Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Filippos ☧
58.7K posts

Filippos ☧
@TheRealLogosT
🇻🇦Ave Christus Rex ☧ Ιησοῦς Χριστός νικᾷ
Nowhere Katılım Temmuz 2021
1.8K Takip Edilen4.3K Takipçiler

@TheRealLogosT @Isabelletkrause It’s not a debate. It’s a fact. It’s utterly laughable and absurd to say the Hobbit trilogy is anywhere near the quality and popularity of its predecessor. You can like it all you want but you’re not gonna get away with saying something stupid like that. Very frickin stupid.
English

@Five9WithShoes @Isabelletkrause Why yall gotta make everything a debate?
English

@TheRealLogosT @Isabelletkrause No it objectively isn’t. It made a ton of mistakes the previous trilogy didn’t and thus what we got was an awful adaptation undeserving of its name. There’s a reason everyone’s heard of LoTR but far, far fewer people have heard of the Hobbit movies.
English

@Isabelletkrause @TheRealLogosT It’s ok.. Hobbit had too much cgi and the one dwarf actor got really sick so too much cgi but has some good parts… diverts too much from the book and they messed up Beorn.. the book is just awesomeness
English
Filippos ☧ retweetledi

@CollinRugg I dont understand how there are so many people struggling like this yet thousands of Indians and muslims are being imported. Why not help people here, why not give them opportunities.
English

NEW: Social media philanthropist, Jimmy Darts, helps raise $150,000 for a struggling family in Oklahoma.
The young boy had previously gone viral after he told Darts that God had been good to him despite his family's struggles.
"Amanda shared with me that she is only a month away from homelessness. She has no car, no money for groceries, and is doing everything she can to care for her children and grandchildren," Darts said on GoFundMe.
"Her son Cody was with her, and through tears he shared that he’s been bullied at school, but still said that God has been good to him."
God bless them.
Video: jimmydarts / ig.
English

@houstonpolice Import the third world…. Become the third world
English

@BlackBoneTory @Xavier_DMercy Modern protestantism…. To be more precise
English

@CrisAZelaya Is the pic supposed to show something?
The ones that love 1948 israel are protestants
English

@AmericanPolack Roman is the name of a rite…
There is only one Catholic Church and its presidential Cathedra is in Rome
English

@AlaskaBird__ @Petersbones Being Catholic is being dedicated to Christ, He established the Catholic Church
English

@Petersbones As long as you’re more dedicated to Christ than anything else, I’m elated.
English

@TheRealLogosT I don't hold to any such thing. My beliefs are thoroughly orthodox.
English

@exanxc @TheRealLogosT Un hombre que no domina sus impulsos puede caer en lujuria con solo ver a una mujer, incluso si está vestida completamente y con ropa holgada. En este mundo cargado de tantos estímulos visuales nosotros somos quienes debemos controlar esos impulsos
Español

@TheRealLogosT @exanxc Si tu ojo te es ocasión de pecado...
Si miras a una mujer con ojos de deseo ya cometiste adulterio en tu corazón...
Eso lo dijo N.S.
Tu puedes ver a una mujer en traje de baño, pero hermano si la miras con ojos lujuriosos eres tu quien tiene que desintoxicar tu cerebro
Español

@exanxc @TheRealLogosT Precisamente, por eso debemos pedir el don de fortaleza al ES, solos no podemos. Bendiciones hermano
Español

@Joseph_Spurgeon Sola Scriptura ends up in a bunch of different factions that interpret scripture differently.
Sola scriptura is a heresy
English

Roman Catholics never seem to understand the doctrine of sola scriptura.
Sola scriptura is not the belief that Holy Scripture is the only authority, nor that an individual can infallibly interpret the Scriptures. Rather, it is the doctrine that Holy Scripture is the only infallible authority and therefore has supreme authority over the church. It is not the only authority. The church has real authority, along with other forms of authority in the Christian life.
Those who hold to sola scriptura also maintain that Scripture is to be understood within the life of the church. It was given to the church. It guards and defines the boundaries of the church. It shapes the life of the church. The church receives it, interprets it, and works through it, not as a single infallible institution, but as a body that is accountable to the Word.
A central problem in Roman Catholic argumentation is their equivocation on the word infallible. They blur the distinction between infallible and inerrant, and then build an entire doctrine on that confusion. Infallible means unable to err by nature. It is not merely that something happens to be correct in a given instance. It means it cannot be wrong.
Holy Scripture is infallible because it is the very Word of God. God cannot err, and therefore His Word cannot err. Everything Scripture says carries full authority because it is true without any possibility of error.
Human beings, however, can make inerrant statements without being infallible. “Jesus Christ is the Messiah” is an inerrant statement. “My name is Joseph Spurgeon” is an inerrant statement. Even something like the table of contents of Scripture can be correct. The church can recognize the canon without error. But none of that makes the church infallible. It simply means that, at times, it has spoken truly.
Infallibility is not something that comes and goes. It is not something that appears in rare moments and then disappears. If a person or institution is infallible, that is a property of what they are, not a temporary condition they enter into under certain circumstances.
That is exactly where the Roman doctrine of papal infallibility breaks down. It claims the Pope is infallible only in specific moments, under carefully defined conditions. That is not infallibility. That is a redefinition of the term to protect a doctrine that cannot stand on its own.
And historically, this was not some universally held belief quietly passed down from the apostles. In the Middle Ages, the Franciscans, particularly in their disputes over poverty, began pressing arguments that would effectively bind the Pope to prior authoritative statements. They were attempting to lock in earlier papal rulings so that a later pope could not overturn them. In response, Pope John XXII rejected those claims outright. He saw exactly what was happening. To grant that kind of infallibility would place the pope in submission to prior declarations in a way that undermined his own authority. He resisted it, and the idea was not accepted as settled doctrine at the time.
Only much later, under very different pressures, was papal infallibility formally defined at the First Vatican Council in 1870. It was not the clear, consistent teaching of the church through the ages. It was a deformation, argued for, resisted, and finally imposed.
Sola scriptura cuts through all of this confusion. It locates infallibility where it actually belongs, in the Word of God. Scripture alone cannot err. Scripture alone carries absolute authority. The church has real authority, but it is always a derived and accountable authority. It can speak truly, but it is never incapable of error.
Everything must be judged by the Word of God, because only the Word of God is infallible.
English

@jakedell73 Youre not Catholic.
Only those in communion with the presidential See of Peter are Catholic
English















