KacZka

2.1K posts

KacZka banner
KacZka

KacZka

@KacZka_Casts

24 y/o PhD student enjoying life | she/her 🏳️‍⚧️, asexual | @warwickesports my beloved | Known to have cast League of Legends

United Kingdom Katılım Nisan 2018
512 Takip Edilen357 Takipçiler
KacZka retweetledi
Jeremy Corbyn
Jeremy Corbyn@jeremycorbyn·
Reform want to round up migrants and detain them indefinitely in areas that don’t vote for them. Yet for most of our media, it’s those marching for Palestine who are creating hatred & fear. These disgusting plans are an affront to democracy — and must be fiercely opposed.
English
2.5K
2.7K
13K
392.9K
KacZka retweetledi
Bad Writing Takes 🖊️🏳️‍🌈
Feels like neo-nazis performing Nazi salutes to a Jewish man in public should be apart of the current conversation about antisemitism... but the media consensus seems to be that Zack Polanski is one of the Bad Kinds Of Jew and therefore it's not really important.
Canary@TheCanaryUK

Nazi salutes thrown by Reform supporters at Polanski's Hastings rally A group of Reform supporters showed up to a Green Party rally led by @ZackPolanski in Hastings to agitate - and then this happened thecanary.co/trending/2026/…

English
18
939
4.7K
81.7K
KacZka retweetledi
The Green Party
The Green Party@TheGreenParty·
The UK government must ACT NOW and: • Condemn the Israeli Navy’s illegal actions against the Flotilla • Demand the safety and release of all British Citizens involved in this mission • Stop all arms exports to Israel immediately • Do everything in its power to end this ongoing genocide
English
2K
2.5K
6.4K
507.9K
KacZka retweetledi
Daniel Lismore
Daniel Lismore@daniellismore·
Trans Rights Won in the High Court Today. Did You Hear About It? The Office for Students tried to fine the University of Sussex £585,000 for having a policy that said transphobia is not tolerated and that staff should positively represent trans people. It was the largest fine the OfS had ever attempted to levy against a university. It was designed to send a message to every institution in the country about what happens when you protect transgender students and staff. The High Court threw it out completely today. The judge found the OfS had closed its mind to any outcome other than finding the university guilty before the investigation was finished. The regulator interviewed Kathleen Stock. It did not interview a single person from the university despite the university repeatedly requesting to be heard. That is not regulation. That is a verdict dressed up as a process. The judge also found the OfS took a fundamentally flawed approach to deciding what academic freedom even means. The university’s vice chancellor called it a devastating indictment of the impartiality and competence of the OfS, implicating its operations, leadership, governance and strategy. Kathleen Stock resigned from Sussex after student protests over her views. She was not dismissed. She chose to leave. The OfS built a £585,000 case on the basis that a policy saying transphobia is not tolerated had made her more cautious about expressing her beliefs. The High Court today said that reasoning did not hold and that the process used to reach it was biased from the start. The OfS said the outcome was disappointing and that it did not accept the finding of bias. Its chairman said he would consider over several weeks whether to appeal. The interim chief executive said he was pleased that a dozen institutions including Sussex had amended policies which restricted freedom of speech as a result of the investigation. Read that again. The regulator whose investigation was found to be biased, closed-minded and procedurally flawed is describing universities removing trans inclusive policies as a positive outcome it is proud of. That tells you everything about what this investigation was actually for. Universities across the country had been watching this case with alarm. A fine of that size for having a trans inclusive policy would have sent a chilling effect through every institution in the country. Institutions would have removed protections for transgender students and staff not because they wanted to but because they could not afford not to. That outcome has been stopped today. From April 2027 universities could face fines of £500,000 or two percent of their income for failing to protect free speech. The regulator that was just found to have closed its mind to any outcome other than the one it wanted is about to be given even stronger powers. That part of the story is not over. But today the University of Sussex stood its ground. Today a High Court judge looked at how this fine was issued and found it could not stand. Today transgender and non-binary students at universities across England got something they have not had much of recently. A win. Take it. They are rare enough to be worth naming when they arrive. Now Let Us Talk About How This Was Reported The BBC covered this story today. It reported the High Court ruling. It covered the fine being overturned. It quoted the vice chancellor and the OfS. It explained the procedural findings against the regulator. It did not use the word transgender once. Think about that. A case that began because a university had a transgender and non-binary inclusion policy. A fine issued because that policy was deemed to create a chilling effect on gender critical views. A High Court ruling that found the regulator was biased in how it investigated that policy. A story entirely about what protection transgender people deserve in academic institutions.
Daniel Lismore tweet media
English
49
118
512
23.4K
KacZka retweetledi
KacZka retweetledi
babey 🏳️‍⚧️
babey 🏳️‍⚧️@edenbound_·
this is great news, only slightly dampened by the BBC’s framing that this was started by protests against kathleen stock’s lack of belief that “gender was more important than biological sex” as opposed to being against her efforts to kick trans people from public life entirely!
BBC Breaking News@BBCBreaking

University of Sussex, in the UK, wins legal challenge after record £585,000 fine over freedom of speech bbc.in/4tHn0FO

English
1
8
83
1.5K
KacZka retweetledi
Leo 𝕏
Leo 𝕏@leo_leo_X·
The University of Sussex has won a landmark free speech victory. A £585k fine over its trans inclusion policy was quashed. The High Court ruled the OfS showed bias and “closed its mind” to evidence. A major blow to the universities watchdog on enforcing free speech rules.
Leo 𝕏 tweet mediaLeo 𝕏 tweet media
English
14
61
341
18.3K
KacZka retweetledi
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
Hilariously, when you actually read this FT article 👇 one of the main "national security problems for Europe" that could be "posed by Chinese green technology" is, quote: "that the US could demand Europe remove Chinese technology from its energy systems — or face tariffs, sanctions or reduced security commitments." In other words, a risk that has literally nothing to do with China but everything to do with the US's chokehold on European sovereignty.
FT Energy@ftenergy

Chinese green technology poses national security problem for Europe, report warns ft.trib.al/r4qQMKH

English
107
3.6K
13.3K
288.2K
KacZka retweetledi
KacZka retweetledi
Jack Dart
Jack Dart@JackWDart·
Why the fuck is a technology company posting a manifesto? Get them out of the NHS, and then out of Britain, immediately.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
156
3.1K
16.5K
302.8K
KacZka retweetledi
Chris Hinchliff MP
Chris Hinchliff MP@CHinchliffMP·
I've written to the Health Secretary calling for the NHS to break with Palantir. This isn't a normal company. Palantir's close ties to the genocidal Israeli military should rule it out of any public contracts.
Chris Hinchliff MP tweet media
English
703
4K
11.2K
174.5K
KacZka retweetledi
Defend Our Juries
Defend Our Juries@DefendOurJuries·
BREAKING - @zarahsultana exercises Parliamentary Privilege to expose the unjust nature of the Filton 24 re-trial. UK press has been court ordered not to publish these details. “If convicted, they and 18 others will be sentenced as terrorists, but the jury will not be told that”
English
236
6.8K
13.9K
769.6K
KacZka retweetledi
The Grayzone
The Grayzone@TheGrayzoneNews·
EXCLUSIVE: UK seeks to jail Palestine Action for ‘terrorism’ amid UK media blackout 6 activists could be sentenced as terrorists, facing long prison terms But the jury has not been notified about the 'terror' designation, and UK media can't report on it thegrayzone.com/2026/04/12/uk-…
English
139
3.9K
6.6K
1.1M
KacZka retweetledi
kay 🐛
kay 🐛@lilgaygreblin·
no joke admitting to faking symptoms to get a diagnosis purely on the basis of hate should be more illegal and this admission should garner beth jail time for wasting time and resources
English
17
133
1.2K
16.9K
KacZka retweetledi
Howard Beckett
Howard Beckett@BeckettUnite·
Israel 🇮🇱 gives it’s response to a ‘ceasefire’: •50 🇮🇱 jets dropped 160 bombs in 1 min •100 Lebanon 🇱🇧 sites bombed in 10 mins •multiple Lebanon 🇱🇧residential locations •300 plus people murdered Israel 🇮🇱 is a pariah state Expel 🇮🇱 from the UN now.
English
3K
36.7K
90K
3.2M