Tex

Alex Rosen and his entire Predator Poacher operation are rapidly losing credibility as he continues to botch these ops and calls a man wearing an anime t-shirt of a "grown woman" a lolicon. Civilian videos can't be used as automatic grounds for arrest, and law enforcement organizations require their own verified investigation to ensure the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments are followed. Otherwise, it would lead to constitutional rights violations. By making these videos 'public,' it leads to pre-trial publicity overload, and defense attorneys will capitalize on it... leading to cases where the 6th amendment rights are violated, where a media frenzy compromises the trial through jury contamination. Then he crashes out at the police, calling ORDER 66, and calling them "useless cowards". No police department wants to deal with that, and it's going to make future tips from Predator Poachers less welcome. Alex has done this before multiple times, such as with the Virginia Beach PD in 2025, crashing out and causing issues with the case. Maine State Police in 2024 also caused a media firestorm as the police didn't arrest the predator right on the spot.... or in Ohio 2024, allegedly calling the police "useless pedo protectors" after a man was allowed to walk free after allegedly admitting to having infant CSAM. The worst case was with Thomas Hibbard, who was arrested in 2023 for allegedly having over 1000 images and videos of CSAM. The judge suppressed all the evidence and dismissed the case in 2025 because it originated from a civilian decoy operation, invoking the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Since the initial investigation was started from an unsanctioned decoy op, every evidence that stems from that becomes inadmissible... and is a core provision of the 4th amendment protection of unwarranted search and seizure. Overall, what Alex Rosen and Predator Poacher do is not helpful when it comes to catching and convicting these predators. If he actually cared about the victims, he would be using or working with organizations like Safe from Online Sex Abuse (SOSA) or Innocent Lives Foundation (ILF), which work quietly with law enforcement every step of the way. No public confrontation for clout, no "public" videos, no drama, and follow strict DA and law enforcement guidelines to catch these predators... and they have a near 100% conviction rate. Instead, the public videos poison the potential jury pool, and guidelines are ignored, leading to insinuation by the defense that illegal methods like entrapment and other tools were used to obtain the "evidence". What Predator Poachers are doing is clout/fame first, and not victim first. The self-reported impact that Predator Poachers claim is over 200+ convictions since 2019, and the public videos create a "deterrence" effect. But the reality is that prosecutors from many of these cases have either dropped or refused them due to evidentiary reasons... specifically because most of the information gained has the exact problem of "fruit of the poisonous tree". Some of the reviews of the cases show that only 30% allegedly led to a conviction. It also poses unnecessary risk to the victims, leads to problems of entrapment, chain of custody issues, destroyed evidence, tainted evidence, and ultimately burns bridges between them and the police, where in many cases, the predator ends up getting protected rather than the victims. Then there are the other alleged "skeletons" in the closet, which I won't go into right now, but if Alex really wanted to protect the victims, he would be using the same tactics that SOSA and ILF uses... no public confrontation, close cooperation with law enforcement, and procedures aligning with DA guidelines so that the constituion is not violated in the process of gathering evidence. Or else, I fear that Alex might end up getting into more legal trouble with various police departments as he continues to rack up alleged charges like harassment, trespassing, peace disturbance, etc.

It's really coming crashing down on him...

@apostate21263 @Grxit It's all good, I have typos all the time. Just be careful with how you word things.

@Kicksovergrabs @Grxit Poor wording on my end, I’m sorry

Child grooming teachers in shambles

@DWIDDLEDEE467 @UrghBIa I'm not the guy with the new account posting like a bot.

@Kicksovergrabs @UrghBIa Like u??✌️😭💔💔💔

For the dishonest porn brained loli lovers who intentionally make bad faith arguments to justify their illness, I do not need to argue with you. Instead, here is a robot that is smarter than you explaining your insecurities:

@Pharllow06 @SeehIsMe No, an anti would just scream pedo at the top of their lungs. I just don't like the government inviting ideas of intruding privacy to "prove" something that should be obviously false. Willing people can be paid, it's been the cases with other "mental theories".

@Kicksovergrabs @SeehIsMe You probably thought I was an anti. Or If you're mad about something else I'm not saying to force lolicons to scan their brains like they're lab experiments- I meant "willingly" ( if they wish to.)

Actually, you know what, since it's sunday and i have some free time, and this is a topic i care about since i've been a victim of CSAM, no, lolicons are not pedophiles Gonna use the little knowledge that i got from studying neuropsychology for some years, so ay, silly emote🧵

@Shodah10 @kuriimu_tenshi @Leawesome9 @_jtb3 @SomniumSpace Cp involves actually harming a child while a 3d mesh is data that doesn't require to sexually harass a minor. Hope that helps.

@kuriimu_tenshi @Leawesome9 @_jtb3 @SomniumSpace A 3D model of a sexualised child, is a 3D model of a sexualised child. The same as a video of CP, is a fucking video of CP Why are you doubling down on paedophilia? Do you think paedophilia is OK?

Lolicon is pedophilia. If anyone rocks a sexualised loli child avatar inside @SomniumSpace you're insta banned. Stay on the other platform that likes that shit.

@Pharllow06 @SeehIsMe Why don't we scan your brain to see if you can actually tell the difference between a crime with a victim involved and a fictional piece of an artist which is neither crime nor involves a victim

@SeehIsMe If lolishocons really are pedos why don't we get some lolishocons to willingly scan their brains to compare them to a pedophiles brain scan and a normal persons brain scan to prove it

@DWIDDLEDEE467 @UrghBIa Holy schizo bait

@Kicksovergrabs @UrghBIa HOLY COPIUM✌️😭💔💔💔

@UrghBIa Also I forgot to mention that the A.I. is incorrect in calling this a red herring or a strawman. The point of "why would you discuss this with family members" is relevant to your question and not a diversion. Look up the terms in Oxford next time.

@Kicksovergrabs Interesting lie. Perhaps since you're biased against me, how about you give it the exact same prompts as I did then?

@UrghBIa Here is another question for you. If you really did care about this topic and are smarter than lolicons, why did you decide to take this up to an A.I. which cannot distinct country laws from your answer instead of a legal expert in said country?

@UrghBIa I have no bias against you. I simply accept that you have no foundational knowledge of these topics and rely on a company owned machine to give you answers you want. As for your question, the anwers will vary depending on our history with the A.I. and which one we use.

@lstr_51213 @macueen47795 @9melp @etherionce A government cannot dictate over your privacy unless there is a criminal act that involves a victim.

@Kicksovergrabs @macueen47795 @9melp @etherionce Totalitarian state is when you can’t masturbate to drawings of children apparently

I BEEN SAYING THIS BTW YALL DONT LISTEN

@macueen47795 @9melp @etherionce 1. The U.S does not raid houses without warrants unlike cases in Australia, which has by definition become a police state. 2. Even if it is just the last case, it doesn't change that the other cases have been argued as unconstitunional, but the article wouldn't tell you that.

@Kicksovergrabs @9melp @etherionce thats only for the last case even doe idk where you got it from that australia has police methods equal to a dictatorship when the USA arguably does worse

@martian_mills @EGX001S If I told my parents they'd react the same way as if I said "hey I am into NRT or fart fantasies." If you checked the most visited tags, they're all a fetish. You also miss the point of law enforcement punishing pedophiles. It's to prevent harm on children, not pursue fiction.

@Kicksovergrabs @EGX001S Yeah, idk why you're trying to squish everyone into some small minority here bud. BUT, "Normal people" is referring to ANYONE who ISN'T into children, real or not. You could have a damn ARMPIT fetish and as long as you don't like kids, real or not, you're normal

It isn’t proof of pedophilia, but I feel like a lot English speaking lolicons are either masochists or just have a need for attention with how much they feel the need to broadcast it, and then pick fights with people who find it gross. They don’t have to do that.

@UrghBIa It doesn't matter what you ask. It will answer with costumer satisfaction. It's programmed to do so and knows how to do so.

@Kicksovergrabs How could it be biased when I asked it a neutral question and it responded logically? The bias is coming from your denial.

@LioManBad Not a lolicon, F tier ragebait

A lolicon sexually assaulted one kid and sexually communicated with another? I'm SO surprised!

@JamesWe35435920 @MinhoBang03 This article fails to explain the pillars under which free speech in terms of creative work are established. The grade of obscenity in an artistic work is difficult to judge, but there are principles to it. Some cases were closed unconstitutionally.

@animeoutsiders @ActivistZero Instead of focusing on it being a drawing you should ask who is being harmed.

The problem is neither side can address their own inherent problem, which just results in idiots shouting at each other. "It's just drawings!" Drawings of what? "It's sexualized children!" Children that aren't real. It's common to indulge in fictional taboos. etc. etc. No one can have an actual debate on the subject because it's not about settling anything, just virtue signaling to either side for likes and retweets.

People hate it when you "both sides" an issue but my god are both sides of the Chibi vs. Schlep lolicon debate just absolutely awful. Loli = pedo is already a touchy subject because no one wants to have a good faith argument about it. It's a very grey and murky issue. Blanket condemnations are retarded, but some of the people attacking Schlep aren't doing themselves any favors with their pedo LARPing, and definitely not by making sexual shota art of him knowing what happened to the guy. And the people attacking Chibi by using what happened with his fiancee are just evil people make-believing they're one of the good guys, straight up. It is really is

@martian_mills @EGX001S "Normal people" don't find anything attractive outside of the vanilla spectrum. And said "normal people" are few in number on the internet.

@EGX001S Idk.. If you like little anime kids, I'm gonna assume you're a pdf. Normal people don't find kids, real or not, attractive.