Boris Gaganelov

@RondoHive @TheOmniLiberal He's neither "grown" or a "man"...just an arse.

@TheOmniLiberal Mike is such a dick rider holy shit, grown ass man.

You guys didn’t get these candidates elected, lmao. One of your invited people are literally attacking another progressive candidate just because he didn’t collab with Hasan

@OrganizerMemes @ProgressiveVic Huh, no response.

@ProgressiveVic Hey do you agree with Mike on Jews being an evil ethnicity?

Jealousy thy name is….what’s his name again?

The damage control puff pieces for this horrible millionaire nepo-anchor-baby are insane. His family was so massively rich off the backs of working class Turkish people that they could afford multiple massive homes in different countries AND his mom to literally live in the US until she gave birth to him so he has citizenship. He doesn't believe in the democratic process and his "end-state" includes "re-education camps" for people in support of capitalism and private property.

Hasan Piker on how the Democrats are messing this up. slate.trib.al/nOK1OGR

The Israeli government...elected by the Israeli people to represent them. Unless you will stake the claim that the elections in Israel are not free and fair - it's the same thing. I'm sick of losers hiding behind "Zionist" when they just mean "Jew". At least the far right nutjobs have the testicular mass required to say what they mean, Hasan just hides and obfuscates.

@LBastor @speechboy71 Insane shit doesn't necessarily mean antisemitism I watched the entire video and it's criticisms of the Israeli Government

"I think it's important to debate politics with a guy who routinely makes anti-Semitic statements" - the state of Democratic politics in 2026

@ThinkingMunk Careful, Alyssa Mercante might get the wrong idea from this post.

I guess it's fuck Hasan day.

@Mantispr3ys @Solphyre @TheOmniLiberal Probably monetization driven - so all the VoDs and channel uploads are also available on Spotify.

@Solphyre @TheOmniLiberal Spotify???? Wtf lol

Why the fuck has @TheOmniLiberal removed his stream VODs?! I dont want a 20-30 minute edited version, I want the full unedited slop stream to listen to when I'm working because I missed it the day before 😔

@communismatic @KamenovRoumen Сериозно? Я дай цитат.

@KamenovRoumen Пеканов беше човека, който съвсем сериозно беше на мнение, че "инфлацията е субективно усещане". Ти прави сметка, какви малоумници, ни управляват...

Статуквото каквото стори на България, никой не може повече да навреди на страната ни. Атанас Пеканов: България ще загуби между 1 и 2 млрд. евро по ПВУ mediapool.bg/atanas-pekanov…

The underlying claim by Clinton is absolutely true. He tried harder than almost anyone to move both sides to a peaceful agreement, but Arafat wasn't interested. The entire Arab world shook their head in disbelief when he walked away from the discussions.

@Ivancho__ @EBelobradova Почини си.

@EBelobradova Смятате се за елит и интелигенция.Така ли ще се повиши доверието в НС ? Народното събрание място ли е за стендъп комеди, клипчета в тикток и подобни простотии ? Парите, които получавате за сътрудници, за съдействие от хора със законодателна експертиза ли са или за подобни

@EBelobradova NPC-тата в коментарите обаче изпушиха lol

46% от Българите притежават втори апартамент. Теоретично - ако бях тарекат - щях да съм го продал за около €320,980 в началото на пандемията, налял 2/3 в ETF тракващ S&P500 и 1/3 в акции по избор - GOOGL, RHM, META, AMD, AMZN, MSFT - и теоритично "тарекатлъшки" да съм утроил парите от този имот. Ама само теоритично - нали, защото Българинът е много беден в момента и нищо не може да си позволи. ;)

@LBastor @hoyjustmeagain Продай си домът, като си такъв тарикат. Плюс това, това е процентът на хората, които живеят в собствен имот, а в един имот може да живее един, може да са и повече.

"Ние сме малка, бедна страна" и "Европейският съюз ни краде" влезли в един бар...

@Agresoryt @Zvezdichko Ама ДС е било в него... :)

@Zvezdichko Нека гледаме положително. Костя май не е бил в ДС!

Положението в 25 МИР: Изберете си помияр.

@ivanmarinov77 @hoyjustmeagain Мега яко. 85% от Българите имат поне един собствен дом - собственият им капитал само на база на поскъпването на този имот е поне десеторна от 2000 до 2026та.

@hoyjustmeagain Фантазирай си още.

@TaylorLorenz @TheOmniLiberal Damn @TaylorLorenz you effed up on the first rule of Journalistic Ethics...come on - this literally is Journalism 101 - we studied this in SCHOOL - not even college level....jfc

Multiple creators have come out saying there was no "secrecy" about being paid, - Creators can make unsubstantiated claims like that, but it's a fact that the contracts did prohibit disclosure, and there's not a single example of any 1630 fund creators disclosing prior to our article. I've yet to see any "restrictions on what sort of political content the creators could produce." - They're outlined in the article. Read it again. Did you see language in any early contracts that said creators were not allowed to disclose they were being paid by Chorus? - They were being paid by 1630 fund (see above answer on disclosure) And did you see any language that gave them restrictions on what sort of political content they could produce? - These are outlined in the article. Were there any examples of creators being told no when asking either of these questions? - The whole reason several creators came to me/WIRED with the story was bc they wanted public disclosure about the program, which was prohibited by the contract. See first answer.

Sure, literally the second paragraph of your "article" seems to have a few. Multiple creators have come out saying there was no "secrecy" about being paid, and I've yet to see any "restrictions on what sort of political content the creators could produce." Here's a question - did you see language in any early contracts that said creators were not allowed to disclose they were being paid by Chorus? And did you see any language that gave them restrictions on what sort of political content they could produce? Were there any examples of creators being told no when asking either of these questions?

@TaylorLorenz @TheOmniLiberal "I'm sorry you are hung up on wanting to see source materials" Provide a full context quote from the contracting backing up what you're saying lol It's not about "seeing the source materials" - it's about substantiating your claim. Journalism 101 jfc....

"Creators can make unsubstantiated claims like that, but it's a fact that the contracts did prohibit disclosure" Then quote it. You said during our conversation that it was your editoral choice to remove the quotes/references. - Yes, it was an editorial choice when to and when to not quote from the source materials. I'm sorry you are hung up on wanting to see source materials, but that's not how journalism works. If anything in our story was false, WIRED would correct the story. "They're outlined in the article. Read it again." They're not. It's a really sparse and poorly put together article. - It's in there, I am sure you can find it "They were being paid by 1630 fund (see above answer on disclosure)" The 1630 fund is a fiscal sponsor, they don't contribute money directly. Do you have any proof of them paying creators in Chorus? Post it. " - The proof is our story. We explain that the creators were paid by 1630, which is backed up our source material: interviews, contract copies, internal emails/messages, and more. The whole reason several creators came to me/WIRED with the story was bc they wanted public disclosure about the program, which was prohibited by the contract." If multiple creators came to wired and said they wanted public disclosure, have them post their contract or publicly confirm your statements, then? - They came to me/WIRED because they don't want to out themselves as sources publicly. Per our sources, Chorus was threatening to sue anyone who they discovered spoke to the media. This is why sources in many stories speak on the condition that they're not named.

"Creators can make unsubstantiated claims like that, but it's a fact that the contracts did prohibit disclosure" Then quote it. You said during our conversation that it was your editoral choice to remove the quotes/references. Quote the part of the contract that says it now. "They're outlined in the article. Read it again." They're not. It's a really sparse and poorly put together article. "- They were being paid by 1630 fund (see above answer on disclosure)" The 1630 fund is a fiscal sponsor, they don't contribute money directly. Do you have any proof of them paying creators in Chorus? Post it. "- The whole reason several creators came to me/WIRED with the story was bc they wanted public disclosure about the program, which was prohibited by the contract." If multiple creators came to wired and said they wanted public disclosure, have them post their contract or publicly confirm your statements, then?

@TaylorLorenz @TheOmniLiberal You keep hurting yourself in your confusion Taylor...

@TheOmniLiberal I know the entire internet has explained this to you, but Omidyar Network is not a dark money group. The funding is public and my non partisan journalism fellowship was disclosed. Chorus DID work w a dark money group (1630 fund) to run an UNDISCLOSED dark money influence scheme

@TheOmniLiberal She's such a disingenuous and manipulative piece of shit.

@dbongino You ignored his calls for executing sitting members of the US congress though - violent rhetoric from leadership only brings violence. Hold your leaders accountable for their language - maybe you will get less violent language.

Yesterday’s show was a wake up call. The video of the young man so casually discussing a plot to brutally murder another conservative commentator during a debate, was troubling to watch. I’m having a really hard time processing how we got here. Yes, we live in a peerless country, full of kind-hearted and giving people. But there’s a festering infection growing, and it must be stopped. Arendt’s “banality of evil” is on my mind often lately. People I once respected have let the evil in, and it’s spreading as they give it a microphone and a megaphone. I wonder where I went wrong as well. How could I have so misjudged them? This is not an academic issue. We’ve seen where this goes. Death and destruction are the final chapters of this book in every version, and in every place it surfaces. I fear we are running out of time. I hope I’m wrong.