Assistant
57 posts
I just left @FanaticsFest and here are my raw thoughts. This was a true experience that transcends a traditional card convention. The attention to detail was incredible and each area did an exceptional job with their setup. I was blown away with everything they had.
I got to watch @TikiBarber broadcast from the @WFAN660 location for a bit which was great. There was something for everyone and a lot of events kids could partake in.
Now for “The Hobby” aspect. I don’t believe Fanatics Fest will replace the national unless they decide to do a dedicated collectors event. What I liked was that the booths were spaced out well and it was easy to walk around.
@CardVaultTB basically built a sports card shop on the show floor which was cool. The setup by @SCCTradingCards and others were impressive also. There were also multiple @Starbucks inside which was an added bonus.
Overall, this was a very cool experience that is unlikely to be matched by anyone. I think a big thing that helps is the lighting and open space. The Javits Center is just on another level.
I would look at Fanatics Fest as an incredible trade show open to the public for sports, not an over the top card convention.
Congratulations and thank you to @michaelrubin because @Fanatics acquiring @Topps is the best thing that could have happened to the hobby. I’m glad I got to experience Fanatics Fest and I am looking forward to coming back next year.
English
@stevenfiorillo My internal plan is as follows!
⬇️！！！
x.com/i/grok/share/3…
English
My last two posts on New York's tax policy did a combined 1.4 million views. New York became the first state in America to freeze new data centers, and this decision is a bigger mistake than the estate tax proposal. Let me walk you through the data.
Here's what actually happened, and it's not what the headlines say. The legislature passed a data center bill on June 4th in the final hours of the session. Governor Hochul @KathyHochul never signed it. Instead she signed an executive order on July 14th that does the same job.
For up to a year New York won't approve state environmental permits for any new data center that uses 50 megawatts or more of power. The unsigned bill on her desk is even stricter and would freeze everything over 20 megawatts.
Now read the fine print. Projects with completed applications are exempt. Manufacturing got carved out which protects Micron's $MU chip plant. Public research got carved out, which protects the state's own Empire AI project.
The one year pause isn't even the bad part. The bill forces data centers into their own utility rate class where they cover every cost they create. It requires them to run on one third renewable energy by 2030 and 90% by 2040. It adds prevailing wage rules and mandatory payments to host communities. Then Governor Hochul went further and said she wants to repeal the sales tax breaks data centers get. Think about that because 6 states offer tax incentives to attract data centers. New York wants to cancel its own.
New York ranks 50th out of 50 states in tax competitiveness. The top income tax rate is 10.9%. The average sales tax is 8.5%. There's an estate tax on top. NY collects $12,506 per person in state and local taxes which is more than any other state in the country.
IRS data shows New York lost almost $10 billion in taxable income to other states in a single year which was the second worst in the country. Florida gained $20.6 billion in that same window. During the two peak COVID years New York lost about $45 billion. Add it all up since 2000 and the estimate is $1.1 trillion in income that New York can no longer tax. That's not a typo. Trillion, with a T.
It gets worse when you look at who's leaving. All 10 of the US counties that lost the most taxpayers are in New York or California. Queens lost 17,109 tax filers in one year. The Bronx lost 16,319. Manhattan gained more new filers than any county in America and still lost almost $1 billion in income since the wealthy people leaving are being replaced by people who earn less. The tax base isn't just shrinking, it's producing less income.
The state lost over 533,000 people from mid-2020 to mid-2023. In 2024 it lost a net 13,662 taxpayers and more than half of that loss was married couples earning $100,000 to $500,000. Those are the families every state fights to keep and 1 out of every 100 people making over $500,000 left in a single year.
Here's why that's a five alarm fire. Income taxes fund 30.5% of everything New York's state and local governments do and the money comes from the top. NYC's top 1% has paid more in income taxes than the bottom 90% combined. Just 100 wealthy households leaving costs the state about $130 million a year. The Citizens Budget Commission says if a recession hits the shrinking tax base could blow a $35 to $50 billion hole in the budget.
Now here's what New York just said no to. We're in the biggest infrastructure buildout of our lifetime. Texas did $4.8 billion of data center construction last year with $7 billion more on the way. Georgia did $2.1 billion. One large data center means about 1,800 construction jobs, $100 million in worker pay, and $271 million flowing into the local economy, then around 300 permanent jobs once it opens. That's electricians, plumbers, ironworkers, truck drivers, and every diner and hotel near the site.
There are 28 large data centers waiting in line to connect to New York's grid right now with almost 10,000 megawatts of proposed investment. Every single one just got told to wait and every economic development office in the other 49 states just got a new sales pitch.
The official reason for the freeze is that data centers will raise your electric bill. This is the part that should make you angry.
New York's energy bills were a crisis before a single one of these projects was built. Your electricity costs about 30 cents per kilowatt hour, roughly two thirds more than the average American pays. This past January wholesale power ran double the national average. The state's winter energy tab hit $2.7 billion, up 50% from two winters ago.
How does the state sitting next to the cheapest natural gas on Earth pay some of the highest energy prices in America? Albany chose this one decision at a time. It banned fracking in 2014. It blocked the Constitution Pipeline until the company gave up in 2020 after seven years of trying, killing enough gas supply for millions of homes. It rejected the NESE pipeline into NYC until that project died too.
Utilities got so squeezed they stopped taking new gas customers downstate in 2019. Then the state closed Indian Point which was over 2,000 megawatts of clean nuclear power and denied permits to upgrade two gas plants. Since 2019 New York added 2.9 gigawatts of power and retired 4.4. The grid's safety cushion collapsed from 17% to 9%, and NYC is projected to be 650 megawatts short this summer.
Gas produces about 90% of downstate electricity and sets the price for all of it. When you choke off the gas supply and every electric bill in the state goes up that is not a data center problem. That's a problem Albany manufactured.
Here's the part almost nobody is covering. The fix is finally happening and Albany isn't the one doing it. Washington pushed the pipelines through. NESE broke ground in April with three cabinet secretaries standing in New York City. It's a $1 billion project that federal officials say will save households over $1,000 a year and S&P found new pipelines could cut Northeast gas prices by up to 30%. Meanwhile in January New York's own environmental agency filed paperwork with federal regulators trying to block the Constitution Pipeline again. The same government freezing data centers in the name of your electric bill is still fighting the gas supply that would lower it.
Now zoom out, since this is bigger than New York. To some people freezing data centers feels like a huge win and in their circles it is one. The bill's own sponsor called it a victory for the movement to fight data centers. Bernie Sanders and AOC want a nationwide freeze. New York isn't the end of this. It's the beginning. So ask yourself what happens if America actually does this?
I'll tell you what happens. China keeps building. China has 60 nuclear reactors running and 36 more under construction right now. That's about half of all the nuclear plants being built on Earth. Add the 16 they've already approved and they're headed for 125 gigawatts of nuclear power. They've approved 10 or more new reactors a year for four years running and they build them in 6 years while the rest of the world takes 9. China figured out that energy is the bottleneck of the AI race and attacked it with everything they have. New York put up a stop sign.
Why does this matter so much? AI is the first technology where winning the economic race and winning the military race are the same thing. More computing power means better AI. Better AI means better cyber weapons, better drones, better logistics, better everything. This isn't theoretical considering the FBI has publicly warned that Chinese hackers are already inside American critical infrastructure, including our power grid. In a world where wars run on computers and robots are on the horizon falling behind on AI isn't a policy choice. It's economic and national security suicide.
Feeling righteous about pausing data centers doesn't slow China down by one megawatt. Nothing would make Beijing happier than watching America argue itself into a national freeze. Every year we spend debating whether to build is a year they spend building. You don't win an arms race by disarming and calling it leadership.
The freeze is 12 months on paper. The message lasts decades.
A state that lost a trillion dollars of taxable income, ranks dead last on taxes, and pays two thirds more for electricity than everyone else just looked at the biggest investment wave of our lifetime and said no thanks.
Site selection committees hear that message. So do taxpayers with moving trucks. So does Beijing. New York keeps sending the same one.
@BillAckman @Jason @chamath @DavidSacks @friedberg did I miss anything?
English
English
Thank you for @wealthmatica for coming on. This was a great discussion about $ZETA
Zeta Global Pivots to Intelligent AI Infrastructure Powered by Palantir ... youtu.be/O48FeJs7T9Q?si… via @YouTube
YouTube
English
English
@stevenfiorillo My internal plan is as follows!
⬇️
x.com/i/grok/share/7…
English
Thank you for coming on. It was a great discussion.
Investing With Brandon@Invest_Brandon
Recommend all to check out the pod I did with @stevenfiorillo a few days ago covering how I do stocks & options. I know a lot of people have questions about what I do and this pod will help A LOT! Check it out here: youtu.be/MPpoagdUIrA?is…
English
@stevenfiorillo My internal plan is as follows!
⬇️
x.com/i/grok/share/4…
English
Everyone claiming $UBER cut its AI token budget is getting the story wrong as the data says the opposite. Here's what really happened.
Uber rolled out Anthropic's Claude Code to roughly 5,000 engineers in December 2025. Adoption went from 32% of engineers in February to 84% by March. By the spring 95% of UBER engineers were using AI tools on a monthly basis and roughly 70% of committed code came from them.
In April Uber's CTO confirmed the company exhausted its ENTIRE 2026 AI budget in 4 months. The average engineer cost $150 to $250 a month in tokens while the power users ended up costing between $500 to $2,000. The CTO himself burned $1,200 in a single 2-hour demo.
Where the "Uber cut tokens" narrative comes from:
1. In late May COO Andrew Macdonald said rising token consumption wasn't clearly translating into more consumer features and that Uber would have to start weighing token costs against headcount.
2. On June 2 Bloomberg reported that an Uber spokesperson confirmed a cap of $1,500 a month per employee per AI coding tool.
What people miss is that $1,500 per tool per month is not a cut. It sits way above the $150 to $250 average and covers most of the power user range. Spending on one tool doesn't count against another. That's governance, not austerity.
Meanwhile, the actual spend is accelerating:
- Q1 2026 R&D came in at $951M, up nearly 17% YoY, with $3.4 billion spent in 2025
- CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said Uber is slowing HIRING to offset growing AI investments. They're funding tokens at the expense of headcount
- The CTO plans to test OpenAI's Codex alongside Claude Code. A second vendor is coming in, not a pullback
- About 10% of committed code now ships from autonomous agents and the tools are spreading to legal and marketing teams
The bottom line is that Uber blew through an undisclosed annual allocation, added per-user caps and kept right on spending.
Saying they "lowered their token budget" overstates it. Guardrails went in and the token spigot stayed open.
English
