Ex-LabourLad

9.1K posts

Ex-LabourLad

Ex-LabourLad

@LadLabour

Katılım Aralık 2018
1.8K Takip Edilen267 Takipçiler
Ex-LabourLad
Ex-LabourLad@LadLabour·
@Swarthyface *Liking" that but shan't like it. (You're welcome to like this if you like.)
English
0
0
1
12
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Brian Berletic
Brian Berletic@BrianJBerletic·
🇺🇸/Iran: Iran Mission Creep and the US-Imposed "Distant Blockade" on China US is bringing in another carrier and additional warplanes as existing hardware approaches maintenance walls indicating intentions to continue the war for at least another month. With the long desired distant blockade now implemented on China and the clock ticking on China's 100 day reserves, the US is likely to continue surging forces into the region to keep the war going and energy exports stopped. The US does not care about its Arab proxies. It does not care about Europe. It does not care about Israel or Ukraine or Japan or South Korea. It doesn't even care about the American public. The window is closing on containing China, China fully aware of all of this and already speeding toward permanent escape velocity. The US is making its move now. The US knows it will be causing immense global damage and damage to itself but believes it has the best chance of weathering it and emerging the strongest on the other end - or at least the best chance it will ever have.
Brian Berletic tweet media
English
0
351
879
55K
Ex-LabourLad
Ex-LabourLad@LadLabour·
@Grossmanite Beg to differ. Inflation is beaten, deflation ahead. USD bottoming out. Major recession coming. Yes, US empire imploding but a long way to go yet: "Dead man still walking". Thx to Henrik Zeberg for analysis.
English
1
0
0
19
Ted Reese
Ted Reese@Grossmanite·
$ debasement incoming
Ted Reese tweet media
English
1
3
22
1.9K
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
THE ISLANDER
THE ISLANDER@IslanderWORLD·
Germany is quietly building a new model of governance — one that doesn’t need to cancel elections, ban parties, or openly censor speech, because it has learned how to administer the art of "legitimacy" upstream. In a striking interview with Neue Zurcher Zeitung, researcher Andrew Lowenthal describes an industrial-scale opinion-management architecture inside Germany. His research maps roughly 330 interconnected actors spanning federal agencies, state ministries, publicly funded NGOs, universities, fact-checking organizations, think tanks, and foundations. They do not operate in opposition to the state. Increasingly, they operate as part of it. This is not blunt censorship. It is far more refined and eloquent in an Orwellian sense. What Lowenthal outlines is an epistemic management system: a closed feedback loop in which political judgment is processed into technical expertise and then returned to the public as neutral truth. The most unsettling detail is not coordination — it is belief. Many participants no longer recognize their work as political at all. They see themselves as custodians of reality, even as they define the boundaries of acceptable thought. The inversion is decisive. NGOs were once adversarial watchdogs. In Germany, they now function as extensions of state capacity, openly coordinating with ministries and regulators. Cooperation with government is no longer viewed as a conflict of interest; it is the baseline. Civil society has been absorbed into administrative infrastructure, while retaining the moral authority of independence. The funding makes the architecture visible. Programs such as Demokratie leben! distribute roughly €200 million annually, sustaining a sprawling ecosystem tasked with combating “hate,” “extremism,” and “disinformation.” These categories are intentionally elastic. Dissent is not banned; it is reclassified. Speech is not silenced; it is managed, filtered through grants, compliance regimes, and platform partnerships, and relabeled democratic resilience. Layered on top is the EU regulatory spine — particularly the Digital Services Act, which pressures platforms into continuous risk assessments, moderation alignment, and privileged “research access.” Transparency is the branding. Narrative leverage is the function. When the same institutional family defines risk, enforces standards, and evaluates outcomes, neutrality becomes circular logic. What makes this moment especially revealing is that Germany is not in a federal election cycle. There is no campaign emergency, no imminent vote, no populist surge forcing extraordinary measures. This system is being expanded mid-cycle, quietly, as routine governance. That matters. It tells us this is not a temporary response to instability. It is the permanent operating environment. Mature systems of control do not wait for crisis. They pre-condition legitimacy long before citizens are asked to participate. Voters are not told what to think; they are trained over time which thoughts are reasonable, which questions are responsible, and which positions fall outside the perimeter of seriousness. Hovering over this architecture is Friedrich Merz — a figure whose authority rests less on popular enthusiasm than on institutional insulation. Legitimacy becomes procedural rather than participatory. Elections persist, but their risk to power is steadily reduced. That is the signature of a system confident not because it is trusted, but because it is buffered. This is not a German aberration. It is a systems test — a warning etched in procedure, a calibration point where democracy is preserved in name while being redesigned in practice, measuring how much trust can be withdrawn from citizens before the result stops resembling freedom. Part 2/2 👇
THE ISLANDER tweet media
THE ISLANDER@IslanderWORLD

An NGO bankrolled 47% by the German federal government and 26% by the EU is now suing X for “access” to Hungary’s election data. They dress it up as transparency. It’s nothing of the sort. This is institutionalized surveillance masquerading as democracy promotion — the same Brussels–Berlin complex that lectures nations about sovereignty while quietly trying to override it. When a foreign-funded NGO like Democracy Reporting International demands privileged access to a sovereign country’s electoral discourse, that’s not oversight — it’s power projection. Hungary’s elections belong to Hungarians, not EU technocrats, not German ministries, and certainly not NGOs operating as policy cut-outs. This isn’t an isolated lawsuit — it’s part of a familiar EU playbook. First comes the moral framing: “foreign interference,” “risk assessment,” “democratic safeguards.” Then comes the demand for access, leverage, and narrative control. Data isn’t neutral here; it’s power. Whoever controls the interpretive layer of an election controls how legitimacy is manufactured after the fact. Hungary has already been tried, convicted, and sentenced in advance by Brussels for the crime of non-compliance, for acting as a sovereign power. This lawsuit is simply the next procedural step in converting dissent into pathology. And notice the asymmetry. Elections in Germany, France, or the Netherlands are treated as sacrosanct domestic affairs. Question them and you’re a conspiracist. But elections in Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia — anywhere outside the approved Atlantic corridor — are framed as inherently suspect, requiring external supervision. That’s not democracy, but conditional sovereignty. The EU doesn’t export values anymore — it exports compliance audits, wrapped in NGO letterhead and paid for by the same governments pretending to be neutral arbiters. Hands off Hungary’s elections.

English
81
857
1.9K
128.4K
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Paul O’Connell
Paul O’Connell@pmpoc·
Epstein's victims deserve justice - beyond punishing the individual scum, Marx noted in 1850 that capitalism invariably generates the 'unbridled assertion of unhealthy and vicious appetites ... particularly in the upper reaches of society' - it's the system that we must break
Paul O’Connell tweet media
English
4
91
241
9.3K
Ex-LabourLad
Ex-LabourLad@LadLabour·
@JamesHeartfield @jasonhickel The protesters want a better life, which has been ruined by ruthless US sanctions designed to wreck the economy & a repressive response by the clerics. The US playbook is the same as ever. At what point do the protesters become US puppets - when the Shah's son returns?
English
2
0
6
140
James Heartfield
James Heartfield@JamesHeartfield·
@jasonhickel But what about the protesters, Jason, what is it that you think they are trying to do?
English
2
0
46
1.8K
Jason Hickel
Jason Hickel@jasonhickel·
Remember, the US and Israel are trying to do regime change in Iran in the name of "democracy" and "freedom", in order to install a puppet monarchy, totally subordinated to the US and Israel, run by the son of a dictator known for brutal political repression.
English
326
1.6K
4.3K
152.5K
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Justin Aukema
Justin Aukema@aukemajk·
Part of the tragedy of the New Left is that, in addition to replacing universalism with relativism, and activism with violence, they reduced human rights to simply various different anti-discrimination and liberation campaigns
English
0
1
4
64
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Lee Jones
Lee Jones@DrLeeJones·
That Suharto has been named by Indonesia's govt as a "national hero" only underscores how his legacy of authoritarianism, corruption and oligarchic rule has persisted despite ostensible "democratic transition". bbc.co.uk/news/articles/… 1/7
English
1
1
1
406
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Aaron Siri
Aaron Siri@AaronSiriSG·
LIVE: The Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigates how corruption in science has influenced vaccine policy and public trust. x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
127
821
2.1K
149.5K
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Peter Ramsay
Peter Ramsay@peteray21·
Trump's lazy populism hands election victory to one of the most authoritarian liberal parties in the world. Populism always fails. telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…
English
0
2
2
151
Ex-LabourLad retweetledi
Ted Reese
Ted Reese@Grossmanite·
The decaying nature of capitalism illustrated by Premier League football shirt sponsors
Ted Reese tweet mediaTed Reese tweet media
English
103
2.4K
14.9K
881.1K