KamesBink

169 posts

KamesBink

KamesBink

@KamesBink

Katılım Mart 2024
78 Takip Edilen16 Takipçiler
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@SpaceInvestor_D I think on the first day, I'll buy just one share—or a small amount—more as a keepsake. I, too, admire Elon's contributions to technology and business, and I'm a huge fan. However, I am disappointed by his conduct in the political sphere.
English
0
0
0
9
Space Investor
Space Investor@SpaceInvestor_D·
I am a huge fan of Elon. What he has built at Tesla and SpaceX is extraordinary. But I will not buy SpaceX on IPO day. A lot of the early hype will not come from price discovery. It will come from private holders trying to turn their rare early access into massive premium, and retail will most likely end up paying extra for that excitement. No disrespect to a16z or Ark. I respect their work, their access, and their legacy. But let’s be honest, when they are already sitting on private shares, the enthusiasm is not exactly neutral. SpaceX IS the greatest space company ever built. That does not automatically make it the best risk reward on IPO day. If you believe in the space supercycle, I think the cleaner 100x opportunities may still be in the shadows, in companies building critical infrastructure rather than owning the headline. Names like $ASTS, $RKLB, $RDW, $LUNR, $VOYG, and maybe others, could offer more upside because they are earlier in their operating and valuation curves. I get the bull case for SpaceX. I really do. I'm still dreaming about humanity becoming multiplanetary, that's why I invest in Space in the first place. The idea of Optimus robots mining the Moon, autonomous factories in orbit, and mass drivers launching rare earth minerals across the solar system sounds like science fiction becoming reality. And honestly, nobody has pushed that future forward more aggressively than Elon and SpaceX. I just think the next big multiple expansion in space may be easier to catch in the builders still under the radar than in the Goliath everyone already wants to own.
English
49
32
314
26.5K
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@Money_or_Life_X 我觉得没有必要。这个市场可以有不同的投资逻辑赚钱
中文
0
0
0
258
Ace from Money or Life 美股频道
其实有没有卖股票,我没有特别看重。当然,如果一家公司狂卖股票,快把自己的股票都卖完了,那另当别论。 任何公司的 CEO 都会卖股票,他们每个人的财务状况、家庭需求是完全不同的。如果一家公司执行力很强,他卖股票我不介意;但如果一家公司执行力没有那么好,就算一辈子都不卖股票,我也不觉得是一个很大的 bonus。
Emma Wang@emmawang1220

@Money_or_Life_X 我是ASTS,RKLB and Telsa 的长期投资者。有一点我非常不赞同你的观点,它的CEO从没卖过一股,只拿最低工资,没有bonus,是一个非常低调但很棒的CEO.这三个公司的ceo 都很棒。

中文
5
0
26
21.3K
Space Investor
Space Investor@SpaceInvestor_D·
@KamesBink The company has always shown great openness in answering any questions that fall within the public domain.
English
1
0
1
90
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@scotto2050 I almost cried, bro—God only knows what we optimistic RedWire investors have been through.
English
0
0
2
225
Scott O
Scott O@scotto2050·
The ‘you’re wrong about Redwire’ group got REAL quiet this past week 😋 $RDW
Scott O tweet media
English
13
6
159
9.9K
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@CuiMao 听到这儿我已经动感情了,打住。
中文
0
0
0
560
CuiMao
CuiMao@CuiMao·
@KamesBink 可以,说起来老长老长了,他们两个人都对我帮助很大。
中文
1
0
0
7.9K
CuiMao
CuiMao@CuiMao·
这张拍的好,笑的好好看🥰🥰🥰
CuiMao tweet media
中文
152
21
1.3K
165.2K
CuiMao
CuiMao@CuiMao·
啊?
CuiMao tweet media
日本語
121
0
272
80.9K
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@CuiMao @luoyonghao @老罗,您初来乍到,要拜把子应该关注这位小姐姐,她可是在用产品经理思维玩抽象梗。传播学这一块。
中文
1
0
1
475
罗永浩
罗永浩@luoyonghao·
直接分享 YouTube 视频的效果好?还是直接上传视频到推特的效果好?推特最大支持上传多长的视频?
中文
1.8K
25
1.1K
570.3K
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@SpaceInvestor_D I’ve suggested a few questions, but it’s entirely up to you—brother—which ones you ask, and how you ask them.
English
0
0
1
56
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@SpaceInvestor_D Regarding Q-Rad: Has it already received patent certification? Is it intended for use on space stations or small satellites? Is it suitable for space-based data centers? Is the product currently in the validation phase, or is it ready for mass production as soon as demand arises?
English
0
0
0
75
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@SpaceInvestor_D or perhaps ask whether we currently hold an indisputable advantage in the competition to become the prime contractor for the lunar power grid—I would be most grateful.
English
0
0
0
67
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@SpaceInvestor_D I would like to express my deep respect to Peter for his unfailing generosity and willingness to engage with retail investors. If you could perhaps inquire about the latest developments and personnel changes regarding Space MD….
English
0
0
1
69
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@peng_hellen 我看你时间不长,很遗憾没有赶上RKLB(不过我也在别的太空股上挣到了)。看得出来大家真的很喜欢你,加油,继续出精彩的视频🫰
中文
0
0
3
1.7K
海伦子Hellen
海伦子Hellen@peng_hellen·
评论区凡是叫我妈妈的,我都点赞,毕竟这么叫很容易被人说肉麻,矫情之类的,我点赞提前挡一到。 我的确帮很多人挣到了钱,十年前开始卖房子的时候就帮很多客户挣到了钱,股市虽然不一定有房产上的金额大,但影响到的人数绝对更多。所以各种抒发感谢之情的,叫姐的,叫妈的,给红包的我都我全盘接受,之后开Youtube会员来接受。 比起肉麻不肉麻,我更看重饮水思源这一点,这类人值得一交。
海伦子Hellen tweet media海伦子Hellen tweet media
中文
60
6
361
29.7K
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@kingtutcap Could this be broadly interpreted as: "We see strong demand, but due to insufficient production capacity, we are unable to secure the contracts"?
English
1
0
1
462
Tut C🅰️pital
Tut C🅰️pital@kingtutcap·
$VELO: The tl;dr from earnings call is demand-constrained in defense, demand-constrained in aerospace, and now entering the semiconductor equipment manufacturing space
English
9
5
115
10.1K
罗永浩
罗永浩@luoyonghao·
测试一下。
中文
4.7K
224
5K
3.9M
Remote Navigator 🧭
Remote Navigator 🧭@RemoteNavigator·
Increasing My Focus on Ethical Investing 🌱 I just wanted to quickly run through the portfolio changes I have recently made related to this, and also what this means for my content going forward. Earlier, I shared that I am looking to scale out of $RDW in the near term due to their recent military pivot. Check out the quoted post if you missed it. This follows similar moves over the past few months in $ONDS and $RKLB, with all three companies moving heavily into military and defence contracts as their primary growth engines. Other recent sales following this ethical trend include: $MSFT: While a tech giant, Microsoft is now deeply integrated into the Digital Battlefield. They hold major Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) contracts and provide the Azure Government/DoD cloud backbone for global warfighting infrastructure. $AMPX: Just last week, Amprius reported a 2.5x revenue jump, but also noted $500M in new orders from U.S. defence customers for high-performance drone and wearable batteries. $LUMN: Beyond commercial fiber, Lumen is a critical partner for the DISA (Defense Information Systems Agency), recently securing multi-million dollar modifications for secure wide-area networks and managed internet services for the DoD. Why It Is Important To Me This is a personal decision. If, for example, I don't support modern offensive warfare, then I shouldn't be putting my capital into names where military contracts are the primary driver. Likewise, I prioritise sustainability at home, so I am getting stricter about letting dirty energy names slip into my portfolio. What This Means For My Content Going Forward This will become a bit more of a focus in my posting going forward. However, my primary focus will remain on the TA, including names like $RDW and $ONDS. Because at the end of the day, this is my decision; but everyone is within their rights to make their own investing choices and I support that independence.
Remote Navigator 🧭@RemoteNavigator

My Ethical Dilemma: Why I Am Scaling Out of $RDW 🛡️ I want to premise this by saying this has nothing to do with how I believe the company or the stock will perform in the future; it is solely based on my own personal investing philosophy. I originally entered $RDW as a commercial space infrastructure play, that was the core attraction for me. However, following the Edge Autonomy acquisition and recent management commentary, it is clear the company is pivoting aggressively toward military applications. As of the Q1 2026 report, revenues are now split nearly 50/50 between the Space (Commercial) and Defence Tech segments. This is part of a process I have worked through over the past few months as I move my portfolio away from military-related and high-polluting stocks. My ethical grounding has always kept me away from pharma, gambling, fast food, and "social harm" stocks, but I am becoming stricter as I do deeper fundamental research into my positions. This shift may help clear up my reasoning for other recent exits: - $ONDS: When I exited last year, I noted that I was not planning to ever re-enter the stock. While they initially focused on commercial drones, their shift toward a military-first strategy began to eat away at me. - $RKLB: This was a difficult one as the New Zealand-founded company remains my biggest historical winner. However, I have completely cut the position as they have secured increasingly significant military and national security contracts. From a revenue standpoint, the pivot to military contracts offers aerospace companies long-term stability, so I understand why they do it. It is crucial for their growth and development. Again, this is a personal decision based on what I want to support with my capital. It is not an indictment of these companies' operational success or their future stock performance; it is simply me deciding where my money sits. And it is something I have fought with for a while, as I love space and do like these companies, and will continue to follow their developments and celebrate their successes. However, I won't be putting my money in them. Disclosure: I am currently scaling out of an open position in $RDW. This post is a personal reflection on ethical investing and is not financial advice, a recommendation to sell, or a comment on the stock's future value. DYOR.

English
14
0
25
5.1K
KamesBink
KamesBink@KamesBink·
@SpaceInvestor_D I had intended to ask you whether "tax avoidance" would influence your investment decisions; now I know the answer. Thank you.
English
0
0
2
86
Space Investor
Space Investor@SpaceInvestor_D·
It took me a while to circle back to this post, because I am not a fan of the "I told you so" game. Back in January, I exited both $RKLB and $ASTS after strong runs. I had made life changing gains in both over the prior year and the risk profile was no longer aligned with my own setup. Simple as that. The reaction at the time was intense. A lot of pushback, a lot of noise, and honestly more emotion than analysis. Most of that sentiment has since faded, but if you scroll back to comments, you can still see what the mood was. What matters more is what actually happened after. Both names ran a bit further, then rolled over hard and gave back close to half of their market cap. That was the part most people did not want to entertain at the time. Fast forward a bit and in early April I stepped back into $RKLB in a big way, based on my own risk framework, because it fit the setup I was comfortable with. That ended up being one of the strongest move of the year for me so far. I also kept my $RDW position from the $5 area a month before, which has been another solid contributor in my gains. The point is not to frame this as anything special. It is to highlight how noisy this space gets when positions run hot and narrative takes over. Crowd mentality and confirmation bias are real, and they distort a lot of decision making here. Don’t let others make you doubt your gut feeling, and don’t hesitate to take profits just to please anyone else. Paying capital gains tax on realized gains is still a better problem to have than holding through a reversal just to avoid it and ending up with nothing to tax at all. I share all of my trades in real time with subscribers, so there is full transparency on timing and positioning. No hindsight adjustments, just the actual process as it happens. Some say I'm good, others that I'm lucky, the truth is probably a bit in between. More than anything, I think we need more independent thinking, and less pressure to conform to whichever narrative is trending on this app. Don't become a contrarian for the sake of it, but build a clear thesis to drive your decisions, and don't be afraid to be challenged in the open, that is where better outcomes come for everyone. If you want to follow along with my trades and thinking in real time, you’re welcome to join us here: x.com/SpaceInvestor_…
Space Investor@SpaceInvestor_D

Since Friday’s rally, I no longer hold $ASTS or $RKLB. Not because they’re bad companies. They’re not. But at this point in the bull market, valuation and margin of safety matter. A LOT. I kept some of my $RDW and a small $ETHA position, but at this stage I’d rather hunt for undiscovered names and raise more cash than assume high-fliers keep compounding forever. After just one trading day in 2026, my portfolio is up ~13% YTD. I could sit in cash at ~4% for the rest of the year and still likely beat the major averages by year end. I know this won’t be a popular post. I’m not here to say what people want to hear, but to be transparent about my investment process. Great stories can stay great until it suddenly doesn't and capital discipline is about recognizing when the risk reward has shifted. Protecting the downside is part of winning long term.

English
40
2
182
31.8K