Sabitlenmiş Tweet
KickPistons 🍞🍷
2.4K posts

KickPistons 🍞🍷
@KickPistons
Catholic con/revert. Church organist. Curator of @RadioReplies. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. Destroy Protestantism or die trying.
Katılım Nisan 2025
831 Takip Edilen570 Takipçiler

@hdpayens My math is off. I was walking when I wrote this. Sorry. 🫠
English

@hdpayens 33.3% ignore it.
33.3% label it the first papal aggression.
33.3% quote it without context to make it look like Clement believed in Sola Scriptura (hilarious).
0.01% read it and honestly grapple with the implications for Christianity and themselves.
English

The earliest Christian document outside the New Testament treats rebellion against ordained Church authority as a grave sin.
Not a matter of opinion. Not a secondary issue. A sin.
That should tell you something.
Around 96 AD, Clement of Rome wrote a letter to the church in Corinth. Clement is traditionally identified as the fourth Bishop of Rome. Irenaeus records that Clement "had seen the blessed Apostles and had been conversant with them" (Against Heresies 3.3.3). This places him within living memory of Peter and Paul themselves.
So what prompted Clement to write?
A crisis. Younger members of the Corinthian church had deposed validly appointed presbyters. They removed ordained men from their ministry. Clement, writing from Rome, intervenes with a letter of correction.
Not a suggestion. A correction.
Here is what he wrote.
1 Clement 44:3-4: "Our apostles also knew, through our Lord Jesus Christ, that there would be strife on account of the office of the episcopate. For this reason, having received complete foreknowledge, they appointed those already mentioned, and afterwards gave a rule of succession, so that when these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed to their ministry."
Think about that for a moment. The Apostles themselves established a rule of succession. Not congregational voting. Not individual interpretation of Scripture. Apostolic succession, handed down through ordained authority.
1 Clement 44:6: "Blessed are those presbyters who, having finished their course before now, obtained a fruitful and perfect departure; for they have no fear lest any one deprive them of the place now appointed them."
The presbyters hold an appointed place. It is not theirs by popular approval. It is theirs by apostolic appointment.
And when the Corinthians violated this order, Clement did not mince words.
1 Clement 47:6: "It is disgraceful, beloved, yea, highly disgraceful, and unworthy of your Christian profession, that such a thing should be heard of as that the most steadfast and ancient Church of the Corinthians should, on account of one or two persons, engage in sedition against its presbyters."
Sedition. That is the word Clement uses. Not "disagreement." Not "reformation." Sedition.
Notice what Clement does not say. He does not say, "Follow your private reading of Scripture and start a new community." He does not say, "If you disagree with your presbyters, you are free to form your own church." He says submit to the ordained authority the Apostles established.
Now consider this carefully and charitably. In the 16th century, ordained priests removed themselves from the authority of their bishops. They rejected the episcopal structure that Clement describes as apostolic in origin. They established new communities based on their own interpretive authority.
Clement, writing within decades of the Apostles, would have called that sedition.
This is not about questioning anyone's sincerity. Many who left Rome in the 16th century did so out of genuine conviction. But sincerity does not settle the question of authority. The Corinthians who deposed their presbyters were presumably sincere too. Clement corrected them anyway.
The earliest post-apostolic witness we possess teaches apostolic succession, ordained authority, and submission to the episcopal structure. Not as a later Catholic invention. As the faith received from the Apostles themselves.
If you are a Protestant who takes early Christianity seriously, this letter deserves your honest engagement. It was written before the last Apostle died. It reflects what the first generation of Christians believed about Church order.
What do you do with Clement's letter?
English

@ArminiusFan @magicbyjiro "Then get back to me." If eternal matters weren't involved, it would be almost cute how you guys habitually appoint yourselves judge over what is or isn't biblical like it's no big deal.
English

@KickPistons @magicbyjiro You, unfortunately, don’t have a clue about what you’re talking about.
Try distinguishing between Apostolic Tradition (contained in Scripture or long since lost) with man-made post-Apostolic Roman Catholic tradition unknown to Christ and the Apostles.
Then get back to me.
English

@ArminiusFan @magicbyjiro You just volunteered to be Exhibit C of this characteristically Thessalonian habit.
English

@KickPistons @magicbyjiro On the contrary, the Bereans tested the oral teachings of the apostle Paul against Scripture and were praised for it.
So much the more do serious Christians test (nonsensical) post-Apostolic Roman Catholic traditions against Scripture.
English

@Cinaboncrusader Protestants will tell you that you can be anything except Catholic with the same energy that demons will tell you that you can worship any God except Christ, and for the same reason.
English

@magicbyjiro Protestants have no right to identify with the Jews of Berea. The Bereans were future Catholics who accepted Paul's apostolic authority to interpret scripture. The Thessalonians were proto-Protestants who insisted on their own interpretation and rejected both Paul and the Gospel
English

@KickPistons Not only that but Bereans accepted the oral traditions and teachings after putting them against the scriptures, so this doesnt work as a protestant gotcha like they think it does.
English

“The brothers immediately sent PAUL and SILAS away by night to Berea, and when they arrived, they went into the synagogue of the Jews. Now these people were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.”
Acts 17:10-11
English

@KickPistons @TLM_Ryan Also: you didn't spend 2.5 mins looking at the little red missal you passed on the way in, the one WITH ALL THE PICTURES OF EVERTHING GOING ON.
English
KickPistons 🍞🍷 retweetledi

@Altered0x @grok @rickbrennanjr @Rblv73 Everyone who is not within the Catholic Church is a heretic, schismatic, or a heathen.
I don't make the rules.
Only the Catholic Church has the Gospel.
English

@Cath_SteelMan No. Total unforced error. Helps no one. Confuses everyone. Emboldens the enemies of God who want to remake the Church in their own image.
English
KickPistons 🍞🍷 retweetledi
KickPistons 🍞🍷 retweetledi

@l_vliet72077 Any dope who thinks he's qualified to interpret Scripture can point to any verse in Scripture and interpret that verse to mean he's qualified to interpret Scripture. It says everything about his convictions and nothing about his qualifications.
English

@KickPistons Scripture itself testifies to its perspicuity. Rom. 10, Deut. 30. These passages prove your claim to scriptural fidelity is empty.
English






