Liberty Dankmeme

14.2K posts

Liberty Dankmeme banner
Liberty Dankmeme

Liberty Dankmeme

@LibertyDankmeme

Christ is King America First https://t.co/xFZ45G7fuC 2Corinthians 3:17

Louisiana, USA Katılım Haziran 2009
542 Takip Edilen699 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
Put WASPs back in control of the country our ancestors founded. That's how you #MAGA
English
11
3
52
5.6K
JAKEGTV
JAKEGTV@jakeg_official·
ZXX
425
6.4K
16.8K
263.4K
Richard Lonsford
Richard Lonsford@dilonsfo·
Israel developed the bomb in secret. In fact, they still do not acknowledge that they have nuclear weapons. Iran bragged about it and let everyone know they were trying to develop the bomb. Had they not said anything they too would have the bomb. Israel was told they could not develop the bomb but they did so in secret and no one knew or they would have been stopped also.
English
1
0
1
23
Treasury Department
Treasury Department@USTreasury·
Today, Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is designating 12 individuals and entities for their roles enabling the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ (IRGC) sale and shipment of Iranian oil to the People’s Republic of China. The IRGC relies on front companies in permissive economic jurisdictions to obfuscate its role in oil sales and funnel the revenue to the Iranian regime. Instead of using this revenue to support the struggling Iranian people, the regime directs it toward weapons development, backing terrorist proxies, and funding security forces that suppress citizens’ freedoms.
English
73
591
1.9K
649.2K
Mrgunsngear
Mrgunsngear@Mrgunsngear·
@RepThomasMassie Can we just eliminate the "background check" entirely? I remember when they didn't exist and it was a better country then....
English
78
57
1.8K
21.5K
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Tomorrow the House will bring my NICS reporting bill for a vote! My bill aims to reduce the number of false denials created by the gun background check system. NICS disproportionately cheats law abiding minorities out of their right to keep & bear arms. realclearpolitics.com/articles/2026/…
English
565
507
3.8K
514.4K
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@RepThomasMassie Law abiding minorities? The second amendment was not for Africans to walk around with guns shooting each other. The founding fathers would be disgusted ... #RepealThe14th
English
0
0
1
58
Joe Northern
Joe Northern@TokenBlkGuy1776·
@WAFB Lmao. Its funny because all the confederates were democrats lol. I'd want them removed too if I was the party of slavery, kkk, Jim Crow, and filibuster of the 1964 civil rights act.
GIF
English
17
0
13
4.1K
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@calvinrobinson Tommy is a Zionist stooge - he's not to be trusted, even when he has the right message on this particular issue.
English
0
1
4
127
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@WBRZ I don't think we should allow these people to vote. Seems like a really bad idea to allow people with a mental illness have control over you
English
0
0
5
51
WBRZ News
WBRZ News@WBRZ·
Nearly 22% of adults in Louisiana experience a mental illness each year, Louisiana Department of Health data shows. Several bills intending to address mental health in the state are making their way through the legislature this session. wbrz.com/news/state-leg…
English
12
4
13
3.3K
Richard Tibbetts
Richard Tibbetts@RichardTibbetts·
If you’re accusing Lutnick of being a child molester, or a sex trafficker, you should just say it. Otherwise you are trying to ruin people through innuendo, and guilt by association. That is what McCarthy did. And you have a huge blind spot for Reid Hoffman and many others who were much closer to Epstein.
English
19
1
19
1.8K
Julian Dorey
Julian Dorey@juliandorey·
🚨Lutnick REFUSES OATH and BLOWS UP his DEPOSITION!!🚨 Howard Lutnick’s deposition is blowing up online… Tense exchanges, viral clips, and viewers questioning what really happened during the testimony.
English
116
1.3K
6.9K
148.8K
K. Vlaardingerbroek
K. Vlaardingerbroek@KeesVlaar·
Recently, the Dutch Council of Churches published a report ('De weg van discipelschap') on the question how the churches should deal with the rise of “far-right ideology” within the member churches. Dr. J. Vlaardingerbroek, Reformed minister emeritus, reacts on the many flaws and troubling one-sidedness of the report. The Council of Churches recently published a report on “the churches’ approach to far-right ideology”. It deals with the far right, with discrimination and racism, and with how churches should deal with people who sympathise with far-right ideology. One would expect the report to begin with a precise definition of these three concepts and an analysis of the current situation: where and how do the far right, discrimination and racism manifest themselves? However, this is not the case. And that has far-reaching consequences. Without definitions and a clear focus, you can accuse people of racism and discrimination as much as you like – you are bound to hit the mark somewhere. But more often than not, you are wrong. Because by no means are all those people concerned about demographic change and the growth of Islam racists. The Council of Churches turns a deaf ear to these people. Admittedly, at the end of the report, there is a certain understanding; but it is the psychiatrist’s understanding, who wants to rid his patient of the problem. For the committee that compiled the report, the predominant politics are not the subject of critical analysis, but rather the starting point. The committee takes the current situation as the starting point and, from there, takes a critical look at people who believe that this country is not heading in the right direction. So one soon comes across the following statement: “It indicates what our future might also be if, as a society, we do not protect our values and do not take effective action against far-right forces.” The committee clearly visualizes the threat posed by the far right. What our future will be if things (especially immigration) continue at the current pace is not asked, even though that future is already taking shape. Everyone knows what will happen to our culture, freedom and democracy if Islam continues to grow in the Netherlands and Europe. Consider what once happened in North Africa and Asia Minor: Islam put an end to Christianity there and set civilisation back centuries. But the report remains silent on this. This premise contains the fundamental flaw of the report, as a result of which anyone who is critical is quickly labelled as (radical) right-wing and a potential threat. Critics of the status quo are not just a danger, they are also wholly or partly to blame for what goes wrong. Look at what the report states: “Dutch people with a migrant background, particularly those who are not originally from Europe, face discrimination. Until now, many people with a migrant background have tried to adapt in order to secure a place in Dutch society. This has been successful for a large proportion of the third and fourth generations, but now that discrimination and mistrust persist, the feeling arises: ‘whatever we do, it is never enough’. It is important to take this seriously.” What is stated here is perhaps not entirely untrue, but in two respects it is only half the truth. Are the third and fourth generations really ‘to a large extent’ so well integrated? But what is worse: insofar as they are not integrated, the report blames this on the indigenous people who discriminated against them. The serious problematic behaviour of the immigrants arriving now is not mentioned. Or is that perhaps also caused by the “discriminatory right”? Neither does the report allow for the fact that discrimination occurs in the Netherlands also in the opposite direction, not against immigrants but against native-born Dutch people. Consider the unfair allocation of housing, in which newly arrived immigrants are strongly favoured, and various court cases. Is any criticism of this ‘far-right’? In describing the ideology of the far right, it is said: “The downfall of our society is not mourned, but will precede the rebirth of the lost golden age, built upon the ruins of the old world”. At first, I couldn’t believe my eyes when I read this, because this is precisely what the ‘right’ sees as the threat from the ‘left’: ‘wokism’. Everything must change. The white race, European civilisation – everything must go. The Great Reset. A different people, a different society, a different culture. You can already see it happening. The big cities look completely different from how they did 30 or 40 years ago. Dutch people can’t afford a home, so they don’t have children. It’s only a matter of time before the transformation is complete. Even history must be rewritten. That is why many people feel like strangers in their own country. The report takes no account of this. The report continues: “As churches, we reject the idea that one person is worth more than another. The human race is one. Any form of racism or group favouritism is unacceptable, whatever differences there may be between people. We reject far-right ideology, which we define as ideology that is anti-democratic or anti-constitutional, that is racist, and that glorifies masculinity.” Here, the report turns things on their head once again. What is rejected here may well be the ideology of certain far-right groups, but these are certainly traits of Islam: anti-democratic, masculine, discriminatory. In Islam, people are not equal. This is evident from the Islamic view of women or the “unbelievers”. Islam is a system of oppression that threatens our culture and our Christian faith. And as for racism: the clearly present anti-white racism is being hushed up. Another passage that begs comment, is the following: “When God enters into his covenant with people, he sets them on the path to order, freedom, justice, peace and security,” the report states. “The stories and texts concerning the creation of all that exists and lives (Genesis 1 and 2), the covenant with the marginalised, biblical people of Israel (Exodus) and the prophetic visions of a new creation in which peace and justice reign, are the sources from which these values can be drawn.” Fine words, certainly, but it is incomprehensible that the authors of the report failed to realise that giving these words any thought should have led to a completely different report. Freedom, justice and security are precisely the issues that concern people who are said to “sympathise with far-right ideology”. Meanwhile, the report condemns participation in violent actions against the establishment of a asylum seekers’ centres, but remains completely silent on participation in violent pro-Palestinian actions, where activists demand that any ties with the state of Israel are severed. Last but not least, what should the churches do about people who espouse far-right ideologies? The report: “In individual cases, measures may be appropriate against an office-bearer, congregation member or parishioner who continues to express racist views. Participation in violent actions surrounding the establishment of asylum centres must be strongly condemned.” The report really does say that. In contrast, the Council of Churches has always remained silent on measures against church members who do or learn things that are contrary to the Bible, including the denial of the existence of God! All of a sudden measures need to be taken. One has to conclude that, according to this report, the fight against far right ideology is where the heart of the church lies. Nothing else said in the report about discipleship as a path to improvement changes this. Sympathy is shown for the fears and uncertainties of people who sympathise with ‘far-right’ ideas, but this is merely a form of therapy: the goal is to purge these people of these obnoxious ideas. Nowhere is it suggested that those fears might well be entirely justified. I fear that we are dealing in this report with much more than simply a misguided policy on a particular issue. This is not an isolated incident, but a disease, a corruption of the church caused by flawed political thinking. The symptoms of this disease were already evident in the 1960s and 1970s, when so-called liberation movements received support from the church only if they were openly anti-Western and anti-Christian.
English
61
152
842
125K
Matt Van Swol
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol·
A 19-year-old White girl in Charlotte NC was TIED TO A BED and TORTURED FOR MONTHS, r*ped, and m*rdered by a Black man. ZERO coverage from: -NYTimes -CNN -WaPo -MSNBC -NPR -USA Today -Reuters -Axios -ABC -PBS EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. COVERED. GEORGE. FLOYD. DO YOU GET IT YET?!!!!
English
2K
36.3K
90.6K
868.3K
60 Minutes
60 Minutes@60Minutes·
The 119th Congress has more Black members than at any point in American history. Louisiana Rep. Cleo Fields says, “It's progress. But it's not progress for Louisiana. There are people who, in this state and others, just will not vote for a Black person for anything.” cbsn.ws/4tsZBqz
English
268
344
957
101.9K
Christa Williams
Christa Williams@christaforcola·
And he think he is going to heaven? Umm, absolutely not, @JeffLandry if yall don't like black folks why in the hell didn't your klan build this Country on your own and left us alone in Africa, you do realize how low IQ you look trying to hurt people that yall low IQ behinds brought here to America 🦗....Hopefully you told the truth on all those questions that reporter asked you because it was question she asked you and when you gave your answer my eyebrow raised like the wrestler "the rock"....Hopefully you were honest because it seem as though you may be asked that question in future court hearing....your interview was very indicative of the self hatred you and many other bitter white men have inside of you....I can tell you this...Im not moving anybody into my house who I don't like....so I asked again, WHY DIDNT YOU ALL BUILD THIS COUNTRY YOURSELVES AND LEAVE BLACK FOLKS WHERE WE WERE????? #LOWIQ
English
2
0
11
385
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@White_Raven9515 @grok @WBRZ Zachary and Central are mostly white - baker is mostly black - why do Europe and Africa look different? Come on man don't play dumb
English
0
0
1
17
🇺🇸White Raven🇺🇸
🇺🇸White Raven🇺🇸@White_Raven9515·
@grok @WBRZ @grok what is it that Zachary and Central did right and Baker got wrong? And looking at St. George’s plan, do they have a model they’re following after Central? I’d assume that’s the goal.
English
2
0
1
41
WBRZ News
WBRZ News@WBRZ·
Voters across Louisiana will decide if the City of St. George can break away from the East Baton Rouge Parish School System and form its own school district on May 16. Read more: wbrz.com/news/amendment…
English
36
12
93
66K
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@White_Raven9515 @grok @WBRZ U gotta build some new admin buildings and stuff ... There ARE start up costs but no where near what the fear mongers would have you believe
English
0
0
0
13
Sacredfire172
Sacredfire172@Sacredfire100·
@jbletlow When elected, you better not stab us in the back like he did. Me and my whole family are voting for you.
English
9
0
2
85
Julia B Letlow, Ph.D.
Today is the last day to VOTE EARLY, Louisiana! I would be honored to earn your support as we fight for strong conservative leadership and a brighter future for our state. 🇺🇸 GEAUX VOTE!
Julia B Letlow, Ph.D. tweet media
English
31
23
64
1.3K
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@NOLAnews What a waste of money ... Might as well have thrown it out the window of a moving car ...
English
0
0
5
151
Liberty Dankmeme
Liberty Dankmeme@LibertyDankmeme·
@WBRZ Why do they always call them "teens" instead of n**gers?
English
0
0
2
46
wdsu
wdsu@wdsu·
Married Slidell man targeted on dating app Grindr attacked, two men arrested, police say | Click on the image to read the full story wdsu.com/article/slidel…
English
5
6
17
8.1K