The Elegant Demon

2.8K posts

The Elegant Demon banner
The Elegant Demon

The Elegant Demon

@LALockliear

Guardian of 2 foo dogs. Spend most of my time avoiding Dave Grohl.

Atlanta, GA Katılım Ocak 2013
821 Takip Edilen115 Takipçiler
The Elegant Demon retweetledi
Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassenstein@EdKrassen·
If you are attacking FBI Director Christopher Wray because you don't like the way he has run the FBI, that's your right. If you are attacking him and claiming he's a "democrat" or "liberal" then you are just simply 100% incorrect. You're not even close to being accurate. Christopher Wray, was literally nominated by Donald Trump. Before that he was a lifelong Republican who also happened to be a member of the conservative and libertarian legal organization, the Federalist Society. Just because the FBI investigates Republicans too much for your liking, doesn't mean he's politically biased. Could it possibly be that those Republicans just so happened to have broken the law, or appear to have broken the law? Democrats aren't fans of Wray either. Democrats believe he completely mishandled the Brett Kavanaugh investigations, among other things.
Ed Krassenstein tweet media
English
1.4K
1.3K
4.4K
678.4K
The Elegant Demon retweetledi
Justin Lamorte
Justin Lamorte@justinlamorte·
Lauren Boebert’s lawyers threatened to sue @MountainValues because Boebert doesn’t like our ads calling her out for supporting cuts to Social Security and Medicare. It’d be a shame for @RepBoebert if this ad got 1,000 RTs and even more people saw it #CO03 #copolitics
Rocky Mountain Values@MountainValues

NEW AD: Puebloans tell @RepBoebert to stop voting against Coloradans. Stop making life harder for veterans. Don't cut Social Security and Medicaid.

English
69
3.7K
3.9K
183.7K
Kat B🇭🇺
Kat B🇭🇺@KatalinB27·
Hello everyone. This is Kat’s husband Joe. I just wanted to let everyone know, that was following Kat’s cancer journey, that it ended at 8:04pm, June 12th. She fought very hard all the way to the very end and was surrounded by love ones when she passed. Thank you for following.
English
11.1K
1.8K
51.9K
2.7M
Lauren Boebert
Lauren Boebert@laurenboebert·
Biden can spew his “Bidenomics” drivel all he wants but when I talk to people, no one is happy with the state of the economy right now. Inflation is still out of control. Nothing has actually changed, Biden just decided since he’s totally unable to fix it he might as well just double down on lying about it!
English
4.6K
678
5.8K
744.1K
The Elegant Demon
The Elegant Demon@LALockliear·
@RepMTG For the love of God, at least attempt to know what you're talking about occasionally. Military, police and security forces are exempt from these bans. You really should know that.
English
0
0
0
2
The Elegant Demon
The Elegant Demon@LALockliear·
@SenJohnKennedy Are you putting up a bill for the forgiven PPP loans? If you're ok with the taxpayers covering those (especially for elected officials) but not the struggling working class - you are just a partisan hypocrite.
English
0
0
0
6
John Kennedy
John Kennedy@SenJohnKennedy·
Pres. Biden’s attempt to cancel student debt was a woke injustice: Forcing Americans who paid their debt or chose not to go to school to foot bills for ppl who haven’t paid back their personal loans. SCOTUS made the right call. Hardworking Americans will be better off for it.
English
945
675
4.4K
101.6K
The Elegant Demon
The Elegant Demon@LALockliear·
@laurenboebert Hey Lauren, I'd like to stop paying for your PPP loan that you had forgiven. Since you believe tax payers shouldn't be responsible for loans that others take out, will you write that bill?
English
0
0
0
6
Lauren Boebert
Lauren Boebert@laurenboebert·
Looks like Biden’s plan on student loans is just to defy the ruling of the court. He’s just trying to run out the clock until 2024 so he can scam people’s votes out of them.
English
2.4K
537
3.4K
194.7K
CALL TO ACTIVISM
CALL TO ACTIVISM@CalltoActivism·
To Ralph Norman, the Congressman of the great state of South Carolina, You say it is “obnoxious” for taxpayers to be responsible for the loans of others. Well sir, we did a little digging and it turns out you had $306,520 in PPP loans forgiven. Every penny of that was money that came from taxpayers and it wasn’t paid back. Here’s the big question: why is it ok for YOU, but not students trying to make their lives better? I think we know the reason. First, it’s because you represent the same SELFISH thinking of your entire party: “It’s good for me but not for thee.” And lastly, it’s because you’re an asshole.
CALL TO ACTIVISM tweet media
English
2.2K
18.4K
52.9K
3.7M
Lauren Boebert
Lauren Boebert@laurenboebert·
The Left talks a lot about protecting democracy. They forget that we’re a republic, but that’s beside the point. If we want to save our country then anyone who sells this country out for their own personal gain needs to be held accountable. That means Joe and Hunter Biden cannot get away with what they’ve done.
English
5.2K
1.4K
6.9K
543.6K
The Elegant Demon
The Elegant Demon@LALockliear·
@DC_Draino I agree with your premise - but I don't think it was "woke" - it seems more like Hubris. Stockton Rush wouldn't hire anyone who challenged him or his methods. He didn't want qualified engineers - he wanted people willing to skirt standards.
English
0
0
0
21
DC_Draino
DC_Draino@DC_Draino·
So many are discussing whether they would’ve gotten into that submarine, what price they’d pay, and what safety measure they’d require My answer is simple Any CEO who openly admits they’re woke and won’t hire experienced submarine experts b/c they’re “white 50 year olds” is an immediate disqualifier for me I’m not walking - I’m *running* away from putting my life in the hands of someone that deranged & racist
English
555
1.7K
13.2K
1.7M
Bruce Campbell
Bruce Campbell@GroovyBruce·
Okay, so I’m 65 today. Time to retire, I guess. Thanks for watching!
Bruce Campbell tweet media
English
7.7K
9.8K
154.1K
7.9M
Omar Rivero
Omar Rivero@OmarRiverosays·
BREAKING: Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff humiliates John Durham, the author of Trump’s phony “Durham report,” during a hearing today by the House Judiciary Committee. It all started when Durham tried to claim that the Justice Department’s investigation into Trump and Russia was a hoax. That’s when Congressman Schiff expertly cut Durham off, declaring, “Mr. Durham, just so people remember what this is all about, let me ask you. The Mueller investigation revealed that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in a sweeping and systemic fashion, correct? This is when the fun began, because Durham had no choice it to respond, “Yes, that is correct.” But Schiff didn’t stop there, continuing to hammer Durham: SCHIFF: And Russia did so through a social media campaign that favored Trump and disparaged Hillary Clinton, correct? DURHAM: The report says yes. SCHIFF: Mueller found that a Russian intel service hacked computers associated with the Clinton campaign and then released the stolen documents publicly. Is that right? DURHAM: That report speaks for itself as well. SCHIFF: Mueller also reported that though he could not establish the crime of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt, he also said, quote, "a statement that the investigation did not establish certain facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts," and also appears in the report, doesn’t it? DURHAM: Yes. SCHIFF: In fact, you cited that very statement in your own report, did you not, as a way of distinguishing between proof beyond a reasonable doubt and evidence that falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt? DURHAM: Correct. SCHIFF: Both Mueller and congressional investigations found that Trump’s campaign chairman Paul Manafort was secretly meeting with an operative linked to Russian intelligence named Konstantin Kilimnik, correct? DURHAM: Yes. SCHIFF: And that Manafort gave that Russian intel operative the campaign's internal polling data. Correct? DURHAM: Yes. SCHIFF: Is it true, Mr. Durham, that Mueller and congressional investigations also revealed that Don Jr. was informed that a Russian official was offering the Trump campaign, quote, "very high level and sensitive information," unquote, "that would be incriminating of Hillary Clinton was part of," quote, "Russia and its government support of Trump." Are you aware of that? DURHAM: Sure, people get phone calls all the time from individuals who claim to have information like that. SCHIFF: Really? The son of a presidential candidate gets calls all the time from a foreign government offering dirt on their important opponent. Is that what you’re saying? DURHAM: I don't think that’s so unique. SCHIFF: Are you really trying to diminish the significance of what happened here and the secret meeting that the president's son set up in Trump Tower to receive that incriminating information? DURHAM: I don’t think that that was a well-advised thing to do. SCHIFF: Oh, not well advised. All right. Well, that’s the understatement of the year. So you think it’s perfectly appropriate or maybe just ill-advised for a presidential campaign to secretly meet with a Russian delegation to get dirt on their opponent? You would merely say that’s inadvisable? DURHAM: I wouldn’t do it, but it wasn’t illegal, was it? It was stupid, foolish, ill advised. SCHIFF: Well, it’s illegal to conspire to get incriminating opposition research from a hostile government. Wouldn’t that violate campaign laws? At this point, all that Durham could respond with a was a shameless “I don’t know.” Please retweet and ❤️ to thank Schiff for setting Durham straight — and consider investing in Tribel, a “woke” new Twitter competitor that’s currently doing a round of equity crowdfunding and just blew past $1.8 million raised from 4,400 of its users. If you want to own a piece of the “next big thing” in social media, here is the link to do so, wefunder.com/Tribel. You can invest as little as $100 — or as much as you’d like.
Omar Rivero tweet media
English
541
4.2K
14.2K
1.3M