Kevin

6.2K posts

Kevin banner
Kevin

Kevin

@KevinMankind

Katılım Temmuz 2011
299 Takip Edilen77 Takipçiler
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@Ofuton410482 没那么麻烦,看看波兹坦公告就知道了,日本领土仅限于本土四岛之内
中文
0
0
0
9
Ofuton
Ofuton@Ofuton410482·
我想问问日本的朋友两个问题: 1)既然你们支持2016南海仲裁的结果合法,即“太平岛不算岛,所以无法获得200海里的EEZ”。那么比太平岛小得多的 冲之鸟、南鸟岛周边的EEZ日本政府准备什么时候放弃? 2)太平岛的实际控制者现在是台湾,你们是主张台湾应该放弃这200海里是么?
NHKニュース@nhk_news

南シナ海問題で中国外務省が日本大使館公使呼び出し 日本反論 news.web.nhk/newsweb/na/na-… #nhk_news

中文
61
9
328
66.1K
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@mengyan1234567 那轮得到南海仲裁,拿出波兹坦公告就可以了。日本领土仅限于本土四岛之内
中文
0
0
0
15
我是梦嫣❤️
我是梦嫣❤️@mengyan1234567·
“按照这一标准,日本的很多其他岛屿也将失去主张海洋权益的依据。……中方有理由认为,日方已按照相同标准,自愿放弃相应的海洋主张。” 很好,文科的同志们发力了,现在开始给日本出题了~!
我是梦嫣❤️ tweet media
中文
36
16
199
14.1K
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@DesmondShum 你这个建议不就是专制的做法?🤭
中文
0
0
0
3
Desmond Shum
Desmond Shum@DesmondShum·
Study China. Don’t Study Under the CCP. In recent years, many have expressed concern about the declining number of American students studying in China and what that means for the future of American expertise on the country. I think the more relevant question is not simply how to get more American students to study in China, but how to help China bound exchange students develop genuine expertise on China. The following article in The Straits Times, like many before it, largely assumes that sending more students to China is inherently beneficial. I disagree. The real issue is preparing students to operate in a CCP-controlled environment so they can extract the most valuable insights from China without allowing their understanding to be shaped by the Party’s carefully curated narrative. The CCP does not leave these exchanges to chance. The experience is carefully designed and managed—from roommates and coursework to ideological content embedded in teaching, organised trips, and the people foreign students are encouraged to meet. It is curated for a purpose. If the free world is serious about building the next generation of China experts, every student participating in an exchange programme in China should first complete a mandatory pre-departure course. That curriculum should include: - The U.S. government’s strategic assessment of China and the reasoning behind it. - A concise history of modern China and the evolution of CCP rule, so students understand the political and historical context they are entering. - Training on how to recognise propaganda, narrative management, and influence efforts. -Practical guidance on avoiding legal, political, and security risks while living in China, including how to recognise and avoid situations that could expose them to coercion, compromise, or criminal liability. - Strategies for getting beyond the official foreign-student experience by building independent relationships and seeing China outside of the curated bubble. The free world absolutely needs more people with first-hand knowledge of China. Reading reports from the comfort of an American campus is no substitute for living in China, speaking the language, and understanding the country firsthand. But sending youngsters into a tightly managed political environment without proper preparation does not build China expertise. It allows the CCP to help shape it. The objective should not simply be to increase the number of exchanges, but to ensure that students return with a deeper and more independent understanding of China—one formed through critical judgment, rather than through a narrative prepared for them by the Party.
Ali Wyne@Ali_Wyne

“[David] Lampton warned of a looming decline in American knowledge of China, in fields ranging from intelligence to agriculture to energy, as the current generation of experts retires.” straitstimes.com/world/fewer-am…

English
17
50
210
30.2K
ChangLin Li 李昌霖
ChangLin Li 李昌霖@freeword111·
台湾是台湾,中国是中国人的中国。不是中国共产党的中国。独裁的党派只会腐败。 非常不喜欢中国共产党。
ChangLin Li 李昌霖 tweet media
中文
115
7
64
40.6K
Kryptos Opus
Kryptos Opus@kryptosopus·
@KevinMankind @BRICSinfo Factories not needing workers is the argument you think it is until exports slow down and there's nobody left to retrain
English
1
0
0
24
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇨🇳 China's economy records its weakest growth in over 3 years.
BRICS News tweet media
English
146
295
3.4K
148.5K
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@Sekihei5i 感谢你们这些汉奸和日本右翼让中国人清醒过来
中文
0
0
3
74
日本参议员石平
日本参议员石平@Sekihei5i·
上个世纪八十年代在中国生活过的人都知道,当时的中国人基本上没有什么仇日情绪,反而对日本充满了好感与憧憬。那时,《追捕》《远山的呼唤》等日本电影在中国风靡一世,山口百惠,高仓健等日本大腕不知获得了多少中国男女的倾心。先富起来的中国家庭都以拥有松下电器的彩电为傲,大批中国学子涌如入东洋的发达国家留学。而日本方面,所有的民调都显示,80%以上的日本人对中国抱有好感,日本政府也向中国提供了不少的开发援助。那是日中关系的黄金时代。
中文
243
51
812
39K
Maya Majueran
Maya Majueran@MayaMajueran·
Once dismissed as the "world's largest swimming pool" and a "Chinese debt trap," Hambantota International Port (HIP) recorded its highest-ever monthly throughput in June 2026 - handling 90,219 vehicles and 80,325 TEUs.
Maya Majueran tweet mediaMaya Majueran tweet media
English
24
155
910
53K
Kryptos Opus
Kryptos Opus@kryptosopus·
@KevinMankind @BRICSinfo Both lol. Too many grads fighting for office jobs, not enough bodies in factories. Same energy as crypto having too much liquidity and no real volume at the same time
English
1
0
0
113
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@Diplomat_APAC 可惜这五位法官所在的所谓的仲裁庭对本案没有管辖权
中文
0
0
0
29
The Diplomat
The Diplomat@Diplomat_APAC·
Under the United Nations’ Law of the Sea, five judges found that most of China’s claims to vast swaths of the South China Sea were invalid, handing a huge victory to the Philippines. A decade later China hasn’t backed off its illegal claims by a single inch. buff.ly/kurJ3QR
English
33
10
32
7.7K
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@CollinSLKoh 看来新加坡不支持国际法😄
中文
0
0
1
12
The Count
The Count@bichaner·
@BRICSinfo Could it be political strategy to to release bad numbers? And maybe they do have growth?
English
1
0
1
1.2K
Kryptos Opus
Kryptos Opus@kryptosopus·
@BRICSinfo Stimulus can't fix a demographic cliff. China's running out of workers before they run out of rate cuts.
English
3
0
6
4.2K
Antonescu Marius
Antonescu Marius@AntonescuMariu2·
@bqy1145141919 @Jibadadacpsv @Zabayar 那么,这件事该枪毙谁? 我知道,中共会尽一切办法掩盖那些生活条件很差的大量地区,同时大力宣传少数几个发达地区,把它们当作宣传样板。
Antonescu Marius tweet media
中文
16
0
0
1.4K
Adel El Zabayar
Adel El Zabayar@Zabayar·
Mientras tanto en China comunista.
Español
445
1.8K
9.7K
579.7K
China view
China view@Chinaview0022·
日本主动全盘认可非法南海仲裁案的判定逻辑,就等于亲手堵死了自己对冲之鸟礁的海洋诉求。这份裁决直接裁定,拥有50万㎡陆地、自带淡水物产、可自给生存的太平岛,仅能算作岩礁,无权拥有专属经济区与大陆架。 反观冲之鸟礁,涨潮后仅两块礁石露出海面,总面积不足10㎡,无淡水、无土壤,全靠日本数十年浇筑混凝土堤坝才免于沉没,完全符合公约里岩礁的定义,日方却妄图以此霸占47万平方公里海域。 既然日本自愿用这套严苛标准约束他国,中方完全有法理依据判定:日本已经主动放弃冲之鸟礁衍生的一切海洋权益。 拿一套规则限制别人,另一套利己规则优待自己,日本这虚伪的不要脸的样子,跟对待二战历史一样一样的啊!
中文
22
17
133
16.7K
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@Hendiction @Chinaview0022 没有必要。波兹坦公告已经规定了日本领土范围仅限于本土四岛之内
中文
0
0
9
168
Hendic
Hendic@Hendiction·
@Chinaview0022 沖ノ鳥礁の判決が決まってから言ったら? 裁判もしてないけど 尖閣についても裁判したらいいよ
日本語
8
0
0
767
ヘル次鋒あき
ヘル次鋒あき@1kJj3TeuQH42709·
@Chinaview0022 >対照的に沖ノ鳥礁は、満潮時にわずか2つの礁石が海面から露出するだけで、総面積は10㎡未満、淡水も土壌もなく、日本が数十年かけてコンクリート堤防を築いてようやく沈没を免れているに過ぎず、公約における岩礁の定義に完全に合致する 提訴してください
日本語
5
0
0
891
Kevin
Kevin@KevinMankind·
@realZhangJin @Chinaview0022 波兹坦公告规定日本领土仅限于本土四岛之内,脱裤子放屁仲裁个毛线啊
中文
0
0
0
46
Zerojoin
Zerojoin@realZhangJin·
@Chinaview0022 似是而非。为什么不要求也特别仲裁一下不就行了吗?
中文
2
0
0
661
Koala
Koala@koalaw79·
@PaceyMav 典型的简中谣言。希腊曾经拥有小亚细亚沿海地,1919年希腊乘土耳其一战战败的机会大举扩张。土耳其用了3年击败希腊的扩张,然后反推把希腊赶下海,拔除所有陆地上的希腊要塞,最后希腊同意割让全部小亚细亚领土,撤出领土上60多万希腊人才结束战争。冲之鸟是岛屿是日本自己声称的。没有一个国家承认。
中文
3
0
0
603
Maverick
Maverick@PaceyMav·
南海仲裁不说国际势力角逐,我们只讲一些基本的逻辑 土耳其因为历史屈辱所以爱琴海绝大多数岛屿都是希腊的,加上联合国海洋公约赋予岛屿的权益,希腊就顺理成章把国界划到了土耳其的沙滩上 按公约,岛屿和礁石以及低潮高地是有明确界定的,岛屿具备全部权益,礁石具备部分,而低潮高地零权益 那么你会说,中国确实不占理。但实际上,你看下面两张图,那张是礁石哪张是岛屿?你可以大胆猜猜看 所以当你用公约占理的时候你就用公约,当你拳头比较大的时候你就用拳头,这就是人类的基本逻辑
Maverick tweet mediaMaverick tweet media
中文
36
5
144
33.3K