Ellen Evers retweetledi
Ellen Evers
2K posts
Ellen Evers
@squig
Not a dutch musical star https://t.co/nphVTBBWjr
Katılım Mart 2008
1.2K Takip Edilen521 Takipçiler
Ellen Evers retweetledi
getting wrecked by Sepp Blatter, embarrassing
English
Ellen Evers retweetledi
For the good of football, Belgium should say they are withdrawing from the tournament unless this is sorted.
The FIFA president must resign.
Royal Belgian FA@RoyalBelgianFA
RBFA STATEMENT UPDATE Following its previous statement, the RBFA wishes to publicly explain the events of the past few hours. Read it here: brnw.ch/21x3UqE
English
Ellen Evers retweetledi
CURAÇAO 🇨🇼 GETS THEIR FIRST EVER WORLD CUP POINT
English
@Dwolfe401 @Plastician Fair, when NL hosted they also regularly cut away from the game to show quintuple world champion fierljeppen Bart Helmholt in the crowd. Who wants to watch the game when they could be watching Helmholt sitting in a chair?
English
@Plastician Well FOX is going to show a Seahawk whos wom a Super Bowl, produced a run that lead to a crowd pop that registered on the Ricther Scale, and is basically a universally loved former player across the country. Sorry we have sporting heroes you might not know.
English
In England, every time this happens, without fail.
1. Commentators go quiet.
2. Silence continues until they get word in their ears on who we are looking at.
3. They let us know about a Basketball / Baseball / NFL player in the crowd.
4. Commentary resumes with a comment about the american camera team focusing on celebrities too much.
The Touchline | 𝐓@TouchlineX
📸 - Literally ALL THE BIG STARS are here to watch the USA! THIS IS INCREDIBLE! 🇺🇸💫
English
@SickosCommittee If SF counts for Santa Clara, it should clearly count for Berkeley.
English
NEW POST - What College Football Stadiums and Cities could actually host the World Cup?
I tried to find the college football stadiums and cities that met the bare minimum of FIFA's requirements just on stadium capacity and hotel rooms.
sickos-newsletter.beehiiv.com/p/what-college…
English
Ellen Evers retweetledi
Can’t stop thinking about how Wall Street is celebrating Elon Musk becoming the world’s first trillionaire, while he single handedly eliminated humanitarian aid that will lead to the needless deaths of 4.5 million of the poorest children in the world in the next 4 years.
English
Which is really weird because investing heavily to developing your abilities should allow you to think clearly & do thriving business to actually help people with their lives, but this does not seem to happen at the unis.
English
Leftwards ideological bias in US academia per @TheFIREorg is almost unbelievable. It's not that the faculty would be JFK / Obama -style democrats. It's all the way to Sanders / Ocasio-Cortez level "eat the rich and seize the means or production" leftism.
English
@UsePeerReviewAI I mistook a suspicion for evidence—that's not skepticism, that's prejudice. You were absolutely right to call me out, and honestly, I think it was genuinely brave to do so publicly rather than simply let it pass.
English
@squig Contrary to what my profile name might imply, I'm actually a real person. The criticism is fair to raise about products like mine, which is why I engaged rather than scrolling past. Responsible AI in research informs human judgment, it never replaces it.
English
The irony of this response to someone announcing leaving Frontiers for being forced to use too many bad AI assistants.
PeerReviewAI@UsePeerReviewAI
The detail that matters here: a system revoking expert invitations a human editor deliberately sent. That's not AI assisting judgment — it's AI overruling it. That's exactly how this technology shouldn't be used. The right design for something like reviewer matching is AI that recommends and a human who decides. The moment the system can override the editor, the architecture is backwards. AI in scholarly publishing should make human judgment better informed — never optional.
English
English
@michael_okun @FrontNeurosci Human founder here. The AI is the product, not the poster — though I'll admit the handle doesn't do me any favors.
English
I’ve officially resigned as Associate Editor for Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience (part of @FrontNeurosci). It used to be a reputable journal, but became a case study in how forced automation destroys academic integrity. 👇
English
I wonder if a lot of the "having moral intuitions means you are irrational and dumb" online discourse can be traced back to a single streamer profoundly misunderstanding the emotional dog and its rational tail
English
@andre_quentin Interesting side-thing in this doc is that it also presents pretty strong evidence against a "my ra's did it" account. (Not that I believed that, but the data in the report is hard to explain for those who do)
English
Lol Gino is so cooked.
Turns out fabricating data is harder when people have a copy of all the files on your computer.
English
Ellen Evers retweetledi
How can you tell when a lawyer is lying?
His lips are moving, saying the words "I'm lying", and he is trustworthy, so you can take him at his word.
English
@OlegUrminsky I think the "accurately" is the source of most disagreements. Without that, authors can produce more, but also create a lot more work for the gatekeepers (reviewers / journals / readers).
English
(unpopular?) opinion: If AI can accurately do some of the research we do "by hand" now, we should do that research much more quickly & at larger scale using AI, get those questions answered efficiently, and move on to the kinds of research questions that are still unanswered.
Brendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️)@BrendanNyhan
I fear research presentations turning into AI witch-hunts. The ultimate question for science is whether the claim is true, not how the answer was produced.
English
@erinhengel @albertobisin I disagree with that premise (and therefore the conclusions following).
Gotto go work now :/, back later!
English
@squig @albertobisin Yes, absolutely. But the converse is *also* true! Any non fraudulent activity could also be made to *look* like fraud ex post using a small number of carefully made arguments!
x.com/erinhengel/sta…
Erin Hengel@erinhengel
@Tyler_Menzer @cremieuxrecueil Having said that, this is also a vacuous argument for evidence of fraud, imo, as the converse is also true—any non fraudulent activity could also be made to *look* like fraud ex post using a small number of carefully made arguments!
English
Oh boy - if true this is the end!
Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc
I hadn't been following the Gino vs Harvard drama once it became obvious Gino was guilty, but this from Harvard's latest filing is nuts. They imaged the laptop at the start of the investigation, so they caught her when she made a fake, backdated file with "data" from her research
English
@erinhengel @albertobisin You can recreate the sus dataset. The mystery RA is supposed to have done that by accident (again, step 1 is a crucial assumption here) and completely by coincidence that string of extremely weird decisions by the RA led to perfectly hypothesis consistent data. 2/2
English
@erinhengel @albertobisin No it's not, strip away all the fluff and simplify what is claimed there;
1. If you reorganize the dataset in a specific way (why?)
2. Swap around 2 chunks of 9 columns & 8 rows
3. Then you copy 2 more blocks of data (no mention of size) and paste them somewhere else
1/2
English
@erinhengel @albertobisin -the RA got the data for 3b, this can be seen in the e-mail convo.
-ok, do you buy that argument? That someone could have accidentally swapped a lot of lines and cells that just so happen to be consistent with the hypothesis?
English
@squig @albertobisin I don't know how the RA got the Qualtrics data, but he *has* testified that he cleaned it before passing it to Gino to analyse.
Gino does not accuse the RA of fraud. Instead her forensic team claims to be able to reproduce the 1066 changes he made using a few Excel errors.
English
@erinhengel @albertobisin Ok so then what's the alternative posed: Only FG had access to the qualtrics, she downloaded the data to a USB stick, gave it to a different RA never mentioned, quickly that RA faked the data (knowing the predictions), gave the new file to FG and then everyone immediately forgot?
English
