Daniel Kurganov
10 posts


Just leaked 110+ plug-and-play n8n templates that multiple industries are paying me $10K+ for.
Your weekend project: Pick any industry, copy-paste a workflow, start printing money.
The vault includes:
- Real estate lead machines (sold to 2 companies)
- Automotive inventory bots
- YouTube-to-TikTok content farms
- E-commerce customer journey automations
- SDR agents that close without you
- Healthcare patient follow-ups
- Legal document processors
- Social media engagement bots
From study agents (because fuck school) to manufacturing systems - every industry that prints money is covered.
The difference: These aren't broken templates with outdated nodes. They're battle-tested, profitable, and actually work in 2025.
Half sold for serious cash. Half are experiments that became goldmines. All are ready to deploy.
Follow, RT + Comment "vault" and I'll drop the entire collection before my accountant kills me for giving away the farm.
(Sorry to every consultant charging $10K for basic automations)
English

@minchoi Would love to try this...can you provide an invite code please? Very much appreciated!!
English

@heyshrutimishra This graphic was created with the help of ChatGPT :)
English

@EricRWeinstein Sorry, my African Grey just quipped: what about the holographic principle and AdS/CFT correspondence?
English

[Nerd Alert. You may want to skip this tweet.]
There is a very subtle problem here for “Quantum Gravity” that worries me that doesn’t seem to worry physicists.
If gravity becomes uncertain, the force particle medium continues to exist.
Bosonic Waves: UNCERTAIN
Bosonic Medium: CERTAIN
Bosonic Norm: UNCERTAIN
Bosonic Derivative: EXISTS
So the photon medium exists. And there is still a derivative called the exterior derivative.
This is not true for matter waves. Unless there is a metric 2-tensor g_ij (i.e. the rulers and protractors I always mention) then the matter medium is not defined.
Fermionic Waves: UNCERTAIN
Fermionic Medium: UNCERTAIN
Fermionic Norm: NONE
Fermionic Derivative: NONE
That to me is a major difference between GL(4,R) double cover and SL(2,C). And there is no Dirac operator either. There is no DeRahm type theory for Spinors. Only a Hodge like Dirac theory.
I am always assured that this is no problem at all. Mumble mumble tetrads….Vierbien this…moving frames…Ashtekar Variables…something something…not a problem.
I don’t believe it. I think it’s a problem. I could be wrong. But I am not yet convinced. Maybe I’m just not getting it. But I’m really really not getting it. I think it’s wrong that there is no big deal here.
I’m not going to get into a major back and forth on X. But if you know what I am talking about, respond and perhaps we can maybe hash it out in a better forum if it makes sense.
Thx.
Nirmalya Kajuri@Kaju_Nut
Question for physicists: If superposition of macroscopic objects is achieved, their gravitational potentials could be in a state of superposition. Is there a sense in which such experiments probe quantum gravity?
English

@EricRWeinstein Did you interact/jam with any Hindustani musicians?
The simultaneous expressive freedom and strict form is touching and transportive.
English










