Nick

@A_GymGuy Yep remember city did this to us at the etihad. Let Konate have it and completely blocked anything off to VVD and the midfield. Killed us that game.

Great tactics. We have found similar issues to progressing the ball without Trent. Teams know to let Ibou have it

@alexgildeatrott When they played us they had to press VVD because they knew he’d just ping a 70 yard diagonal to Salah. Spent the whole game letting Konate have the ball.

Pep said let them have it there 😂

@heis_fede Salah always gets the ‘doesn’t pass the eye test’ comments but no one says it about Saka when he’s worse on the eye and doesn’t get the numbers either.

The first black winger I’ve seen that cannot dribble lmaooo

@Rzj77_ Steph Curry has more talent in his little finger than 99% of professional football players.

Most talentless sport itw. A genetic lottery

@Telstar22995931 I think the sarcasm has gone right over your head mate 🤦‍♂️

@LFCnja Demand another replay 🤣

On Danny Welbeck's second goal for Brighton against Liverpool. This time it was Liverpool's turn to concede a goal when the attacker was onside due to the in-built 5cm tolerance level.

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides No instead believe a guy that thinks the premier league is corrupt who has no evidence to suggest so. I’m done with you, enjoy the championship next season where there’s no VAR or corruption 👍

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Don’t believe everything you read on the internet Nick 😄

🚨❌Incorrect offside decision by VAR in the Birghton vs. Liverpool match. 📸Welbeck was slightly ahead of the ball in Brighton's second goal. 👉The goal was given due to the Premier League's 5cm "tolerance level".

@thudock11 @Jaytuzzle10 @DaleJohnsonBBC Where have I used a tv image? I’ve only ever talked about the images the VAR use?

@LFCnja @Jaytuzzle10 @DaleJohnsonBBC Nick the image you are using isn't accurate- its a TV image and those are not what the offside is based on so its a flawed guess because the info is just wrong

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides And I already told you it’s a digital identical copy of the game to make it clearer to see, it’s not altered in any way.

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Already told you it’s AI buddy. Keep up 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides No comment on the evidence though? Thought not.

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Your lines are straight Nick 🤷‍♂️

@SibiLFC No but there’s absolutely no way you could get rid of him if that happens.

If Slot wins the Champions league and FA Cup, would you still want him here next season?

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides I made it EVEN clearer for you 👍

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides I’m still waiting for this evidence Nick

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides I wouldn’t know in this instance. The only thing you’ve ‘proven’ is your ability to completely disregard and ignore any evidence I have shown you due to your own delusional views.

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Hurts to be wrong though eh Nick? 😄

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Proved wrong? 😂 calling you naive and stubborn isn’t name calling, it’s describing your behaviour/views.

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Do you always revert to name calling when you’re proved wrong Nick? 😄

@Quak3r72 @donhutch4 Such a dumb take. Doing that turns a non-subjective offside decision into a subjective offside decision. Everyone cries for consistency, but then still complain about offside, which is basically the only thing consistent in VAR!

@donhutch4 If it takes longer than 30 seconds to view without drawing lines then the onfield decision stands. Stops lazy refereeing, speeds decisions up and the camera frame rate isn’t good enough for micro managing

@Jaytuzzle10 @DaleJohnsonBBC Well there is, because Welbeck was onside and Sarr wasn’t 😂

@LFCnja @DaleJohnsonBBC There is no way Wellbeck is more behind the ball than Sarr based on the 2 incidents. Absolutely no way.

@Jaytuzzle10 @DaleJohnsonBBC That still image proves nothing without perspective. Also the VAR use different cameras with different frame rates to what you see on tv. So it’s almost certainly likely that is not the still image they used. But go ahead, be delusional and believe the league is corrupt.

@LFCnja @DaleJohnsonBBC

@psychoFTID @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Must be miserable having that mindset. Every time a decision goes against you it’s because the league is ‘corrupt’. No point arguing with someone as naive and stubborn as you. The evidence is right in front of you but you’re blinded by your own delusional views.

@LFCnja @jamieallan1998 @FutOffsides Yes. Thought I’d made that quite clear tbf ….and with the Chelsea and Man City charges they don’t even try to hide it 🤷‍♂️

@Jaytuzzle10 @DaleJohnsonBBC His knee isn’t further than his face.

@LFCnja @DaleJohnsonBBC I tell what is in plain sight. The ball in the dark green patch and the player in the light green. His knee is clearly also further forward than his face yet that’s what the automated system is using.

@Jaytuzzle10 @DaleJohnsonBBC It’s literally there in plain sight. The line on the floor is 5cm and the attacker is beyond it.

@DaleJohnsonBBC It really isn’t

@LFC_000 4-2-2-2 isn’t the play. We should have 3 in midfield with 3 up top. Whether it’s 4-3-1-2 with Wirtz behind Isak and Ekitike, or 4-3-3 with 2 pacy wingers. 4-2-2-2 is shit.

I won’t stop until we get this