. The government itself is a naturally-forming monopoly on violence. Ayn Rand is frequently guilty of this kind of magical thinking in which everything would be perfect if the government just disappeared. Well, there are still large parts of Africa today in which there is effectively no government. Is it utopia? Meanwhile the Industrial Revolution could not have taken place without the financial incentives put in place by intellectual property law such as patents, which require an incredibly strong government to enforce. The right really needs to get away from this whole “everything the government does is bad” loser mindset.
Sowell Economics@sowelleconomics

Ayn Rand: "Under a free system, no one could acquire a monopoly on anything. If you look at economics, and economic history, you will discover that all monopolies have been established with government help."

English
903
566
6K
365.4K
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
i genuinely do not understand this reasoning. What do people think we did before capitalism? like the labor people did for their own basic necessities was... just not slavery somehow? like the default state of nature is lounging peacefully on the ground eating berries?
Idalis !@IdalisReign

@JMary64u everything we do under capitalism or an exchange of labor/bodies for currency and basic necessities is slavery.

English
206
204
4.9K
168.5K
Bryan Walker
Bryan Walker@kbryanw·
@d4nnytye Because humans are the subject of the study, it's ethical to explain to them in a way they can understand.
English
0
0
1
196