Kenn Coutu

@RouseLives @The_Astral_

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ Lol ok. Keep projecting. And don't stop believin!

The comments on this are brutal. The UFO community is going in on the Bledsoes’ approach to their orb videos.

@RouseLives @The_Astral_ Yes, keep coming back, keep seething feel it pulse through your veins. Brace yourself to have to try to cover up more… Off to your YouTube channel.

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ My comprehension? Lol you've literally done nothing but insult and make faith claims. Block you? What is it like a fetish for you?

@RouseLives @The_Astral_ Your comprehension has me on the floor, holding my stomach laughing, go on now… Block me

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ Aw more insults.. still no actual argument. Go play outside.

@RouseLives @The_Astral_ The truth is the truth, and it doesn’t need defending, but it does need people to try to hide it. This is where you enter stage left.

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ But sure I'll bite... his CLAIMS are here. If you think dodgy videos are receipts YOU'RE hilarious.. and operating on nothing but faith.

@RouseLives @The_Astral_ Oh boy… You really fancy yourself a thinker. Keep away from runaround Sue.

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ Ad hominem now - another fallacy. And I don't know how to form arguments? All you know how to do is blindly trust authority and insult skeptics. Oh ya, ANOTHER fallacy - appeal to authority. "hIs PiCtUrEs R aT nAsA" 🤡

@The_Astral_ Comment section is a read through of angry voices. 🤣 echoing “NO!” “Wrong!” “B.S” Meanwhile yesterday was a remote view day and they weren’t anywhere around saying these things. Weird

The only Bob Lazar interview I want to see is with Congress.

@RouseLives @The_Astral_ You’re hilarious, his claims and receipts are here. You can’t even form a proper argument.

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ Committing 3 consecutive begging the question fallacies in a row doesn't make an argument. Provide an actual argument and I'll gladly engage.

@RouseLives @The_Astral_ Is it the photographs he has at NASA that make him the grifter? Is it the people that come out to his events that all witnessed the orbs the grift? Is it the years of posting videos of orbs moving in anomalous directions the grift? Which part is the grift?

@KennCoutu @The_Astral_ You can have an open mind and also know a grifter when you see one. They're not mutually exclusive.

@The_Astral_ @VettedPodcast Are we there yet? Dad my tummy hurts, how long till we get there-Astral all day long 😂

@VettedPodcast He recorded a VHS tape with a button pin camera. 99% chance the video looks like shit.

I've seen screenshots of the alleged video. I'll definitely be making a video on this.

@BillyKryzak Aren’t the objectives the same for capturing UAP? Clearer footage?

Here are are two orbs i caught last year in thermal. Invisible to the eye. Orbs are real in my personal universe.. i can catch them on my camera systems. These two were caught on my pulsar XL50. I just don't find them that particularly interesting i guess. I've known about them since i was a kid and its like they are a bird in the sky to me at this point. Just part of our reality. I don't really know how to study them any further.

@King_Wakata_ Come on… Do you really think this is true? Lol. 🤣

Good to know I'm still human

@The_Astral_ Didn’t he display this on Skinwalker Ranch? I don’t think this is case closed at all no matter what the storytelling is.

@KennCoutu The video doesn’t matter, the data does. If you can rule out prosaic objects and capture the same object across multiple sensors, that’s what makes it anomalous.

The thing about the Bledsoes is they have HD mirrorless cameras, they understand multi-sensor data collection, they know people are cross-referencing prosaic objects in real time... They know what it would take to actually prove this. They just aren’t doing it.

@AskaPol_UAPs @UFOB_ @AndyOgles Yes, Trump is absolutely known as the guy who tells the truth 🤣😂😆

NEW: Rep. @AndyOgles on UFO files: President Trump wants to be “the guy that revealed the truth” Ask a Pol UAP asks: Is the White House trolling us by registering Aliens [dot] gov — or is it a genuine signal that UFO disclosure is coming? Key Ogles: “There’s been so much chatter, and there’s so many people coming forward that the administration, President Trump, just wants to lay a baseline and he wants to be honest with it,” Rep. Andy Ogles exclusively tells Ask a Pol UAP. “He likes to break the mold, right? And so being the guy that revealed the truth — whatever the truth is — that’d be historic, right? So, I mean, that’s exactly who President Trump is.” Full interview & transcript at Ask a Pol UAP on Substack.

@lesternare I want everyone to read between the lines- Lacatski Nothing bothers me more than people who interpret it wrong -Lacatski

It’s that time of year again, same energy

@BillyKryzak I’m not sure how the story telling goes here. I’m real he’s not? He’s been posting orbs for years. You got one? How’s that going to convince anyone?

Want to see an actual real orb? Here you are.... With the Bledsoe orb making the rounds.. i wanted to share an actual real Orb that i captured. This was during a photoshoot where i was using my Infrared camera. I had my Full Spectrum Modified Sony A7RV with a vintage Russian 50mm lens at F2.0 (very shallow depth of field). I had a 850nm filter on it so the ONLY photons i captured was in the NEAR-IR. i was standing about 15 feet away from the window for the picture. This orb is in focus because it is next to the window which is what i was focused on. it's being lit by the sun going through the window. it has a somewhat oblong shape because of the rolling shutter in the camera. So the orb was moving Left to right pretty quickly. At the time of the photo, the orb is invisible to the naked eye. but obviously its completely visible in the near infrared. It must be right at the window because of the sun lighting it up. It cannot be dust in front of my camera due to the room being completely unlit. This is an honest actually real orb. and i'm including the actual RAW Image that captured it. dropbox.com/scl/fo/wsaodzn…

@MinuteofZombie @ShawnRyan762 For originally playing the advocate for Trump, soap boxes for destruction

@ShawnRyan762 @ShawnRyan762 I desperately hope you have the self awareness to feel like a goddamned fool.

The Pentagon summoned the Pope's ambassador, told him the United States has the military power to do "whatever it wants," and warned that the Church better take its side. They even invoked the Avignon Papacy, a dark chapter in history when a government used military force to bend the Church to its will. So where exactly does this end? If the Pope refuses to fall in line, what's the next move, bomb the Vatican? thedailybeast.com/trump-official…

@pangusTHEdangus @Mr_BenPrime I don’t know. I’m watching the circus.

@KennCoutu @Mr_BenPrime Mantids are likely the controllers of 'orbs' -- which aren't fairy spirits, but metallic spheres. 🙃 Again, the Bledsoe' are a psyop meant to conflate the reality of the phenomenon; still wondering why the Lady didn't come this Easter, did the date change?

An ambiguous purple ball lazily drifting around a black screen is hardly the triumphant inarguable paradigm shift we were given to expect sir. Wherefore art the shining orbular multitude rising from the oceans as the Lady stays the sword arm of humanity with the New Knowledge?

@JimFilmsUFOs @ShaneFrakes Lol, his post says… Here’s when I captured with my big camera. Thanks Jim for making stuff up.

That Bledsoe orb clip looks like it may have been AI-enhanced. If that’s the case, what people are reacting to is not the original visual data but a reconstruction layered with assumptions. Once AI starts filling in pixels, sharpening edges, or amplifying light sources, you’re looking at an “interpretation.” AI enhancement is not neutral. It predicts, it interpolates, and invents structure where none may exist. That can be useful for aesthetics, but it’s dangerous for analysis. Every enhancement step moves you further away from the raw capture and closer to a synthetic artifact. This is basically the Ship of Theseus problem applied to video. If you replace enough of the original pixels with inferred ones, at what point is it no longer the same object? By the time an orb has been “enhanced” into something crisp, glowing, and structured, the question becomes “Are we analyzing the phenomenon, or are we analyzing the algorithm’s guess about the phenomenon?”