knut retweetledi
knut
1.4K posts

knut retweetledi

Drive-home thought…
Yes, Britain has become poorer.
Years of foolish decisions and short-sighted governments will do that to a country.
But the decline you see everywhere now isn’t just economic.
It’s something far more embarrassing.
We’ve lost our pride.
There was a time when people had less — smaller homes, older cars, wages that barely stretched to the end of the week — yet they still cared about their street, their town and the place they lived.
People swept their front step.
They cut the grass outside the gate.
And they didn’t throw rubbish out of the car window like a toddler emptying a toy box.
Now look around.
Fast-food boxes in hedges.
Energy drink cans rolling down the gutter.
Plastic bags tangled in trees like pathetic little flags of surrender.
If you want the clearest example, just take a look at motorway exit roads.
Come off any motorway in Britain and the verges look like someone’s opened the car window and emptied a bin bag at 70mph.
Coffee cups.
Burger cartons.
Plastic bottles.
Lottery tickets.
Entire takeaway meals apparently jettisoned mid-journey.
And every single one of those bits of rubbish came from someone sitting in a perfectly good car who simply couldn’t be bothered to take it home.
It’s not poverty.
It’s laziness and a complete lack of self-respect.
Previous generations didn’t need recycling apps, environmental campaigns, or a bin collection calendar that looks like the invasion plan for Normandy.
They just understood one simple rule:
Don’t live like a scruffy bastard.
Take your rubbish home.
Put it in a bin.
Show a bit of pride in where you live.
Because governments might make a country poorer…
…but only its people can turn it into a tip.
English
knut retweetledi

It's been a 40-year trail of failed forecasts.
If the Climate Crisis were a commercial product, it would have been recalled for false advertising decades ago. This emerging economic disaster relies on a Code Red emergency that simply hasn't arrived. Surely, the most important metric for any science is the accuracy of its deadlines.
The broken promises:
1989 (UN): Predicted the Maldives would be underwater by 2000. Today, the Maldives' land area has actually expanded through natural accretion and reclamation.
2009 (Al Gore): Predicted ice-free Arctic summers by 2014. In 2026, the ice remains resilient.
2019 (António Guterres): Claimed Tuvalu was sinking on the front line of an emergency. Scientific studies show Tuvalu’s land area has increased by nearly 3%.
The goalposts are always moving because the Climate Cavalcade is anchored in policy and finance not atmospheric reality. When a 2014 deadline fails, its reset to 2030. When 2030 fails, it moves to 2050. It’s an easy game of chance when you're playing with other people's money.
The real crisis isn’t the climate; it’s institutional overreach and a massive breach of public trust.

Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
knut retweetledi

Palm oil is in approximately 40% of packaged supermarket products.
It is in your bread. Your biscuits. Your chocolate. Your margarine. Your plant-based burger. Your vegan cheese. Your "sustainable" soap. Your shampoo. Your lipstick.
The primary growing region is Borneo and Sumatra. The primary land use change in those regions over the last 30 years is rainforest to palm plantation.
The Bornean orangutan is critically endangered. The Sumatran tiger is critically endangered. The pygmy elephant of Borneo is endangered.
None of these animals are endangered because of cattle grazing in Yorkshire.
They are endangered because of the ingredient list on the back of your dairy-free butter.
English
knut retweetledi

The avocado has been granted a cultural status that its environmental record does not support.
It is green. It photographs well. It has a buttery texture that food stylists love. It appears on toast in restaurants with exposed brickwork and pendant lighting and a menu that uses the word "artisan" without apparent embarrassment. It is associated with a particular kind of urban, health-conscious, ethically-minded consumer who recycles and cycles to work and has strong opinions about palm oil.
In Michoacán, Mexico, where the majority of the world's avocado supply originates, the industry has become substantially controlled by organised criminal networks who have found that an avocado grove is more profitable, more defensible, and considerably more socially acceptable than most of the other things they might otherwise be doing.
Farmers who refuse to cooperate with extortion have been murdered. This is not a conspiracy theory. It has been reported by the New York Times, the Guardian, and every major news organisation that covers Mexico. The Mexican army has been deployed to avocado-growing regions because of the level of cartel involvement.
In Chile, avocado production in the Petorca region has been directly linked to the drying up of rivers that local communities depend on for drinking water. Investigations found illegal water extraction by avocado farms, with residents receiving water by tanker lorry while the orchards were irrigated. The people went without water so that the avocado could travel to the brunch plates of people who were eating it because they cared about the environment.
The avocado does not have an environmental halo. The avocado has a very good publicist.

English
knut retweetledi
knut retweetledi

We used to have lots of places in the UK where you could get most of what you needed within 15 minutes walk: school, GP, grocer, butcher, church, pub, children's playground, sports club.
We called them "towns" and "villages".
Then along came central and local government.
They encouraged large chains to build out of town supermarkets, forcing town centre butchers and grocers and fishmongers out of business.
They planted acres of new housing around towns and villages, with no facilities, and too far away from town centres for people to walk there. And they sold off sports grounds and playgrounds for more housing.
They built centralised "superhospitals", moving patient care away from their local neighbourhood, while running down the GP service and replacing it with call centres and "apps".
They raised business rates and car park prices in town centres, and installed lots of bike lanes and "traffic calming", thereby narrowing roads and causing more traffic congestion, reducing footfall, and sending town centre shops out of business.
They closed pubs, playgrounds, sports clubs, churches to save us all from a *checks notes* deadly respiratory virus.
And now what do they want to do?
They want to recreate those 15 minute communities that we used to have in small towns and villages, but in bigger towns and cities instead. Only they're not doing it by encouraging small businesses to open neighbourhood stores, or reducing local business rates, or decentralising the NHS, ensuring we can all live in that same 15 minute paradise.
No, they're doing it by installing traffic filters and CCTV and enforcement infrastructure and fines. All stick and no carrot. Creating new inner city ghettos.
There is seemingly no situation which central and local government cannot make worse.

English
knut retweetledi
knut retweetledi
knut retweetledi

Did you know C.S. Lewis predicted the modern obsession with “being nice” would destroy the soul?
In The Abolition of Man, Lewis argues that when a society stops believing in objective virtue, it doesn’t become tolerant… it becomes manipulable.
He calls the result “men without chests.”
People with appetites and intellects, but no courage, no honor, no trained moral instincts. They can calculate everything and defend nothing.
Lewis saw that once we reject inherited moral law, we don’t become free. We become raw material… easily shaped by propaganda, pleasure, and fear.
Modern man prides himself on compassion while quietly surrendering every standard that once gave compassion meaning.
Lewis’s insight is brutal: a civilization that educates clever cowards will eventually be ruled by tyrants or technicians.
Because when nothing is worth dying for, everything becomes negotiable… including human dignity.

English
knut retweetledi
knut retweetledi
knut retweetledi

A publicly funded British museum has declared Father Christmas "too white," "too patriarchal," and morally unfit to judge children. This is not satire, parody, or a student stunt. It is the official voice of Brighton and Hove Museums – an institution paid by taxpayers to preserve heritage, now treating it as a problem to be solved.
Their complaint is not that Santa has been commercialised or cheapened, but that he exercises judgement. The naughty list, we're told, is a "Western binary." Moral distinction is "colonial." The solution is to scrap judgement entirely, rebrand him as "Mother Christmas," and recast the elves as co-workers in a flattened, grievance-managed collective. Charity without standards. Joy without meaning. Tradition without roots.
What's being proposed here isn't reform but repudiation. A cultural authority has looked at one of the most benign figures in European folklore – a symbol of generosity, restraint, and reward earned through conduct – and concluded that the problem lies not with human behaviour, but with the civilisation that dares to distinguish right from wrong. That alone tells you how far the rot has spread.
The attack on Santa isn't about Santa. It's about narrative control. If they can make you feel ashamed of a story as joyful and harmless as Father Christmas – a figure rooted in European folklore, Christian charity, and festive tradition – they can make you ashamed of anything. Your history. Your religion. Your nation. Your skin.
This is what ideological colonisation looks like: strip a culture of its symbols, flood its traditions with guilt, and turn its festivals into battlegrounds for theory. First Christmas was too religious. Then it was too white. Now it's too binary, too judgmental, too "colonial." What remains if this logic wins? Lights without meaning. Songs without story. A hollow shell where memory used to live.
And let's not pretend this is an isolated case. Across Britain, cultural institutions are infected by the same poison – a bureaucratic class that sees its role not as steward of the past but as its interrogator. Museums sneer at what they were built to protect. Galleries use public money to dismantle beauty in the name of "reimagining." Libraries swap storytelling for ideology, and schools tiptoe around December as if tradition itself were a threat.
Ask yourself this: would any other civilisation do this? Would Saudi Arabia replace Eid with a seminar on white privilege? Would India allow its temples to host deconstructions of Diwali? Would Nigeria denounce its tribal folklore as oppressive binaries? Of course not. Only the West does this. Only the West funds the demolition of its own inheritance and calls it progress.
That's the deeper point. This isn't cultural evolution. It's self-harm dressed as virtue. These people don't want to "reimagine" Christmas. They want to dissolve it – to turn a season of belonging and wonder into a classroom for resentment. They see children not as heirs to joy, but as blank slates to be programmed with guilt. "Santa is too white" is just another way of saying you are too white. "Judgement is colonial" is code for morality itself being suspect.
And if they get away with this, it won't stop at Christmas. Every tradition will be rewritten. Every figure flattened. Every national story edited until nothing remains but apologies and disclaimers. This is Year Zero thinking – erase what was, replace it with what should be, and raise a generation that no longer recognises the country it inhabits.
Britain is being taught to forget itself – and to hate what it remembers. So no, this isn't just about Santa. It's about a line in the sand. Push back now, or surrender childhood, heritage, and joy to a class of cultural saboteurs who believe the past must burn so they can rule over the ashes.
"They see children not as heirs to joy, but as blank slates to be programmed with guilt. "Santa is too white" is just another way of saying you are too white."

English
knut retweetledi

🚨🇪🇺 ECB QUIETLY UNVEILS THE FINAL CHAIN: DIGITAL EURO LOCKDOWN BY 2029
In what central bankers are celebrating as the “crowning evolution of money,” the European Central Bank just confirmed the irreversible rollout: a fully trackable, programmable digital euro arriving no later than 2029, with pilot transactions and wallet seeding beginning mid-2027 - assuming the co-legislators rubber-stamp the cage in 2026.
The captured ECB blog post spills the real agenda in polite bureaucrat-speak: cash is “going nowhere” (for now), but every offline-capable digital euro will still be issued, held, and revocable by the ECB itself.
Translation: no one outside Frankfurt will ever transact anonymously again once merchants and banks are forced to accept it everywhere.
They admit the quiet part out loud: Europe’s payments are currently “dominated by non-European providers,” and that makes the continent a hostage in a “polarised and fragmented world.”
Their solution isn’t competition; it’s total control.
One public ledger to rule them all, designed from day one to “reduce external dependencies” and guarantee the EU can freeze, limit, or tax any citizen’s spending in real time without begging Visa, Mastercard, or - God forbid - Washington for permission.
No more unapproved donations. No more cash under the mattress when the next “temporary” capital controls hit. No more buying a coffee or a car without the algorithm knowing your exact carbon footprint, political loyalty score, or vaccine status.
They promise it will “complement” private payment apps. It won’t. The moment holding limits, negative interest rates, or “emergency climate quotas” become politically convenient, every private wallet will be throttled until the digital euro is the only one that still works.
Cash isn’t being replaced. It’s being gently, legally, permanently suffocated.
2026: the law.
2027: the pilots.
2029: the switch flips.
Welcome to the open-air digital prison they’re calling “strategic autonomy.” Your money was the last freedom they hadn’t fully taken.
They just told you the exact date.
Source: ECB Europa, The Banker

English
knut retweetledi

Why I despise this EU:
In 2013 the Italian coastguard had picked up 24 Africans on the high seas and returned them to Africa.
WIth the Help of an NGO they sued Italy from an asylum camp (!) in Lybia and won their case before the ECHR (European council of "human rights".
Italy had to pay them 360,000 euros AND ship the to europe. This was the starting point for the flood of illegals over the Med. The european institutions paralyzed the nation states. They became defenseless.
The EU works hand in hand with the ECHR against the eureopan nations.
I despise them.

English
knut retweetledi

🇪🇺 WELCOME TO THE EU'S BUREAUCRATIC EMPIRE: WHERE DEMOCRACY GOES TO DIE
So, you went to the polls. You voted. Maybe you even knocked doors or argued politics with your uncle over dinner. Congratulations. You exercised your democratic right. Now let’s tell you why it doesn’t matter.
Because in the grand, gleaming halls of Brussels, someone you didn’t elect is making the real decisions. And that’s not a conspiracy - it’s the institutional design.
This is the EU: a glorious experiment in post-democratic governance. The elected leaders of your country? They get to give speeches, sure. But when it comes to setting the rules, managing trade, telling your judges what to rule and your farmers what to grow - there’s a lovely little pyramid, and guess what? You’re not anywhere near the top.
And no, the European Parliament doesn’t save you. It’s the decorative plant of EU democracy. The laws don’t start there. The real power sits with the European Commission - an unelected gang of technocrats who can outregulate, outmaneuver, and outvote your national government on everything from fisheries to fiscal policy. You can’t fire them. You can’t replace them. But don’t worry - they’re very “competent.”
This is how democracy dies: not with tanks, but with treaties. Slowly. Softly. Signed away by prime ministers chasing subsidies and photo-ops. Until one day, your country’s parliament becomes a glorified comment section on rules already written elsewhere.
Try passing a law your voters want that conflicts with EU policy. Try setting an immigration standard your people demanded. Good luck. You’ll be politely reminded that you’re bound by commitments - commitments no voter ever saw on a ballot. And if you push too hard? Out come the infringement procedures. Out come the threats. Out come the lectures about “European values,” as if bureaucracy is a moral compass.
And don’t you dare try to question the EU’s authority. That’s what “populists” do. That’s dangerous. That’s the kind of thinking that leads to... horror of horrors... sovereignty.
Because at the end of the day, this isn’t just about cooperation. This is about control. This is about centralizing power behind a wall of civil servants and calling it progress. It’s about wrapping political decisions in technocratic jargon until nobody remembers who was supposed to be in charge.
You still get to vote, sure. But the question is: for what? National elections start to feel like choosing the flavor of frosting on a cake someone else already baked. With someone else’s recipe. And someone else’s rules about how many eggs you’re allowed to use.
Call it what you want - shared governance, interdependence, modern integration. But don’t pretend it’s democratic. When your vote can’t change the law, when your government can’t defy the script, and when real power belongs to the unelected, then what you’ve got isn’t democracy.
It’s bureaucracy with a flag.

Elon Musk@elonmusk
😂
English
knut retweetledi

They told us China was cheating. Turns out they were just building while we were preaching. While the West was busy dismantling coal plants, paying people not to boil kettles and covering farmland with solar panels that don’t work when it’s dark, China did the obvious: They kept the lights on and built everything.
The result? China now makes 80% of the world’s solar panels, 70% of the batteries, 60% of the wind turbine parts and 55% of global steel (more than the next 15 countries combined). And they’re still commissioning two state-of-the-art coal plants a week – the cleanest coal plants ever built, because reliable power beats ideology every single time.
In 2000 China’s manufacturing output was smaller than Italy’s. Today it’s larger than America + Europe + Japan + South Korea combined. We outsourced the actual hardware of the 'green revolution' to our main rival, then acted surprised when they became the workshop of the world and the richest industrial power in history.
The miracle isn’t mysterious. It’s embarrassingly simple:
Abundant energy. No net-zero cults. A government that sees steel mills and giga-factories as strategic assets, not sins. The biggest transfer of wealth and power in human history didn’t happen with guns or treaties. It happened because one side built things and the other side wrote strongly worded letters and paid influencers to shame anyone who pointed it out.
China installed more solar in 2024 than the entire world had installed cumulatively by 2017.
From 2005–2023 China added ~1,100 GW of coal capacity while the West lost ~200 GW. That gap is the story of the century.
The West ran a 20-year experiment in whether you can deindustrialize your own civilization, hand the manufacturing base to a strategic rival, subsidise that rival with your own climate policies, yet still win the century.
Result so far: China’s manufacturing share of global GDP went from ~6% in 2000 to ~30% today. America’s went from ~22% to ~15%. Europe’s collapsed from ~25% to ~14%.
China didn’t beat us. We decommissioned ourselves.
Ready to discuss?

Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
knut retweetledi
knut retweetledi

From Becky Neale on FB facebook.com/share/17QRgQ7J…
Ladies and gentlemen, why is everyone not doing this?
Walk into any store using facial recognition cameras and demand a copy of that data.
Do not leave until you’ve asked for it.
Under UK GDPR Article 15 and Section 45 of the Data Protection Act 2018, you are legally entitled to a copy of any personal data they hold on you — including facial recognition scans. If they refuse or fob you off, they are breaking the law.
They have one month to give you the data.
If they fail to do so, you can claim compensation — easily £2,500+ in many cases.
Now imagine if a thousand people did this.
The system would collapse overnight. They rely on you not knowing your rights. They rely on you walking away.
Come on people, there’s loads of you on here.
Stop shrugging it off and start doing it.
Even if just a thousand of you hit them with a Subject Access Request (SAR's), the whole rotten setup would be overwhelmed.
Knowledge is power. Use it.
Script to say at the desk:
“Hi, I believe your store is using facial recognition cameras. Under GDPR, I have the legal right to a copy of any personal data you’ve collected on me. This includes any images or facial recognition scans.
I would like to make a Subject Access Request for that data right now. Please log my request immediately.
I am entitled to receive this data within one month. If you refuse or fail to process this request properly, you will be in breach of GDPR and liable to fines or claims.
Please confirm you’ve recorded my request and tell me what the next step is.”
If they try to brush you off:
“If you’re saying you can’t do it here, please give me the full details of your Data Protection Officer. Just so you’re aware, failure to comply can result in a claim of up to £2,500. I know my rights and I’m exercising them.”
Useful links:
GDPR Article 15 (Right of Access): gdpr-info.eu/art-15-gdpr
ICO - Right Of Access:
ico.org.uk/for-organisati…
UK Data Protection Act 2018 Section 45: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/…
ICO guide to Subject Access Requests:
1) ico.org.uk/for-organisati…
2) ico.org.uk/for-organisati…
ICO on Facial Recognition Technology:
1) ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/…
2) ico.org.uk/for-organisati…

English

















