P

18.2K posts

P banner
P

P

@LGCoachP

chin up chest out🇷🇸 @liquiditygames

416 Katılım Temmuz 2017
581 Takip Edilen430 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
P
P@LGCoachP·
My future predictions: •AI adoption becomes the new Industrial Revolution •ai pushes us forward in ways we can’t yet imagine; breakthroughs in tech, healthcare, communication, reasoning, travel, sales & service •workforce shifts from wages to small business, many online
English
3
0
3
2.4K
P
P@LGCoachP·
This is good advice
Andrew NFX@andrew_nfx

A guy I know blew $28,000 on prop firm challenges in 8 months. Never passed a single one. I looked at his trading journal. His win rate was 71%. Average RR was 1.8 to 1. Meaning his system actually worked. So why was he failing every challenge? I asked him to show me his equity curves. Every single challenge had the same pattern: Start strong. Build 4-6% profit in the first 2 weeks. Then one losing day would hit. And he'd spiral. Instead of taking a break or sticking to his rules, he'd revenge trade. Trying to 'make it back' before the end of the day. He'd go from 1% risk per trade to 3-4% risk. From 1-2 trades per day to 6-7 trades. Within 48 hours he'd breach the account. Almost every single time. I told him: 'You don't have a strategy problem. You have an emotional and risk management problem.' I made him do something simple: After any losing trade, no more trades that day. Doesn't matter if it's 9am or 3pm. One loss = done for the day. He thought it was extreme. But he agreed to try it for one challenge. That challenge? He passed in 19 days. No revenge trading. No spirals. No blowing up. Just consistent execution with a hard stop after losses. Now he's on his third funded account and has taken two payouts totalling $11,400. All because he stopped trying to 'fix' red days in real time. Your biggest enemy isn't the losing trade. It's what you do after the losing trade. Most traders can handle one loss. They just can't handle walking away after it

English
0
0
0
0
P retweetledi
Matt🔺🏔
Matt🔺🏔@MattSchmenk·
It never pays to get overly bear pilled, I was that way in 2022-2023 and was like a year late in terms of allocating. It also made me very hesitant in terms of hopping back in after the tariff sell off. If you want to be a perma anything it’s much more +EV to be a perma bull. Just remember, the fiat system is a ponzi at the end of the day, so assets are programmed to go up.
English
14
14
194
13.7K
P retweetledi
NeoSpirituality
NeoSpirituality@neospirituality·
Whenever you spend money, consciously become aware that you are NOT 'spending' money, but circulating it. Bless the person receiving your money, that he may use it to bless himself and his family. Money is energy. In spirituality, it is prana/air. Money's nature is to be in circulation, and it is never meant to be hoarded. What happens if you hoard air? Others suffocate. And you participate in a process which seals your own fate, ensuring you eventually must suffocate in turn.
English
4
25
226
4.7K
P retweetledi
Jaynit
Jaynit@jaynitx·
Conor Neill on the 3 best ways to start a speech (most people get this wrong): "I guarantee if you go to conferences, 19 out of 20 speakers will start in one of these ways: 'My name is Conor Neill. I'm from Tango, and this talk is about the latest trend in monitoring strategies.' But all of you are sitting with a piece of paper that already says who I am and what I'm going to talk about. By repeating what you already know, I'm giving a signal that it's time to get your BlackBerry out." Conor explains the three best ways to start instead: Third best: A question that matters to the audience. "How do you phrase a problem that the audience faces in a question?" Second best: A factoid that shocks. "There are more people alive today than have ever died. Every two minutes, the energy reaching the earth from the sun is equivalent to the whole annual energy usage of humanity. Does that change how you think about energy?" The best way: Start like you'd start a story to a child. "How do we start a story to a child? 'Once upon a time.' And what happens when you say once upon a time? My daughter leans forward, gets ready to hear, engages. We were all trained as kids to know when a story's coming. We also know when a teacher is about to deliver a 40-minute boring lecture." He explains the grown-up version: "In business, you don't hear Jack Welch saying 'once upon a time.' Steve Jobs doesn't start his speeches with 'once upon a time.' So there's a grown-up way of saying it: 'In October, the last time I was in this room, there were 120 people here. I was having a conversation with one of the world's experts on public speaking and he said something to me that changed what I think about what's important in speaking.' Now I can pause for 30 seconds, and you want to know what he said." Conor concludes: "Stories are about people. They're not about objects. They're not about things. If you want to tell a good story about your company, don't talk about the software talk about the people who built the software. What they do. How they are. What's important to them. What they sacrifice."
English
38
467
5.9K
239K
P retweetledi
Bret 🍁
Bret 🍁@Bret_Sears·
This exchange between Tucker Carlson and Professor Jiang Xueqin on the current state of Canada is worth watching. TUCKER: You mentioned Canada. Most Americans don't even know the capital of Canada. Canada does not appear on their radar, doesn't figure in their thoughts. But you described it as probably, quote, probably the richest country in the world. I think that's objectively true. And yet Canada is not a rich country. In fact, it's getting poorer. Its life expectancy is declining. Its GDP is declining, and that's on purpose. The nation of Canada has been suppressed on purpose. Its population is being killed off by the state through its assisted suicide program and its population is changing through mass immigration against the will of the population. So that country is being held down on purpose. And my question is, by whom and why? JIANG: Sure. That's a great question. And it's something that I struggle with all the time because I am a Canadian citizen. I went to school there. So my answer is that Canada was never really a nation-state. It's more of a glorified resource colony for the British, the city of London and the reality is now that the British are under a lot of strain, the state of London is under a lot of financial pressure. It sees places like Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. And what do you do if you have financial issues? You do corporate restructuring, right? You change the middle management. right and historically you know the British got along very well with the Indian elite right they went into India and stole tons of dollars from uh the indians and the Indian elite were perfectly happy to help them so why not use the same model for Australia and for Canada So there are millions of Indians who immigrated to Canada in the past five years and it's put a lot of strain on the Canadian economy because housing prices have exploded and so ordinary Canadians can no longer afford to buy a house. And it's put tremendous pressure on the Canadian welfare system, on the Canadian economy. And you would think that the proper strategy would have a moratorium where they're like, you know what, we've had too many immigrants and we need to close the borders and absorb these immigrants because we want to ensure that these immigrants have proper housing, they have decent jobs, right? You would think that that'd be the right strategy. And instead, Mark Carney goes to India and says, we want more Indians, and also, we'll give you scholarships to come to Canada to study for free. Meanwhile, there are a lot of Canadians who are homeless, who are unemployed, and who cannot put food on the table. But hey, we want more Indians. So if it's not corporate restructuring, if it's not trying to asset strip Canada, I really don't understand the strategy for this. TUCKER: Well, I mean, it's a kind of genocide against Canadians, people whose ancestors built the country, but you wonder what the purpose is. Because it is happening all over the West, all over the English speaking world in the white countries. And it's not an accident, it's not organic. So it's a big picture that spans from Australia to Ottawa.
English
204
1.1K
4.2K
293.1K
P retweetledi
AB
AB@AB84·
Choosing a good mother for your kids is more important than choosing a beautiful wife for yourself.
English
128
564
4.2K
114.5K
P retweetledi
Kush
Kush@kush_147·
Their final gift to you, was repeating their pattern one more time so you could finally see that, despite their potential, this is who they choose to be
English
133
4.9K
20.6K
348K
P retweetledi
Throttle Cars
Throttle Cars@ThrottleCars·
TOYOTA LAND CRUISER 250 🖤🖤
Throttle Cars tweet mediaThrottle Cars tweet mediaThrottle Cars tweet mediaThrottle Cars tweet media
Français
11
110
2K
183.4K
P retweetledi
flexxico
flexxico@ripflexxico·
Soulja Boy bumping The Weeknd's "House of Balloons" 15 years ago when nobody knew him Most say this mini vlog helped put him on
English
126
3.6K
35.2K
4.9M
P
P@LGCoachP·
Ppl who work on anything to do with children need to be double background checked
Dapper Detective@Dapper_Det

🚨BREAKING: @Roblox programmer arrested in New Orleans by Homeland Security Investigations for possessing child rape pornography and importing a child sex doll. Roblox is a pedo mill and must be dismantled.

English
0
0
0
9
P retweetledi
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
Our species norm is polygyny: 80% of cultures historically let high-status men hoard wives while low-status men get nothing. Christianity (inherited from Rome) forced monogamy for 2000 years. Now we've mostly ditched it—and we're sliding back toward the old pattern. Louise Perry: Lifting the monogamous restriction produces worse outcomes—higher crime, domestic violence, economic inequality. Monogamy is better for women and low-status men. Monogamy isn't "natural"—it's an engineered cultural upgrade that tamed inequality and violence. Do you think monogamy is worth defending even if it's not the "default" human pattern? Or are we better off returning to the species norm? Your take 👇
English
1K
565
4.3K
1.2M
P retweetledi
TITAN
TITAN@TemooTitan·
Is she speaking facts?
English
59
431
2.4K
50.2K
P retweetledi
MUSIC RADAR
MUSIC RADAR@musicradarHQ·
You ever listen to Kodak Black and realize how talented he actually is??
English
860
4.5K
24.2K
689.3K
P retweetledi
Tom
Tom@t0mbfx·
I didn't start journalling my trades until late 2024 I'd been trading for 4+ years at that point Once I started journalling PROPERLY (not just screenshot + P&L, but actual thoughts, emotions, what I saw, why I took it) my trading improved massively I genuinely think I'd be 2 years further ahead if I'd started journalling from day 1 If you're not journalling yet, you're making the same mistake I did
English
57
49
639
19.3K
P
P@LGCoachP·
I am 5 trades away from payout on my @TradingLucid 25k account Wish me luck this week🤣
English
0
0
0
15