Lewis Rice

@ups5bubbles @AnonPengux Any slippery slope starts with a ‘first time’ though. If you say yes this time and then no next time, it leads to questions of ‘what are you hiding? You let me see last time’. For me, it’s just an absolute no. Like you say though, you do you, I just think it leads to resentment.

@LewisRiceujcm @AnonPengux I do agree with you that trust is the foundation!! but at the same time if its one time (and clearly not a toxic pattern) and I have nothing to hide, then why should i refuse? that's my thought process, but again, you do you, nothing wrong with that <3

if the person i love was genuinely needing reassurance id blast that damn screenshare in a damn 100in tv screen, sometimes brains and thoughts are mean

@anisboy4ever @AnonPengux @ups5bubbles The same logic applies regardless of who it is, given that as far as we know there’s nothing to say he actually has texted his ex at all

@LewisRiceujcm @AnonPengux @ups5bubbles it's their EX. it's so weird to text your ex and then have your partner refuse to see it??

@anastasia_dova @jmsnftzptrck Having to pull your weight sounds like a nightmare? Christ you’re entitled.

@LewisRiceujcm @jmsnftzptrck Yikes. I am sooo glad I’m married and don’t have to try to date in this new crazy world where a man expects a woman to pay for shit. I’ve never had a job in my entire life and my husband wouldn’t ever want me to either, thank God! Sounds like a nightmare.

why in the world would you want to go on a date with someone with this expectation

@AnonPengux @ups5bubbles Because it’s a slippery slope. Once you’re having to prove yourself it becomes a regular thing and the requests get more and more extreme. If you’re with someone, you should trust them implicitly. If you don’t, end it.

@ups5bubbles Besides, what would even be the harm in it? If you share it, it'd give peace of mind to the person you claim to like enough to be dating. What would not sharing mean for either person?

@anastasia_dova @jmsnftzptrck Why doesn’t she pay for it? She’s just as capable of paying as he is.

@jmsnftzptrck Because she knows if he won’t get her a car to safely take her to their 3rd date then he isn’t worth marrying so what’s the point. A first date I can understand not expecting that but after 2 whole dates and some FaceTimes? Get the lady a car you cheap bastard.

@TheBazGaz @henrywinter Especially since one of them was against a terrible Oxford side (even if saints did end up losing). If you’re spying on them, you’re spying on everyone.

@henrywinter They've only admitted the games they had evidence against them so far. Why would they only do some games? If they've been doing this for months, and supposedly it's ok, then its likely its been more than 3 games.

Tonda Eckert was assistant coach of RB Leipzig Under-19s when Spygate 1 engulfed English football in January, 2019. Would a young coach in Germany have been aware of such a huge story dominating English football at the time? Marcelo Bielsa, revered amongst coaches, filled many headlines. In its Spygate 2 coverage, @TeleFootball is currently reporting that Eckert claims he didn’t think he was breaking EFL rules as spying was commonplace on the Continent. Spygate 1 was massive. Bielsa famously delivered a 70-minute PowerPoint presentation to the media about preparing for games. Aspiring coaches might be tempted to tune in. Eckert’s club, Southampton, are appealing the Spygate 2 verdict and punishment on Wednesday. Interesting to see how that goes on Wednesday given they’ve admitted breaches, and the punishments are in the EFL rule-book. Also interesting to see whether FA brings charges against individuals. The EFL has shown strong governance. Will the FA follow suit? Impossible to believe the young analyst intern was acting on his own initiative, especially if he was live-streaming back. Unfair if he’s hung out to dry. Eckert joined Southampton in November, 2025. Club admitted to spying breaches concerning “fixtures against Oxford United in December 2025, Ipswich Town in April 2026 and Middlesbrough in May 2026”, according to EFL. Eckert obviously has questions to answer to the club – and, probably, to the FA.

@BenRedders @henrywinter The shock was at the EFL having the balls to do it. We all thought they’d bottle it. No one outside of Southampton seems to think it’s disproportionate. You cheated, you got caught. I feel for you as fans because it’s your club that’s fucked you over, but it’s a fair punishment.

@henrywinter The punishment handed down is harsher than any sanctions given to clubs who have spent years exploiting financial rules. The shock across football when the news broke tells you just how disproportionate this all feels

@jackbfc1995 @_callumfowler Doesn’t directly lead to the goal? If it doesn’t hit his arm it flies past both him and Cunha. The goal physically can’t happen without the handball

@_callumfowler Hits is leg then arm it’s not a deliberate hand ball and doesn’t directly lead to the goal as he doesn’t score it by the rules the goal should be given 🤷🏻

Stop this sport. Worst decision I’ve ever seen

@ryan11888 @DougieCritchley Forest, as made clear by UEFA, had nothing to do with that

Exhibit 5000 of 25/26 as to why Elliot Anderson is a quality operator. I love Amad for obvious reasons, but his form has been poor recently. Got to be stronger there. As I type, United respond instantly, but this has to be ruled out. Mbeumo traps the ball between arm and body!

@kalen_wwfc @DougieCritchley It’s stupid to do, no doubt, and I’m not surprised it got given. My point is more that saying you can’t have any complaints about it just isn’t true.

@LewisRiceujcm @DougieCritchley It’s a pen let it go

Forest fans can't have any complaints... Complete brain fade by Milenković, there's just absolutely no need.

@Alonso_GD @Room101SmithWin Right, so given that Argentina doesn’t maintain effective possession, by your logic they no longer have a claim right?

@Room101SmithWin There’s no “keepsies” in the law. You either excercise effective possession or you don’t. Leaving a plaque is evidence that Britain abandoned the islands and lost effective possession. And then in the 1790s committed to not build settlements in islands adjacent to South America

Third row is wrong. The islands were initially settled by 🇫🇷 in 1764. 🇬🇧 settlers arrived in 1765 but 🇫🇷 ceded the islands to 🇪🇸 in 1766 and then 🇬🇧 renounced its claims in the 1790s. In 1811 🇪🇸 forces leave the islands to fight 🇦🇷 rebels. 🇦🇷 returns in 1820. 🇬🇧 attacks in 1833