
Kale Reed
314 posts







Going full nuffy here, but with the noise removed, you can clearly hear "you pay", which aligns more with "why are you paying that" over "how much are they paying you"


We officially have Collard 2.0. Nick Foot is doubling down, has told the AFL today he heard Butters say something much stronger than a query about why he paid a decision. Port backing Butters. If neither party backs down by late this arvo we are likely off to a tribunal, which could hear the case ungraded. How else can the AFL solve it? The ump microphones weren’t turned off, they just didn’t pick up the exchange 👇 heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/the-…




Confirmed no umpire microphone audio of what Zak Butters allegedly said. Historical reference points for umpire abuse: - Liam Ryan fined $1500 last year - Dale Thomas fined $7,500 for calling a boundary umpire a cheat in 2019 - Dane Rampe fined $5k (+$5k suspended) for telling an umpire he talks ‘like a little girl’ @1116sen @SENBreakfast


“You can’t have a player placed on report for saying, ‘What was that for?’” MORE | bit.ly/3Q3JnpY @SENBreakfast | #AFL


Port Adelaide was terrible to close out Gather Round — and the alarm bells will be ringing for Josh Carr 👉 bit.ly/4ehwjqQ


Captain of a club not allowed to calmly talk to an umpire post-game. 6.01


















