Kuleen ◎

875 posts

Kuleen ◎ banner
Kuleen ◎

Kuleen ◎

@knimkar

Unemployed Prev: Diplomat @SolanaFndn I write sometimes at https://t.co/NZeapsJQ7y

NYC Katılım Nisan 2009
808 Takip Edilen4.7K Takipçiler
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
@kaledora ive concluded that some things people / society have to just continually re-make the mistakes to remind themselves of the principle
English
1
0
0
48
kaledora
kaledora@kaledora·
i have this ‘bit’ about tech bros reinventing things from first principles > “i read that studies show that social interaction increases longevity”: reinventing friends from first principles?? > “huberman says that sunlight is really important”: reinventing going outside from first principles?? > etc and crypto is currently in peak “reinventing things from first principles” mode: > “tokens should have cash flows and ownership rights” reinventing securities from first principles > “products should be useful and solve a problem”: reinventing company building from first principles?? > “finding users is really important”: reinventing go to market from first principles?? the good news is that this is actually great and a sign of a maturing industry! for better or for worse, it is basically a human universal that wisdom can only really come from first hand experience making mistakes and re-deriving the seemingly obvious from first principles i have great hope the rising generation of DeFi / crypto might actually be more committed to the “obvious” principles now re-derived *because* the industry so viscerally experienced the downsides of ignoring the obvious
English
12
2
80
6.2K
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
@beaniemaxi Where can I learn more? I am a mega bull on onchain gaming (esp lottery, casino, poker)
English
2
0
4
695
Beanie
Beanie@beaniemaxi·
Fully onchain and permissionless poker. No house. No tokens allocated for anything other than gameplay. Polymarket disrupted sportsbooks. This is the start of disrupting the casino complex. The first "burn to earn" mechanism that I've seen in crypto gaming. Drops soon on Solana.
Beanie tweet media
English
52
26
300
26.5K
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
@TraderNoah cant tell if it's "markets are forward looking" or attention spans are incredibly short perhaps both
English
0
0
1
39
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
@jito_sol If you give me limit orders that work, I will never leave the app
English
0
0
2
287
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
Imo what we are seeing atm is a glimpse into what "alt szn" will look like going forward Still large moves, just channeled into a much smaller set of names (e.g., solana:CARDSccUMFKoPRZxt5vt3ksUbxEFEcnZ3H2pd3dKxYjp and ethereum:0x808507121b80c02388fad14726482e061b8da827 today)
English
0
0
3
191
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
Re HIP-4, consider the track record of "product" efforts on @HyperliquidX : Highly successful: HIP3 Limited success to date: USDH, HIP-2 (spot markets), HyperEVM Perps are the thing that have worked. Nothing else has moved the needle. So your prior on HIP-4 probably should be that it won't be highly successful
English
3
0
14
2.7K
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
Not sure why I feel compelled to bear post about my bags but 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
English
0
0
0
156
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
Actually a bit crazy to see Hyperliquid and Binance mentioned somewhat casually in a post by John Arnold
John Arnold@johnarnold

Curious how Jane Street made $40 billion last year with few negative days? Here’s one example: - Between 1990-2000, there was only one exchange-listed product to trade natural gas: the NYMEX (now CME) physically-settled futures contract - In 2000, ICE realized there was demand for a financially settled (swap) futures contract and introduced it - CME countered and listed their own swap future At this point, the products were primarily for institutional and sophisticated individuals with a commodities account. But as commodities boomed in the 2000s, exchanges created new contracts to increase access and appeal to retail traders. - the NYSE introduced an ETF (UNG) that followed natural gas prices in 2007 - More ETFs followed that offered ability to bet on a price decline and to get 2x or 3x leverage - CME introduced a mini contract that was 1/4th the size of the original The next evolution was to appeal to the pure speculator by expanding the market to less regulated exchanges, widening access globally, increasing leverage, and creating daily bets. - CME introduced the micro contract that is 1/10th the size of the original - CME and ICE introduced contracts that expire each trading day - Hyperliquid and Binance offer unregulated, on-chain, high leverage, perpetual nat gas contracts for non-US uses - Kalshi offers same day binary contracts. Other prediction markets are moving forward as well. Now add other iterations on settlement days for the contracts and options on everything listed above. Note that all of these contracts settle (perps notwithstanding) against the original CME physical futures contract. But instead of one way to trade the product, there are dozens. This creates an opportunity to make markets across all of these surfaces and arbitrage among them. And that's what Jane Street and other similar HFT shops do (among many, many other things). Nat gas for delivery at Henry Hub, Louisiana is just one product. Take all the ways to trade equities, currencies, commodities, crypto, interest rates, etc across all the different exchanges in all the jurisdictions and the opportunity of making $50 here and $1000 there adds up to an enormous, low-risk money making machine. This opportunity originates from the large variety of ways people desire to trade random financial instruments and the various products designed for them. This creates a hugely profitable opportunity for the HFTs. They provide a valuable service of creating liquidity for those seeking to trade. Whether that trading is smart and profitable for the average punter on the other side is a different story.

English
0
0
9
3K
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
I land somewhere in the middle on this debate. Would much rather live in a world where teams don’t have to do buybacks to prove their token is worth > $0. Strong early stage businesses probably have lots of useful things to do with capital. But in absence of that, I’ll begrudgingly accept buybacks are ok. Anyways, yes this is a @MetaDAOProject / ownership coin bull post
Jeff Dorman@jdorman81

Disagree with a16z completely. This is such a VC "everything will just workout" mindset and completely misses the structural flaws. x.com/jdorman81/stat… The biggest (and really only) difference between stocks and tokens is that equity investors trust equity issuers (partially for legal reasons, partially due to how long equities have been around). Now, that is often misguided, as management can still make terrible decisions with capital allocation (pay employees too much, make bad acquisitions, bad R&D expenses, etc)... but for the most part, paying dividends or doing buybacks is not necessary right away for equity investors because they either blindly trust management, or because they know eventually the profits of the entity will go to shareholders. Thus, dividends/buybacks can wait. But token issuers grow much faster than traditional companies, largely because of the token incentives that help these entities grow. Therefore, they should be paid back quicker. And buybacks are the ONLY viable path towards paying back tokenholders. The only thing that would change my mind would be if token issuers did a better job of communicating their visions, and built trust with their token holders. In doing so, then token holders might be willing to wait longer to be repaid.

English
0
0
5
500
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
This is neat. Better market structure for valuable assets that don't already have it
vibhu@vibhu

Doma is bringing a new RWA to @solana soon: Tokenized baskets of 100k+ premium domain names listed in secondary marketplaces, representing billions of dollars. Holders get paid on each sale. One of the most ambitious attempts ever to rewire the $10 billion domain industry.

English
0
0
0
284
Kuleen ◎ retweetledi
sterling
sterling@sterlingishere·
Spent a bit of time making a dashboard for SHFL for all the purple coin enjoyers out there. This takes publicly available data and updates each Friday after the lottery draw is complete. dune.com/shflfoundation…
English
6
8
44
5.1K
molu
molu@molusol·
@knimkar Perps is growing, especially with @PhoenixTrade Spot volume has been decent, in a bear 65B last month, 100B month before. More and more L1/ L2 listings on Solana as well. Agree with you
English
1
0
0
81
Kuleen ◎
Kuleen ◎@knimkar·
Not a single one of these metrics is something I am looking at for $SOL There are only two things I am looking for: 1/ Is growth inflecting for any category of spot trading? - weekly trading volumes for various segments of assets (memecoins, tokenized stocks, other crypto assets like BTC on Solana) 2/ Is growth inflecting for derivatives (perps)? - is there a perps product on mainnet growing trading volumes? These activities pay the bills
molu@molusol

$SOL bull thesis: > firedancer targeted 1M TPS. > $1.1t on-chain activity last quarter. > $832b stablecoin volume. > 99% tokenized pre-ipo equities market share. > JPMorgan, SoFi, and Western Union chose Solana. > 416 new projects in Q1. > SOL/BTC at 2.5 year lows > a 12-18 month accumulation play, currently 71% off ATH

English
1
0
9
1K