Nathan Kipp

2.5K posts

Nathan Kipp

Nathan Kipp

@KippNathan

license custom spray operator, truck driver, mechanic, welder.Helping our customers produce high quality crops @silvercreekag

Milverton Ontario Katılım Haziran 2015
391 Takip Edilen507 Takipçiler
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Franco Terrazzano
Franco Terrazzano@franco_nomics·
Carbon taxes on refineries make it more expensive to drive. Carbon taxes on fertilizer plants make it more expensive to eat. Carbon taxes on electricity make it more expensive to live. Carbon taxes on Canadian businesses don't cut emissions. They cut Canadian jobs.
English
54
692
1.8K
17.4K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Antonio Sabato Jr
Antonio Sabato Jr@AntonioSabatoJr·
Listen to this, perfectly explained. It’s all been a big fraud and a lie all done purposely.
English
224
2.7K
7.5K
288.9K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Michelle Leahy Ferreri
Michelle Leahy Ferreri@mferreriptbokaw·
4 chances to make your life safer. They said no to every one. They aren’t working for you. But they sure are making life better for criminals. 🤷‍♀️
English
35
184
557
4.7K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM
While preparing for a brief on the independence petition due tomorrow, I came across this from the Supreme Court of Canada that is worth sharing: “The right of the people to discuss and debate ideas forms the very foundation of democracy… For this reason, the Supreme Court of Canada has assiduously protected the right of each citizen to participate in political debate... Permitting an effective voice for unpopular and minority views — views political parties may not embrace — is essential to deliberative democracy. The goal should be to bring the views of all citizens into the political arena for consideration, be they accepted or rejected at the end of the day. Free speech in the public square may not be curtailed merely because one might find the message unappetizing or the messenger distasteful… The ability to engage in effective speech in the public square means nothing if it does not include the ability to attempt to persuade one’s fellow citizens through debate and discussion. This is the kernel from which reasoned political discourse emerges. Freedom of expression must allow a citizen to give voice to her vision for her community and nation, to advocate change through the art of persuasion in the hope of improving her life and indeed the larger social, political and economic landscape… Freedom of expression protects not only the individual who speaks the message, but also the recipient. Members of the public — as viewers, listeners and readers — have a right to information on public governance, absent which they cannot cast an informed vote.” These are words from the Supreme Court of Canada that recognize the importance of debate and discussion, even when the views are unpopular, uncomfortable, or distasteful. So when someone tries to shut down the conversation, shame you, or tell you certain topics should not even be discussed, remind them of that. The answer is not silence or suppression. A petition, a debate, even a controversial idea, these are not failures of the system. They are expressions of it. The real risk is when we start deciding which views are acceptable to be heard. Because once that line starts moving, it does not stop where you think it will. So the question is: Are we prepared to actually live this principle or do we only support it when we agree with the message? Because the more you know and understand, the more effectively you can participate, ask better questions, and actually effect change.
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM tweet mediaEva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM tweet mediaEva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM tweet mediaEva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM tweet media
English
139
1.3K
2.7K
43.5K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦
😡 INCOMING RANT - UTTERLY DISGUSTING AND INFURIATING! Taxpayer-funded CBC is COMPLETELY SILENT on the real Canadian hero we should be hearing about EVERY SINGLE DAY — 12-year-old Maya Gebala from Tumbler Ridge, BC! This brave little girl didn’t run or hide during the horrific Feb 10, 2026 school shooting that killed 8 people (including kids). She rushed to lock the library door to protect her classmates and teachers from the shooter. She was shot multiple times in the head and neck, left with catastrophic brain injuries, and she’s STILL fighting for her life in BC Children’s Hospital after weeks of surgeries and setbacks. A TRUE HERO!! A child who put everyone else first. Meanwhile, UFC boss Dana White steps up like an absolute LEGEND — offering to fly her to a world-class LA children’s hospital for top-tier brain trauma care, cover ALL medical costs, and even pay for her family’s accommodations! UFC even honored her in the Octagon. But what does our so-called “public” broadcaster obsess over instead? Liberal propaganda, some CEO who fumbled French, or Mark Carney’s bilingual messaging nonsense! CBC isn’t informing Canadians — it’s the Liberal microphone, wasting OUR hard-earned tax dollars while burying real Canadian stories and real heroes. This is beyond shameful. This is criminal neglect. WHERE IS THE DAILY COVERAGE ON MAYA?! Why aren’t you screaming this from the rooftops, CBC?! We pay your salaries — do your damn job! SHARE if you’re as furious as I am. Demand better. Demand they cover the heroes, not the hype. #MayaGebala #CanadianHero #CBCFail #DefundCBC #TumblerRidgeShooting #DanaWhiteStepsUp 🔥🇨🇦💔
English
85
1.2K
3.5K
45.7K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
John Barlow
John Barlow@JohnBarlowMP·
Shutting down agricultural research stations while claiming there’s no money isn’t a budget decision. It’s a values decision. The closure of seven research stations across the country reflects deeply misaligned priorities and the agriculture and agri-food have emphasized this time and time again. Watch below👇
English
14
61
198
6.1K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
lifewithsonduren
lifewithsonduren@lifewitsonduren·
Mark Carney says "affordability's the best it's been in over a decade" in Canada. He just flat out lied to all Canadians.
English
95
295
815
10.4K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
🚨 BREAKING It’s a very dark day in Canada today. The Liberals just voted down ALL FOUR Conservative public safety bills. Bill C-246: consecutive sentences for sexual predators. So they serve time for EACH offence. Not a bulk discount. VOTED DOWN. Bill C-220: stop judges from giving lighter sentences to rapists and child predators because deportation might be a consequence. VOTED DOWN. Bill C-243: end the cycle that forces victims to relive their trauma at parole hearings year after year. Victims begged for this. VOTED DOWN. Bill C-242: the Jail Not Bail Act. Repeal catch and release for repeat violent offenders. VOTED DOWN. Tougher sentences for sex offenders? No. Accountability for foreign criminals? No. Mercy for victims? No. Keeping dangerous people locked up? No. Four bills. Four chances to protect Canadians. They said NO to all of them. This is what they stand for. NOTHING.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ PS. What they will do tonight, is vote in favour of their own hate bill. Because words matter more.
English
636
4.7K
10.6K
235.4K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Marc Nixon
Marc Nixon@MarcNixon24·
HAPPENING NOW: Shuvaloy Majumdar OBLITERATES the LEFT Net Zero Anti-Energy Policies. After you watch his SPEECH there won't be a SINGLE Liberal SUPPORTER left in CANADA.
English
151
2.1K
5K
83.5K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Rebel News
Rebel News@RebelNewsOnline·
Floor-crossing MP Lori Idlout is even worse than we thought Remember when Lori Idlout crossed the floor? Yeah, that was bad. Nunavut voters elected her as an NDP MP by just 41 votes. A handful of families changing their minds would’ve flipped the result. Then she handed that seat to Mark Carney’s Liberals anyway. A quiet deal in Ottawa that erased the choice voters made. But now we know more. It turns out Lori Idlout wasn’t just playing politics. She was also billing taxpayers for purchases from her own business. House of Commons disclosures show four transactions in 2025 tied to her company, Carvings Nunavut, totalling about $1,756. That includes multiple smaller purchases and one larger one just under $1,400. Only after media questions did she suddenly realize this was a problem. Her explanation? It was an “error.” Right. Because apparently, running purchases from your own company through your parliamentary expense account just… happens. And we’re supposed to believe this wasn’t noticed until reporters started asking questions? She paid it back. But let’s be very clear about what that means: she didn’t stop — she got caught. Now zoom out because this is where the pattern matters. Idlout’s own ethics disclosures show she has full ownership of Carvings Nunavut and full ownership of Nunavut Holdings. She’s also listed as a director in federal corporate records. Long before this expense scandal broke, there were already serious questions about federal money flowing to companies connected to her interests and her household, including sole-sourced contracts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars while she was a sitting MP. After all of that, she crosses the floor to join the very government that controls those contracts. If you tried to design a textbook example of how public office and private interest can collide, you’d struggle to make it clearer than this. As long as everything is technically within the rules — rules written by the same political class — nobody in power wants to pull the thread. But Canadians aren’t stupid. They can see the sequence. Win as an NDP MP, have business interests tied to government money. Bill your own company through taxpayer expenses, call it an “error” after getting caught. Then cross the floor to the governing Liberals. And the people of Nunavut are stuck with it. If Lori Idlout thinks this is all above board if she truly believes she still has the confidence of Nunavut, then there’s a simple test: resign, run again as a Liberal and defend her record to voters. Because right now, she’s holding a seat she didn’t win under the banner she’s serving. REPORT by @SheilaGunnReid:
English
112
1.4K
3.6K
83K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Melanie In Saskatchewan
Melanie In Saskatchewan@saskatchewan_in·
The Checkout Called. It's Not Impressed. Your Economy Doesn’t Feed People. Dear @MarkJCarney You told Canadians to judge you at the checkout. That was your standard. Your line in the sand. So I took you at your word. And I came prepared. I brought my grocery receipt, and I brought my tax assessment from the Canada Revenue Agency, because I am well aware that the easiest way to dismiss people like me is to pretend we are exaggerating. I am not. My gross income sits at roughly $26,800. I am a widowed, rural school bus driver raising an 11 year old child. That number is not theoretical. It is the framework every decision in my household has to fit inside. Now let’s talk about your “Judge me at by the checkout” remark. $84.78. Twelve items. One week of school lunch supplies. One luxury bag of Doritos I hope my autistic kid will like. One bag of Sunchips I know she will like. Not groceries. Not abundance. Not even balance. No meat except for pepperoni sticks. No dairy. Just Supplies. And before anyone reaches for the standard talking points, let me address them directly, because I already know what your response would be. You would point to a school food program. You would point to a grocery benefit. You would present both as evidence that help is either here or just around the corner. Neither of those things solves this problem. As I said, my daughter is autistic. Food is not a matter of preference or persuasion. It is a hard boundary defined by texture, predictability, and tolerance. If you think a child like mine will eventually “get hungry enough” to eat whatever is put in front of her, then you do not understand what autism looks like in real life, and the endless feelings of failure mixed with overwhelmed exasperation for parents. My child has, and will go forty hours without eating something she cannot tolerate. And if she forces it, she will throw it up simply from the stress of eating something she cant tolerate. That is not stubbornness. That is not behavior that can be corrected with incentives or programs. That is neurological biology meeting reality. So no, I cannot rely on a generic school food program filled with random items, unknown ingredients, and inconsistent preparation in kitchens I don't know are free from cross-contamination or not. I cannot gamble on whether something will trigger headaches, nausea, or outright refusal. And I cannot risk my child going hungry because a policy designer in Ottawa assumed all children interact with food the same way. There is another layer to this that people like to ignore because it is uncomfortable. If my child consistently shows up to school not eating what is provided, or not eating enough, it does not get interpreted as “policy failure.” It risks being interpreted as parental neglect. Teachers report concerns. Systems activate. Suddenly I am not just navigating grocery prices, I am defending myself as a low-income parent of an autistic child. One more stereotypical label applied to my household without considering the facts. That is the reality your programs do not account for. I can't even fathom hiw disabled Canadians with special diets survive. That might explain why we just surpassed 100,000 doctor assisted suicide in your MAiD program. So I do what parents have always done. I adapt. I buy what she will eat. I cook extra at night so she has something for lunch. Sometimes I cook an entirely separate meal just so she can get take it in her lunch and get through the school week. She will not eat sandwiches. She will eat the components, but not assembled. The only bread she tolerates is light rye, at six dollars a loaf, and only if there’s a cheeseburger between the slices. Otheriwse she wont eat bread or toast, so even that workaround comes with a premium. This is not inefficiency. This is survival inside constraints you have never had to think about. Now let’s talk about cost, because that is where this all collapses. The box of food I bought is not impressive. It is not nutritionally perfect. It is not what your government would showcase in a campaign graphic. It is what fits inside my budget and inside my child’s limits at the same time. Milk at $7.39 plus deposit. Cereal at $7.29. Those are not even in my cart. They are examples of the line I cannot cross. They represent the point where “better choices” become financially inaccessible. On top of that, I pay deposits on beverage containers in Saskatchewan. I’m paying $1.60/L for fuel to travel forty kilometres to the nearest grocery store and back. The closest Walmart is 3 hours one way. The closest No Frills is 80 minutawaine way. I pay taxes layered onto already inflated prices. Every step increases cost before the food ever reaches my kitchen. And while all of that is happening, I am told to follow the Canada Food Guide. Have you SEEN it? I somehow doubt while in your ivory tower eating your foie gras, that you’re attuned to the hunger beneath you. The food guide states our plates should be comprised of half fruits and vegetables. The rest whole grains and lean protein. Explain how that is supposed to work on $26,800 a year, with a child who cannot simply “adjust,” in a system where every input cost is rising. Explain it in numbers like I’m five. Because the numbers I am working with do not reconcile with the expectations you are setting. Let me make this even clearer. My child has already adapted to scarcity. She usually goes without breakfast, because of limited choices, availability and her never-ending pickiness of textures, smells and consistency. But dont worry you and your cabinet will say “...but there is a school food program!” Lunch is small. The students are only given 13 minutes to eat their lunches, because time is money and teachers feel underpaid for their efforts. So no extra time allowed lest the teachers have to give up more of their time unpaid. Supper is portioned. Not because that is what I want for her, but because that is what the budget allows. Water fills a lot of the empty spacetin order to fake the feel of being sated. Water consumption is the one part of the food guide we can actually follow as long as I pay the water bill. As for me, I eat about once every thirty hours on average. Not because I am not hungry. Because that is what I can afford to do so she can eat. That is what YOUR liberal economy looks like from the inside. Food banks are not the safety net people imagine. The closest one to me is an hour away. That requires fuel I cannot spare. It requires me to show up in person during hours I am working. It is not accessible in any meaningful way. For context, I get paid four hours a day to drive a school bus and the food bank hours are 1-4 pm. Remember, its a one hour drive just to get there. Another hour home. I won’t even describe how long it takes to wait in the line, or the endless embarrassment at having to do so. There is no daycare. No babysitters hiding out in the canola fields. No means to find a second job that won't get eaten up paying for daycare. So when you stand there and suggest that the Liberal system has supports built into it, understand that those supports do not reach a lot of people who need them. They certainly do not reach households like mine in a way that materially changes outcomes. The fact the system even needs supports your first clue that your system is failing. And people like me don't want supports. We want a paycheck that isn't taxed to death so we can afford to live again. And every time you or one of your clown ministers answers a question about affordability with comments like “We brought in a school food program” its an outright slap in the face. Even the child tax credit, at it’s highest amount doesn’t elevate us above the poverty line so again, your cabinet ministers claiming they’re raising thousands of children out of poverty is outright bullshit. Please! Enough! Just STOP with the bullshit. I refuse to accept it any longer. And this is the part you need to hear, whether you like it or not. Before oil prices moved. Before the latest conflict overseas. Before any of the convenient explanations. Nothing was getting better. Not one solitary thing. You have travelled in contradiction to your climate rhetoric and carbon goals. You have announced billions in endless supports for Ukraine and other international programs that do nothing for my household, or even my country. You have signed agreements and issued statements and reassured Canadians that progress is being made, yet Canadian cannot point to any progress affecting their lives in any meaningful way. And at the supermarket checkout, where your performance is actually measured, there is no evidence of progress anywhere. Absolute nothingness. An abyssal cavern of emptiness and hungry stomachs. Not one single thing. If you believe you can continue reshaping the economy, layering costs through policy, and pursuing your agenda while assuming people will quietly absorb it, then you are fundamentally misreading the country you are governing. Because people are not confused. They are not misinformed. They are not failing to understand your vision. They are doing the math. And the math is not working. Right now, families like mine are being forced into a calculation no parent should have to make. We are choosing between the food our children will actually eat and the food we can afford to throw away when they cannot. That is not a policy debate. That is a failure. You told Canadians to judge you at the checkout. So here is the judgment. Your words have not translated into results. Your policies have not produced relief. And the reality in homes like mine is moving in the opposite direction of everything you promised. Fix that. Now. Or accept that people will stop listening to what you say and start responding to what they are living. You have the audacity to go on vacation leaving millions of Canadians hanging, waiting for any sign you might, some day, perhaps, just maybe, do that “something” for Canada that you claimed only you alone could do, since you alone are the only one who “understands how the world works.” You clearly don’t understand Jack shit about how the world works, and it shows. Yours in justified contempt, Melanie in Saskatchewan School bus driver Widowed mother And... Still waiting for your promises to show up at the checkout. 👇🏻 buymeacoffee.com/melanieinsaska… 👇🏻 open.substack.com/pub/melanieins…
Melanie In Saskatchewan tweet media
English
81
386
893
16K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Chris Ryan
Chris Ryan@Watchdog_MP·
🚨 BREAKING: Unions and MPs are sounding the alarm: Liberal funding cuts to Veterans Affairs could cripple services for our Canadian heroes! While billions flow to foreign aid and pet projects, our veterans get the short end. This is unacceptable! Who else is outraged? RT if you stand with our vets. 🪖 #SupportOurVeterans #Cdnpoli
Chris Ryan tweet media
CTV News@CTVNews

Unions, MPs warn funding cuts could affect services for veterans ctvnews.ca/politics/artic…

English
82
926
1.5K
23.5K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Ivano Defazio 🇨🇦🇮🇹🇺🇸
How ridiculous is this??? The Government is asking for another $17 million to tell Canadians how to budget but can't budget themselves.
English
22
384
793
10.8K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
BREAKING: Carney attempted to cover up the bombing of Canadian troops, due to the optics of his flip flopping. He did it, for politics. CarneyWatch.ca put together the timeline. The Bulletin is being emailed out this afternoon. The bombing, it happened nearly a week and a half ago. Iran was debated in Parliament. Carney decided to not show up! Knowing, our troops were bombed and he stated that we will never be a part of the war, after supporting the US & Israel. This should be national and international headlines.
English
108
755
2K
23.1K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Josh Ryan 🍁
Josh Ryan 🍁@joshryanjames·
Liberal MP Mark Gerretsen is confronted by a Canadian voter and gets up and runs away. Mark Gerretsen posts propaganda on X and restricts responses and can't handle questionning from a voter who pays his salary.
English
158
883
3K
51.9K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
The Buck You Will
The Buck You Will@TheBuckYouWill·
🚨DEPORT JAKIRAT SINDU NOW.🚨 Sidhu blew through a stop sign at 100KPH, and killed 16 teens and coaches while critically injuring 13 more. ALL WHITE, OF COURSE. Sidhu had 70 trucking violations in 11 days before the crash. He got an 8-year sentence. He was out in 3 years. CANADIANS WANT TO DEPORT HIM. But he's sueing to stay on “humanitarian” grounds. Says his “mental health” will get worse in India. No proper treatment there, and poor air quality would be bad for his three year old. NOW GET THIS: His lawyer Michael Greene says this is a “litmus test for Canadians.” “Are we generous and forgiving or are we punitive?” IF YOU ARE NOT RAGING AFTER READING THIS POST, THEN YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.
The Buck You Will tweet mediaThe Buck You Will tweet mediaThe Buck You Will tweet media
English
402
1K
3.5K
62.7K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
SandraCobena
SandraCobena@SandraCobena_·
🚨BREAKING: I officially tabled the Stand on Guard Act. This bill would clarify the legal standard for self-defence to add a clear presumption that when someone knowingly and unlawfully enters your home, the force you thought necessary to defend yourself and your family is presumed to be reasonable, unless the facts show otherwise. Your home should be your safe place, not the place where the law turns against you for protecting the people you love. #cdnpoli
English
450
1.8K
7.9K
283.8K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Kirk Lubimov
Kirk Lubimov@KirkLubimov·
This may be the stupidest thing ever said in the House of Commons, and after 10+ years of Liberals that says a lot. Minister of Housing and Infrastructure Gregor Robertson: "It's no surprise that Canadians are challenged with buying homes right now when there is a war right now in the Middle East." 🤦🏼
English
823
1.4K
6K
217.5K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
Carney will be the first Prime Minister, IN HISTORY, To achieve a Majority government through floor crossings. The most disrespectful thing that can be done to Canadian voters, effectively invalidating their votes and wishes. Now, imagine Trump did the same. Canadians would lose their mind. That’s why our country is lost. We care more about US politics than our own country.
English
627
2.1K
7.1K
73.3K
Nathan Kipp retweetledi
Anti-Boomer
Anti-Boomer@mapleblooded·
Floor-crosser Lori Idlout and her husband own Nunavut Holdings, a home construction and supply business. And it just so happens that the Liberals have focused their rapid home building in Nunavut? And it just so happens a $50 million dollar university that needs construction supplies, appliances, and furnishings was announced by the Liberals? And it just so happens that she crosses the floor to the Liberals? The corruption is so out of control in this country. The government extorts taxes from Canadians and hand it out to each other.
Anti-Boomer tweet media
English
447
3K
7.3K
138.3K