L2pir

@libriscent Not caring just means you don’t matter

A lot of socializing involves performative interest and my issue is I simply do not give a shit

@libriscent Then shut the fuck up.

@_6signxxx Do rapist Africans not deserve pussy? “Africans don’t deserve pussy because they’re Africans”

Dudes will get on here and be like "poor k!ds don't deserve to have a cookie" and think they are the good guys!!!

@birdbrawns @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL I’ve read them and the explanations for my questions are weak You can’t answer my questions and youre claiming to have read the articles The fact that diplomatic immunity exists demonstrates the true nature of “jurisdiction” and undermines the “elite mind” of the leftist jurist

@L2pir @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL I think you’re an actual idiot and not worth my time. There are countless articles written on how the 14th amendment is. You should read one (or several)

🚨 Do you understand what SCOTUS is about to decide? in 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Black Americans... even those born free on American soil.. could never be citizens.. it was called the Dred Scott decision.. one of the most shameful rulings in legal history.. it took a Civil War and 360,000 Union deaths to fix it.. in 1868, Congress passed the 14th Amendment.. "all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens".. no exceptions.. no asterisks.. they wrote it that way on purpose.. so no government could ever again decide who counts as American on this soil.. it has stood for 156 years.. Trump signed an executive order trying to end it.. not a constitutional amendment.. not an act of Congress.. an executive order.. and SCOTUS is about to decide if that's allowed.. here's what nobody's saying out loud.. this isn't about immigration.. if a president can override the 14th Amendment with an executive order.. there is no amendment a president cannot override with an executive order.. one executive order just did what the Confederacy couldn't.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL The act of deportation doesn’t grant the right to create anchor babies. That’s ridiculous. Jurisdiction isn’t a binary switch. Jurisdiction literally does exist in one spot and then is nonexistent in another.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL “Sorry but by trying deport us, you are actually now forced to keep us” That’s straight up retarded. That’s not how the law works. Absolutely ridiculous. That’s how you come to your conclusions? lol

@Wh4th3fu @TukiFromKL I have to go back to this for you. This isn’t the text of the law. I don’t know what law it is in reference to. And this speaks only to children of naturalized parents, not illegal aliens. The right agrees with you on naturalized parents, at least legally.

@L2pir @TukiFromKL ...yes, the list is "all persons born subject to US law". If US law applies to the baby upon birth, they are a citizen. Congressional debate literally covered the "but what about children born to [scary ethnic group] who I think will use this power to take over invade" question

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL You’re still begging the question. Why would they argue that we’ve made up most 2A rights? Pure conclusions. You aren’t saying anything. 2A is based on rights to possess weapons. 14A is about interactions between people and government and legal status conferred at birth.

@L2pir @TukiFromKL Because the intention and context of 2A surrounded the founding father’s distrust of a standing army in favor of community militias. So an originalist would argue that we’ve essentially made up most “gun rights” for the past 2 centuries.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL How? You aren’t saying anything except conclusions. This is how you think? As for the 14th, the US can literally decline jurisdiction over individuals.

@L2pir @TukiFromKL And personally I think that’s a bit hypocritical

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL Why should an originalist disagree with today’s implementation of 2A? And an originalist view requires respect for the second element of the process.

@L2pir @TukiFromKL I’m not comparing the principals, I’m comparing constitutional frameworks. As in an originalist reading of the 2nd amendment should absolutely disagree with how it’s implemented in 2026- while simultaneously seeking an originalist reading of the 14th amendment

@birdbrawns @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL Enemy militaries are subject to US law when in the US. So are foreign diplomats. How the fuck do you think they are designated as not being under our jurisdiction? The US law/policy says so.

@L2pir @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL Do you not comprehend the words? It means beholden to the laws [of the U.S.] undocumented immigrants are. Diplomats are not. It’s really not that complicated.

@Wh4th3fu @TukiFromKL Enemy military men are subject to US law. That doesn’t work. Plus US law and policy can choose who is subject to it. How the fuck do you think foreign diplomats aren’t subject to the jurisdiction?

@HankHeil What do you mean? The DNC is literally letting BIPOC criminals free so that they can get smoked by a white cop. If a black cop hadn’t marked the deserving retard in New Orleans the other day, you’d have it. That’s how you do it, send the recidivist BIPOCs out to die

The No Kings protests have me questioning the narrative on Race War Summer 2020. Not that it didn't happen and that it wasn't controlled but that they really captured lightning in a bottle and fundamentally do not understand how it worked and how to do it again.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL What principles can you overlap?

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL In that the second amendment lays out the ability to arm one’s self for the safety of themselves, their families and their rights as citizens. The fourteenth amendment lays out the parameters for granting citizenship to those that are under the jurisdiction of the US govt.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL But random foreigners can come against the law of the US and their children are citizens, allowing them to use taxpayer money for the maintenance of their illegal family members? What makes your list exhaustive?

@L2pir @TukiFromKL That is also how I would interpret the second element. Children born in the US to diplomats, foreign dignitaries and foreign armies.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL The 14th has two (2) elements for birthright citizenship purposes (1) born in the US and (2) subject to the jurisdiction thereof What does number 2 mean? Statutory interpretation requires that elements are not made superfluous AntiUS says anyone but diplomat kids born here

@L2pir @TukiFromKL Is that you leave yourself very open to hypocritical analysis of other issues right. Being consistent is like a super big part of being a Supreme Court Justice but being an originalist or living constitutionalist means you’re going to be inconsistent on issues you care about.

@birdbrawns @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL There are multiple types of children born to non us citizens, like the ones in question that you’re knowing obfuscating in favor of. Those here with legal authorization and those here without legal authorization. Governments can decide when to assert jurisdiction as well.

@L2pir @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL Diplomats have diplomatic immunity. (non-U.S-born visitors, like tourists, ARE subject to the United States United States to the jurisdiction of the United States). Invading armies are subject to the laws of war, and tribal nations are only subject to some U.S. law.

@jarevarado @TukiFromKL Terrible wording by you. The 2nd and 14th amendment aren’t comparable in any way you’re trying to do it.

@L2pir @TukiFromKL Like generally speaking absolutely no one wasn’t consider the intent behind the 2nd amendment because a living constitutionalist framing is like core to US life. Which is why I believe the 14th should continue to be interpreted as is and if there is enough will to change it,

@birdbrawns @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL “Subject to the jurisdiction means subject to the jurisdiction” -you So what does that mean?

@L2pir @pilky0001 @MikJagermeister @TukiFromKL I understand you want to simplify the subject so you can wrap your head around it, but there are just different reasons for each that can’t be simplified to “born somewhere else.”