Legal Leaks

This is really disturbing:

Bitcoin’s founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, has remained hidden for 17 years. A trail of clues — and a year of digging by our reporter, John Carreyrou — led us to a 55-year-old computer scientist in El Salvador named Adam Back. nyti.ms/4bXWC3V

🚨BREAKING: Bill Gates to testify before House Oversight Committee over Epstein links. Bill Gates and Epstein began planning pandemics in 2011. 2011–2017: Emails/texts between Gates and Epstein discuss pandemic simulations and vaccine funding structures. 2019: Event 201 co-hosted by Gates Foundation simulates a global coronavirus pandemic weeks before COVID.

IMPORTANT UPDATE ON EVIDENCE OF POTENTIAL JUDICIAL CORRUPTION 💥 Below is a screenshot of my original email to Lord Justice Stephen Males on 15 July 2025 at 16:06, sent to him after I obtained a copy of a list of people with his name on the list at number 1. Males did not reply. However he did (I can infer) at 11:55am on 16 July 2025, six hours and five minutes before the time limit I had given him, ask someone else who was known to me to pass me a message saying he was ‘one of the better ones’ and it was quite common for a judge to ‘let others do a first draft of a Judgment’ (i.e. involving a third party who was not in Court in the process). Here is that message in full: “Don't attack Stephen Males, Andrew. He's one of the better ones! Judges often let others do a first draft of a judgment. so long as they, themselves, review, amend, adjust and finalise it, what does it matter? US Supreme court judges do this all the time. There's nothing wrong with it. It's not "corruption", by any stretch. Corruption is when judges take bribes, or emoluments in kind, from powerful people or rich people. THAT is corruption. Judges toeing a party political line or an ideological line, inherently imposed by government, fellow judges or the Civil Service, is also corruption. There is certainly evidence of this. But getting a colleague to write a first draft judgment? No. That is not "corruption".” This can only have originated from Males as no-one other than Males knew I had emailed Males the previous day. This response seems to indicate that Males allows third parties to draft his Court Judgments, which is illegal under English law. This evidence tends to show corruption of a Court of Appeal judge. Episode 3 of the documentary The Other Night shows Males cooking up a false version of events to give to ITV about what happened during a legal case: x.com/huntandgathert… As my case moves forward against Matt Hancock in the Court of Appeal, I hope that Males is not involved. Please share and comment.

The digital control prison is being rolled out in Europe.

EU President Ursula von Der Leyen deleted all the texts from her phone of her ‘negotiations’ with Pfizer so she could not be prosecuted for corruption. And now Poland and Romania have to pay !

Jillian Gillespie: “The Judiciary is corrupt” A judge that dismissed an Australian GMO court case against Pfizer, turned out to have deep ties to Pfizer. After it was exposed there was an attempt to cover it up. “They are protecting the executive government”.

‘The UK is bringing in men from countries they warn women against travelling to. Our borders are open to people from the most misogynistic cultures on Earth. Why is it a crime to be alarmed by this?’ @Tom_Slater_ on the UK’s migrant crimewave

Imagine a world where hard work is rewarded, truth and justice prevail in courtrooms, the government doesn’t steal your labor by debasing the currency, bureaucrats aren’t captured by corporations, and our taxes go toward critical infrastructure instead of wars overseas.

@EthicalApproach The foundational principle of constitutional law, that "power must check power", has morphed into its opposite meaning, that power must shield power and at all cost. Any notion of separation of powers at this point is pure fantasy, legislative, executive and judicial powers unite

When the State’s Mask is Displaced Behind the ordinary administration of justice, a coordinating centre emerged, quietly, efficiently and without meaningful public scrutiny. A system capable of influencing what is heard, what is delayed and what is never permitted to reach a court at all. This is not conjecture. It is evidenced. The rule of law does not depend upon appearances. It depends upon separation, independence and the absence of centralised control over the course of justice. When those boundaries blur, the State does not announce it. When the mask of the State is displaced, even briefly, the obligation is not to look away, but to ask, without fear, what, precisely, have we just seen?!

🔴 Six years later, the true scale of the vaccines’ side effects is emerging. Yet those coping with life-changing conditions remain ignored Read how Nikola was left disabled after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine below 🔗 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/2…

🚨NEWS: UK iPhone users must now prove their age or lose full internet access "It is absolutely outrageous that, overnight, Apple has put a chokehold on Britons' freedom to search the internet, access information and use apps unless they provide sensitive ID documents. This means 35 million Brits who have paid hundreds or even thousands of pounds for Apple tech suddenly now have a child's device unless they comply with invasive demands for personal information that go far beyond what UK law requires. Apple has crossed the Rubicon with this software update which is more like ransomware, holding customers hostage to ID demands that are invasive, exclusionary and unnecessary. Children's online safety is vital but requires better parental controls and thoughtful tech responsibility - not sweeping, draconian, shock demands by foreign companies for all of our IDs and credit cards." - Silkie Carlo [@silkiecarlo]

"Men need to be perp-walked in handcuffs to the jail, and until we see that here in this country... we don't have a system of justice that's working." Republican Congressman Thomas Massie on whether survivors of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will see justice done. #Newsnight

Unfortunately, the Oversight Committee's "investigation" into Epstein et al has been disingenuous at best. The Oversight Committee has allowed witnesses to repeatedly commit perjury with impunity. One egregious example is Les Wexner, who's absolutely a co-conspirator. Before the Oversight Committee, Wexner testified that the last time he spoke to Epstein was 2006. But the Oversight Committee has emails between Epstein and Wexner in 2008, and a 6/11/2019 New York Times article reported that a Wexner "foundation" received $56 million in 2011 from an Epstein "trust." Wexner might be wealthy, but I believe that it would still be difficult to forget about $56 million.

In the Dutch study a few years ago, asylum seekers cost €475,000 or £410,000 each on average (those from some regions cost more). Therefore the full scheme could cost at least £19.5 billion over their lifetimes (without counting the costs so far or from further chain migration).

This week, the Starmer administration voted to get rid of jury trials, a right enjoyed by British citizens for over 800 years. But my investigations reveal THREE pro-Israeli lawyers pushing for the change. Here are their names:🧵

It was quite a day in court yesterday. Grateful to Channel 4 News for covering the case. It’s all there: Avoidable deaths. 90,000 emails deleted. An entire NHS email account erased. A key board meeting note denied to exist. Thanks to all our supporters. It was a great turn out as always.

I predicted the ENERGY LOCKDOWNS in Europe soon. Asia is starting them already. Thailand is the first, with government agencies. Coming soon to a country near you. "Short term pain for long term gain" is the propaganda slogan this time. This will be long term for no gain, only loss of freedom.

Netherlands Lawyer, Peter E Stassen, on the case against Bill Gates and the co-conspirators: “The Judges have seen it. They know that the ‘Covid-19 Vaccine’…is not a ‘Vaccine’ but a Bioweapon and we offered the proof. The official ‘Covid-19’ narrative was fake…”