Lasselukas Jensen

3.3K posts

Lasselukas Jensen banner
Lasselukas Jensen

Lasselukas Jensen

@Lasselukas

SCCM Specialist and general client management. Lover of all tech and science.

Copenhagen Katılım Nisan 2010
122 Takip Edilen240 Takipçiler
Lasselukas Jensen
Lasselukas Jensen@Lasselukas·
@Emma_A_Webb A fictional character which is described in great details! Idiots hiding in their bubble. I would love for them to have that discussion face to face.
English
0
0
0
17
Emma Trimble
Emma Trimble@Emma_A_Webb·
This show is now an artefact. It all seems so anachronistic. Their snobbery is so old hat. “The richest man in the world, who is working to send man to Mars, is so stupid he can’t have read the Odyssey hohoho the only Homer he has heard of is Simpson hoho”
English
1.1K
822
10.4K
962.7K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Release the footage, you evil bastards!
Elon Musk tweet media
English
4.5K
23.9K
153.7K
4.9M
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Spencer Pratt
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt·
There’s a reason “Dog” is just “God”, backwards; they share an unconditional love for mankind. Both Nithya and Karen Bass ignore these poor animals being killed on Skid Row and in their city shelters. They don’t care. I will put an end to this horror. VOTE to save these animals.
English
829
8K
42.5K
598.9K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Spencer Pratt
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt·
When people criticize me for not having experience, I’m a lifelong Angeleno who’s seen my home city waste away under poor leadership. THAT is my experience. Just like you. Vote for LA. Vote today.
English
1.1K
6.8K
56.7K
1M
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Nic Cruz Patane
Nic Cruz Patane@niccruzpatane·
The $640K+ Ferrari Luce EV just shows how FAR ahead the Tesla Model S Plaid was compared to the rest of the EV industry. Model S Plaid ($109,990): • 0-60 mph in 1.99s • 1,020 hp • 368 Miles of Range • 1/4 mile in 9.23s @ 155mph • 0-124 mph in 6.2s • Self-Driving • Free Lifetime Supercharging • Free Maintenance for 4 years • 204 mph Top Speed w/Track Pack • Seats 5 adults Comfortably • Comfort Air Suspension Ferrari Luce EV ($640,000): • 0-60 mph in 2.4s • 1,020 hp • 280 miles of range • 0-124 mph in 6.8s • No Self-Driving • 193 mph top speed • Seating for 4 The Model S Plaid went out as one of the best performance cars ever. Legacy Auto can’t even catch up.
Nic Cruz Patane tweet media
English
148
338
2.5K
126.3K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Rustavi
Rustavi@Rustavi·
🚨 Spain is officially pushing for Tesla FSD. 🇪🇸⚡ Tesla owner Fernando just filed formal requests with Spain’s Ministry of Industry, the DGT traffic authority, and Tesla, demanding approval for Full Self-Driving (Supervised). He’s using the successful precedents from the Netherlands and Lithuania as the foundation. Europe is already moving. Lithuania surprised everyone, Belgium looks next, so why should Spain 🇪🇸 stay behind? The pressure is on. If one country after another keeps opening the door, the whole continent could follow fast. Come on Spain, let’s get FSD rolling. 🔥🚗 #Tesla #FSD #Spain #AutonomousDriving @Tesla @elonmusk
Rustavi tweet media
Fernando Martín@fmartintome

🚨 Tesla España 🇪🇸 Hoy he presentado solicitudes ante Industria, DGT y Tesla para pedir FSD (Supervised) en España, tomando como precedente 🇳🇱 Países Bajos y 🇱🇹 Lituania. Si Europa se mueve, ¿por qué España no? #Tesla #FSD

English
26
119
801
69.3K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Maxi
Maxi@AllForProgress_·
You might have heard of Maggie Oliver. She's a former Greater Manchester detective who, in 2012, was ordered to abandon her investigation into the systematic rape of children in Rochdale, and decided she would rather resign her warrant card rather than do so. Maggie, as that would imply, is one of the good ones. I constantly ask how our police can consider themselves worthy of the badge if they are not willing to return the badge rather than commit injustice in its name. Maggie did just that; she was asked to cover for criminals, so she told the shirts to stuff themselves and handed back her commission. She won a small but consequential victory in the High Court on Friday. Mr Justice Kimblin granted her foundation a full judicial review of whether the British state has actually done anything about the recommendations it accepted, in 2022, at the end of a seven-year inquiry into the institutional cover-up of decades of child sexual abuse. Maggie Oliver is one woman. She has no political party behind her and no standing in Whitehall. She has no peerage, no chambers, no billionaire foundation footing her bills. She was ordered, by senior officers, to drop her investigation into a network of men who were raping children in industrial quantities in her city, because of the demographics to which those men belong made the whole thing a bit awkward. Fourteen years on, she has done what nobody else in this country has been able to. She has hauled the British state into open court to answer for the choice it made, over four years and under two governments, to hold a seven-year, £200 million inquiry into the institutional cover-up of child abuse and implement, deliberately, none of that inquiry's recommendations. The Home Office accepted those recommendations in 2022. So did the Department for Education, the police inspectorates and the Crown Prosecution Service. And then nothing happened. The recommendations sat. The departments restructured. Ministers rotated. The girls and women who had given evidence aged. More such operations continued around the country, while the men who had run the previous set of them either walked free, left the country, or drew their own pensions. The state, in the manner of every institution Tony Blair ever built, had decided that the writing of the report was the action, and the doing of the report could be handed off to history. That is what Maggie Oliver has now forced into court. And the political class knows what that means. The Home Secretary has not commented. The Prime Minister has not commented. The candidates jockeying through the post-Starmer Labour succession have, at the time of writing, failed even to speak her name, as though they know that, if they do, lightning will flash in the sky and they'll be turned into a pillar of Tesco's-own-brand dishwasher salt. They are silent because they recognise, accurately, that the answers a judicial review will produce - to the question of why their inquiry's findings were treated as ornamental - will, should, must end the careers of every official who was supposed to act on them and did not. That councillors and councils, mayors, indeed entire political parties, will be caught under ultraviolet light and shown for their guilt. It's time a government did what the British state has spent twenty years declining to do. Take on institutional failure. Name the institutions that failed, in public, on the record. Name the officers and officials who covered it up, and the officers and officials who pressed for the cover-up too. Prosecute them under the standards that any other employee of a public organisation defrauding the public would expect to face. The recommendations the inquiry produced must be implemented in full, alongside whatever further measures a second look at the evidence then demands. There will not be another inquiry into the inquiries. There will be the verdicts. Maggie Oliver is one of the bravest people in Britain. She has earned, by her own resignation and by fourteen years and a foundation and a court case carried on her back, the right to expect from a future British government the simple thing that ought to have happened in 2014, in 2016, in 2018, in 2022 and in every other year of this national disgrace. She has not yet been given it; we have not yet been given it. But it will be given, and soon.
Maxi tweet media
English
378
5.5K
16.2K
565.5K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Elon Musk’s Lawyer on Today’s OpenAI Judgment: THIS WAR IS NOT OVER. • The court never properly examined whether Altman and Brockman abused the charity by converting OpenAI from a non-profit into a for-profit company and enriching themselves with billions. • The lawyer confirmed they will file an appeal with the Ninth Circuit. They believe the judge’s decision on the technicality can be challenged. • The lawyer strongly rejected claims that Elon filed the case only to “disparage” OpenAI. He emphasized that many other people and groups supported the case. • Broad Support for Elon’s Side: ◦International youth group Encode ◦ Whistleblowers (including Harvard professor Larry Lessig) ◦ Over 40 charities, charity professors, and labor organizations ◦ All these groups agreed that using a charity to raise public money and then converting it into a for-profit for personal gain is wrong • The lawyer noted there were preconceptions against Elon Musk during jury selection, both for political reasons and because of his views on AI. • There were protesters outside the court, which the lawyer believes may have influenced the atmosphere. • This case is about protecting the charitable system in America. The lawyer said that without Elon filing the case, Altman and others would have “gotten away with it.” • He called claims that Elon only wanted to “disparage opening” as nonsense. He described this as just the first step in a longer fight and said “this war is not over.”
English
186
362
1.4K
55.8K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Karen Bass COLLUDED to get Nithya Raman running for LA mayor because she's terrified of Spencer Pratt, and now privately ADMITS Pratt is surging Bass now desperately hopes to force RAMAN into the runoff, because only the top 2 vote getters win SPENCER WILL DEFY HER! TMZ FOUNDER HARVEY LEVIN: "I spoke to somebody in Karen Bass's office...I got some recon...she is more afraid of Spencer Pratt than she is her former employee who is now running against her, that she acknowledges the traction he has gotten." "She is much more fearful that he'll come in second as opposed to her." @SpencerPratt knew all along, Karen is terrified. In a 1v1, she may be COOKED. Force him through! h/t @jayplemons
English
330
1.2K
8.1K
476.3K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Lara Logan
Lara Logan@laralogan·
What a stupid, arrogant, elitist idiot who does not have the character or integrity to say she was wrong and apologize to this man.
English
550
1.4K
11.1K
154.1K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Hugo Gurdon
Hugo Gurdon@hgurdon·
Perhaps Bill Maher’s best monologue yet. It clearly made his LA audience uncomfortable.
English
124
853
6.1K
420.3K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Neuralink
Neuralink@neuralink·
After a car accident left her paralyzed from the neck down, Audrey didn’t think she would be able to draw or paint again. 20 years later, she became the first female participant in our clinical trials. Now, she uses her brain-computer interface to create art with her mind.
English
783
2.5K
12.3K
2.7M
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@NaomiSeibt Farage is lying
English
2K
3.9K
45.3K
1.5M
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
John Cleese
John Cleese@JohnCleese·
If British jews are to be held responsible for what happens in Gaza...then by the same reasoning British Muslims should be held responsible for the massacres of Christians by Muslims in Nigeria
English
2.2K
15.1K
84.6K
1.2M
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Yaqoub Ali
Yaqoub Ali@Ya_ali9191·
“Vidnet fortæller, at han hørte kvinden råbe: »Stop, jeg dør alligevel af det, I gør mod mig – så dræb mig bare!« Da mændene var færdige med at voldtage hende, lo de og skød hende i hovedet.” Jeg har faktisk ikke ord for min vrede og forargelse. Jeg synes, I selv skal læse om de grusomheder, som jøder og israelere blev udsat for af palæstinensiske terrorister.
Yaqoub Ali tweet media
Dansk
2
29
292
7.2K
Lasselukas Jensen retweetledi
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
@CAgovernor How much fraud we allowing this year?
English
1.1K
4.2K
86K
473.5K