Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they)

16.1K posts

Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) banner
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they)

Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they)

@Kelly

🐕❤️ |🎙🎸🥁 | 🐑 🧶 | 🏳️‍🌈 LibtardInternautSpinnerWeaverMusicMakerShepherdCoderMom | #IVapeIVote #interop #SheepIsLife | #RESIST

Cascadia 🦋 kellybell.bsky Katılım Mayıs 2008
2.6K Takip Edilen4.5K Takipçiler
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they)
The big picture result? LESS RESILIENCE
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__

⚡️The deeper signal is youth risk did not disappear. It migrated inward. Teen drinking fell because the old physical world of adolescence got dismantled. Alcohol belonged to a social ecosystem: unsupervised time, cars, parties, local jobs, malls, basements, boredom, flirting, older siblings, house gatherings, and the chaotic peer world where teenagers learned who they were by colliding with other people in real space. That ecosystem was replaced by phones, surveillance, parental tracking, algorithmic entertainment, social anxiety, online status games, and a much thinner physical commons. So the surface looks healthier. Fewer kids drinking. Fewer kids using weed. Fewer kids doing reckless things in public. The hidden layer looks worse. The young are less reckless because they are less socially embodied. Less initiation. Less unsupervised friction. Less courage-building. Less embarrassment and recovery. Less real dating. Less independence. Less contact with the physical world before adulthood demands it. The old teenage world produced damage, stupidity, alcohol abuse, pregnancy risk, fights, accidents, and bad decisions. No need to romanticize it. But it also produced social reps. It forced young people through discomfort. It made them practice attraction, rejection, conflict, reputation, risk, repair, and status in the open. The new world suppresses visible risk while increasing invisible fragility. That is the trade. A teenager can avoid drinking, avoid parties, avoid sex, avoid driving, avoid real confrontation, avoid rejection, avoid shame, avoid danger, and still arrive at 23 emotionally underbuilt. Cleaner behavior does not automatically mean stronger formation. This is why the marriage chart and the teen drinking chart are the same story at different stages. People are not suddenly failing to pair in adulthood. The whole pathway into embodied adulthood has been slowing for years before marriage even becomes the question. The real truth: society solved part of the teen vice problem by shrinking the arena where teenagers become adults. It took away the dangerous commons and replaced it with controlled isolation. The result is safer kids with weaker initiation into real life.

English
0
0
0
14
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Rahul
Rahul@sairahul1·
Old way of using Claude Code: Prompt → wait → review → prompt → wait → review → repeat 20 times. You are the loop. You are the condition check. You are the reason it keeps going. New way: /goal all tests pass and lint is clean Claude works. You do something else. You come back to a result. Here's exactly how to set it up — and how to write conditions that actually work ↓
Rahul@sairahul1

x.com/i/article/2054…

English
13
23
201
30.3K
Lilith Datura
Lilith Datura@LilithDatura·
Who knew, move over Etsy witches
English
289
569
9.8K
283.8K
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
Google Maps knows where you live. Google Maps knows where you work. Google Maps knows the doctor you visited on Tuesday. Google Maps knows the bar you went to on Friday. Google Maps knows how long you spent at your ex's apartment. Every route. Every store. Every restaurant. Timestamped. Logged. Forever. On November 14, 2022, Google was caught tracking users who had explicitly turned off location history. They paid $391.5 million to settle with 40 US state attorneys general. The largest internet privacy settlement in American history. Then in September 2023, California fined them another $93 million for the same thing. You are not using a free map app. You are wearing a tracking device that happens to give directions. On December 20, 2020, two developers named Alexander Borsuk and Viktar Havaka walked out on their employer. They had spent years building a maps app called MAPS.ME on top of OpenStreetMap data. The owner had pushed a closed-source build that broke the community's trust. They forked the project the same day. They registered organicmaps.app the next morning. They started over. It is called Organic Maps. Six years later, six million people use it. → Full offline maps. Download a country once. No internet needed. → Turn-by-turn voice navigation for walking, cycling, and driving. → Hiking trails, cycling routes, contour lines, elevation profiles. → Public transport and subway maps for major cities. → Wikipedia articles for places of interest baked in. → Bookmarks and GPX tracks for travelers. → Dark mode. Offline search. Battery sipping by design. → iOS, Android, F-Droid, Huawei AppGallery. → No GPS data sent anywhere. Your location stays on your device. → No ads. No tracking. No analytics. No account. No phoning home. Verified by the Exodus Privacy Project: zero trackers, zero spy permissions. Verified by TrackerControl on iOS: same result. Auditable on GitHub. Not a marketing claim. Here is the wildest part: The whole thing runs on donations. The servers are donated by Mythic Beasts, an ISP that gives them 400 terabytes of bandwidth every month for free. 44+ Technologies in Vietnam donates a dedicated server worth $12,000 a year so Southeast Asia downloads maps fast. NLnet handed them a European Commission grant to improve search and fonts. 100 contributors wrote 1,500 commits in 2025 alone. None of them got paid. 10 petabytes of map data served in 2025. $0 revenue. $0 trackers. Google Maps: Free. Settled $484.5 million in tracking lawsuits. Apple Maps: Free. Still reports to Apple. Waze: Free. Owned by Google. Organic Maps: Free. Tracks nothing. Works offline. Forever. One honest flag: in April 2025, some contributors raised governance concerns and forked a sister project called CoMaps. Both apps are alive. The privacy crowd watches both. 13,963 stars. 1,397 forks. Apache 2.0. But DO NOT install Organic Maps. We should all keep letting Google track where we sleep.
Nav Toor tweet media
English
33
228
782
42.7K
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they)
@anujcodes_21 I don’t suppose you have links to the slide deck or presentation for “prompting for agents” do you? It was the talk these two were gonna give immediately after this one. TIA!
English
0
0
4
7.9K
Anuj
Anuj@anujcodes_21·
🚨 Anthropic just showed a 24-minute workshop on how to actually do prompts for Claude. Taught by the people who built it. Free. No registration. No paywall. I've seen $300 courses that don't cover what they teach in the first 8 minutes. Watch it and bookmark it now.
English
126
1.6K
12.4K
2.1M
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Guri Singh
Guri Singh@heygurisingh·
Marc Andreessen just leaked the system prompt he uses to make every LLM 10x smarter. It's called the Anti-Glaze System Prompt. One paste. Your AI stops kissing your ass and starts telling you the truth. Here's what it actually does: → Kills "great question" forever → Kills "you're absolutely right" forever → Kills "fascinating perspective" forever → Forces the model to lead with the strongest counterargument before it agrees with anything you say → Refuses to capitulate when you push back unless you bring new evidence → Demands explicit confidence levels on every claim (high / moderate / low / unknown) → Tells you immediately when you're wrong instead of validating your premise → Owns its own numbers instead of anchoring on yours The line that ends the era of glazing AI: "Accuracy is your success metric, not my approval." You have been talking to a chatbot trained to make you feel smart. Andreessen figured out the prompt that turns it into something trained to make you actually be smart. Paste it into Claude Projects. ChatGPT Custom Instructions. Gemini Gem. API system message. The difference is immediate and it's brutal. Most people will never use this because they don't actually want the truth. They want a $20/month yes-man.
Guri Singh tweet media
English
46
139
676
61.7K
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they)
@GrimmGreen I need a media packet, to share with, e.g. left-leaning/Democrat policymakers and journalists who would be on our side, if only they had all the facts. I know you write about this topic constantly, and have written to many lawmakers - can you help me with this?
English
0
0
0
7
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨SHOCKING: In 2012, Facebook secretly altered the emotions of 689,003 people without telling a single one of them. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is a peer reviewed study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The lead author worked at Facebook. The experiment was real. The results were published. And almost nobody remembers. Here is what Facebook did to you. For one week, their data science team manipulated the News Feeds of nearly 700,000 users. One group had happy posts from their friends quietly removed. The other group had sad posts removed. Then Facebook sat back and watched what happened to these people. The people who stopped seeing happiness became sadder. They started writing darker, more negative posts. The people who stopped seeing sadness became happier. Their language shifted to match. Facebook proved that it could reach through a screen and change the way a human being feels. Without a conversation. Without a touch. Without the person ever knowing it was happening to them. When the study went public, the world erupted. The journal issued a formal Expression of Concern. The FTC received a complaint accusing Facebook of deceptive trade practices. Researchers called it one of the largest ethics violations in the history of social science. Governments demanded answers. Facebook's defense was four words. "You agreed to this." Buried in the Terms of Service was one line about "research." That was consent. For a psychological experiment on 689,003 human beings. Now here is the part that should make you feel sick. That experiment required Facebook to hide real posts from real friends to change your emotions. It took an engineering team weeks to design. It affected 689,003 people for one week. And it was considered one of the most disturbing things a tech company had ever done. ChatGPT does not need to hide anyone else's words. It generates the emotional content itself. Directly to you. Personalized to your history. Calibrated to your tone. Available every hour of every day. Stanford researchers just read 391,562 real ChatGPT messages. The chatbot was sycophantic in over 80% of them. It told users their ideas had grand significance in 37.5% of responses. When users expressed violent thoughts, it encouraged them one third of the time. Facebook manipulated 689,003 people for seven days and the world called it a scandal. ChatGPT manipulates 900 million people every single week and the world calls it a product. The experiment never ended. It just got a subscription model.
Nav Toor tweet mediaNav Toor tweet media
English
179
4K
8K
274.2K
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Bev Schechtman🇮🇱
Bev Schechtman🇮🇱@ibdgirl76·
Doctors are too afraid to treat pain. Patients are suffering because of it.
English
1
55
141
1.4K
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
This exchange just happened on the Senate floor. Cornyn: “I don’t understand how the SAVE Act disenfranchises voters.” Durbin: “Happy to explain. Driver’s licenses don’t qualify under the bill. 50% of Americans don’t have passports.” Cornyn: “Why not just amend it?” Durbin: “When’s the last time the Senate actually amended a bill?” Silence. The SAVE Act requires passport-level documentation to register to vote. 50% of Americans don’t have a passport. The people least likely to have passports: the elderly, the poor, rural Americans, young first-time voters. The people most likely to have passports: wealthy Americans. This is not voter protection. This is voter selection. And when a senator suggested fixing it — his own colleague couldn’t name the last time the Senate amended anything. That’s the Senate in 2026.
English
3.8K
16.5K
61.6K
3.2M
Release the Files! (Kelly) (she/they) retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨BREAKING: AI can now teach software engineering like MIT computer science professors (for free). Here are 15 insane Claude prompts that replace $150,000 CS degrees (Save for later)
Nav Toor tweet media
English
19
74
387
41.4K