
Laurence Fredricks
216 posts

Laurence Fredricks
@LRFredricks
Housing and the Social Contract at @ukonward. Policy fellow @BuildForBritain. All views my own.


Southwark councillors rubber-stamp agreement for NHG to pull out of later phases of 4,200-home regeneration: Southwark Council wants to speed up Aylesbury Estate project amid reports of anti-social behaviour in vacant blocks dlvr.it/TRYkdV #ukhousing #housing

Small groups with something to lose are very effective at stopping change. That's one reason why getting necessary homes and infrastructure built can be so difficult. In our new paper, Onward sets out a proposal to introduce land readjustment to the UK, a land assembly mechanism that gives the people most likely to oppose a development, the landowners themselves, excellent reasons to support it. But how does it work? Working with a developer, land readjustment allows landowners to pool their plots into a single scheme so the area can be redeveloped as a whole. After the development, the landowners receive back a piece of land in the area, significantly more valuable than the plot they had before. The scheme can *only* go ahead if a supermajority of landowners who own a supermajority of the land in question support the scheme. This prevents any single or small group of landowners from vetoing a development while also motivating the developer to draw up a scheme that can win the support of most of the landowners, and to return to the drawing board if it doesn't. This democratic element makes land readjustment less fragile than assembling land by negotiating with each landowner, when any single party can refuse to engage or demand an extortionate price. It is also far more democratic than compulsory purchase. To learn more about land readjustment, and its use in other parts of the world, read our paper below. ukonward.com/reports/buildi…





















